MikeK
Gold Member
- Jun 11, 2010
- 15,930
- 2,495
For one thing he launched two unnecessary and enormously costly military engagements at the same time as he lowered taxes on the wealthy, which, according to every economic expert who has commented on it, were unprecedented and potentially ruinous actions.I am so sick of hearing the libs blaming all of this on W
OK Libs lets hear it
what did GWB do to cause any of it?
I am an economics dummy but there is no doubt in my mind that George W. Bush was installed as President for the express purpose of putting the final touches on Reaganomics and disempowering the middle class, which is exactly what he did. If our democratic republic manages to survive the deliberate and malicious damage done to it by greedy financial elitists who foisted Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush on us it will take many years to fully recover.
George W. Bush is a criminal. If rather than acting to protect Bush, Obama had appointed a motivated prosecutor and as much energy and resources were expended on investigating the Bush Administration as were wasted on investigating the Clinton blowjob, I have no doubt that Bush along with Cheney, Libby, Gonzales, Addington, Yu, Ashcroft, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rice and several other conspirators would be serving long prison terms.
In the final analysis, George W. Bush has inflicted more damage on the United States than Osama bin Laden and his entire following has done. And that is not a rhetorical exaggeration