What is the republican solution to ending mass shootings? Why don’t they ever offer solutions?

What is the solution to murder, robbery, fraud, bullying, adultry, child abuse, pedofilia, necrofilia, lying and etc., and etc.? Was prohibition the answer to excess drinking, the war on drugs the answer to drug abuse? When has prohibition ever been the answer to anything people wanted or wanted to do?

Q. (to first sentence) There are no panaceas to any crime on you list.

Prohibition generally creates a black market and criminal enterprises, and creates more criminals.

By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.

We can do something and take a win whenever we can or do nothing and just accept a total loss. We change what we can and accept what we can't change. If we save even one life then it's worth it.
If we know from experience a proposed solution is unworkable why blindly pursue it. As Einstein said
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity"
In Switzerland, they DO have freedom of speech and press. In fact, their press is more free than ours is.
They do not have a right of freedom of speech, nowhere does it say that.
They like all of Europe are part of a fucked up collective...

True, we don’t have any real freedom in this country… Just like every other country
This is from the Swiss Constitution.
Art. 17 Freedom of the media
1 Freedom of the press, radio and television and of other forms of dissemination of features and information by means of public telecommunications is guaranteed.

2 Censorship is prohibited.

Your pronounced ignorance of other countries is astounding.
Lol
Thats best joke I’ve heard all day...
The original question has been asked many more times it remains a much better joke than mine.
The serious question remains and remains unanswered
when has prohibition ever been the answer? Betcha don't/can't/won't answer that.

You lose. It's done through Regulation. Making the regulation so tight that it essentially is a ban. Like the 1934 Firearms Act was driven by the Thompson 45 SMG that was used for nefarious uses by organized criminals. Not only were they mowing each other down, innocents were caught in the cross fire. So they regulated it and created a special class for automatic weapons. They grandfathered it in. It became illegal to sell to non Firearms Licensed People, illegal to even give them even in an estate to your family members unless they had a proper Firearms license. The Parts to repair them were also regulated the same. They didn't confiscate the weapons unless they found them. They relied on taking them from criminals when they were busted. In about 10 years, the Thompson SMG all but disappeared from the normal channels. This can be done with any firearm. Even if there are millions of them in circulation. So I suggest you don't get too cocky.
Your statement proves my point. Though owning a machine gun is not illegal it is difficult. Consequently there are many machine guns in circulation without question illegally most for tax issues. Just as heroin is illegal there is a large amount of it in circulation or any number of hard drugs. Where there is a demand it will be met.
 
What is the solution to murder, robbery, fraud, bullying, adultry, child abuse, pedofilia, necrofilia, lying and etc., and etc.? Was prohibition the answer to excess drinking, the war on drugs the answer to drug abuse? When has prohibition ever been the answer to anything people wanted or wanted to do?

Q. (to first sentence) There are no panaceas to any crime on you list.

Prohibition generally creates a black market and criminal enterprises, and creates more criminals.

By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
We can identify the who, and we can get close as to the when, but law enforcement has got to have it's hands untied in moving on those who spew vile threats and rehtoric in which alerts them to the possibility of yet another crazy person who has lost it, and is once again within their grasp.
No solution here.
 
Q. (to first sentence) There are no panaceas to any crime on you list.

Prohibition generally creates a black market and criminal enterprises, and creates more criminals.

By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.
The solution has been found, it's called enforcement of punishment based on the crimes committed. They once hung pirates along the battery walls as a massage to those who figured that pirating was a good occupation.

Hanging was another good message to send to those who were also considering making capital crime their choice in life. Yes, hanging is something the leftist can't stomach, and so it has been stopped for years in order to suggest to us that keeping cold blooded killers in prison for life is a better alternative. Meanwhile no compassion or give a dam goes out to the victims of these horrendous crimes when trying to make it easy on a natural born killer.

Sick situation.
Did it end piracy, or murder or any crime? No solution there.
Yep, in America it sure did end it. Solutions don't need to end things completely when first applied, but at least the solution should slow it down to a crawl until time itself eradicates the rest of it. Gotta start somewhere right ??
 
