bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,317
- 2,180
Those aren't the rules, moron. The Bill of Rights are the rules.Tough shit. Rules are rules.Scotus ruled incorrectly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those aren't the rules, moron. The Bill of Rights are the rules.Tough shit. Rules are rules.Scotus ruled incorrectly.
Cry it all out, son.except for democratsTough shit. Rules are rules.Scotus ruled incorrectly.
These guys are morons.Still waiting for comment on Sharpton and his years of tax evasion not being prosecuted. But just to embarrass your partisan ass some more.....Nope. You're repeating bullshit that has been spoon fed to you.Now you’re just flat out lying. The desperation is coming off you in waves.
I've read the documents. The notes confirm he lied. There's no mythical "missing" document that says he didn't. Just some bullshit you are told to believe. The facts are the facts. He lied.
You claimed it was proven he didn't lie. Still waiting for that proof.
![]()
Former DOJ spokesman Ian Prior suggests original FBI report on Flynn interview was 'intentionally lost'
Former Department of Justice Deputy Director of Public Affairs Ian Prior told Fox News Friday that the missing FBI report on a crucial interview of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is “a big issue.”www.foxnews.com
![]()
Devin Nunes: "We Can't Find" FBI's Original Michael Flynn Interview 302 Report; "It's Gone, Poof"
Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing." "The original report that was used to brief the United States Congress, that...www.realclearpolitics.com
![]()
Ian Prior reacts to FBI ‘missing’ 302 report on Flynn case: Seems like it was ‘intentionally lost’
Trump calls for FBI’s ‘302’ report on the Michael Flynn case that officials say vanished after the president’s first national security adviser met with federal agents in January 2017; Former DOJ deputy director, Ian Prior weighs in.news.yahoo.com
Oops, wrong again.Those aren't the rules
SCOTUS was perfectly correct. Trump was claiming he was above the law and the Constitution says he's not.Scotus ruled incorrectly. I fail to see where the Constitution says you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes.
really? Is Biden enforcing immigration laws? Was Hillary prosecuted for improper handling of classified documents? Was Biden's son prosecuted yet for numerus violations?Cry it all out, son.except for democratsTough shit. Rules are rules.Scotus ruled incorrectly.
Please quote where the it says you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes.SCOTUS was perfectly correct. Trump was claiming he was above the law and the Constitution says he's not.Scotus ruled incorrectly. I fail to see where the Constitution says you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes.
The 4th amendment was followed just fine.
Maybe the pattern of your fantasies not matching reality is a strong clue that the problem there is you and your ignorance of the facts.really? Is Biden enforcing immigration laws? Was Hillary prosecuted for improper handling of classified documents? Was Biden's son prosecuted yet for numerus violations?Cry it all out, son.except for democratsTough shit. Rules are rules.Scotus ruled incorrectly.
He didn’t lose his 4th amendment rights.Please quote where the it says you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes.
Yes he did.He didn’t lose his 4th amendment rights.Please quote where the it says you lose your 4th Amendment rights because someone does your taxes.
How?Yes he did.
You got it. Just regurgitating libtard lies. Desperate. Still waiting on your condemnation of Vance for not prosecuting Al Sharpton.These guys are morons.Still waiting for comment on Sharpton and his years of tax evasion not being prosecuted. But just to embarrass your partisan ass some more.....Nope. You're repeating bullshit that has been spoon fed to you.Now you’re just flat out lying. The desperation is coming off you in waves.
I've read the documents. The notes confirm he lied. There's no mythical "missing" document that says he didn't. Just some bullshit you are told to believe. The facts are the facts. He lied.
You claimed it was proven he didn't lie. Still waiting for that proof.
