What To Do About A Lawless President?

[PoliticalChic]

Well, having established that Obama is a lawless President, what is it that a lawless President might do?

I suppose he could simply decide that the borders that identify nationhood don't exist.....


And he did.


What happens when a lawless President decides that the United States no longer has any border?


5. "Rick Perry Warns ISIS May Already Be in the United States

ISIS terrorists may already be in the country, Governor Rick Perry (R., Texas) warned, saying that the terrorists’ own version of “mission creep” will draw them from Iraq to the United States.

“I think there is the obvious great concern that because of the condition of the border, from the standpoint of it not being secure and us not knowing who is penetrating across, that individuals from ISIS or other terrorist states could be [entering the country],” Perry said during an event hosted byNational Reviewand the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C."
Rick Perry Warns ISIS May Already Be in the United States | National Review Online

 

[PoliticalChic]

The GAO report says not a word about the President. It does not say the President broke the law. It says the DoD violated the reporting requirements of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

But that doesn't stop the tards from substituting "Obama" for "DoD".

Perhaps you have forgotten who is the Commander-in-Chief.

I'm being kind.

In actuality you're simply an imbecile.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

I sometimes talk with Sports Zombies about their favorite team and they can quote me all sorts of stuff like: Win/Loss record, place in division, how many games left, starting pitcher record and ERA, injury list, it goes on and on.

I'll act all interested for a while but then I'll ask them: "What's the 4th Amendment to the Constitution?". 99.9% of the time I'll just get a blank stare. I've done this numerous times. I've even done this while waiting in line at the store on some sports guy wearing a jersey. (They're all fat so they're not intimidating at all)

They may get mad at me but I've already planted the seed and they'll think about it more later.

My solution? Turn off the TV. Read News stories on the Internet. Reading requires Active Participation while TV just puts you in a Mind-Numbed Trance.

Find out where your local gov't offices are. And go there.
Buy a Dash Cam and record Officers when they pull you over.
Fight a Traffic Ticket.
Submit a FOIR request. If you don't know how, learn how.
Know the Laws of your State. Learn how Laws are made in the State. Compare that with "rules" and "ordinances".

There are MANY things you can do to better our Government and Society but NONE of them will come as a result of watching a TV News Show or voting in an online poll.

They will come as a result of YOU getting involved. Not just for 30 minutes, but for the rest of your life.

Bread and circus....

....anybody recall Gibbon?

One of the big problems Americans have is that they think things will get better when "their party wins elections".

They have no idea how corrupt and controlled BOTH parties are so they cheer "their side" like it's the NBA Finals or World Series and they're gonna' gain something from it.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

Are you endorsing the illegality of the thug in office, or haven't you thought that far ahead?

Let's take a trip to 'Wonderland'....what would your post look like if it had been Bush?

As a self appointed word smith, I'm sure you have evidence that President Obama is a "thug". Let's use the dictionary.com definition of thug: "a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber ,or murderer."

Post the evidence.

As for President Bush (43) I found him incompetent, and until his final year, too easily influenced (lead) by Cheney who I believe to be a very evil man.

Evil, as defined by dictionary.com: "morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked"

Thug: "“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said ..."
Obama brings a gun to a knife fight - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Wow, are you channelling CrusaderFrank?

You're dodging the subject...that means I win, right?

In fact, it's probably a wise idea for you to dodge....as this thug in office has provided the milieu that results in Ferguson Riots.

The "Ferguson Riots" have roots which go back well beyond the birth of President Obama. You know that, but being the dishonest person you are, you choose to dodge the real issues.

So....you'd rather I blame the Democrat Lyndon Johnson rather than the Democrat Barack Obama?


Tell ya' what....I'll stick with the Obama guy, after all he installed a racist as head of the misnamed 'Department of Justice.'

