What is the republican solution to ending mass shootings? Why don’t they ever offer solutions?

A gun is a great equalizer. It provides strength to the weak

It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...
In progressive controlled urban America

There are only 3 Republican Mayors of major Urban Metro Areas left and they aren't long for the world. The GOP doens't even try and run in most Metro Areas. The Metro Areas didn't abandon the Republican Party, the Republican Party abandoned the Metro Areas. Jack Kemp is a prime example.
 
A gun is a great equalizer. It provides strength to the weak

It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...
In progressive controlled urban America
You guys don't have schools and churches and malls out there in the hinterlands?

The way he talks, they have a lot of Banjo playing and marrying cousins. That may explain things. Paddle faster, I think I hear banjos.
 
Actually, it IS part of the Constitution under the 2nd, 10th and 14th. Unlike you I support the whole document instead of just pick and choose.
Wow. I actually agree with you, even though you do nothing but throw out bullshit insults and nonsense most of the time.

The problem arises with the 14th Amendment. When it is interpreted beyond its original intend (giving rights and citizenship to former slaves) it fucks everything up. The 2nd Amendment was intended to be nothing more than a limit on the authority of the Federal Government. Technically, under the both the privileges and immunities clause and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, states cannot regulate firearms, so nobody has the authority to regulate firearms, given the overly broad and clumsy nature of the 14th, which pretty much shits on the 10th.

The SCOTUS obviously recognized the pile of shit the 14th created, including Scalia. They have whistled past the graveyard on that issue since the 1920s.

My solution? Repeal or modify and limit the 14th and restore the 10th.

But, I agree with you that states should have the right to decide. Let the 2nd Amendment be construed as intended and kill all federal gun laws.

.

Oh, I see. Your bunch can call me insane, a communist, a socialist and more and that's okay. It's been long noted that your bunch has a double standard.

That being said, I like it like it is written. I do think we need to do a rethink on the first two phrases of the 2nd amendment though since we no longer have to fear the Federal Government become what our founding fathers feared the most. And even if it did, what could the common man or state do about it? We have written into the Military laws that prevent this from happening. The Guncrazies all say that the Military will side with them. If things go south, the Military will side with no one. Their own UCMJ (Constitution), Customs and Traditions prevent them from doing anything. And without the support of the Military, the Feds can't take over any one state because they lack the power to do so. But it really doesn't harm anything to just leave it alone as it is. It's just archaic.

The 14th is there to prevent the States from running roughshod over the citizen. The Citizen must be afforded due process. I don't see how that is in conflict with the 10th. In fact, I see that they both support each other. Both pretty well ties the Feds hands and leaves much of things up to the states.
 
A gun is a great equalizer. It provides strength to the weak

It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...

You are really confused about this, aren't you?

As been pointed out many times in this thread mass shootings are a very minor element of gun violence. Most gun related deaths are suicides. The great majority of the remainder are criminal activities among the druggies, gangbangers, thugs and other big city ghetto shitholes minority populace that don't adhere to the existing laws, no less any new ones.

Get your head out of your ass Moon Bat. You are embarrassing yourself with your stupidity.
 
Actually, it IS part of the Constitution under the 2nd, 10th and 14th. Unlike you I support the whole document instead of just pick and choose.
Wow. I actually agree with you, even though you do nothing but throw out bullshit insults and nonsense most of the time.

The problem arises with the 14th Amendment. When it is interpreted beyond its original intend (giving rights and citizenship to former slaves) it fucks everything up. The 2nd Amendment was intended to be nothing more than a limit on the authority of the Federal Government. Technically, under the both the privileges and immunities clause and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, states cannot regulate firearms, so nobody has the authority to regulate firearms, given the overly broad and clumsy nature of the 14th, which pretty much shits on the 10th.

The SCOTUS obviously recognized the pile of shit the 14th created, including Scalia. They have whistled past the graveyard on that issue since the 1920s.

My solution? Repeal or modify and limit the 14th and restore the 10th.

But, I agree with you that states should have the right to decide. Let the 2nd Amendment be construed as intended and kill all federal gun laws.

.

Oh, I see. Your bunch can call me insane, a communist, a socialist and more and that's okay. It's been long noted that your bunch has a double standard.