What is the solution to murder, robbery, fraud, bullying, adultry, child abuse, pedofilia, necrofilia, lying and etc., and etc.? Was prohibition the answer to excess drinking, the war on drugs the answer to drug abuse? When has prohibition ever been the answer to anything people wanted or wanted to do?

Q. (to first sentence) There are no panaceas to any crime on you list.

Prohibition generally creates a black market and criminal enterprises, and creates more criminals.

By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
We can identify the who, and we can get close as to the when, but law enforcement has got to have it's hands untied in moving on those who spew vile threats and rehtoric in which alerts them to the possibility of yet another crazy person who has lost it, and is once again within their grasp.
No solution here.
So now you are reduced to a troll ??
 
Q. (to first sentence) There are no panaceas to any crime on you list.

Prohibition generally creates a black market and criminal enterprises, and creates more criminals.

By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.

We can do something and take a win whenever we can or do nothing and just accept a total loss. We change what we can and accept what we can't change. If we save even one life then it's worth it.
If we know from experience a proposed solution is unworkable why blindly pursue it. As Einstein said
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity"
They do not have a right of freedom of speech, nowhere does it say that.
They like all of Europe are part of a fucked up collective...

True, we don’t have any real freedom in this country… Just like every other country
This is from the Swiss Constitution.
Art. 17 Freedom of the media
1 Freedom of the press, radio and television and of other forms of dissemination of features and information by means of public telecommunications is guaranteed.

2 Censorship is prohibited.

Your pronounced ignorance of other countries is astounding.
Lol
Thats best joke I’ve heard all day...
The original question has been asked many more times it remains a much better joke than mine.
The serious question remains and remains unanswered
when has prohibition ever been the answer? Betcha don't/can't/won't answer that.

You lose. It's done through Regulation. Making the regulation so tight that it essentially is a ban. Like the 1934 Firearms Act was driven by the Thompson 45 SMG that was used for nefarious uses by organized criminals. Not only were they mowing each other down, innocents were caught in the cross fire. So they regulated it and created a special class for automatic weapons. They grandfathered it in. It became illegal to sell to non Firearms Licensed People, illegal to even give them even in an estate to your family members unless they had a proper Firearms license. The Parts to repair them were also regulated the same. They didn't confiscate the weapons unless they found them. They relied on taking them from criminals when they were busted. In about 10 years, the Thompson SMG all but disappeared from the normal channels. This can be done with any firearm. Even if there are millions of them in circulation. So I suggest you don't get too cocky.
Your statement proves my point. Though owning a machine gun is not illegal it is difficult. Consequently there are many machine guns in circulation without question illegally most for tax issues. Just as heroin is illegal there is a large amount of it in circulation or any number of hard drugs. Where there is a demand it will be met.

There are almost zero full auto weapons in circulation illegally today. Get one and find out just how vigorous all law enforcement and Alphabets get in coming after it unless it's legal.
 
By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.

We can do something and take a win whenever we can or do nothing and just accept a total loss. We change what we can and accept what we can't change. If we save even one life then it's worth it.
If we know from experience a proposed solution is unworkable why blindly pursue it. As Einstein said
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity"
This is from the Swiss Constitution.
Art. 17 Freedom of the media
1 Freedom of the press, radio and television and of other forms of dissemination of features and information by means of public telecommunications is guaranteed.

2 Censorship is prohibited.

Your pronounced ignorance of other countries is astounding.
Lol
Thats best joke I’ve heard all day...
The original question has been asked many more times it remains a much better joke than mine.
The serious question remains and remains unanswered
when has prohibition ever been the answer? Betcha don't/can't/won't answer that.

You lose. It's done through Regulation. Making the regulation so tight that it essentially is a ban. Like the 1934 Firearms Act was driven by the Thompson 45 SMG that was used for nefarious uses by organized criminals. Not only were they mowing each other down, innocents were caught in the cross fire. So they regulated it and created a special class for automatic weapons. They grandfathered it in. It became illegal to sell to non Firearms Licensed People, illegal to even give them even in an estate to your family members unless they had a proper Firearms license. The Parts to repair them were also regulated the same. They didn't confiscate the weapons unless they found them. They relied on taking them from criminals when they were busted. In about 10 years, the Thompson SMG all but disappeared from the normal channels. This can be done with any firearm. Even if there are millions of them in circulation. So I suggest you don't get too cocky.
Your statement proves my point. Though owning a machine gun is not illegal it is difficult. Consequently there are many machine guns in circulation without question illegally most for tax issues. Just as heroin is illegal there is a large amount of it in circulation or any number of hard drugs. Where there is a demand it will be met.

