Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anti-gun nutters like yourself should educate themselves on the real dangers. More people are killed by bathtubs than people using ar15’s… FactThe count down has started , 7 states and multiple cities already have banned the assault weapon and many more to come. It's easy with these, I'm going to kill you gun bubbas on the other side of the issue.Typical anti-gun nutter and a control freak...Did you have fun with all those posts. You don't mind if I didn't read them all since they pretty welll say the same thing over and over.
Since you won't prove that you are a gun dealer, I guess we just consider you wear a pink tutu and ride a Unicorn which makes more sense.
Have a nice day and watch your world disappear.
LolThe first 40,000 were sold to the air force as the AR-15, anyway that is what the NRA says.From the NRA's American rifleman "The U.S. Air Force recommended after its 1960 test that the AR-15 rifle be adopted as the standard shoulder weapon in the Air Force."Lots more bullets can be carried and it is a real hamburger maker. They are light and full of little tricks that makes hamburger without breaking geneva. That's both the gun and ammunition.When did the military start using the AR-15?
FYI the military NEVER issued an Ar 15 to any soldier
Idiot
Was the Ar 15 ever USED by the military in any combat
No it was not
The first 40,000 were sold to the air force as the AR-15, anyway that is what the NRA says.From the NRA's American rifleman "The U.S. Air Force recommended after its 1960 test that the AR-15 rifle be adopted as the standard shoulder weapon in the Air Force."Lots more bullets can be carried and it is a real hamburger maker. They are light and full of little tricks that makes hamburger without breaking geneva. That's both the gun and ammunition.When did the military start using the AR-15?
FYI the military NEVER issued an Ar 15 to any soldier
Idiot
Was the Ar 15 ever USED by the military in any combat
No it was not
Na, an ar15 and the like are just sporting rifles, nothing more nothing less.Don't need to every company that made the ar-15 and its brothers have called it a assault weapon the designer who made this gun for the military called it a assault weapon, In fact he was 100% apposed to it being used by the public , that what his family said anyway, so why say such stupid things.An ar15 and the like are not so called assault weapons they are just sporting rifles, nothing more nothing less.No that's not the solution, 7 states and multiple cities have banned assault weapons and the courts have supported all of them, give your money and push for the local ban in every part of the country , increase the number of places that they are banned. It is clear to everyone by example that none of these haters here , who have nothing but threats and people offering to murder me , should be able to have a gun, simply read the responses to my post here and decide if you think these people should be able to have a gun.There is no other reason for the massive increase of gun ownership. The hypocrisy is unbelievable.
Then don't obtain a firearm. No one's forcing you to. However it is my Constitutional right, so mind your own business.
You are obviously not very bright, Please educate yourself on the subject before you speak - you look foolish
you watch far too many Hollywood movies made by child molesting the Hollywood types.
and if guns didn't exist , no one would be killed with a gun.Firearms are harmless, People kill people not firearmsThe reason they threaten to kill me here is, i'm opposed to what they want. That is quite obvious. so your saying it ok to threaten peoples life with a gun.Benjamin Franklin said it's stupid to put a gun in the hands of people like on this thread because they can't be trusted with a gun, as in their threats to kill me. Tell me why a person who threatens to kill someone should be able to own a gun.
That depends on who they threaten to kill and why they threatened to kill them.....
Cars are harmless. Drivers kill people not cars. And your point is?
You have no clue and I've proved non stop every time you open your mouth, "In 1957 the Continental Army Command requested two manufacturers to provide new rifles and a new cal. .22 military cartridge." From the NRA American rifleman "It wasn'tThe AR-15 from the start was designed as a military weapon, and the gumdrops here want you to think that it isn't , they want to bullshit their way through this , with all their mumbo jumbo about this gun. The gun industry got together when the heat was on and decided to try to stop calling these assault weapons assault weapons and maybe the heat would go away, they tried to bullshit their way through this and all gun bubbas do nothing but.
