What To Do About A Lawless President?

[PoliticalChic]

Try winning an election

As to your OP, you people already have a lawsuit filed against the President. What more do you want?

Maybe in the meantime Repubs could work on legislation that will pass the senate?

Your side's butt hurtedness knows no bounds and you exemplify it daily PoliHack.

"In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

"That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others)."

Link: Internet troll personality study: Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism.






Actually, my hurt is based on the fact there are some folks....fewer all the time....who are as abysmally stupid as you appear to be.

The point of the OP is that this is a lawless President....

...do you have any comment to that point?

The point of the OP is to troll, something you do regularly. Then, when others disagree with you, you call them stupid. In every thread you post, the pattern is the same.

I suppose mental masturbation provides you some degree of satisfaction, that's sad and would be pitiful, but you don't deserve pity.

OP is a troll???? WTF? the OP provided an opinion and material relevant to it. You, however provide nothing of substance while calling him a troll.
You barely deserve notice.

An empty post???


Why, that's the most intelligent one you've ever posted!


Keep up the good work.

 

[Wry Catcher]

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

I sometimes talk with Sports Zombies about their favorite team and they can quote me all sorts of stuff like: Win/Loss record, place in division, how many games left, starting pitcher record and ERA, injury list, it goes on and on.

I'll act all interested for a while but then I'll ask them: "What's the 4th Amendment to the Constitution?". 99.9% of the time I'll just get a blank stare. I've done this numerous times. I've even done this while waiting in line at the store on some sports guy wearing a jersey. (They're all fat so they're not intimidating at all)

They may get mad at me but I've already planted the seed and they'll think about it more later.

My solution? Turn off the TV. Read News stories on the Internet. Reading requires Active Participation while TV just puts you in a Mind-Numbed Trance.

Find out where your local gov't offices are. And go there.
Buy a Dash Cam and record Officers when they pull you over.
Fight a Traffic Ticket.
Submit a FOIR request. If you don't know how, learn how.
Know the Laws of your State. Learn how Laws are made in the State. Compare that with "rules" and "ordinances".

There are MANY things you can do to better our Government and Society but NONE of them will come as a result of watching a TV News Show or voting in an online poll.

They will come as a result of YOU getting involved. Not just for 30 minutes, but for the rest of your life.

Bread and circus....

....anybody recall Gibbon?

One of the big problems Americans have is that they think things will get better when "their party wins elections".

They have no idea how corrupt and controlled BOTH parties are so they cheer "their side" like it's the NBA Finals or World Series and they're gonna' gain something from it.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

Are you endorsing the illegality of the thug in office, or haven't you thought that far ahead?

Let's take a trip to 'Wonderland'....what would your post look like if it had been Bush?

As a self appointed word smith, I'm sure you have evidence that President Obama is a "thug". Let's use the dictionary.com definition of thug: "a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber ,or murderer."

Post the evidence.

As for President Bush (43) I found him incompetent, and until his final year, too easily influenced (lead) by Cheney who I believe to be a very evil man.

Evil, as defined by dictionary.com: "morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked"

Thug: "“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said ..."
Obama brings a gun to a knife fight - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Wow, are you channelling CrusaderFrank?

 

[g5000]

Here's what we need to do.

When the GOP was in charge, they doubled the national debt, started a few wars, increased the size of the federal government, expanded the breadth and scope of government power astronomically, created an entirely unfunded new medical entitlement social welfare program, locked up American citizens without habeas corpus, spied on tens of millions of Americans without warrants, harassed reporters and spied on them, lost guns in Mexico, suffered several attacks on diplomatic missions overseas, created a whole new Cabinet-level department with massive police powers, and laid the groundwork for the greatest financial crash since the Great Depression.

When the Democrats were in charge, they doubled the national debt, increased the size of the federal government, expanded the breadth and scope of government power astronomically, created an entirely new medical entitlement social welfare program, spied on tens of millions of Americans without warrants, harassed reporters and spied on them, lost guns in Mexico, suffered an attack on a diplomatic mission overseas, and failed to robustly recover from the greatest financial crash since the Great Depression.


We clearly need to restore the GOP back to power so they can double the national debt, start a few wars, increase the size of the federal government, expand the breadth and scope of government power astronomically, creat an entirely unfunded new medical entitlement social welfare program, lock up American citizens without habeas corpus, spy on tens of millions of Americans without warrants, harass reporters and spy on them, lose guns in Mexico, suffer several attacks on diplomatic missions overseas, create a whole new Cabinet-level department, and lay the groundwork for the greatest financial crash since the one in 2008.

