What are people thinking as they hear the Senate arguments?

Trump called for a demonstration to put pressure on Congress.

Yes. Pressure to do what?

Do not run away from that question. You need to finish your thought if it truly is a thought.


"To stop the steal", obviously. As you knew. As everyone reading this knew.


I wasn't trying to be dishonest. You are the dishonest one here.
How were they going to be able to "stop the steal" from outside the Capitol while Congress was inside the Capitol certifying the election?


Though political pressure. Obviously.


That is the way that protests, ACTUAL protests are supposed to work.


You have reached the point of "direct action" which is more a practice you see in civil unrest, or civil war.


Until Jan 6th. We on teh right had NOT reached that point. It was reasonable of Trump to think that a crowd would gather, makes some noise and maybe embarrass Congress into looking into the accusations of cheating.
You sound like a retard.

Making noise would not "stop the steal." Again, Congress was in the middle of certifying the election. Making noise outside the building would not stop that.

Thanks for admitting the only way to "stop the steal" was to break into the Capitol.


You sound like an asshole. And you are a liar. The idea that political pressure could get political results, was unlikely but it was possible.

Asking for a demonstration, and for political pressure to be brought to bear, was completely reasonable and legal.


YOur pretense otherwise is just you manufacturing pretend outrage to justify your next escalation in your war on US.
You're not explaining how it was possible. Just saying it was possible doesn't mean it was.

Again...

Congress was inside the Capitol in the middle of certifying the election.

What kind of pressure outside the Capitol could have stopped that?


I explained it clearly . YOu are playing stupid as part of your normal stonewalling.
Great, now you're hiding behind the lie that you explained it so you can avoid explaining it.

All you said was, they could apply "political pressure." That doesn't explain anything since they were outside the building. Just posting words, "political pressure," doesn't explain how that would "stop the steal." You can't even demonstrate the lawmakers inside the Capitol would hear the crowd outside or would even be interrupted in certifying the election.


Political pressure does not require physical contact to work.


Your pretense that you have to be in teh same room to apply political pressure is retarded.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I didn't say same room -- I said same "building."
icon_rolleyes.gif


But you've not explained how they could apply pressure from outside the Capitol.


LOL!!!

Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.
LOLOL

So now you don't even know the difference between a room and a building??

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


The lengths you'll go to just to avoid answering a question everyone here knows you can't answer is hysterical.


You are the one who does not understand how a group outside of a building can put political pressure on those inside the building.


YOu are teh retard here, not me.
LOLOL

How could they do that, ya moron? They were gonna send vibes to Congressmen?

:lmao:


Spin it however you like.

Such behavior is the normal goal of protests.

YOur pretense otherwise is just you using your retarded-ness as an tool to stonewall.
The behavior of protests is to be noticed to effect change.

You prove you're incapable of describing how that would have worked in this case.


Your pretense that you need me to explain how people inside of a building can be aware of a protest outside of the building is dismissed.

I believe that you are very stupid. BUT, you are not so stupid as to not know the various ways that a person can be aware of events outside of a building.
Imbecile, the members of Congress didn't even know the insurgents were storming the Capitol. People had to rush into the respective chambers to warn them.

There was no political pressure put upon any of them until that point. Until then, Congress was moving forward with certifying the election.


I did not say that the people in the building had to be aware of the crowd storming the building.


They had to be aware that the crowd was there.


Good pretending to be retarded though. That was a really stupid mistake on your part.
 
Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.

Answer the question.

How does the protest stop the proceedings insudec the Senate Chamber scheduled for that day by lawfully staying behind barricades set up to protect that crucial process from being disrupted?


Though political pressure. D'uh.
What kind of political pressure? Can't you say?


The political pressure of a large demonstration.


There. I said it. Now you look like a fucking retard. Who is stonewalling. Because you are also an asshole.
LOLOL

You're not saying anything. A lawful protest outside the building puts zero pressure on those inside the building because they can't hear them.


Wow. YOu are pretending that politicians inside of a building would not be told that there is a large demonstration outside the building?


Helpful hint. iF you pretending to be profoundly retarded, try adjusting your vocabulary downward. Because right now, your performance is not credible.