That being said, I like it like it is written. I do think we need to do a rethink on the first two phrases of the 2nd amendment though since we no longer have to fear the Federal Government become what our founding fathers feared the most. And even if it did, what could the common man or state do about it? We have written into the Military laws that prevent this from happening. The Guncrazies all say that the Military will side with them. If things go south, the Military will side with no one. Their own UCMJ (Constitution), Customs and Traditions prevent them from doing anything. And without the support of the Military, the Feds can't take over any one state because they lack the power to do so. But it really doesn't harm anything to just leave it alone as it is. It's just archaic.

The 14th is there to prevent the States from running roughshod over the citizen. The Citizen must be afforded due process. I don't see how that is in conflict with the 10th. In fact, I see that they both support each other. Both pretty well ties the Feds hands and leaves much of things up to the states.

Double standard

That's funny

I have one and that is mind your own fucking business

you want to stick your nose into the lives of others but no one better stick their nose into your life
 
A gun is a great equalizer. It provides strength to the weak

It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...

You are really confused about this, aren't you?

As been pointed out many times in this thread mass shootings are a very minor element of gun violence. Most gun related deaths are suicides. The great majority of the remainder are criminal activities among the druggies, gangbangers, thugs and other big city ghetto shitholes minority populace that don't adhere to the existing laws, no less any new ones.

Get your head out of your ass Moon Bat. You are embarrassing yourself with your stupidity.

Facts don't matter to these idiots
 
It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...
In progressive controlled urban America
You guys don't have schools and churches and malls out there in the hinterlands?

The way he talks, they have a lot of Banjo playing and marrying cousins. That may explain things. Paddle faster, I think I hear banjos.

you sure seem to know a lot about it or is your only life experience gained via movies?
 
A gun is a great equalizer. It provides strength to the weak

It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...
In progressive controlled urban America

There are only 3 Republican Mayors of major Urban Metro Areas left and they aren't long for the world. The GOP doens't even try and run in most Metro Areas. The Metro Areas didn't abandon the Republican Party, the Republican Party abandoned the Metro Areas. Jack Kemp is a prime example.


Those Jungle Monkeys in the big city shitholes love to vote their race, don't they?

Jungle Monkeys vote for the party that promises them the most welfare, don't they?
 
Lol
No schools, churches, shopping centers, etc.
you watch too many Hollywood movies made by a child molesting Hollywood types… Of course we have those places we just don’t have crazy progressives

Well if you do...you are as at risk of mass shootings as anywhere else
Na, not really
we have Very few progressives around this area
 
A gun is a great equalizer. It provides strength to the weak

It allows the weak to kill the many


Mass killing are a very small part of gun crime in the US. The great majority of the gun crime in this country is gang, drug and criminal activity among the minority and illegal populace of a few large Democrat controlled shitholes in this country and all the gun control in the world is not going change that one bit. All gun control is going to do is take away the ability of the law abiding people to defend themselves against the criminal element that would do them harm,
Mass killings are kind of an issue...to people who have kids..or go to concerts...or go to movies...or go to bars...or churches...or synagogues......pretty much anyone who leaves their house...
In progressive controlled urban America

There are only 3 Republican Mayors of major Urban Metro Areas left and they aren't long for the world. The GOP doens't even try and run in most Metro Areas. The Metro Areas didn't abandon the Republican Party, the Republican Party abandoned the Metro Areas. Jack Kemp is a prime example.
Progressive controlled urban America is caulked full of crazies, and progressives eat paste...
 
Actually, it IS part of the Constitution under the 2nd, 10th and 14th. Unlike you I support the whole document instead of just pick and choose.
Wow. I actually agree with you, even though you do nothing but throw out bullshit insults and nonsense most of the time.

The problem arises with the 14th Amendment. When it is interpreted beyond its original intend (giving rights and citizenship to former slaves) it fucks everything up. The 2nd Amendment was intended to be nothing more than a limit on the authority of the Federal Government. Technically, under the both the privileges and immunities clause and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, states cannot regulate firearms, so nobody has the authority to regulate firearms, given the overly broad and clumsy nature of the 14th, which pretty much shits on the 10th.

The SCOTUS obviously recognized the pile of shit the 14th created, including Scalia. They have whistled past the graveyard on that issue since the 1920s.

