P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 78,966
- 4,381
I know, let's have both sides agree to stop attacking each other. How about both sides at the very least agree that deliberately attacking non-combatants is off limits. What about both sides agreeing that the other side has the right to exist? How's that for a start? When you see one side that refuses to agree to even try that much you know which side to blame for the on-going bloodshed.
How about both sides at the very least agree that deliberately attacking non-combatants is off limits.
Hamas has already made that offer to Israel. Israel rejected it.
Link?
And how about the part where they both agree that the other side has the right to exist?
In 2003 we went to Cairo. The Egyptians asked whether Hamas is ready to stop the martyrdom operations or not. We gave the Egyptians a better offer. We were ready to have an agreement to stop targeting civilians [on] both sides. The army is supposed to fight, but civilians should be out of it. The Egyptians agreed and passed it on to the Israelis.
Halevi went back to Israel, but Sharon rejected the proposal.
A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org
And how about the part where they both agree that the other side has the right to exist?
Arafat did that during Oslo. Israel has not reciprocated.
When you see one side that refuses to agree to even try that much you know which side to blame for the on-going bloodshed.
Amen