1. "For much of his life, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. carried around something peculiar…an old clipping of a quote from Harlem preacher Reverend Samuel D. Proctor. Holder put the clipping in his wallet in 1971, when he was studying history at Columbia University, and kept it in wallet after wallet over the ensuing decades. What were Proctor’s words that Holder found so compelling? “Blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America. No matter how affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.”…When asked to explain the passage, Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney. And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”…It may seem shocking to hear these racialist views ascribed to America’s top law enforcement officer. But to people who have worked inside the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, these attitudes are perfectly familiar."
   DOJ Whistleblower J. Christian Adams Releases New Book | Video | TheBlaze.com DOJ‘s ’Whistleblower’ in New Black Panther Case Releases Book | Video | TheBlaze.com

2. “Has anyone asked Holder what exactly is the “common cause” that binds the black attorney general and the black criminal? More important, what should the black attorney general do about this common cause? Should the black criminal feel empathy for the black attorney general or more likely, do the favors only flow in one direction?

Holder’s explanation of Proctor’s quote offers some key insights into our attorney generals’ worldview. First, being “more particular” than anything else, skin color limits and defines Americans- in other words, race comes first for Holder.

Second, despite Americans’ widespread belief in trans-racial principles such as individual liberty and equal protection, blacks are expected to show solidarity with other blacks.

And third, black law enforcement officers are expected to show this solidarity toward their racial compatriots, including black criminals.” J. Christian Adams,

 

[Siete]

LMAO

 

[g5000]

The GAO report says not a word about the President. It does not say the President broke the law. It says the DoD violated the reporting requirements of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

But that doesn't stop the tards from substituting "Obama" for "DoD".

Perhaps you have forgotten who is the Commander-in-Chief.

I'm being kind.

In actuality you're simply an imbecile.

Please quote from the GAO report where they say Obama broke the law.

Thanks!

 

[g5000]

Feds: Obama Broke Law with Bergdahl Swap | National Review Online

Please quote from the GAO report where it says Obama broke the law.

 

[PoliticalChic]

LMAO

First it was your cerebral hemispheres.....

...now it's your gluteus maximus.....

....what else have you lost???


Possibly a telethon may be in order.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The GAO report says not a word about the President. It does not say the President broke the law. It says the DoD violated the reporting requirements of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

But that doesn't stop the tards from substituting "Obama" for "DoD".

Perhaps you have forgotten who is the Commander-in-Chief.

I'm being kind.

In actuality you're simply an imbecile.

Please quote from the GAO report where they say Obama broke the law.

Thanks!

It wasn't necessary to prove you are an imbecile, but thank you for going the extra mile.

 

[Siete]

First it was your cerebral hemispheres.....

...now it's your gluteus maximus.....

....what else have you lost???


Possibly a telethon may be in order.

watching you debate yourself is very cerebral .... for worms.

 

[g5000]

PoliticalChic's hatred for the Department of Defense is well established. She drank the piss about them coming to rounding us all up and putting us in FEMA camps last year and is probably still breathlessly wetting her panties in expectation of being submissively dominated by American troops.

From the GAO report:

This responds to your June 13, 2014, request for our opinion on whether the Department of Defense (DOD) incurred obligations in violation of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar. Section 8111 prohibits DOD from using appropriated funds to transfer any individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay unless the Secretary of Defense notifies certain congressional committees at least 30 days before the transfer. Pub. L. No. 113-76, div. C, title VIII, § 8111, 128 Stat. 5, 131 (Jan. 17, 2014).

As explained below, we conclude that DOD violated section 8111 because it did not notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the transfer.

Here is the Public Law cited by the GAO: Text - H.R.3547 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

And here is the entirety of Section 8111:

Sec. 8111. None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made
available in this Act may be used to transfer any individual detained
at United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the custody or
control of the individual's country of origin, any other foreign
country, or any other foreign entity except in accordance with section
1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.

Here is the NDAA for 2014: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CPRT-113HPRT86280/pdf/CPRT-113HPRT86280.pdf

And here is the relevant part of section 1035, which is not copy and pastable so I am providing a screen cap:

This is the same NDAA which the same hysterical faux righties were screaming about its constitutional violations when it was passed, including PoliticalChic.

 

[g5000]

The GAO report says not a word about the President. It does not say the President broke the law. It says the DoD violated the reporting requirements of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

But that doesn't stop the tards from substituting "Obama" for "DoD".

Perhaps you have forgotten who is the Commander-in-Chief.

I'm being kind.

In actuality you're simply an imbecile.

