What Have You Done?

[Tehon]

I'm curious.....what is your understanding of liberty in the context of the US Constitution?

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

In the context of the OP does it mean to you that one is free to 'eschew religion and morality'...?

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are u going to deny that today's white supremacist groups are NOT voting republican?

Several times I've called you on your posts, and asked for documentation.

I assume asking the same now would be just as useless.



But.....I've given numerous post filled with facts.....and you have yet to refute any beyond the usual Liberal "Is not, isssssss nootttttttt!!!'


I believe readers will get the gist of what is going on.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You.....Democrats, Liberals, Progressives.....and the throngs of misguided acolytes who never think through what you have agreed to empower.




1. In allowing yourselves to have been tricked into giving power the sinister party in the hope of bettering society, you've done the very opposite: you've poisoned the culture, set one man's hand against the next.
You have reduced the culture to a gutter level, agreed to children born out of wedlock, snuffing out the lives of the unborn, fed a welfare culture that embraces drug and alcohol abuse, crime, violence, recreational sex, illegitimacy, and family breakup.

And poverty remains at close to exactly what it was when the Democrat 'war on poverty' began....$22 trillion ago.



2. The central truth is that Leftist doctrine eschews religion and morality, and makes no differentiation between humans and every other form of life.
There is no morality. No care or concern for other, or for life. Nor is any required. This is the gift of the Enlightenment, with its view to replacing religion with science, with reason. Here it is today, explained not by Jack London, but by former Obama czar Steven Rattner:
“Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
Opinion | Health Care Reform Beyond Obamacare

To put it more directly:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky




3. Here, the beating heart of the Democrat Party: "In this particular idea of the Enlightenment, the need to change human nature, and to eliminate customs and traditions, to remake established institutions, to do away with all inequalities in order to bring man closer to the state, which was the expression of the general will." Talmon, “Origins of Totalitarian Democracy,” p. 3-7

4. You elected....twice....a rapist and convicted perjurer and low-life who forced this upon the nation:
"Sexual definitions, the researchers hypothesized, were inevitably shaped by President Clinton’s famous “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” statement and the ensuing national discussion.

“Like President Clinton, adolescents and young adults often interpret these words with a degree of latitude, depending on whether they want to maintain an image of being sexually experienced or inexperienced,” the report explained.

“Unlike respondents in the previous samples, our respondents were adolescents after the Clinton-Lewinsky era, which our comparisons of data over time suggest may have been a turning point in conceptualizations of oral-genital contact. The dramatic and sudden shift in attitudes toward oral-genital contact can therefore be termed the Clinton-Lewinsky effect.”
'Clinton-Lewinsky Effect': Study Shows Students' Changing Views Of Oral Sex | HuffPost



Democrats, Liberals, Progressives......what have you done?

Liberals have done a hell of a lot more for this country than some paid Russian troll like you ever did, that's for damn sure.

The truth sure irks you half-head Liberals.

I notice you can't find a single thing in any of my posts to rebut.


In effect, you've proven their veracity.



OK....time for you to go back to your Helen Hunt blow-up doll.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals created this country
Every major social advance has come from Liberals

If mankind relied on conservatives, we would still be cavemen

Same lie?

The modern 'Liberal' is the Socialist Party......John Dewey had them change their name to 'Liberal' and dunces and liars bought it like it was on sale.

The classical liberals, the Founders, or, what are called conservatives today....created the nation based on individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.


You, Liberals, Socialists, Communists, Nazis, Fascists. Progressives, stand for this:

the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


Thanks for the opportunity to reveal the truth.

Or, would you prefer 'Sieg Heil' to 'thank you'?

 

[Timmy]

Are u going to deny that today's white supremacist groups are NOT voting republican?

Several times I've called you on your posts, and asked for documentation.

I assume asking the same now would be just as useless.



But.....I've given numerous post filled with facts.....and you have yet to refute any beyond the usual Liberal "Is not, isssssss nootttttttt!!!'


I believe readers will get the gist of what is going on.

Linking to some righty kook site doesn't suddenly legitimize your rediculous claims .