Instead of coming across as profoundly retarded, you are coming across as a filthy liar.
LOLOLOLOL

You yourself admitted the protest was not putting any political pressure on them. That means you're agreeing with me; which means you just called yourself a profoundly retarded filthy liar.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


I did not admit that. Are you moving from pretending to be retarded to pretending to be delusional?
 
Your pretense that you need me to explain how people inside of a building can be aware of a protest outside of the building is dismissed.

actually you need to explain why the people inside ignored the large demonstration outside and began the proceeding to endorse the election that was stolen from DJTQ and his mob. The reason the proceeding stopped was the threat of physical violence from the mob that DJTQ incited to stop the members in that body from certifying the election that dumbasses like you think was stolen.
 
Trump called for a demonstration to put pressure on Congress.

Yes. Pressure to do what?

Do not run away from that question. You need to finish your thought if it truly is a thought.


"To stop the steal", obviously. As you knew. As everyone reading this knew.


I wasn't trying to be dishonest. You are the dishonest one here.
How were they going to be able to "stop the steal" from outside the Capitol while Congress was inside the Capitol certifying the election?


Though political pressure. Obviously.


That is the way that protests, ACTUAL protests are supposed to work.


You have reached the point of "direct action" which is more a practice you see in civil unrest, or civil war.


Until Jan 6th. We on teh right had NOT reached that point. It was reasonable of Trump to think that a crowd would gather, makes some noise and maybe embarrass Congress into looking into the accusations of cheating.
You sound like a retard.

Making noise would not "stop the steal." Again, Congress was in the middle of certifying the election. Making noise outside the building would not stop that.

Thanks for admitting the only way to "stop the steal" was to break into the Capitol.


You sound like an asshole. And you are a liar. The idea that political pressure could get political results, was unlikely but it was possible.

Asking for a demonstration, and for political pressure to be brought to bear, was completely reasonable and legal.


YOur pretense otherwise is just you manufacturing pretend outrage to justify your next escalation in your war on US.
You're not explaining how it was possible. Just saying it was possible doesn't mean it was.

Again...

Congress was inside the Capitol in the middle of certifying the election.

What kind of pressure outside the Capitol could have stopped that?


I explained it clearly . YOu are playing stupid as part of your normal stonewalling.
Great, now you're hiding behind the lie that you explained it so you can avoid explaining it.

All you said was, they could apply "political pressure." That doesn't explain anything since they were outside the building. Just posting words, "political pressure," doesn't explain how that would "stop the steal." You can't even demonstrate the lawmakers inside the Capitol would hear the crowd outside or would even be interrupted in certifying the election.


Political pressure does not require physical contact to work.


Your pretense that you have to be in teh same room to apply political pressure is retarded.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I didn't say same room -- I said same "building."
icon_rolleyes.gif


But you've not explained how they could apply pressure from outside the Capitol.


LOL!!!

Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.
LOLOL

So now you don't even know the difference between a room and a building??

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


The lengths you'll go to just to avoid answering a question everyone here knows you can't answer is hysterical.


You are the one who does not understand how a group outside of a building can put political pressure on those inside the building.


YOu are teh retard here, not me.
LOLOL

How could they do that, ya moron? They were gonna send vibes to Congressmen?

:lmao:


Spin it however you like.

Such behavior is the normal goal of protests.

YOur pretense otherwise is just you using your retarded-ness as an tool to stonewall.
The behavior of protests is to be noticed to effect change.

You prove you're incapable of describing how that would have worked in this case.


Your pretense that you need me to explain how people inside of a building can be aware of a protest outside of the building is dismissed.

I believe that you are very stupid. BUT, you are not so stupid as to not know the various ways that a person can be aware of events outside of a building.
Imbecile, the members of Congress didn't even know the insurgents were storming the Capitol. People had to rush into the respective chambers to warn them.

There was no political pressure put upon any of them until that point. Until then, Congress was moving forward with certifying the election.


I did not say that the people in the building had to be aware of the crowd storming the building.


They had to be aware that the crowd was there.


Good pretending to be retarded though. That was a really stupid mistake on your part.
I pointed out they didn't even know the mob was storming the building to show they didn't know what was going on outside.
 
Your pretense that you need me to explain how people inside of a building can be aware of a protest outside of the building is dismissed.

actually you need to explain why the people inside ignored the large demonstration outside and began the proceeding to endorse the election that was stolen from DJTQ and his mob. The reason the proceeding stopped was the threat of physical violence from the mob that DJTQ incited to stop the members in that body from certifying the election that dumbasses like you think was stolen.