Please quote from the GAO report where they say Obama broke the law.

Thanks!

It wasn't necessary to prove you are an imbecile, but thank you for going the extra mile.

Thanks for proving you can't find Obama in the report, and that you and NRO bogusly substituted out "DoD" and put in "Obama".

The DoD wanted to trade the detainees for Bergdahl. I guess that doesn't fit into the narrative that he was a deserter, eh? The DoD wouldn't have gone to all that trouble for someone they thought was a traitor.

So let's do a little jive dance and make it all about Obama, right?

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliticalChic's hatred for the Department of Defense is well established. She drank the piss about them coming to rounding us all up and putting us in FEMA camps last year and is probably still breathlessly wetting her panties in expectation of being submissively dominated by American troops.

From the GAO report:

This responds to your June 13, 2014, request for our opinion on whether the Department of Defense (DOD) incurred obligations in violation of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar. Section 8111 prohibits DOD from using appropriated funds to transfer any individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay unless the Secretary of Defense notifies certain congressional committees at least 30 days before the transfer. Pub. L. No. 113-76, div. C, title VIII, § 8111, 128 Stat. 5, 131 (Jan. 17, 2014).

As explained below, we conclude that DOD violated section 8111 because it did not notify the relevant congressional committees at least 30 days in advance of the transfer.

Here is the Public Law cited by the GAO: Text - H.R.3547 - 113th Congress (2013-2014): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

And here is the entirety of Section 8111:

Sec. 8111. None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made
available in this Act may be used to transfer any individual detained
at United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the custody or
control of the individual's country of origin, any other foreign
country, or any other foreign entity except in accordance with section
1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.

Here is the NDAA for 2014: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CPRT-113HPRT86280/pdf/CPRT-113HPRT86280.pdf

And here is the relevant part of section 1035, which is not copy and pastable so I am providing a screen cap:

This is the same NDAA which the same hysterical faux righties were screaming about its constitutional violations when it was passed, including PoliticalChic.

So.....did I miss the part that stated that Barack Obama (peace be on him)m is not in charge of the Department?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The GAO report says not a word about the President. It does not say the President broke the law. It says the DoD violated the reporting requirements of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

But that doesn't stop the tards from substituting "Obama" for "DoD".

Perhaps you have forgotten who is the Commander-in-Chief.

I'm being kind.

In actuality you're simply an imbecile.

Please quote from the GAO report where they say Obama broke the law.

Thanks!

It wasn't necessary to prove you are an imbecile, but thank you for going the extra mile.

Thanks for proving you can't find Obama in the report, and that you and NRO bogusly substituted out "DoD" and put in "Obama".

The DoD wanted to trade the detainees for Bergdahl. I guess that doesn't fit into the narrative that he was a deserter, eh? The DoD wouldn't have gone to all that trouble for someone they thought was a traitor.

So let's do a little jive dance and make it all about Obama, right?

I sure don't mind rubbing your face in it....probably an improvement, too....

"The GAO said the Pentagon violated the 2014 Defense AppropriationsAct. ... The Pentagon broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from ... the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."
Google
Watchdog: DOD broke law with Bergdahl swap | TheHill



How ya' like that, boyyyyyeeeee???

 

[g5000]

I sure don't mind rubbing your face in it....probably an improvement, too....

"The GAO said the Pentagon violated the 2014 Defense AppropriationsAct. ... The Pentagon broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from ... the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."
Google



How ya' like that, boyyyyyeeeee???

So you think quoting from partisan hack media sites is a substitute for the ACTUAL GAO REPORT!?!?

BWA-HA-HA-HA!


I'm sorry, Tard. Links to the Daily Caller just prove you are a piss guzzler.

Instead of "the report said", how about quoting from the actual report? I even made it simple enough for a Tard like you by providing you a direct link to the report itself.

So go ahead and quote from the actual report that "Obama knowingly violated the law".

Good luck with that!

Jesus, you really hit a new low of Dumbass with your post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I sure don't mind rubbing your face in it....probably an improvement, too....

"The GAO said the Pentagon violated the 2014 Defense AppropriationsAct. ... The Pentagon broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from ... the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."
Google



How ya' like that, boyyyyyeeeee???

