What Robert Frost Reveals About Libersals

[PoliticalChic]

Frost wrote...
"Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, ...."


Once upon a time it was a compliment to be a Liberal...you know, when they supported the first amendment, and America.....

The current crop, sadly, has found the road marked 'Fascist' more to their liking.
Have an alternative opinion, fail to toe the social warrior line, refuse to bend the knee and the neck to the latest social engineering....and be slandered, lied about, put out of work, or have your business fined out of existence.


1. “Liberals do not believe in the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness which are American ideals, or at least they used to be. If you love freedom, then you will be hated by the modern liberal who believes that government should regulate individual freedom.

2. Most liberals are hateful people. As hateful as Nazis. As hateful as KKK members. As hateful as Fred Phelps and his God hates f@gs wackos, who are, come to think of it, Democrats.

3. Liberals are as much defined by whom they hate as what they believe in.

4. They hate straight, white males and non-liberal white people in general. They hate Christians. They hate Republicans in general and conservatives in particular. They hate women who don’t tow the feminist line. They hate the wealthy, business owners, bankers and stockbrokers. They hate southerners, gun owners, soldiers and cops.

5. Liberals hurl abuse at these people, attack them on social media and reward liberals who make the most vicious attacks on those groups.




6. Yet, over time, liberal complaints have become a badge of honor. In fact, if there aren’t liberals lobbing hate at you, you’re probably doing something wrong."
It’s Better to be Hated by Liberals Than Have Their “Help.”

Let's consider the current political climate and consider these 14 points PoliticalChic has claimed liberals have adopted and are using today:

Time to pull out again: The 14 Points of Fascism

Consider what the Democrats in Congress are doing, investigating an attack on our democracy by Russia, along with many Republicans, Independents and conservatives, it seems Ms Chic's usual attack on more than half of our nation's citizens once again misses its mark and is nothing more than her need to get attention.

1. " these 14 points PoliticalChic has claimed liberals have adopted and are using today"
I made no such claim.

I'd suggest that you eschew lying...but then you'd be mute.


2. "...it seems Ms Chic's usual attack on more than half of our nation's citizens..."
My 'attack' is on Fascists.
You seem to have both intuited same, and resent it.....personally.



1. “Liberals do not believe in the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness which are American ideals, or at least they used to be. If you love freedom, then you will be hated by the modern liberal who believes that government should regulate individual freedom.

2. Most liberals are hateful people. As hateful as Nazis. As hateful as KKK members. As hateful as Fred Phelps and his God hates f@gs wackos, who are, come to think of it, Democrats.

3. Liberals are as much defined by whom they hate as what they believe in.

4. They hate straight, white males and non-liberal white people in general. They hate Christians. They hate Republicans in general and conservatives in particular. They hate women who don’t tow the feminist line. They hate the wealthy, business owners, bankers and stockbrokers. They hate southerners, gun owners, soldiers and cops.

5. Liberals hurl abuse at these people, attack them on social media and reward liberals who make the most vicious attacks on those groups.




6. Yet, over time, liberal complaints have become a badge of honor. In fact, if there aren’t liberals lobbing hate at you, you’re probably doing something wrong."
It’s Better to be Hated by Liberals Than Have Their “Help.”

 

[Pogo]

I'd suggest that you eschew lying...but then you'd be mute.

I'd suggest you eschew spelling. Read your own title.

 

[eddiew37]

No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake

"No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake"



The lady in question is a life long Liberal.

A real Liberal.

Here are some of the notes I took when I read her book:

Kirsten Powers is a beautiful young lady, and a strong and capable spokesman for the Leftist perspective...

....yet, she is not one of the mindless drones who claim that the other side is stupid, or evil.



In her new book, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech," she makes these remarks:


1. She describes her parents: 'The allegiance to the Democratic Party had been cemented generations before, when family members reached the shores of America. I was constantly reminded that the Democratic Party stood up for working people, for families like ours, and those that came later, and just from Ireland.