There are almost zero full auto weapons in circulation illegally today. Get one and find out just how vigorous all law enforcement and Alphabets get in coming after it unless it's legal.

Now that is the stupid for today post. Criminals have AKs, M16s tommys uzis, hell you name it even some M60s. And more. Your ex president and his Ag gave them all kinds of shit. Sessions tracked almost all down after 8 years of murders.
 
By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.
The solution has been found, it's called enforcement of punishment based on the crimes committed. They once hung pirates along the battery walls as a massage to those who figured that pirating was a good occupation.

Hanging was another good message to send to those who were also considering making capital crime their choice in life. Yes, hanging is something the leftist can't stomach, and so it has been stopped for years in order to suggest to us that keeping cold blooded killers in prison for life is a better alternative. Meanwhile no compassion or give a dam goes out to the victims of these horrendous crimes when trying to make it easy on a natural born killer.

Sick situation.
Did it end piracy, or murder or any crime? No solution there.
Yep, in America it sure did end it. Solutions don't need to end things completely when first applied, but at least the solution should slow it down to a crawl until time itself eradicates the rest of it. Gotta start somewhere right ??
Just keep your head in the sand. Telling yourself lies is nothing more than lying to yourself.
 
By implication what is the solution to mass shootings.
The answer lies in the solution to all crime.

There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.

We can do something and take a win whenever we can or do nothing and just accept a total loss. We change what we can and accept what we can't change. If we save even one life then it's worth it.
If we know from experience a proposed solution is unworkable why blindly pursue it. As Einstein said
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity"
This is from the Swiss Constitution.
Art. 17 Freedom of the media
1 Freedom of the press, radio and television and of other forms of dissemination of features and information by means of public telecommunications is guaranteed.

2 Censorship is prohibited.

Your pronounced ignorance of other countries is astounding.
Lol
Thats best joke I’ve heard all day...
The original question has been asked many more times it remains a much better joke than mine.
The serious question remains and remains unanswered
when has prohibition ever been the answer? Betcha don't/can't/won't answer that.

You lose. It's done through Regulation. Making the regulation so tight that it essentially is a ban. Like the 1934 Firearms Act was driven by the Thompson 45 SMG that was used for nefarious uses by organized criminals. Not only were they mowing each other down, innocents were caught in the cross fire. So they regulated it and created a special class for automatic weapons. They grandfathered it in. It became illegal to sell to non Firearms Licensed People, illegal to even give them even in an estate to your family members unless they had a proper Firearms license. The Parts to repair them were also regulated the same. They didn't confiscate the weapons unless they found them. They relied on taking them from criminals when they were busted. In about 10 years, the Thompson SMG all but disappeared from the normal channels. This can be done with any firearm. Even if there are millions of them in circulation. So I suggest you don't get too cocky.
Your statement proves my point. Though owning a machine gun is not illegal it is difficult. Consequently there are many machine guns in circulation without question illegally most for tax issues. Just as heroin is illegal there is a large amount of it in circulation or any number of hard drugs. Where there is a demand it will be met.

There are almost zero full auto weapons in circulation illegally today. Get one and find out just how vigorous all law enforcement and Alphabets get in coming after it unless it's legal.
Yes criminals are well known for following all law to the letter. Government is well known for enforcing all law to the letter. How stupidly ignorant is it possible to get? Fully automatic weapons are gang favorites. If a criminal wants a fully automatic weapon they are available for a price.
 
There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.

We can do something and take a win whenever we can or do nothing and just accept a total loss. We change what we can and accept what we can't change. If we save even one life then it's worth it.
If we know from experience a proposed solution is unworkable why blindly pursue it. As Einstein said
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity"
Lol
Thats best joke I’ve heard all day...
The original question has been asked many more times it remains a much better joke than mine.
The serious question remains and remains unanswered
when has prohibition ever been the answer? Betcha don't/can't/won't answer that.