So you think quoting from partisan hack media sites is a substitute for the ACTUAL GAO REPORT!?!?

BWA-HA-HA-HA!


I'm sorry, Tard. Links to the Daily Caller just prove you are a piss guzzler.

Instead of "the report said", how about quoting from the actual report? Good luck with that!

Jesus, you really hit a new low of Dumbass with your post.

It's, "The Hill," you dope



"The Hill is a liberal on-line newspaper..."
Is the hill a liberal or conservative newspaper



Another face-rub.

 

[g5000]

Once again, here is the GAO report: U.S. GAO - Department of Defense--Compliance with Statutory Notification Requirement

There. You can't miss it.

Please quote where it says Obama knowingly violated the law, Tard.


Some people never learn. After having their ass handed to them time and time and time and time again that the Daily Caller and Fox News and the Washington Times and the NRO all willfully manufacture bullshit, they keep going back to chow down on more!

It is amazing.

 

[g5000]

I sure don't mind rubbing your face in it....probably an improvement, too....

"The GAO said the Pentagon violated the 2014 Defense AppropriationsAct. ... The Pentagon broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from ... the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."
Google



How ya' like that, boyyyyyeeeee???

So you think quoting from partisan hack media sites is a substitute for the ACTUAL GAO REPORT!?!?

BWA-HA-HA-HA!


I'm sorry, Tard. Links to the Daily Caller just prove you are a piss guzzler.

Instead of "the report said", how about quoting from the actual report? Good luck with that!

Jesus, you really hit a new low of Dumbass with your post.

It's, "The Hill," you dope



"The Hill is a liberal on-line newspaper..."
Is the hill a liberal or conservative newspaper

Quote. From. The. GAO. Report.

U.S. GAO - Department of Defense--Compliance with Statutory Notification Requirement

Tard.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So, both medical diseases and human diseases are streaming into the United States, now that Obama has erased enforcement....

But did he decide to do away with the borders that identify a nation? Gee....that would identify a lawless President....or did folks from outside simply decide all at once to invade the nation, to Obama's surprise and chagrin???

Coincidence how "lawless" and "lying" seem to link so well.....

Obama invited them in, along with the tidal wave of illegal immigrants he called upon to invade:



6. " According to a “help wanted” Request For Information (RFI) posted onFedBizOpps.gov, the feds were looking for vendors to help escort unaccompanied alien children (UAC) in JANUARY of this year. According to a “help wanted” Request For Information (RFI) posted onFedBizOpps.gov, the feds were looking for vendors to help escort unaccompanied alien children (UAC) in JANUARY of this year.

The question is, how in January, did the U.S. government know up to 65,000 unaccompanied illegal alien children would be arriving?"
Feds advertised for escort services for unaccompanied alien children in January - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com

 

[g5000]

I sure don't mind rubbing your face in it....probably an improvement, too....

"The GAO said the Pentagon violated the 2014 Defense AppropriationsAct. ... The Pentagon broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from ... the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."
Google
Watchdog: DOD broke law with Bergdahl swap | TheHill



How ya' like that, boyyyyyeeeee???

Oh, man. This is going to be fun.

The Hill says Watchdog: DOD broke law with Bergdahl swap

The DoD.

Now, folks, I want you to pay special attention to the part PoliticalChic bolded in her post: ...the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."

Notice the ellipses.

PoliticalChic willfully left out what was in front of that ellipsis:

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), one of the nine Republican senators on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee who requested the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law.

A REPUBLICAN SENATOR stating her opinion.

PC willfully constructed her post to make it sound like the GAO report said it:

"The GAO said the Pentagon violated the 2014 Defense AppropriationsAct. ... The Pentagon broke the law when it transferred five Taliban detainees from ... the report, said it confirmed that Obama knowingly violated the law."

You've been busted, PC. You fucking lying tard.

 

[g5000]

So instead of quoting from the actual report, PoliticalChic willfully manufactured a completely bogus statement of what the GAO report said.

Incredible.

Not that you ever had any to begin with, but you just completely blew up your integrity, PC. You willfully manufactured a bogus lie.

Busted.