2. Despite this background, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate.


3. I had been happily cocooned for much of my twenties as I worked as a political appointee in the Clinton administration. The isolation grew when I moved to New York....where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn. That unfamiliarity ultimately bred contempt.


4. Two experiences unexpectedly put me in a regular relationship with conservatives: working as a contributor at Fox News and a later in life conversion to Christianity. The more I got to know actual conservative and religious people, the harder it was to justify the stereotypes......


5. I'm now embarrassed that I ever thought such a thing, let alone said it aloud. Such a prejudiced view was only able to take root because of the lack of ideological, political, and religious diversity in my world."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech,"






Now.....did you read Tocqueville's?

No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake

"No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake"



The lady in question is a life long Liberal.

A real Liberal.

Here are some of the notes I took when I read her book:

Kirsten Powers is a beautiful young lady, and a strong and capable spokesman for the Leftist perspective...

....yet, she is not one of the mindless drones who claim that the other side is stupid, or evil.



In her new book, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech," she makes these remarks:


1. She describes her parents: 'The allegiance to the Democratic Party had been cemented generations before, when family members reached the shores of America. I was constantly reminded that the Democratic Party stood up for working people, for families like ours, and those that came later, and just from Ireland.


2. Despite this background, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate.


3. I had been happily cocooned for much of my twenties as I worked as a political appointee in the Clinton administration. The isolation grew when I moved to New York....where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn. That unfamiliarity ultimately bred contempt.


4. Two experiences unexpectedly put me in a regular relationship with conservatives: working as a contributor at Fox News and a later in life conversion to Christianity. The more I got to know actual conservative and religious people, the harder it was to justify the stereotypes......


5. I'm now embarrassed that I ever thought such a thing, let alone said it aloud. Such a prejudiced view was only able to take root because of the lack of ideological, political, and religious diversity in my world."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech,"






Now.....did you read Tocqueville's?

No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake

"No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake"



The lady in question is a life long Liberal.

A real Liberal.

Here are some of the notes I took when I read her book:

Kirsten Powers is a beautiful young lady, and a strong and capable spokesman for the Leftist perspective...

....yet, she is not one of the mindless drones who claim that the other side is stupid, or evil.



In her new book, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech," she makes these remarks:


1. She describes her parents: 'The allegiance to the Democratic Party had been cemented generations before, when family members reached the shores of America. I was constantly reminded that the Democratic Party stood up for working people, for families like ours, and those that came later, and just from Ireland.


2. Despite this background, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate.


3. I had been happily cocooned for much of my twenties as I worked as a political appointee in the Clinton administration. The isolation grew when I moved to New York....where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn. That unfamiliarity ultimately bred contempt.


4. Two experiences unexpectedly put me in a regular relationship with conservatives: working as a contributor at Fox News and a later in life conversion to Christianity. The more I got to know actual conservative and religious people, the harder it was to justify the stereotypes......


5. I'm now embarrassed that I ever thought such a thing, let alone said it aloud. Such a prejudiced view was only able to take root because of the lack of ideological, political, and religious diversity in my world."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech,"






Now.....did you read Tocqueville's?

I seem to have unnerved you.

You've become something that I never am........

....speechless.

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'd suggest that you eschew lying...but then you'd be mute.

I'd suggest you eschew spelling. Read your own title.

You are correct.....I noticed it just after I began the thread.....and am truly embarrassed.



I hope the same embarrassment is your response to my revealing the lies that you've posted.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake"



The lady in question is a life long Liberal.

A real Liberal.

Here are some of the notes I took when I read her book:

Kirsten Powers is a beautiful young lady, and a strong and capable spokesman for the Leftist perspective...

....yet, she is not one of the mindless drones who claim that the other side is stupid, or evil.