You lose. It's done through Regulation. Making the regulation so tight that it essentially is a ban. Like the 1934 Firearms Act was driven by the Thompson 45 SMG that was used for nefarious uses by organized criminals. Not only were they mowing each other down, innocents were caught in the cross fire. So they regulated it and created a special class for automatic weapons. They grandfathered it in. It became illegal to sell to non Firearms Licensed People, illegal to even give them even in an estate to your family members unless they had a proper Firearms license. The Parts to repair them were also regulated the same. They didn't confiscate the weapons unless they found them. They relied on taking them from criminals when they were busted. In about 10 years, the Thompson SMG all but disappeared from the normal channels. This can be done with any firearm. Even if there are millions of them in circulation. So I suggest you don't get too cocky.
Your statement proves my point. Though owning a machine gun is not illegal it is difficult. Consequently there are many machine guns in circulation without question illegally most for tax issues. Just as heroin is illegal there is a large amount of it in circulation or any number of hard drugs. Where there is a demand it will be met.

There are almost zero full auto weapons in circulation illegally today. Get one and find out just how vigorous all law enforcement and Alphabets get in coming after it unless it's legal.

Now that is the stupid for today post. Criminals have AKs, M16s tommys uzis, hell you name it even some M60s. And more. Your ex president and his Ag gave them all kinds of shit. Sessions tracked almost all down after 8 years of murders.

Now that you have stuck your foot in your mouth, prove it. Show where all those weapons have been recovered. Hell, show where all those weapons have been used. Otherwise, you get a nice tidy FAKE NEWS.
 
Butt socks makes a gun very inaccurate for one, it also does not allow you to deplete an entire clip from one trigger pull the same as a automatic machine gun, so they are NOT an equivalent. Take it from a military veteran, you don’t know what you are talking about. That is the same crazy “logic” an individual would use to try and compare a Corvette to a Ferrari. Keep digging your hole deeper.

Bump stock....
 
There is no panacea or solution to mass shootings. Confiscation of all firearms in America is impossible, as is any way to learn who, where and when the next one will occur.
If there is no panacea for crime why is the crime of mass shooting in a special solvable category? All of the hype over mass shooting is just that hype. Crime has been with humanity since the beginning and in the whole course of history no solution has been found.
There are those crying for and demanding something that has been for the whole of human history impossible.

We can do something and take a win whenever we can or do nothing and just accept a total loss. We change what we can and accept what we can't change. If we save even one life then it's worth it.
If we know from experience a proposed solution is unworkable why blindly pursue it. As Einstein said
"Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result is insanity"
Lol
Thats best joke I’ve heard all day...
The original question has been asked many more times it remains a much better joke than mine.
The serious question remains and remains unanswered
when has prohibition ever been the answer? Betcha don't/can't/won't answer that.

You lose. It's done through Regulation. Making the regulation so tight that it essentially is a ban. Like the 1934 Firearms Act was driven by the Thompson 45 SMG that was used for nefarious uses by organized criminals. Not only were they mowing each other down, innocents were caught in the cross fire. So they regulated it and created a special class for automatic weapons. They grandfathered it in. It became illegal to sell to non Firearms Licensed People, illegal to even give them even in an estate to your family members unless they had a proper Firearms license. The Parts to repair them were also regulated the same. They didn't confiscate the weapons unless they found them. They relied on taking them from criminals when they were busted. In about 10 years, the Thompson SMG all but disappeared from the normal channels. This can be done with any firearm. Even if there are millions of them in circulation. So I suggest you don't get too cocky.
Your statement proves my point. Though owning a machine gun is not illegal it is difficult. Consequently there are many machine guns in circulation without question illegally most for tax issues. Just as heroin is illegal there is a large amount of it in circulation or any number of hard drugs. Where there is a demand it will be met.

There are almost zero full auto weapons in circulation illegally today. Get one and find out just how vigorous all law enforcement and Alphabets get in coming after it unless it's legal.
Yes criminals are well known for following all law to the letter. Government is well known for enforcing all law to the letter. How stupidly ignorant is it possible to get? Fully automatic weapons are gang favorites. If a criminal wants a fully automatic weapon they are available for a price.