![]()
Former DOJ spokesman Ian Prior suggests original FBI report on Flynn interview was 'intentionally lost'
Former Department of Justice Deputy Director of Public Affairs Ian Prior told Fox News Friday that the missing FBI report on a crucial interview of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is “a big issue.”www.foxnews.com
![]()
Devin Nunes: "We Can't Find" FBI's Original Michael Flynn Interview 302 Report; "It's Gone, Poof"
Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing." "The original report that was used to brief the United States Congress, that...www.realclearpolitics.com
![]()
Ian Prior reacts to FBI ‘missing’ 302 report on Flynn case: Seems like it was ‘intentionally lost’
Trump calls for FBI’s ‘302’ report on the Michael Flynn case that officials say vanished after the president’s first national security adviser met with federal agents in January 2017; Former DOJ deputy director, Ian Prior weighs in.news.yahoo.com
The 302 was released years ago.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
Still waiting on that proof that he wasn't lying.
Which of those stated cases is false? With legitimate legal documentation proving such. We’ll wait until the 5th of NEVER for you to produce that proof.Maybe the pattern of your fantasies not matching reality is a strong clue that the problem there is you and your ignorance of the facts.really? Is Biden enforcing immigration laws? Was Hillary prosecuted for improper handling of classified documents? Was Biden's son prosecuted yet for numerus violations?Cry it all out, son.except for democratsTough shit. Rules are rules.Scotus ruled incorrectly.
So your claim now is Weisselberg isn't charged with tax crimes?Besides opening the wrong thread? Check the title.This thread is about charging people for tax crimes. Not limited to one guy. See what I did there
How is it a deflection to talk about tax crimes in a thread about tax crimes, Dumbfuck?You would just avoid the thread.Start a thread on it. This is a thread about Weisselberg.Yet still silent on Al Sharpton and his years of cheating resulting in owing millions more than this elderly man doesn’t. So yes fuck you you hypocritical POS.Yeah, screw me because I don't support the freedom to cheat on your taxes.My goal is to piss off freedom hating assholes like you.
This thread is about charging people for tax crimes. Not limited to one guy. See what I did there?
Your attempted deflection FAILS!!!!
Please quote your post in this thread that actually talks about the topic and not whining about other posters.Read the thread asshole. You obviously have zero idea what the subject is so I’m trying to enlighten you. Apparently you’re not interested in the subject at hand so continue howling at the moon.Either prove the p
You've said nothingWELL Weisselberg isn't gonna plead. I'm not sure what offer Vance can make him. Weissleberg would have to have immunity, or at least an agreement to plead and pretty favorable payback terms for taxes he avoided by getting stuff in lieu of pay. I assume he paid something but no where near what he'd have paid in straight up income taxes. But he'd have to have the same deal for all his family members.
ANDTHEN, he'd have to flip on Trump and say Trump told him to fiddle the values of property for taxes and loans. Vance doesn't really care about Weisselberg. That has no fatual connenction to the charges. But if he fliped he'd be admitting to what look like felonies because he made the valuations under oath. So he'd have to have immunity from that.
Not that I really care. I just want Trump permanently done. Not an icepick in his ear, but ... done. I think Weissleberg may be really screwed though.
I think that the horse trading will happen during Weisselberg's sentencing phase. They got him red-handed.
I don't think that there will be any link between these tax evasion charges and Trump. Weisselberg kept 2 sets of books. He failed to declare these perks on his tax returns and hid them on the Trump organizations books by creating a second set of books. If anything, he was not only evading taxes, but ripping off Trump as well.
What they want is for Weisselberg to tell everything he knows about Trump's involvement in the planning of the Jan. 6 attack, and any other illegal activity by Trump.
The arm twisting will come at sentencing time...either he spends the rest of his life in prison or he gets a slap on the w
Either prove the point or STFU!Again, READ THE THREAD and don’t comment again until you do so.Read the thread dumbfuck, then STFU hack.Please enlighten me or STFU!
So you got nothing.
You apparently got NOTHING to say relevant to the thread.
So your 'Read the thread' bullshit is nonsense,
You've said nothing relevant to the topic.
Time to put you on ignore.
The courts play that game, too. It's called, "criminal conspiracy".So now the Democrats are playing the guilt by association game.