In her new book, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech," she makes these remarks:


1. She describes her parents: 'The allegiance to the Democratic Party had been cemented generations before, when family members reached the shores of America. I was constantly reminded that the Democratic Party stood up for working people, for families like ours, and those that came later, and just from Ireland.


2. Despite this background, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate.


3. I had been happily cocooned for much of my twenties as I worked as a political appointee in the Clinton administration. The isolation grew when I moved to New York....where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn. That unfamiliarity ultimately bred contempt.


4. Two experiences unexpectedly put me in a regular relationship with conservatives: working as a contributor at Fox News and a later in life conversion to Christianity. The more I got to know actual conservative and religious people, the harder it was to justify the stereotypes......


5. I'm now embarrassed that I ever thought such a thing, let alone said it aloud. Such a prejudiced view was only able to take root because of the lack of ideological, political, and religious diversity in my world."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech,"






Now.....did you read Tocqueville's?

"No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake"



The lady in question is a life long Liberal.

A real Liberal.

Here are some of the notes I took when I read her book:

Kirsten Powers is a beautiful young lady, and a strong and capable spokesman for the Leftist perspective...

....yet, she is not one of the mindless drones who claim that the other side is stupid, or evil.



In her new book, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech," she makes these remarks:


1. She describes her parents: 'The allegiance to the Democratic Party had been cemented generations before, when family members reached the shores of America. I was constantly reminded that the Democratic Party stood up for working people, for families like ours, and those that came later, and just from Ireland.


2. Despite this background, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate.


3. I had been happily cocooned for much of my twenties as I worked as a political appointee in the Clinton administration. The isolation grew when I moved to New York....where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn. That unfamiliarity ultimately bred contempt.


4. Two experiences unexpectedly put me in a regular relationship with conservatives: working as a contributor at Fox News and a later in life conversion to Christianity. The more I got to know actual conservative and religious people, the harder it was to justify the stereotypes......


5. I'm now embarrassed that I ever thought such a thing, let alone said it aloud. Such a prejudiced view was only able to take root because of the lack of ideological, political, and religious diversity in my world."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech,"






Now.....did you read Tocqueville's?

"No can't say I did but shes crazier than a fruit cake"



The lady in question is a life long Liberal.

A real Liberal.

Here are some of the notes I took when I read her book:

Kirsten Powers is a beautiful young lady, and a strong and capable spokesman for the Leftist perspective...

....yet, she is not one of the mindless drones who claim that the other side is stupid, or evil.



In her new book, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech," she makes these remarks:


1. She describes her parents: 'The allegiance to the Democratic Party had been cemented generations before, when family members reached the shores of America. I was constantly reminded that the Democratic Party stood up for working people, for families like ours, and those that came later, and just from Ireland.


2. Despite this background, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate.


3. I had been happily cocooned for much of my twenties as I worked as a political appointee in the Clinton administration. The isolation grew when I moved to New York....where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn. That unfamiliarity ultimately bred contempt.


4. Two experiences unexpectedly put me in a regular relationship with conservatives: working as a contributor at Fox News and a later in life conversion to Christianity. The more I got to know actual conservative and religious people, the harder it was to justify the stereotypes......


5. I'm now embarrassed that I ever thought such a thing, let alone said it aloud. Such a prejudiced view was only able to take root because of the lack of ideological, political, and religious diversity in my world."
Kirsten Powers, "The Silencing: How The Left Is Killing Free Speech,"






Now.....did you read Tocqueville's?

I seem to have unnerved you.

You've become something that I never am........

....speechless.

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

 

[BlindBoo]

Mending Wall by Robert Frost

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun;
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbour know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
"Stay where you are until our backs are turned!"
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, "Good fences make good neighbours."
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
"Why do they make good neighbours? Isn't it
Where there are cows? But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down." I could say "Elves" to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me,
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."


So....you've come around to Trump's thinking about the wall?

Excellent.

