Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2011
- 101,230
- 46,221
If I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
What say you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is why we need term limits.They care about their wealthy benefactors more than any of their constituents.
If I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
Which is why we need term limits.They care about their wealthy benefactors more than any of their constituents.
Care enough to actually try to help them, 5%. Most care about themselves and the lobbies.If I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
They need to realize once elected they work for everyone.At least part of the problem is that most pols care about their political base, i.e., their voters and supporters, more than they do the populace in their district or state.
Which is why we need term limits.They care about their wealthy benefactors more than any of their constituents.
Without a doubt, and on supreme court judges as well.
If I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
They need to realize once elected they work for everyone.At least part of the problem is that most pols care about their political base, i.e., their voters and supporters, more than they do the populace in their district or state.
I think age restrictions would be more appropriate for SCOTUS. Mandatory age retirement at say 60 or 65. Unless you are close to the elderly you can easily miss illnesses that can have adverse effects of their mental facultiesWhich is why we need term limits.They care about their wealthy benefactors more than any of their constituents.
Without a doubt, and on supreme court judges as well.
PowerIf I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
I would say that nobody runs for office unless they are deeply committed to serving their communities.
Seriously, why else would you put yourself and your family through that kind of agony for a job that really doesn't pay better than a mid-level executive?
If I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
I would say that nobody runs for office unless they are deeply committed to serving their communities.
Seriously, why else would you put yourself and your family through that kind of agony for a job that really doesn't pay better than a mid-level executive?
It is the ultimate welfare program.If I had to take a guess I'd sad about 20%
What say you?
I would say that nobody runs for office unless they are deeply committed to serving their communities.
Seriously, why else would you put yourself and your family through that kind of agony for a job that really doesn't pay better than a mid-level executive?
Simple, you get a great health plan.....completely different than the one that you forced upon the commoners, 175k per year, work about 10 days a year, great retirement, walk out a multimillionaire.
How many of them have We The People as their number one priority? I'd think 20% may be generous.What say you?