Do you ever have an independent thought of your own? I asked a simple question about today's white supremacists. Try answering it .

 

[rightwinger]

Liberals created this country
Every major social advance has come from Liberals

If mankind relied on conservatives, we would still be cavemen

Same lie?

The modern 'Liberal' is the Socialist Party......John Dewey had them change their name to 'Liberal' and dunces and liars bought it like it was on sale.

The classical liberals, the Founders, or, what are called conservatives today....created the nation based on individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.


You, Liberals, Socialists, Communists, Nazis, Fascists. Progressives, stand for this:

the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


Thanks for the opportunity to reveal the truth.

Or, would you prefer 'Sieg Heil' to 'thank you'?

Liberals are the Socialist Party like Conservatives are the Nazi Party

The Party Trump loves

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Call yourself a 'Liberal'?
What are the attributes associated with the term "Liberal"?



Well, there was the "Liberal Lion," Ted Kennedy.....

a.a serial adulterer, a murderer of a young woman, a traitor who allied himself with the Kremlin against the United States President.
A Liberal.



b. And....today we have yet another "Liberal Lion"...

"One New York Times reporter calls him a “liberal lion"....Film producer Harvey Weinstein, a longtime champion of liberal causes and Hollywood icon, has been exposed by The New York Times as being a serial sexual harasser of women..... allegations against Mr. Weinstein stretching over nearly three decades, documented through interviews with current and former employees and film industry workers, as well as legal records, emails and internal documents from the businesses he has run..." 10 Noteworthy Twitter Reactions to the Harvey Weinstein Sexual Harassment Bombshell

Liberal lions.....the icons of Liberalism.




What we have witnessed from the Liberal leadership is hardly different from their political predecessors, the Bolsheviks.
They are poisoners of the culture, bigots and racists, who use the power of big government to force and coerce.




This is what Democrats, Liberals, Progressives have brought to the culture of America.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I'm curious.....what is your understanding of liberty in the context of the US Constitution?

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

In the context of the OP does it mean to you that one is free to 'eschew religion and morality'...?

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

OK.....you are staying within the lines there.....more to the point: do you support freedom of religion and a moral society...?

 

[Tehon]

I'm curious.....what is your understanding of liberty in the context of the US Constitution?

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

In the context of the OP does it mean to you that one is free to 'eschew religion and morality'...?

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

OK.....you are staying within the lines there.....more to the point: do you support freedom of religion and a moral society...?

Yes

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I'm curious.....what is your understanding of liberty in the context of the US Constitution?

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

In the context of the OP does it mean to you that one is free to 'eschew religion and morality'...?

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

OK.....you are staying within the lines there.....more to the point: do you support freedom of religion and a moral society...?

Yes

Good for you.....so what is your problem with Polichic and liberty?

 

[xotoxi]

Nothing. I don't see this issue as much of a problem as you. Therefore,

What do YOU propose is done about this?

I propose that cowards like you stop lying, and confront what your party has become....

....and start by admitting what a huge problem welfare, criminality and out of wedlock births are.

Can you do it?

That's your solution?

Asking you to show some courage is 'no solution'?

That makes you simply a part of the problem.

How does me having "courage" solve the "problem"?

This is typical of you...ramblin on about a problem, but never proposing a solution.

Why so afraid to lose your Liberal creds?

At what point in your life did principles and rectitude cease being important to you?


Should I be flattered that yellow has become your fav color?

I'm not liberal. I just don't like blind partisanship, which is why I am always poking you.

 

[rightwinger]

Conservatives gave us slavery, second degree status for blacks, women, minority and gays, fought against worker rights, gay rights, environmental protections

Imagine a world where conservatives had their way

 

[Tehon]

I'm curious.....what is your understanding of liberty in the context of the US Constitution?

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

In the context of the OP does it mean to you that one is free to 'eschew religion and morality'...?

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

OK.....you are staying within the lines there.....more to the point: do you support freedom of religion and a moral society...?

Yes

Good for you.....so what is your problem with Polichic and liberty?