If that is all you get out of that poem, well, so be it. The answer is no, of course.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Mending Wall by Robert Frost

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun;
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbour know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
"Stay where you are until our backs are turned!"
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, "Good fences make good neighbours."
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
"Why do they make good neighbours? Isn't it
Where there are cows? But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down." I could say "Elves" to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me,
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."


So....you've come around to Trump's thinking about the wall?

Excellent.

If that is all you get out of that poem, well, so be it. The answer is no, of course.

So you posted this...but don't subscribe to it?
"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."



Ohhhhh,.....see, I was starting to imagine that there was actually hope of your learning.


Oh, well.....you can remain under the Leftists' thumb.

 

[eddiew37]

I seem to have unnerved you.

You've become something that I never am........

....speechless.

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

One question to you Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal?? Are you so one sided you leave out truth?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I seem to have unnerved you.

You've become something that I never am........

....speechless.

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

One question to you Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal?? Are you so one sided you leave out truth?

"Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal??"

What???

Don't you agree that I strongly implied the real reason?
This:

Hussein Obama is a crypto-Islamist and suffers from a deep and abiding hatred of America and Western Civilization.



But I'll let you have another try at answer these pertinent queries:
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

 

[eddiew37]

You've become something that I never am........

....speechless.

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

One question to you Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal?? Are you so one sided you leave out truth?

"Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal??"

What???

Don't you agree that I strongly implied the real reason?
This:

Hussein Obama is a crypto-Islamist and suffers from a deep and abiding hatred of America and Western Civilization.



But I'll let you have another try at answer these pertinent queries:
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

You make the best deal you can AND still you neglect to answer what was the benefit of the pact? Are you sure you're from Brooklyn?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You've become something that I never am........

....speechless.

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

One question to you Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal?? Are you so one sided you leave out truth?

"Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal??"

What???

Don't you agree that I strongly implied the real reason?
This:

Hussein Obama is a crypto-Islamist and suffers from a deep and abiding hatred of America and Western Civilization.



But I'll let you have another try at answer these pertinent queries:
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

You make the best deal you can AND still you neglect to answer what was the benefit of the pact? Are you sure you're from Brooklyn?

Still don't care to try to actually confront these issues?
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?


Perhaps I should point out that a successful President....unlike Obama.....did what needed to be done in an earlier situation:
Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he been in favor of ending Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.

Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p.185


You're no dope, eddie.....why do you suppose Obama insisted that Iran have nucs?

 

[BlindBoo]

Mending Wall by Robert Frost

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun;
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbour know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
"Stay where you are until our backs are turned!"
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, "Good fences make good neighbours."
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
"Why do they make good neighbours? Isn't it
Where there are cows? But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down." I could say "Elves" to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me,
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."


So....you've come around to Trump's thinking about the wall?

Excellent.

If that is all you get out of that poem, well, so be it. The answer is no, of course.

So you posted this...but don't subscribe to it?
"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."



Ohhhhh,.....see, I was starting to imagine that there was actually hope of your learning.


Oh, well.....you can remain under the Leftists' thumb.

Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And, to drive home the point, rather than beg Iran to come to the table....

Reagan:
"His genial grin and wise-cracking demeanor concealed a spine of steel when push came to shove. Yet at their next meeting in Reykjavik in 1986, where Gorbachev would not budge on the "Star Wars" question, Reagan was decisive and unforgiving. He recalls in An American Life how he stood up from the table to proclaim that the meeting was over. Then he turned to his Secretary of State: "Let's go, George. We're leaving." Like any good diplomat, Shultz was crushed by so much roughness, but Reagan was completely unfazed. Later on, he explained: "I went to Reykjavik determined that everything was negotiable except two things, our freedom and our future."
FindArticles.com | CBSi
The 'Amazing and Mysterious Life' of Ronald Reagan

 

[eddiew37]

Trump crook at it again
Trump company applies for casino trademark in Macau

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

One question to you Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal?? Are you so one sided you leave out truth?

"Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal??"

What???

Don't you agree that I strongly implied the real reason?
This:

Hussein Obama is a crypto-Islamist and suffers from a deep and abiding hatred of America and Western Civilization.



But I'll let you have another try at answer these pertinent queries:
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

You make the best deal you can AND still you neglect to answer what was the benefit of the pact? Are you sure you're from Brooklyn?

Still don't care to try to actually confront these issues?
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?


Perhaps I should point out that a successful President....unlike Obama.....did what needed to be done in an earlier situation:
Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he been in favor of ending Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.

Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p.185


You're no dope, eddie.....why do you suppose Obama insisted that Iran have nucs?

My knowledge on the subject is limited BUT the little I do know is the pact was the only way ,,besides Israel bombing them, to stop their nuke production Now we have inspectors there

 

[PoliticalChic]

Mending Wall by Robert Frost

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun;
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbour know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
"Stay where you are until our backs are turned!"
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, "Good fences make good neighbours."
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
"Why do they make good neighbours? Isn't it
Where there are cows? But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down." I could say "Elves" to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me,
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."


So....you've come around to Trump's thinking about the wall?

Excellent.

If that is all you get out of that poem, well, so be it. The answer is no, of course.

So you posted this...but don't subscribe to it?
"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."



Ohhhhh,.....see, I was starting to imagine that there was actually hope of your learning.


Oh, well.....you can remain under the Leftists' thumb.

Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines.

You posted this:

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

And this:
"Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines"


Let's see ya' come up with any explanation for those lines that doesn't support Trump's wall.
Bet ya' can't.


You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And, that compared to this.....how?

Two questions that should be asked about the perspective of Hussein Obama in awarding Iran the Nuclear Deal:


a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

One question to you Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal?? Are you so one sided you leave out truth?

"Why do you leave out the real reason for Iran deal??"

What???

Don't you agree that I strongly implied the real reason?
This:

Hussein Obama is a crypto-Islamist and suffers from a deep and abiding hatred of America and Western Civilization.



But I'll let you have another try at answer these pertinent queries:
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?

You make the best deal you can AND still you neglect to answer what was the benefit of the pact? Are you sure you're from Brooklyn?

Still don't care to try to actually confront these issues?
a. Why did he abandon the sanctions that were working to cripple the Mullahs?


b. Why didn't the deal address the fact that Iran has, for years, providing 20-30% of North Korea's bomb and missile testing/building for Iran?


Perhaps I should point out that a successful President....unlike Obama.....did what needed to be done in an earlier situation:
Obama could have done what Reagan did, had he been in favor of ending Iran's support for terror and Islamofascism:

"...the president [Reagan] signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 32, which....called for aid to Solidarity, counter-propaganda in Poland, tightening of sanctions on the Soviet Union, and covert activities to achieve these objectives.

Reagan sent out 328 such 'Top Secret' directives to the diplomatic, military, and intelligence agencies during his presidency."
The President, the Pope, And the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World," p.185


You're no dope, eddie.....why do you suppose Obama insisted that Iran have nucs?

My knowledge on the subject is limited BUT the little I do know is the pact was the only way ,,besides Israel bombing them, to stop their nuke production Now we have inspectors there

"...BUT the little I do know is the pact was the only way..."


So, what happens to your claim when I show that sanctions were killing the Mullahs?


“And so we could still maintain some of our unilateral sanctions, but it would be far less effective -- as it was before we were able to put together these multilateral sanctions.” – President Obama The Facts The most effective sanctions against Iran have been those that give companies and countries a choice to· do business with Iran or the United States. When given such a choice – which would still be possible to if Congress rejects this agreement – they have chosen the United States.

The Obama Administration has never liked sanctions, and fought vigorously to oppose sanctions targeting· Iran’s Central Bank in December 2011. Then – as they are now - the Obama Administration claimed that imposing these sanctions would divide the international coalition, and leave the United States alone in the world. Businesses, and in particular banks, will be hesitate to put a premium on the Iranian market if that would· mean getting shut-out of the United States.