You have been watching way too many movies. Criminals have semi autos or revolvers or single shot guns. Most don't even have any ARs or AKs. Once Swat shows up, the Cops have the criminals outgunned so bad, it's silly with their Colt Model 6250 ARs. You've earned a FAKE NEWS!!!!!
 
Butt socks makes a gun very inaccurate for one, it also does not allow you to deplete an entire clip from one trigger pull the same as a automatic machine gun, so they are NOT an equivalent. Take it from a military veteran, you don’t know what you are talking about. That is the same crazy “logic” an individual would use to try and compare a Corvette to a Ferrari. Keep digging your hole deeper.

Bump stock....

If I posted the same posting, you gunnutters would be all over me like stink on a skunk. There are so many things wrong with shakles post.
 
Now that you have stuck your foot in your mouth, prove it. Show where all those weapons have been recovered. Hell, show where all those weapons have been used. Otherwise, you get a nice tidy FAKE NEWS.

I have no clue as to how many of Eric Holders weapons have been recovered. Their use, however, is a different matter. I'm certain we'll never have an accurate count.

69 more killed thru Obama's Fast and Furious
Saturday, May 28, 2016
|
Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com)

The death toll from the Obama administration’s notorious Fast and Furious covert program to track down weapons to Mexican drug cartels now stands at 200 after another 69 deaths were reported by a watchdog group based in the nation’s capital.

President Barack Obama’s botched federal sting operation hit another low as more massacres — one of which left 22 dead — have been reported by Judicial Watch, which maintains that at least 69 more people have been killed by firearms that his plan put into criminals’ hands before disappearing.

Horrible track record

According to Judicial Watch, the Obama administration is responsible for arming gangsters south of the border with nearly a hundred weapons.

“[A] total of 94 Fast and Furious firearms have been recovered in Mexico City and 12 Mexican states, with the majority being seized in Sonora, Chihuahua and Sinaloa,” the watchdog group out of Washington, D.C., announced. “Of the weapons recovered, 82 were rifles and 12 were pistols identified as having been part of the Fast and Furious program. Reports suggest the Fast and Furious guns are tied to at least 69 killings.”
[...]
69 more killed thru Obama's Fast and Furious
 
Now that you have stuck your foot in your mouth, prove it. Show where all those weapons have been recovered. Hell, show where all those weapons have been used. Otherwise, you get a nice tidy FAKE NEWS.

I have no clue as to how many of Eric Holders weapons have been recovered. Their use, however, is a different matter. I'm certain we'll never have an accurate count.

69 more killed thru Obama's Fast and Furious
Saturday, May 28, 2016
|
Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com)

The death toll from the Obama administration’s notorious Fast and Furious covert program to track down weapons to Mexican drug cartels now stands at 200 after another 69 deaths were reported by a watchdog group based in the nation’s capital.

President Barack Obama’s botched federal sting operation hit another low as more massacres — one of which left 22 dead — have been reported by Judicial Watch, which maintains that at least 69 more people have been killed by firearms that his plan put into criminals’ hands before disappearing.

Horrible track record

According to Judicial Watch, the Obama administration is responsible for arming gangsters south of the border with nearly a hundred weapons.

“[A] total of 94 Fast and Furious firearms have been recovered in Mexico City and 12 Mexican states, with the majority being seized in Sonora, Chihuahua and Sinaloa,” the watchdog group out of Washington, D.C., announced. “Of the weapons recovered, 82 were rifles and 12 were pistols identified as having been part of the Fast and Furious program. Reports suggest the Fast and Furious guns are tied to at least 69 killings.”
[...]
69 more killed thru Obama's Fast and Furious

Funny, not one single fully auto mentioned like you people are claiming. You just hit the big

FAKE NEWS!!!!!

 
You have been
watching way too many movies. Criminals have semi autos or revolvers or single shot guns. Most don't even have any ARs or AKs. Once Swat shows up, the Cops have the criminals outgunned so bad, it's silly with their Colt Model 6250 ARs. You've earned a FAKE NEWS!!!!!

You're being foolish. Criminals have had automatic weapons for decades. Another reason for police ramping up their own weapons and vehicles.