Why do I need to explain that?
 
Trump called for a demonstration to put pressure on Congress.

Yes. Pressure to do what?

Do not run away from that question. You need to finish your thought if it truly is a thought.


"To stop the steal", obviously. As you knew. As everyone reading this knew.


I wasn't trying to be dishonest. You are the dishonest one here.
How were they going to be able to "stop the steal" from outside the Capitol while Congress was inside the Capitol certifying the election?


Though political pressure. Obviously.


That is the way that protests, ACTUAL protests are supposed to work.


You have reached the point of "direct action" which is more a practice you see in civil unrest, or civil war.


Until Jan 6th. We on teh right had NOT reached that point. It was reasonable of Trump to think that a crowd would gather, makes some noise and maybe embarrass Congress into looking into the accusations of cheating.
You sound like a retard.

Making noise would not "stop the steal." Again, Congress was in the middle of certifying the election. Making noise outside the building would not stop that.

Thanks for admitting the only way to "stop the steal" was to break into the Capitol.


You sound like an asshole. And you are a liar. The idea that political pressure could get political results, was unlikely but it was possible.

Asking for a demonstration, and for political pressure to be brought to bear, was completely reasonable and legal.


YOur pretense otherwise is just you manufacturing pretend outrage to justify your next escalation in your war on US.
You're not explaining how it was possible. Just saying it was possible doesn't mean it was.

Again...

Congress was inside the Capitol in the middle of certifying the election.

What kind of pressure outside the Capitol could have stopped that?


I explained it clearly . YOu are playing stupid as part of your normal stonewalling.
Great, now you're hiding behind the lie that you explained it so you can avoid explaining it.

All you said was, they could apply "political pressure." That doesn't explain anything since they were outside the building. Just posting words, "political pressure," doesn't explain how that would "stop the steal." You can't even demonstrate the lawmakers inside the Capitol would hear the crowd outside or would even be interrupted in certifying the election.


Political pressure does not require physical contact to work.


Your pretense that you have to be in teh same room to apply political pressure is retarded.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I didn't say same room -- I said same "building."
icon_rolleyes.gif


But you've not explained how they could apply pressure from outside the Capitol.


LOL!!!

Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.
LOLOL

So now you don't even know the difference between a room and a building??

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


The lengths you'll go to just to avoid answering a question everyone here knows you can't answer is hysterical.


You are the one who does not understand how a group outside of a building can put political pressure on those inside the building.


YOu are teh retard here, not me.
LOLOL

How could they do that, ya moron? They were gonna send vibes to Congressmen?

:lmao:


Spin it however you like.

Such behavior is the normal goal of protests.

YOur pretense otherwise is just you using your retarded-ness as an tool to stonewall.
The behavior of protests is to be noticed to effect change.

You prove you're incapable of describing how that would have worked in this case.


Your pretense that you need me to explain how people inside of a building can be aware of a protest outside of the building is dismissed.

I believe that you are very stupid. BUT, you are not so stupid as to not know the various ways that a person can be aware of events outside of a building.
Imbecile, the members of Congress didn't even know the insurgents were storming the Capitol. People had to rush into the respective chambers to warn them.

There was no political pressure put upon any of them until that point. Until then, Congress was moving forward with certifying the election.


I did not say that the people in the building had to be aware of the crowd storming the building.


They had to be aware that the crowd was there.


Good pretending to be retarded though. That was a really stupid mistake on your part.
Trump called for a demonstration to put pressure on Congress.

Yes. Pressure to do what?

Do not run away from that question. You need to finish your thought if it truly is a thought.


"To stop the steal", obviously. As you knew. As everyone reading this knew.


I wasn't trying to be dishonest. You are the dishonest one here.
How were they going to be able to "stop the steal" from outside the Capitol while Congress was inside the Capitol certifying the election?


Though political pressure. Obviously.


That is the way that protests, ACTUAL protests are supposed to work.


You have reached the point of "direct action" which is more a practice you see in civil unrest, or civil war.


Until Jan 6th. We on teh right had NOT reached that point. It was reasonable of Trump to think that a crowd would gather, makes some noise and maybe embarrass Congress into looking into the accusations of cheating.
You sound like a retard.