As much as President Obama doesn’t like it, we are still number one in the world. While maintaining a united sanctions front after Congress rejects the nuclear agreement will be difficult,· it will be easier to do so today than five or so years down the line when Iran is caught cheating and a sanctions regime must be reconstituted. There were no signs of the sanctions regime collapsing when the Obama negotiations began"
https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/files/04_HFAC - IRAN - Myths and Facts.pdf


Know who said that?
Obama's advisers....the ones he ignored:
"Former Obama advisers warn against emerging Iran deal"
Former Obama advisers warn against emerging Iran deal




"When you look at the diplomatic insults and the hatred the Obama administration has poured on Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, when you look at the pressure this administration has put on Israel to negotiate with people who use terrorism, and when you look at how openly it has enabled Iran to obtain nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, ...

".... in ending economic sanctions as part of the [Iran] nuclear deal, the Obama administration just gave over $100 billion to Iran, the top terrorist-sponsoring nation in the world—by far! Iran is famous for sponsoring some of the most violent terrorists on Earth, terrorists who continually attack Jews.

Iran has promised to wipe Israel off the map.

It supports Islamic terrorists who want to do the same.

And they want to wipe President Obama’s own nation off the map as well!

They call America the “big Satan” and the Jewish state the “little Satan.”

What Inspires President Obama's Relationship With Israel?




"North Korea: Iran's Pathway to a Nuclear Weapon

A central plank of the Obama administration’s case for the nuclear deal just concluded by the P5+1 powers is that the agreement closes off "all pathways” by which the Iranian regime could acquire a nuclear capability, at least for the coming decade.

That, however, simply isn’t true. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the new nuclear bargain is officially called, only addresses the overt means by which Iran might go nuclear. A covert path to the bomb, entailing the procurement of materiel from foreign suppliers, still remains open to Iran, if it chooses to take that route.

....over the past three decades, Iran and the Stalinist regime of the Kim dynasty in North Korea have erected a formidable alliance—the centerpiece of which is cooperation on nuclear and ballistic-missile capabilities." North Korea: Iran's Pathway to a Nuclear Weapon

 

[mamooth]

"Liberals love to see women kill their babies so much that Susan Smith should be their patron saint,

I love it when pro-liar authoritarian cultists bring up Susan Smith, because it allows me to point out what dishonest cowards they are.

Imagine, if you will, you came upon Susan Smith pushing her car into the lake.

However, in this scenario, in addition to the boys being in the car, this time there's also a freezer chest containing 2000 frozen embryos, all scheduled for implantation.

You can save either the boys or the embryos. If you try to save both, everyone drowns.

So which do you save? All pro-lifers, feel free to chime in.

The ethical and decent people -- the pro-choicers -- we have no problem with the scenario. We instantly say to save the boys. The immoral pro-lifers have a huge problem with it, which is why most flat out refuse to answer, and try to deflect away with insults.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Liberals love to see women kill their babies so much that Susan Smith should be their patron saint,

I love it when pro-liar authoritarian cultists bring up Susan Smith, because it allows me to point out what dishonest cowards they are.

Imagine, if you will, you came upon Susan Smith pushing her car into the lake.

However, in this scenario, in addition to the boys being in the car, this time there's also a freezer chest containing 2000 frozen embryos, all scheduled for implantation.

You can save either the boys or the embryos. If you try to save both, everyone drowns.

So which do you save? All pro-lifers, feel free to chime in.

The ethical and decent people -- the pro-choicers -- we have no problem with the scenario. We instantly say to save the boys. The immoral pro-lifers have a huge problem with it, which is why most flat out refuse to answer, and try to deflect away with insults.

For context.....did you support the pro-infanticide President?