How the North Hollywood shootout changed policing
More than 300 outgunned LEOs from five agencies, fighting for their lives, fired more than 550 rounds

Mar 1, 2017

By Dana Bartholomew
Daily News, Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — LAPD Officer James Zboravan was two months and eight days out of the police academy when he faced a barrage of machine-gun fire, shot and wounded a bank robber and dove across unarmored officers to shield them with his bulletproof vest.

He was shot four times before leaping through an exploding glass doorway.

bullets-2.jpg

An inside view of a bullet ridden LAPD patrol car windshield is seen while on display at the North Hollywood police station prior to a ceremony marking the 20th anniversary of the shootout. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)
How to explain to the public why cops don't shoot to woundHere's why all police need a patrol rifle

“There was no time to be scared. It’s not a macho thing. There’s so much going on. You fall back on your training — the best in the world,” recalled Zboravan, an award-winning sergeant now serving as an assistant watch commander at Northeast Division. “The lesson is, very plainly: “Just because you’re shot doesn’t mean you’re going to die. You must fight on.”

Twenty years ago, on Feb. 28, 1997, two men armed with fully automatic weapons and clad in heavy body armor did more than rob the Bank of America at 6600 Laurel Canyon Blvd. in North Hollywood.

For 44 thunderous minutes, they marched through a neighborhood under siege, spraying stores, homes and cars with 1,100 armor-piercing bullets, wounding 11 police officers and six bystanders.

More than 300 outgunned law enforcement officers from five agencies, fighting for their lives, fired back with more than 550 rounds. But most were from .38 revolvers or 9 mm pistols pitted against an arsenal of high-capacity AK-47s and automatic rifles.

The nation then watched the terror unfold on live TV as news helicopters broadcast the battle now known as the North Hollywood shootout.

When the shell casings stopped rolling, two bandits lay dead — one after shooting himself after sustaining 10 gunshot wounds — and the other after bleeding to death from 29 gunshots after telling police, “F--- you. Shoot me in the head.”
[...]
How the North Hollywood shootout changed policing

Police in this infamous shootout were forced to go to gun shops to acquire the necessary weapons and ammunition to combat these criminals. Nothing has changed to this day.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.


The Republican solution is to buy more guns, then offering up their sympathies & holding prayer vigils, while refusing to legislate laws that would help to keep guns out of the wrong hands.
90 percent of Americans want expanded background checks on guns. Why isn’t this a political slam dunk?

Everyone knows that!

david-horsey-cartoon20091019.jpg


When you can't even stop people who are on terrorists watch lists from buying guns, there's a problem
Obama argues for gun controls as way to fight terror

Orlando shootingl
Orlando shooting: 49 killed, shooter pledged ISIS allegiance - CNN

 
Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.


The Republican solution is to buy more guns, offering up their sympathies & holding prayer vigils, while refusing to legislate laws that would help to keep guns out of the wrong hands.

Everyone knows that!

david-horsey-cartoon20091019.jpg


When you can't even stop people who are on terrorists watch lists from buying guns, there's a problem
Obama argues for gun controls as way to fight terror

Orlando shootingl
Orlando shooting: 49 killed, shooter pledged ISIS allegiance - CNN
The problem with the Demon-crats, is that they mis-identify who the threat is, and therefore go after the good citizens in a bid to cover up their weaknesses when the crap hits the fan. People know this, and it is why they can't stand the Demon-crats telling them what to do, how to do it, and when to do it.
 
You have been
watching way too many movies. Criminals have semi autos or revolvers or single shot guns. Most don't even have any ARs or AKs. Once Swat shows up, the Cops have the criminals outgunned so bad, it's silly with their Colt Model 6250 ARs. You've earned a FAKE NEWS!!!!!

You're being foolish. Criminals have had automatic weapons for decades. Another reason for police ramping up their own weapons and vehicles.

How the North Hollywood shootout changed policing
More than 300 outgunned LEOs from five agencies, fighting for their lives, fired more than 550 rounds

Mar 1, 2017

By Dana Bartholomew
Daily News, Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — LAPD Officer James Zboravan was two months and eight days out of the police academy when he faced a barrage of machine-gun fire, shot and wounded a bank robber and dove across unarmored officers to shield them with his bulletproof vest.