Making noise would not "stop the steal." Again, Congress was in the middle of certifying the election. Making noise outside the building would not stop that.

Thanks for admitting the only way to "stop the steal" was to break into the Capitol.


You sound like an asshole. And you are a liar. The idea that political pressure could get political results, was unlikely but it was possible.

Asking for a demonstration, and for political pressure to be brought to bear, was completely reasonable and legal.


YOur pretense otherwise is just you manufacturing pretend outrage to justify your next escalation in your war on US.
You're not explaining how it was possible. Just saying it was possible doesn't mean it was.

Again...

Congress was inside the Capitol in the middle of certifying the election.

What kind of pressure outside the Capitol could have stopped that?


I explained it clearly . YOu are playing stupid as part of your normal stonewalling.
Great, now you're hiding behind the lie that you explained it so you can avoid explaining it.

All you said was, they could apply "political pressure." That doesn't explain anything since they were outside the building. Just posting words, "political pressure," doesn't explain how that would "stop the steal." You can't even demonstrate the lawmakers inside the Capitol would hear the crowd outside or would even be interrupted in certifying the election.


Political pressure does not require physical contact to work.


Your pretense that you have to be in teh same room to apply political pressure is retarded.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I didn't say same room -- I said same "building."
icon_rolleyes.gif


But you've not explained how they could apply pressure from outside the Capitol.


LOL!!!

Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.
LOLOL

So now you don't even know the difference between a room and a building??

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


The lengths you'll go to just to avoid answering a question everyone here knows you can't answer is hysterical.


You are the one who does not understand how a group outside of a building can put political pressure on those inside the building.


YOu are teh retard here, not me.
LOLOL

How could they do that, ya moron? They were gonna send vibes to Congressmen?

:lmao:


Spin it however you like.

Such behavior is the normal goal of protests.

YOur pretense otherwise is just you using your retarded-ness as an tool to stonewall.
The behavior of protests is to be noticed to effect change.

You prove you're incapable of describing how that would have worked in this case.


Your pretense that you need me to explain how people inside of a building can be aware of a protest outside of the building is dismissed.

I believe that you are very stupid. BUT, you are not so stupid as to not know the various ways that a person can be aware of events outside of a building.
Imbecile, the members of Congress didn't even know the insurgents were storming the Capitol. People had to rush into the respective chambers to warn them.

There was no political pressure put upon any of them until that point. Until then, Congress was moving forward with certifying the election.


I did not say that the people in the building had to be aware of the crowd storming the building.


They had to be aware that the crowd was there.


Good pretending to be retarded though. That was a really stupid mistake on your part.
I pointed out they didn't even know the mob was storming the building to show they didn't know what was going on outside.


Because, in your retarded mind, if one knows that a crowd is outside, one knows what the crowd is doing as soon as they do it, even if you are involved in doing something else?


Mmm, no, that is just you pretending to be retarded.
 
Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.

Answer the question.

How does the protest stop the proceedings insudec the Senate Chamber scheduled for that day by lawfully staying behind barricades set up to protect that crucial process from being disrupted?


Though political pressure. D'uh.
What kind of political pressure? Can't you say?


The political pressure of a large demonstration.


There. I said it. Now you look like a fucking retard. Who is stonewalling. Because you are also an asshole.
LOLOL

You're not saying anything. A lawful protest outside the building puts zero pressure on those inside the building because they can't hear them.


Wow. YOu are pretending that politicians inside of a building would not be told that there is a large demonstration outside the building?


Helpful hint. iF you pretending to be profoundly retarded, try adjusting your vocabulary downward. Because right now, your performance is not credible.


Instead of coming across as profoundly retarded, you are coming across as a filthy liar.
LOLOLOLOL

You yourself admitted the protest was not putting any political pressure on them. That means you're agreeing with me; which means you just called yourself a profoundly retarded filthy liar.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


I did not admit that. Are you moving from pretending to be retarded to pretending to be delusional?
Sure you did...

NotFooledByW: Therefore the facts are the political pressure of a large demonstration was not working that day to achieve TrumpQ’s objective. Do you agree with that?

Correll: Yes.​
 
Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.

Answer the question.

How does the protest stop the proceedings insudec the Senate Chamber scheduled for that day by lawfully staying behind barricades set up to protect that crucial process from being disrupted?