All the Ar 15 is is a semiautomatic rifle chambered for 5.56 caliber ammo
But with your room temperature IQ you are utterly incapable of understanding that
and if guns didn't exist , no one would be killed with a gun.Firearms are harmless, People kill people not firearmsThe reason they threaten to kill me here is, i'm opposed to what they want. That is quite obvious. so your saying it ok to threaten peoples life with a gun.That depends on who they threaten to kill and why they threatened to kill them.....
Cars are harmless. Drivers kill people not cars. And your point is?
Kid, you and everyone you know is gonna die from anything but an AR. AR's aren't an issue. Only the Gun Grabber Communist assholes are making it one. AR's are involved with a minuscule amount of deaths and injuries in this country. The Democrats are just exploiting dead kids again to push their Anti-Constitution Agenda. Nothing more, nothing less.
The point is obvious , how weak a mind is it that can be thinking that their slogan that it is not the gun it's the person who pulls the trigger. That it Makes one ounce of sense.My answer is always just as stupid, if there was no guns no one would be killed by guns. Stupid on stupid. but it's all these poor suckers have a a reason to do things their way.and guns don't kill people people kill people so what's your pointFirearms are harmless, People kill people not firearmsThe reason they threaten to kill me here is, i'm opposed to what they want. That is quite obvious. so your saying it ok to threaten peoples life with a gun.Benjamin Franklin said it's stupid to put a gun in the hands of people like on this thread because they can't be trusted with a gun, as in their threats to kill me. Tell me why a person who threatens to kill someone should be able to own a gun.
That depends on who they threaten to kill and why they threatened to kill them.....
Cars are harmless. Drivers kill people not cars. And your point is?
How willing are these clowns to show what air heads they are, gun control now in this micro mind says regulations causes more deaths , I mean how stupid do they think people are.Bathtubs kill more people than people using ar15’s... Fact
More frivolous gun control laws equal more violent crime… Every time
Thanks that is what I have been saying all along. Good point.The mini 14 is functionally no different from the Ar 15It’s just slightly more than a varmint rifle that’s all ar15’s are, you watch far too many Hollywood movies made by child molesting Hollywood types. You need to educate yourself old manAssault weapon?When a crazy decides to go on a rampage, and kill as many as they can do they chose bolt action, lever, or pump gun? No, they chose an assault weapon, with a fast reloadable magazine. Since Columbine we have seen multiple mass murders. The ones that have the highest kill rates are done with AR type weapons. Requiring a special license to own one of these would help considerably in keeping the assault weapons out of the hands of the crazies. However, you absolutists will create a situation where we have gun control laws that affect even the weapons I have. It is you, and those like you are a danger to my right to own a weapon.
You obviously know nothing and are just a liberal parrot.
No one, repeat NO ONE would go into a fire fight with a glorified 22LR, and, THAT IS WHAT AN AR15 IS.
You are an idiot.
Yet we have had millions of GI go into fire fights with that "Glorified 22LR". Except it's not a 22LR. It's a 223/556 high velocity rifle cartridge originally designed to kill or wound Human Beings long before it was introduced in a sporting rifle. Let' s look at the specs on the two.
22 long rifle
.22 caliber
40 grain
1200 fps
131 ft lbs
Used by many boyscouts as their first gun.
AR15
Comes in two varieties but we will lump them together for time restraints
.223/.556 Caliber
55 grain
3240 fps
1282 ft lbs
Used primarily by Military
Wow, that's some Glorification you have there, Grandma.
That "Varmint" rifle was invented to kill people in wars. And it is still used for that purpose throughout the world today. Can it be used for other things? Sure. I can use a Mah Duece to unclog the drain as well. But it's still designed to kill people. I know of very few people that show up on varmint shoots with an AR-15 but I know a number of people that show up with Mini-14 223s along with various models of 22-250s and others. The AR is NOT a popular Varmint Rifle and never has been. When I shot varmint, I got laughed at when they found out I was using a 22 lr until they saw the rig. A Mauser Shavetail with a 20 power scope and match grade ammo. The guys with the more powerful guns would shoot where the shot was. I shot where it was going to be at 200 yds and only did head shots. The night before, I placed pieces of cloth every 50 ft to gauge wind. I didn't fire until all flags were down. When it was my turn to shoot it took some time. But no one made any noise and were extremely respectful since they knew my shot was much more skillful than theirs.
