Rosotar
Member
When you tell the enemy when you are leaving and they will be able to spread their terror unchecked - that is surrender
How many terror attacks occured in Iraq prior to the U.S. invasion?
ZERO!
Are you starting to get it RSR?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you tell the enemy when you are leaving and they will be able to spread their terror unchecked - that is surrender
How many terror attacks occured in Iraq prior to the U.S. invasion?
ZERO!
Are you starting to get it RSR?
Silly statements to a lib like yiou is the truth that derails your rants
Show me ANYTHING you have ever posted that even remotely relates to "truth" RSR.
Okay ... let's spell this out.
The bill is funding for the troops. Democrats attached a rider attempting usurp the authority of the President, and has NOTHING to do with funding..
What is the end result of those timelines being signed into law? They announce to the enemy the dates we are going to abandon the field to them.
That may not be surrendering one's army, but it IS surrendering the field.
When you tell the enemy when you are leaving and they will be able to spread their terror unchecked - that is surrender
Are you saying Bush should continue receiving a blank check with no oversight into what he's doing with the money?
Here's the deal. Congress is willing to give Bush the $ he wants but there are conditions on it. That's not unusual. Nobody is "usurping" his authority. Congress has the authority to fund and monitor that funding. It's called "checks and balances" on government. Bush doesn't like it because he's a spoiled brat and he's not used to being held accountable.
Remember when Bush proposed this assinine "surge" in troop levels?
We were told that we should know whether or not it was going to work within six months. Congress has given Bush plenty of time for his surge to work or not.
What's the problem? If the deadline comes and goes something different needs to be done anyway.
no...when you turn over your encampments and positions to the legitimate government that you helped to establish and that you fully support, that is not surrender. Go read the definition of the word. You are misusing it.
I ask again: Did Britain surrender Palestine in the spring of 1948? Can you answer that question?
Okay ... let's spell this out.
The bill is funding for the troops. Democrats attached a rider attempting usurp the authority of the President, and has NOTHING to do with funding.
What is the end result of those timelines being signed into law? They announce to the enemy the dates we are going to abandon the field to them.
That may not be surrendering one's army, but it IS surrendering the field.
surrendering the field to whom? to sunni and shiite militias at war with one another? Whenever we leave we will do that. Are you suggesting that America annex Iraq and just stay there forever?
It is surrender MM - learn to accept the truth
learn to speak the english language. Can you answer my question?
surrendering to terrorists and Iran
are you still trying to sell that bullshit that Iran is funding Al Qaeda, by the way?
when we leave, the shiites will eventually prevail. It is no great secret that the shiites of Iraq are and will continue to be closely aligned with the shiites of Iran. We should have been smart enough to see that coming before we invaded in the first place. We will be unable to stop an elected shiite government in Iraq from creating close ties to the shiite government in Iran.
Al Qaeda is in Iraq and are being assisted by Iran
I am not the only one calling the surrdender plan what it is
The voters are starting to see it as well - the Gallup poll has Dems at 27%
oh, please provide some non-partisan link that would show that persian shiite Iran was providing assistance to sunni arab AQ.
Answer the question about Britain if you dare.
the Gallup poll has congress at that number....not democrats.
my guess is, if congress were all democrats, we wouldn't have this sort of mess.
I have and being a good little liberal - you dismiss them
Surrender is surender MM - if you won;t accept the truth - that is your problem
you have never provided anything that states that Iran would fund Al Qaeda...and the mere fact that you continue to suggest such idiocy is proof of your total lack of understanding about the various factions in this conflict.
Will you answer my question about Britain, please?
did Britain surrender, or give up or submit to any enemy power when they left Palestine in the spring of 1948?