Though political pressure. D'uh.
What kind of political pressure? Can't you say?


The political pressure of a large demonstration.


There. I said it. Now you look like a fucking retard. Who is stonewalling. Because you are also an asshole.
LOLOL

You're not saying anything. A lawful protest outside the building puts zero pressure on those inside the building because they can't hear them.


Wow. YOu are pretending that politicians inside of a building would not be told that there is a large demonstration outside the building?


Helpful hint. iF you pretending to be profoundly retarded, try adjusting your vocabulary downward. Because right now, your performance is not credible.


Instead of coming across as profoundly retarded, you are coming across as a filthy liar.
LOLOLOLOL

You yourself admitted the protest was not putting any political pressure on them. That means you're agreeing with me; which means you just called yourself a profoundly retarded filthy liar.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


I did not admit that. Are you moving from pretending to be retarded to pretending to be delusional?
Sure you did...

NotFooledByW: Therefore the facts are the political pressure of a large demonstration was not working that day to achieve TrumpQ’s objective. Do you agree with that?​
Correll: Yes.​


Your playing the retard is really improving. I want to take credit for that. By putting pressure on you, I am forcing your to up your retard game.


Anyways.


Here is the definitions of "putting' and "working". You read up on them and think about it for a couple of hours. And after your brain stops hurting, go have your mommy explain it to you.




 
Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.

Answer the question.

How does the protest stop the proceedings insudec the Senate Chamber scheduled for that day by lawfully staying behind barricades set up to protect that crucial process from being disrupted?


Though political pressure. D'uh.
What kind of political pressure? Can't you say?


The political pressure of a large demonstration.


There. I said it. Now you look like a fucking retard. Who is stonewalling. Because you are also an asshole.
LOLOL

You're not saying anything. A lawful protest outside the building puts zero pressure on those inside the building because they can't hear them.


Wow. YOu are pretending that politicians inside of a building would not be told that there is a large demonstration outside the building?


Helpful hint. iF you pretending to be profoundly retarded, try adjusting your vocabulary downward. Because right now, your performance is not credible.


Instead of coming across as profoundly retarded, you are coming across as a filthy liar.
LOLOLOLOL

You yourself admitted the protest was not putting any political pressure on them. That means you're agreeing with me; which means you just called yourself a profoundly retarded filthy liar.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


I did not admit that. Are you moving from pretending to be retarded to pretending to be delusional?
Sure you did...

NotFooledByW: Therefore the facts are the political pressure of a large demonstration was not working that day to achieve TrumpQ’s objective. Do you agree with that?​
Correll: Yes.​


Your playing the retard is really improving. I want to take credit for that. By putting pressure on you, I am forcing your to up your retard game.


Anyways.


Here is the definitions of "putting' and "working". You read up on them and think about it for a couple of hours. And after your brain stops hurting, go have your mommy explain it to you.




LOL

Moron, I too pointed out political pressure wasn't working. You literally agreed with too.
 
Room, building, you are pretending to be retarded as part of your stonewalling. Dismissed.

Answer the question.

How does the protest stop the proceedings insudec the Senate Chamber scheduled for that day by lawfully staying behind barricades set up to protect that crucial process from being disrupted?


Though political pressure. D'uh.
What kind of political pressure? Can't you say?


The political pressure of a large demonstration.


There. I said it. Now you look like a fucking retard. Who is stonewalling. Because you are also an asshole.
LOLOL

You're not saying anything. A lawful protest outside the building puts zero pressure on those inside the building because they can't hear them.


Wow. YOu are pretending that politicians inside of a building would not be told that there is a large demonstration outside the building?


Helpful hint. iF you pretending to be profoundly retarded, try adjusting your vocabulary downward. Because right now, your performance is not credible.


Instead of coming across as profoundly retarded, you are coming across as a filthy liar.
LOLOLOLOL

You yourself admitted the protest was not putting any political pressure on them. That means you're agreeing with me; which means you just called yourself a profoundly retarded filthy liar.

1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif


I did not admit that. Are you moving from pretending to be retarded to pretending to be delusional?
Sure you did...

