What legal standing does Barr have to NOT release Mueller's report to Congress?

[Markle]

Yes, a NON-BINDING RESOLUTION URGING the release of the Muller report.

And the republicans in the senate blocked it.

One Republican and in the words of Hillary Clinton, what difference does it make?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

View attachment 253911
View attachment 253912

We demand to see the full report...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....

Waaaaaah! They are demanding to see the full report! Who's going to protect dear leader?!?!?! Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

One Republican and in the words of Hillary Clinton, what difference does it make?

It only came up, because someone made up a lie to the contrary. So go complain to that poster.

Oh , that's right. That was you.

 

[Markle]

One Republican and in the words of Hillary Clinton, what difference does it make?

It only came up, because someone made up a lie to the contrary. So go complain to that poster.

Oh , that's right. That was you.

What did I lie about?

 

[Rambunctious]

View attachment 253911
View attachment 253912

We demand to see the full report...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....

Waaaaaah! They are demanding to see the full report! Who's going to protect dear leader?!?!?! Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh

You get a failing grade for copying...that's cheating....just like a libtard....cheating stealing killing anything goes as long as dembos win....

 

[easyt65]

The American people are not as stupid as the treasonous hypocritical Democrats think they are...

Nadler in 1998: Of course you can't release grand-jury testimony in prosecutor's report

 

[toobfreak]

What legal standing does Barr have to NOT release Mueller's report to Congress?

The REAL question is to ask what legal standing do the Democrats have to demand anything of the AG? Are they accusing him of a cover-up? The answer is, they have NO legal standing to demand or force a thing.

 

[easyt65]

It does not matter....the traitors are claiming Barr is omitting the truth. When the report is released they will claim the damning part was redacted. If there is no redacted part they will give their own translation and call it evidence of collusion.

Members of the all-Pro-DNC/Hillary Mueller 'hit squad' are now supposedly leaking (surprise surprise) they feel Barr's summary misrepresents their findings.

I am sure the Hillary-supporting/donating Mueller team wrote many negative things, but the bottom line, according to Mueller's own words, is no collusion established and no indictment for obstruction.

The Democrats continue to prove they are on a mission to affect a political coup against an elected President because they did not like the election results.

 

[hadit]

We both know that whatever the democrats get will be released, one way or another.

But that's irrelevant.

Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.

 

[easyt65]

Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.

How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....

 

[hadit]

Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.

How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....

I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.

 

[easyt65]

Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.

How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....

I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.

OF COURSE it will be leaked.

Trump-hating Democrats / conspirators and Democrats have proven themselves to be a porous / leak-proof as a screen door on a submarine.

 

[hadit]

Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.

How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....

I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.

OF COURSE it will be leaked.

Trump-hating Democrats / conspirators and Democrats have proven themselves to be a porous / leak-proof as a screen door on a submarine.

Can you imagine Spartacus and Schiff hearing a salacious secret? They'd kick over an old lady in a wheelchair if she was between them and a TV camera.

 

[Lesh]

Ultimately, sure. But good reason to fight as long as possible and warn the American people, naming the potential sources of the leaks.

How far back are we talking? Strzok talked about the Dems' 'Leak Strategy', and McCabe was recommended for Indictment for his about a year ago - which nothing has been done about....

I'm talking about the Congresscritters who are salivating over the prospect of seeing the total Mueller report. They won't accept being able to see something they think can damage the president, but not be able to trumpet it far and wide, so they'll leak what they want, then act all outraged about what was leaked. I have no confidence that they will accept seeing it in secret and leaving it there.

Sorry but what "you are afraid of" has no legal standing

 

[nat4900]

Can you imagine Spartacus and Schiff hearing a salacious secret? They'd kick over an old lady in a wheelchair if she was between them and a TV camera.

Ahem..........LOL


Watchdog group files ethics complaint against Nunes after report of ...

Devin Nunes: A Timeline of His White House Visits and Trump ... - Wired

Senate Intelligence Leaders Say House G.O.P. Leaked a Senator's ...

 

[easyt65]

Sorry but what "you are afraid of" has no legal standing

Neither does the continuous leaks of information by Trump-hating Democrats....

 

[Lesh]

You do realize that your post makes no sense... right?

 

[easyt65]

You do realize that your post makes no sense... right?

Let me 'splain in simple terms: The Democrats; continuous leaks of information are illegal; yet, they continue to do so anyway. You and other snowflakes trying to convince others that the President's personal tax information once in their hands will result in anything differently is a moronic waste of time.

 

[Faun]

All Republicans voted to release it.

False. Senate republicans blocked the vote.

Please show us.

Senate blocks resolution calling for public release of Robert Mueller's report after House voted 420-0

I guess Republicans don't want to win the Senate next year.

I guess Democrats don't even try to hide that they consider winning more important than the law.

Oh? What law says the Attorney General can’t release the report?

 

[kyzr]

All Republicans voted to release it.

False. Senate republicans blocked the vote.

Please show us.

Senate blocks resolution calling for public release of Robert Mueller's report after House voted 420-0

I guess Republicans don't want to win the Senate next year.

We know the socialists won't win the Senate, don't we?