So don't BS around using an AR for Varmint shooting.
They both shoot the same round at the same rate of fire which is one round per trigger pull
The only differences between the 2 rifles are purely cosmetic
The 2nd Amendment says that Congress will not pass laws regulating arms.Of course cars should be banned, the holy 2nd amendment says every well regulated psychopath should be able to own an assault rifle, it doesn't say anything about cars....
The general right to life, liberty, and property dictates that owning a car is a right. Operating that car on state roads is not a right.
Your hyperbolic strawman was so fucked up, you actually ended up proving our point.
No, it clearly does NOT say that Congress cannot pass laws regulating arms. It says they cannot prevent individuals from having arms. Something COMPLETELY different
LolGod are you that brain dead. Take what I said as fact, first I don't lie non stop like you people and it just happens to be the truth . For everyone else believe it.You are not fooling anybody, you want to ban the Second Amendment. You just want to get your foot in the door by using the scary “black gun”I'm a supporter of the second amendment, there is no way that I want guns taken away, I've been a hunter all my life , I have Deer in multiple records books and I have another green scored for Boone and Crocket and another green scored for Minnesota whitetail classic and Pope and Young. I have a lifetime free membership and entry for all Minnesota whitetail classics shows. I've supported the second my whole life but if it is having to do it the NRA gun Bubbas way or getting rid of the second, I would choose to get rid of the second. I'm sick of there non stop lies and I'm getting tire of people on this forum threatening to kill me.It's not that simple. Guns are here to stay. Please don't be as pick headed as the gun nutz are. Go for the common sense gun regulations. You can win that one. But you will never win gun banning. It'll never happen.
You anti-gun nutters are incredibly transparent, It’s obvious you want to get rid of the Second Amendment by using a scary “black gun”… How juvenile
Wonder why the inventor of this assault weapon said it was never made for the general public, only the military., you know shit.
The gun of choice by all mass murderers in the schools and the public is the assault weapon. By numbers the AR-15 tops the list.you do not give a shit about the murder rate.I have never killed anybody, Need has nothing to do with it... someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your business just like it’s none of my business.I don’t need a car, and my firearm ownership is none of your businessyes and the biggest threat to the second is you my way or the highway gun bubbas. You need a car , you don't need a gun. Cars have massive amounts of regulations so should guns
Then you also don't need a firearm. WE all would be safer if you didn't have either.
I don't contribute to the high body counts by not getting involved. Get involved. This is how we keep the body count low. No we can't stop the body count but we can keep it low. If that is all we can do then at least that is something. If we don't do something then we are just as guilty as the shooter.
If you did you wouldn't be harping about the AR 15
70% of all murders occur in very distinct and very small geographical areas in this country
We all know where the problem is and we all ignore it
The courts and politicians. The second can be dumped, It won't be but it can be and as we speak there are 7 states and multiple cities that has banned the Assault weapon and they all have been backed totally by the courts, including all the way up to the supreme court. The number will increase quickly now, one because it's the weapon of choice of all mass murderers. And the brain dead gun bubbas who say it's their way or the highway. They trying to protect the unpredictable.They can pick the guns that they can have.The 2nd Amendment says that Congress will not pass laws regulating arms.Of course cars should be banned, the holy 2nd amendment says every well regulated psychopath should be able to own an assault rifle, it doesn't say anything about cars....
The general right to life, liberty, and property dictates that owning a car is a right. Operating that car on state roads is not a right.
Your hyperbolic strawman was so fucked up, you actually ended up proving our point.
No, it clearly does NOT say that Congress cannot pass laws regulating arms. It says they cannot prevent individuals from having arms. Something COMPLETELY different
They being individuals or they being Congress?
Please, think about what you're writing.
and if guns didn't exist , no one would be killed with a gun.Firearms are harmless, People kill people not firearmsThe reason they threaten to kill me here is, i'm opposed to what they want. That is quite obvious. so your saying it ok to threaten peoples life with a gun.