NotFooledByW: Therefore the facts are the political pressure of a large demonstration was not working that day to achieve TrumpQ’s objective. Do you agree with that?​
Correll: Yes.​


Your playing the retard is really improving. I want to take credit for that. By putting pressure on you, I am forcing your to up your retard game.


Anyways.


Here is the definitions of "putting' and "working". You read up on them and think about it for a couple of hours. And after your brain stops hurting, go have your mommy explain it to you.




LOL

Moron, I too pointed out political pressure wasn't working. You literally agreed with too.


No, you claimed that it was being put on them.

You did not claim it was not working.


Like I said, your pretense of being retarded, is getting really good, and I want the credit for that.


Just remember,

1613581843563.png
 
NotFooledByW: Therefore the facts are the political pressure of a large demonstration was not working that day to achieve TrumpQ’s objective. Do you agree with that?

Correll: Yes

Therefore TrumpQ incited his MAGA mob to converge on the Capitol on January 6 2021 to stop the electoral proceeding (Stop the Steal) taking place that day as stipulated in the Constitution. The mob made unlawful violent entry into the Capitol to comply with DJTQ’s direction as the only way for white patriots to save their country.

Hey just heard that I outlived Rush Limbaugh - Do you need time to grieve the loss of one of the all time American hate mongers?
 
Last edited:
NotFooledByW: Therefore the facts are the political pressure of a large demonstration was not working that day to achieve TrumpQ’s objective. Do you agree with that?

Correll: Yes

Therefore TrumpQ incited his MAGA mob to converge on the Capitol on January 6 2021 to stop the electoral proceeding (Stop the Steal) taking place that day as stipulated in the Constitution. The mob made unlawful violent entry into the Capitol to comply with DJTQ’s direction as the only way for white patriots to save their country.

.....


Your leap from, "the political pressure was not working" to "thus Trump incited" is not supported.


Plenty of attempts to put political pressure on people fail. It happens all the time. You cant' assume that because such an attempt did not work that there was a secret additional plan of violence.


That makes absolutely no sense.
 
Your leap from, "the political pressure was not working" to "thus Trump incited" is not supported.

DJTQ did not request political pressure to get Congress moving on investigations into his huge pack of lies about election fraud.
Per Mitch:​
"The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things. ....."Sadly, many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors that unhinged listeners might take literally......"This was different......"This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters' decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.

DJTQ told his supporters that they had to overturn the (fraudulent) voters' decision on January 6 or lose their country. The only patriotic way to do that on January 6 was to stop Mike Pence and the rest of the deep state immediately by going in unlawfully to stop it.,

How can you claim that entering the Capitol was not what Trump intended his deliberately assemble mob to do?

DJTQ did not order the mob out of the Capitol via tweet after seeing them go in
Again Mitch: "The unconscionable behavior did not end when the violence began. ..... "Whatever our ex-President claims he thought might happen that day... whatever reaction he says he meant to produce... by that afternoon, he was watching the same live television as the rest of the world. ....... "A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him.........."It was obvious that only President Trump could end this........."Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the Administration. ......."But the President did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed, and order restored........"Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election! ........."Even after it was clear to any reasonable observer that Vice President Pence was in danger... even as the mob carrying Trump banners was beating cops and breaching perimeters... the President sent a further tweet attacking his Vice President. ...... "Predictably and foreseeably under the circumstances, members of the mob seemed to interpret this as further inspiration to lawlessness and violence. ..... "Later, even when the President did halfheartedly begin calling for peace, he did not call right away for the riot to end. He did not tell the mob to depart until even later. ..... "And even then, with police officers bleeding and broken glass covering Capitol floors, he kept repeating election lies and praising the criminals.​
 
its shadow will lie over our Republic for a long time
Naw, it won't. The violence of the preceeding 11 months and that of the unhinged left that is sure to follow is the real issue.
While the dumb shit the tards did on the 6th was out of bounds it is done and over. Meanwhile the sickness that is the progressive mentality is still crippling our nation and there are no signs of it letting up.

Your kind is blind to your political cult. Trump was but a blip on the radar while the shit you guys are infecting our nation with has been ongoing for near a decade and shows no signs of receding.

“Your kind” ? — My kind ?
“You guys” ? — My guys ?
“Your political cult” ? — My political cult ?

I’m glad and recognize you at least characterized the violence in D.C. as ... “the dumb shit the tards did on the 6th was out of bounds.”