1. "Newt Gingrich deflected a question ...by pointing out that Obama voted in favor of a law that protected abortion providers during his term as state senator of Illinois
"You did not once during the 2008 campaign ask why Barack Obama voted in favor of legalizing infanticide," Gingrich said. "If we're going to debate about who is the extremist on this issues, it is President Obama, who, as a state senator, voted to protect doctors who killed babies."
Newt Gingrich Calls Obama An 'Extremist' Who Supported 'Infanticide' At GOP Debate


2. n·fan·ti·cide/inˈfantiˌsīd/
Noun:
The practice in some societies of killing unwanted children soon after birth.


3. "Gingrich was presumably referencing Obama’s opposition to Illinois’ proposed version of a “born alive” law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion....FactCheck.org found holes in Obama’s explanations as to why he did not support the “born alive” legislation..."
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch - Naureen Khan - NationalJournal.com

FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch

a. "Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee’s 2003 mark-up session."
FactCheck.org : Obama and ‘Infanticide’

4. If a child is 'accidentally' born alive as a result of a botched abortion attempt, Senator Obama had no problem allowing that newborn to die, sans any medical attention.



5.


Pay special attention to the vid @ :50

"...if a baby is born alive after a late term abortion, we can throw it away...Barack Obama approved that..."

2:01

2:40

3:55

5:28



After you admit to supporting infanticide, we can go on to discuss which jungle you were brought up in....

OK?

 

[BlindBoo]

Mending Wall by Robert Frost

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
And spills the upper boulders in the sun;
And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
The work of hunters is another thing:
I have come after them and made repair
Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
No one has seen them made or heard them made,
But at spring mending-time we find them there.
I let my neighbour know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.
To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
We have to use a spell to make them balance:
"Stay where you are until our backs are turned!"
We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
One on a side. It comes to little more:
There where it is we do not need the wall:
He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
My apple trees will never get across
And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
He only says, "Good fences make good neighbours."
Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
If I could put a notion in his head:
"Why do they make good neighbours? Isn't it
Where there are cows? But here there are no cows.
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offence.
Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down." I could say "Elves" to him,
But it's not elves exactly, and I'd rather
He said it for himself. I see him there
Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
He moves in darkness as it seems to me,
Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."


So....you've come around to Trump's thinking about the wall?

Excellent.

If that is all you get out of that poem, well, so be it. The answer is no, of course.

So you posted this...but don't subscribe to it?
"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."



Ohhhhh,.....see, I was starting to imagine that there was actually hope of your learning.


Oh, well.....you can remain under the Leftists' thumb.

Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines.

You posted this:

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

And this:
"Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines"


Let's see ya' come up with any explanation for those lines that doesn't support Trump's wall.
Bet ya' can't.


You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.

I can definitely say that poem does not invoke in me the thoughtlessness that The Grabber in Chief displays in his pubic statements. Especially over the Wall.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."


So....you've come around to Trump's thinking about the wall?

Excellent.

If that is all you get out of that poem, well, so be it. The answer is no, of course.

So you posted this...but don't subscribe to it?
"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."



Ohhhhh,.....see, I was starting to imagine that there was actually hope of your learning.


Oh, well.....you can remain under the Leftists' thumb.

Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines.

You posted this:

"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

And this:
"Well what do I expect but for a con to try and narrow down (reads dumbed down) a complex poem by Frost into two
pitiful lines"


Let's see ya' come up with any explanation for those lines that doesn't support Trump's wall.
Bet ya' can't.


You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.

I can definitely say that poem does not invoke in me the thoughtlessness that The Grabber in Chief displays in his pubic statements. Especially over the Wall.

"....that poem does not invoke in me the thoughtlessness that...."
No one asked what convoluted indoctrination you could provide....

The question was:
Let's see ya' come up with any explanation for those lines that doesn't support Trump's wall.
"And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, "Good fences make good neighbours."

Bet ya' can't.

And, sure enough....you couldn't.


You can run, but you can't hide.
So saith the Brown Bomber.