My solution? Repeal or modify and limit the 14th and restore the 10th.

But, I agree with you that states should have the right to decide. Let the 2nd Amendment be construed as intended and kill all federal gun laws.

.

Oh, I see. Your bunch can call me insane, a communist, a socialist and more and that's okay. It's been long noted that your bunch has a double standard.

That being said, I like it like it is written. I do think we need to do a rethink on the first two phrases of the 2nd amendment though since we no longer have to fear the Federal Government become what our founding fathers feared the most. And even if it did, what could the common man or state do about it? We have written into the Military laws that prevent this from happening. The Guncrazies all say that the Military will side with them. If things go south, the Military will side with no one. Their own UCMJ (Constitution), Customs and Traditions prevent them from doing anything. And without the support of the Military, the Feds can't take over any one state because they lack the power to do so. But it really doesn't harm anything to just leave it alone as it is. It's just archaic.

The 14th is there to prevent the States from running roughshod over the citizen. The Citizen must be afforded due process. I don't see how that is in conflict with the 10th. In fact, I see that they both support each other. Both pretty well ties the Feds hands and leaves much of things up to the states.
523888e769bedd6316d28234-750.jpg
 
I do think we need to do a rethink on the first two phrases of the 2nd amendment though since we no longer have to fear the Federal Government become what our founding fathers feared the most.
:laughing0301:

Yeah. Nothing to worry about.

That pretty much tells me all I need to know about you.

The 14th is there to prevent the States from running roughshod over the citizen. The Citizen must be afforded due process. I don't see how that is in conflict with the 10th. In fact, I see that they both support each other. Both pretty well ties the Feds hands and leaves much of things up to the states.
Please explain.
 
Yep, and as long the libs refuse to blame the thugs/criminals/gangbangers etc, and continue to go after the guns in which are only bad in the hands of such criminals then we won't never solve the issue... No they (the libs), want only to go after the non-criminals rights in this country, and so we won't ever solve the issue, and therefore the killing by these lib protected criminals will continue.

And as long as your bunch keeps making the weapons so readily and easily available to them they will continue to use them. The Gun Runner and Supplier is as guilty as the criminal that shoots the gun. And you support the supplying of the arms to criminals. So stand up and take a bow.
You take the bow for supporting the criminals first by attacking the good citizens for the evilness of the bad people. The bad people can be stopped, but liberalism/leftism won't stop it ever, because it has a serious problem with sympathizing with the bad people who are just getting back at those "evil rich priveledged citizens" in life. Now Own it.

You mean it's wrong to take away the supply of guns from the criminals? You mean that your bunch supplying those guns is a good thing? Wow, what a concept. So keep supplying those arms that are used to kill 7 year olds and Grandmothers for their SS checks. Hope you are proud of yourself.
No, you lock the criminals up, and then there are no criminals to steal guns from the good people. No one is supplying guns to criminals except for the criminals getting them from other criminals who should have been locked up as well. Getting Demon-crats to get tough on crime and criminals is like attempting to pull lions teeth with ones bare hands. Nice try attempting to suggest that conservatives are responsible for arming criminals. You lose.

Are you against universal background checks that are vigorously enforced? That would stop the illegal buying, transporting and selling of illegal guns into the Metro Gang Areas along with exporting said guns to Mexican Cartels. Sorry, the Mexican Cartels get the good stuff because they can afford to pay for it. The Gangs just get the cheap junk. Wouldn't you say that anyone buying guns with the express purpose of selling them to a gang in Chicago is a Criminal?
And who is buying guns for the Express purpose of selling them to a gang or gang's in Chicago ???
 
I do think we need to do a rethink on the first two phrases of the 2nd amendment though since we no longer have to fear the Federal Government become what our founding fathers feared the most.
:laughing0301:

Yeah. Nothing to worry about.

That pretty much tells me all I need to know about you.

The 14th is there to prevent the States from running roughshod over the citizen. The Citizen must be afforded due process. I don't see how that is in conflict with the 10th. In fact, I see that they both support each other. Both pretty well ties the Feds hands and leaves much of things up to the states.
Please explain.

And that tells me all I need to know about you. Have a nice day.
 

Forum List

Back
Top