I don’t lump you in with those lunatics and thugs by saying they are ... “your kind.”

Please extend me a similar courtesy in regard to whatever violence or looting or “unhinged shit” you are objecting to.

But the funny thing is Trump does proudly talk about “his people,” and plays on the grievances of “ignorant people” whom he “loves.” He flatters them and feeds them “big lies” about the “big steal” of an election he won “in a landslide” ... and then purposely unleashed them on the Capitol Building.

The months of “unhinged” “dumb shit” Trump personally encouraged and articulated ineluctably led to Jan. 6th, when his people carrying his banners and shouting his slogans tried to keep him in power illegally.

That is the “dark shadow” of political mob rule that will remain hovering over U.S. politics as long as ex-President Trump goes unpunished.
But you support these slime.
Dem Threats.jpg
democrat insurrectionists.jpg
 
Your leap from, "the political pressure was not working" to "thus Trump incited" is not supported.

DJTQ did not request political pressure to get Congress moving on investigations into his huge pack of lies about election fraud.
Per Mitch:​
"The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things. ....."Sadly, many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors that unhinged listeners might take literally......"This was different......"This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters' decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.

DJTQ told his supporters that they had to overturn the (fraudulent) voters' decision on January 6 or lose their country. The only patriotic way to do that on January 6 was to stop Mike Pence and the rest of the deep state immediately by going in unlawfully to stop it.,

How can you claim that entering the Capitol was not what Trump intended his deliberately assemble mob to do?

DJTQ did not order the mob out of the Capitol via tweet after seeing them go in
Again Mitch: "The unconscionable behavior did not end when the violence began. ..... "Whatever our ex-President claims he thought might happen that day... whatever reaction he says he meant to produce... by that afternoon, he was watching the same live television as the rest of the world. ....... "A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him.........."It was obvious that only President Trump could end this........."Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the Administration. ......."But the President did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed, and order restored........"Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election! ........."Even after it was clear to any reasonable observer that Vice President Pence was in danger... even as the mob carrying Trump banners was beating cops and breaching perimeters... the President sent a further tweet attacking his Vice President. ...... "Predictably and foreseeably under the circumstances, members of the mob seemed to interpret this as further inspiration to lawlessness and violence. ..... "Later, even when the President did halfheartedly begin calling for peace, he did not call right away for the riot to end. He did not tell the mob to depart until even later. ..... "And even then, with police officers bleeding and broken glass covering Capitol floors, he kept repeating election lies and praising the criminals.​
I find it quite interesting that the election commissions in GA, PA, MI and WI are all investigating multiple cases of voter fraud RIGHT NOW. So much for unsubstantiated.
 
DJTQ told his supporters that they had to overturn the (fraudulent) voters' decision on January 6 or lose their country. The only patriotic way to do that on January 6 was to stop Mike Pence and the rest of the deep state immediately by going in unlawfully to stop it.,


Right here, you are assuming that the pro-Trump demonstrators think just like you on the matter.


That is an unsupported assumption, and if your assumption is false, then the rest of your logic falls apart.
 
I find it quite interesting that the election commissions in GA, PA, MI and WI are all investigating multiple cases of voter fraud RIGHT NOW. So much for unsubstantiated.

Link please? Nobody says there is zero fraud. It!s a crime and should be investigated. No evidence that any of those results can be overturned.
 
I find it quite interesting that the election commissions in GA, PA, MI and WI are all investigating multiple cases of voter fraud RIGHT NOW. So much for unsubstantiated.

Link please? Nobody says there is zero fraud. It!s a crime and should be investigated. No evidence that any of those results can be overturned.


Actually, the conclusion I mostly heard was, something along the lines of " there is not enough fraud to swing the election so we should not bother having an investigation".
 
Right here, you are assuming that the pro-Trump demonstrators think just like you on the matter.

You ignorant DJTQ goon. The rioters that went in tell us that’s what they thought they were invited to DC to stop the steal.

Some insurrectionist were surprised that DJTQ DIDN’T HAVE A PLAN when they got into the building.

AND Trump didn’t react against violence and disorder when the mob started scaling walls and breaking windows and beating up cops for the first couple of hours.

DJTQ’s early response was overt non-action that proves DJTQ expected the mob to get in and interfere with the Constitutional process.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top