Cars are harmless. Drivers kill people not cars. And your point is?
Kid, you and everyone you know is gonna die from anything but an AR. AR's aren't an issue. Only the Gun Grabber Communist assholes are making it one. AR's are involved with a minuscule amount of deaths and injuries in this country. The Democrats are just exploiting dead kids again to push their Anti-Constitution Agenda. Nothing more, nothing less.
And it’s not working well.
Bullshit, the assault weapon have been banned in 7 states , and multiple cities all have been challenged in court all the time the ban has held , the court has always supported the ban. That number will increase quickly now.The 2nd Amendment says that Congress will not pass laws regulating arms.Of course cars should be banned, the holy 2nd amendment says every well regulated psychopath should be able to own an assault rifle, it doesn't say anything about cars....
The general right to life, liberty, and property dictates that owning a car is a right. Operating that car on state roads is not a right.
Your hyperbolic strawman was so fucked up, you actually ended up proving our point.
No, it clearly does NOT say that Congress cannot pass laws regulating arms. It says they cannot prevent individuals from having arms. Something COMPLETELY different
Wrong......you are uninformed about the ruling in D.C. v Heller, Caetano v. Massachusetts and the dissent in Friedman v Highland Park where Scalia elaborates on what can and can't be banned....and Miller v United States
Weapons that are in common use for lawful purposes.... like the AR-15 civilian rifle and semi automatic rifles..... are protected.. and the 2nd Amendment extends to all bearable arms.......
You have a lot of reading to do before you make sense...
The chances of being killed by someone using a Ar15 are many times less than getting struck by lightning. Fact
and they were never used as a service weaponThe first 40,000 were sold to the air force as the AR-15, anyway that is what the NRA says.From the NRA's American rifleman "The U.S. Air Force recommended after its 1960 test that the AR-15 rifle be adopted as the standard shoulder weapon in the Air Force."Lots more bullets can be carried and it is a real hamburger maker. They are light and full of little tricks that makes hamburger without breaking geneva. That's both the gun and ammunition.When did the military start using the AR-15?
FYI the military NEVER issued an Ar 15 to any soldier
Idiot
Was the Ar 15 ever USED by the military in any combat
No it was not
Bullshit, the assault weapon have been banned in 7 states , and multiple cities all have been challenged in court all the time the ban has held , the court has always supported the ban. That number will increase quickly now.The 2nd Amendment says that Congress will not pass laws regulating arms.Of course cars should be banned, the holy 2nd amendment says every well regulated psychopath should be able to own an assault rifle, it doesn't say anything about cars....
The general right to life, liberty, and property dictates that owning a car is a right. Operating that car on state roads is not a right.
Your hyperbolic strawman was so fucked up, you actually ended up proving our point.
No, it clearly does NOT say that Congress cannot pass laws regulating arms. It says they cannot prevent individuals from having arms. Something COMPLETELY different
Wrong......you are uninformed about the ruling in D.C. v Heller, Caetano v. Massachusetts and the dissent in Friedman v Highland Park where Scalia elaborates on what can and can't be banned....and Miller v United States
Weapons that are in common use for lawful purposes.... like the AR-15 civilian rifle and semi automatic rifles..... are protected.. and the 2nd Amendment extends to all bearable arms.......
You have a lot of reading to do before you make sense...
The gun of choice by all mass murderers in the schools and the public is the assault weapon. By numbers the AR-15 tops the list.you do not give a shit about the murder rate.I have never killed anybody, Need has nothing to do with it... someone else’s firearm ownership is none of your business just like it’s none of my business.I don’t need a car, and my firearm ownership is none of your business
Then you also don't need a firearm. WE all would be safer if you didn't have either.
I don't contribute to the high body counts by not getting involved. Get involved. This is how we keep the body count low. No we can't stop the body count but we can keep it low. If that is all we can do then at least that is something. If we don't do something then we are just as guilty as the shooter.
If you did you wouldn't be harping about the AR 15
70% of all murders occur in very distinct and very small geographical areas in this country
We all know where the problem is and we all ignore it