She doesn't understand the term as it relates to the constitution. It leads her to faulty conclusions about what the constitution represents. I asked her to discuss it and she declined. I don't really have a problem with her though.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I propose that cowards like you stop lying, and confront what your party has become....

....and start by admitting what a huge problem welfare, criminality and out of wedlock births are.

Can you do it?

That's your solution?

Asking you to show some courage is 'no solution'?

That makes you simply a part of the problem.

How does me having "courage" solve the "problem"?

This is typical of you...ramblin on about a problem, but never proposing a solution.

Why so afraid to lose your Liberal creds?

At what point in your life did principles and rectitude cease being important to you?


Should I be flattered that yellow has become your fav color?

I'm not liberal. I just don't like blind partisanship, which is why I am always poking you.

"I'm not liberal."

Of course you are.


If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, ...guess what.


In giving your view on out of wedlock births, and my proving it linked to criminality and welfare, you wrote " I don't see this issue as much of a problem as you."


It's a huge problem for the child, for the mother, and for society.


Get it now, ducky?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I'm curious.....what is your understanding of liberty in the context of the US Constitution?

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

In the context of the OP does it mean to you that one is free to 'eschew religion and morality'...?

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

OK.....you are staying within the lines there.....more to the point: do you support freedom of religion and a moral society...?

Yes

Good for you.....so what is your problem with Polichic and liberty?

She doesn't understand the term as it relates to the constitution. It leads her to faulty conclusions about what the constitution represents. I asked her to discuss it and she declined. I don't really have a problem with her though.

That's pretty vague....................

 

[Tehon]

Liberty in a civil society is the freedom " to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative shall enact, according to the trust put in it." John Locke

Of course one is free to eschew religion. It is a right guaranteed by the people's government

OK.....you are staying within the lines there.....more to the point: do you support freedom of religion and a moral society...?

Yes

Good for you.....so what is your problem with Polichic and liberty?

She doesn't understand the term as it relates to the constitution. It leads her to faulty conclusions about what the constitution represents. I asked her to discuss it and she declined. I don't really have a problem with her though.

That's pretty vague....................

Sorry to disappoint you. There really is nothing more to it than that.

 

[xotoxi]

In giving your view on out of wedlock births, and my proving it linked to criminality and welfare, you wrote " I don't see this issue as much of a problem as you."


It's a huge problem for the child, for the mother, and for society.

You are making a good case for why abortion should remain legal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In giving your view on out of wedlock births, and my proving it linked to criminality and welfare, you wrote " I don't see this issue as much of a problem as you."


It's a huge problem for the child, for the mother, and for society.

You are making a good case for why abortion should remain legal.

Truly the stupidest statement you've made today.....and that's goin' some.


Almost every single abortion in this country is for nothing more than convenience.

Only a Liberal...you, ducky....could imagine me making an argument in favor of the murder of the unborn.

Only a Liberal...you,ducky.....could claim that abortion is an argument against having a child when one is not ready for same.


I'm gonna assume that your post was simply the gum-flapping of one who'd love to be able to dispute my post.....but just can't come up with anything.
True?

 

[xotoxi]

In giving your view on out of wedlock births, and my proving it linked to criminality and welfare, you wrote " I don't see this issue as much of a problem as you."


It's a huge problem for the child, for the mother, and for society.

You are making a good case for why abortion should remain legal.

Truly the stupidest statement you've made today.....and that's goin' some.


Almost every single abortion in this country is for nothing more than convenience.

Only a Liberal...you, ducky....could imagine me making an argument in favor of the murder of the unborn.

Only a Liberal...you,ducky.....could claim that abortion is an argument against having a child when one is not ready for same.


I'm gonna assume that your post was simply the gum-flapping of one who'd love to be able to dispute my post.....but just can't come up with anything.
True?

If you're not making a good case for why abortion should be legal, then you certainly are making a good case of why birth control should be made available to everyone who wants them and their use should be encouraged.

Unintended, out of wedlock pregnancies are a huge problem for the child, for the mother, and for society.

 

[rightwinger]