He was shot four times before leaping through an exploding glass doorway.

bullets-2.jpg

An inside view of a bullet ridden LAPD patrol car windshield is seen while on display at the North Hollywood police station prior to a ceremony marking the 20th anniversary of the shootout. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel)
How to explain to the public why cops don't shoot to woundHere's why all police need a patrol rifle

“There was no time to be scared. It’s not a macho thing. There’s so much going on. You fall back on your training — the best in the world,” recalled Zboravan, an award-winning sergeant now serving as an assistant watch commander at Northeast Division. “The lesson is, very plainly: “Just because you’re shot doesn’t mean you’re going to die. You must fight on.”

Twenty years ago, on Feb. 28, 1997, two men armed with fully automatic weapons and clad in heavy body armor did more than rob the Bank of America at 6600 Laurel Canyon Blvd. in North Hollywood.

For 44 thunderous minutes, they marched through a neighborhood under siege, spraying stores, homes and cars with 1,100 armor-piercing bullets, wounding 11 police officers and six bystanders.

More than 300 outgunned law enforcement officers from five agencies, fighting for their lives, fired back with more than 550 rounds. But most were from .38 revolvers or 9 mm pistols pitted against an arsenal of high-capacity AK-47s and automatic rifles.

The nation then watched the terror unfold on live TV as news helicopters broadcast the battle now known as the North Hollywood shootout.

When the shell casings stopped rolling, two bandits lay dead — one after shooting himself after sustaining 10 gunshot wounds — and the other after bleeding to death from 29 gunshots after telling police, “F--- you. Shoot me in the head.”
[...]
How the North Hollywood shootout changed policing

Police in this infamous shootout were forced to go to gun shops to acquire the necessary weapons and ammunition to combat these criminals. Nothing has changed to this day.

Bushmaster XM15 is a Semi Auto Rifle
The AK-47 was an automatic yes. But it got taken out early.

And that was over 20 years ago. What this article is about is to tell the public that 20 years ago, the police were ill equipped to handle this type of situation. But today, they are no longer outgunned even if the same thing were to come up. They have the Colt LE6920 Assault Rifles in Every Car which can go head to head in such an even and it would be dealt with long before SWAT would have arrived.

Plus, availability of the full auto weapons is almost non existent today. Once again, you have made the heart warning

FAKE NEWS!!!!!
 
Okay, so any level gun control is bad which is of course retarded on its own, but the right can’t even think of any alternatives to curbing gun violence. Saying “no” to everything accomplishes absolutely nothing. It’s astounding we are still at square one.


The Republican solution is to buy more guns, offering up their sympathies & holding prayer vigils, while refusing to legislate laws that would help to keep guns out of the wrong hands.

Everyone knows that!

david-horsey-cartoon20091019.jpg


When you can't even stop people who are on terrorists watch lists from buying guns, there's a problem
Obama argues for gun controls as way to fight terror

Orlando shootingl
Orlando shooting: 49 killed, shooter pledged ISIS allegiance - CNN
The problem with the Demon-crats, is that they mis-identify who the threat is, and therefore go after the good citizens in a bid to cover up their weaknesses when the crap hits the fan. People know this, and it is why they can't stand the Demon-crats telling them what to do, how to do it, and when to do it.

You already made your case and made the grade for FAKE NEWS!!!!! Quit while you are behind.
 
Bushmaster XM15 is a Semi Auto Rifle
The AK-47 was an automatic yes. But it got taken out early.

And that was over 20 years ago. What this article is about is to tell the public that 20 years ago, the police were ill equipped to handle this type of situation. But today, they are no longer outgunned even if the same thing were to come up. They have the Colt LE6920 Assault Rifles in Every Car which can go head to head in such an even and it would be dealt with long before SWAT would have arrived.

Plus, availability of the full auto weapons is almost non existent today. Once again, you have made the heart warning

FAKE NEWS!!!!!

You admit that my article is 100% accurate and then you claim it is fake news. Really?

Thank you too for agreeing that the AR-15 is NOT an assault weapon and very few, if any, are converted to fully automatic.

You're fun!
 

Forum List

Back
Top