 

[boedicca]

We may not have a chance to do anything about a Lawless President. The odds are increasing that ISIS will attack within the U.S. border, and Obama wil use that as a pretext for voiding the 22nd amendment and declaring martial law.

I really wouldn't put it past him at this point.

 

[g5000]

We may not have a chance to do anything about a Lawless President. The odds are increasing that ISIS will attack within the U.S. border, and Obama wil use that as a pretext for voiding the 22nd amendment and declaring martial law.

I really wouldn't put it past him at this point.

Wishful thinking.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Try winning an election

As to your OP, you people already have a lawsuit filed against the President. What more do you want?

Maybe in the meantime Repubs could work on legislation that will pass the senate?

Your side's butt hurtedness knows no bounds and you exemplify it daily PoliHack.

"In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

"That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others)."

Link: Internet troll personality study: Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism.






Actually, my hurt is based on the fact there are some folks....fewer all the time....who are as abysmally stupid as you appear to be.

The point of the OP is that this is a lawless President....

...do you have any comment to that point?

The point of the OP is to troll, something you do regularly. Then, when others disagree with you, you call them stupid. In every thread you post, the pattern is the same.

I suppose mental masturbation provides you some degree of satisfaction, that's sad and would be pitiful, but you don't deserve pity.

OP is a troll???? WTF? the OP provided an opinion and material relevant to it. You, however provide nothing of substance while calling him a troll.
You barely deserve notice.

An empty post???


Why, that's the most intelligent one you've ever posted!


Keep up the good work.

"In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

"That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others)."

Reads like a bio of you PC; for more, see:

Internet troll personality study: Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

I sometimes talk with Sports Zombies about their favorite team and they can quote me all sorts of stuff like: Win/Loss record, place in division, how many games left, starting pitcher record and ERA, injury list, it goes on and on.

I'll act all interested for a while but then I'll ask them: "What's the 4th Amendment to the Constitution?". 99.9% of the time I'll just get a blank stare. I've done this numerous times. I've even done this while waiting in line at the store on some sports guy wearing a jersey. (They're all fat so they're not intimidating at all)

They may get mad at me but I've already planted the seed and they'll think about it more later.

My solution? Turn off the TV. Read News stories on the Internet. Reading requires Active Participation while TV just puts you in a Mind-Numbed Trance.

Find out where your local gov't offices are. And go there.
Buy a Dash Cam and record Officers when they pull you over.
Fight a Traffic Ticket.
Submit a FOIR request. If you don't know how, learn how.
Know the Laws of your State. Learn how Laws are made in the State. Compare that with "rules" and "ordinances".

There are MANY things you can do to better our Government and Society but NONE of them will come as a result of watching a TV News Show or voting in an online poll.

They will come as a result of YOU getting involved. Not just for 30 minutes, but for the rest of your life.

Bread and circus....

....anybody recall Gibbon?

One of the big problems Americans have is that they think things will get better when "their party wins elections".

They have no idea how corrupt and controlled BOTH parties are so they cheer "their side" like it's the NBA Finals or World Series and they're gonna' gain something from it.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

Are you endorsing the illegality of the thug in office, or haven't you thought that far ahead?

Let's take a trip to 'Wonderland'....what would your post look like if it had been Bush?

As a self appointed word smith, I'm sure you have evidence that President Obama is a "thug". Let's use the dictionary.com definition of thug: "a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber ,or murderer."

Post the evidence.

As for President Bush (43) I found him incompetent, and until his final year, too easily influenced (lead) by Cheney who I believe to be a very evil man.

Evil, as defined by dictionary.com: "morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked"

Thug: "“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said ..."
Obama brings a gun to a knife fight - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Wow, are you channelling CrusaderFrank?

You're dodging the subject...that means I win, right?

In fact, it's probably a wise idea for you to dodge....as this thug in office has provided the milieu that results in Ferguson Riots.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Try winning an election

As to your OP, you people already have a lawsuit filed against the President. What more do you want?

Maybe in the meantime Repubs could work on legislation that will pass the senate?

Your side's butt hurtedness knows no bounds and you exemplify it daily PoliHack.

"In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

"That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others)."

Link: Internet troll personality study: Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism.






Actually, my hurt is based on the fact there are some folks....fewer all the time....who are as abysmally stupid as you appear to be.

The point of the OP is that this is a lawless President....

...do you have any comment to that point?

The point of the OP is to troll, something you do regularly. Then, when others disagree with you, you call them stupid. In every thread you post, the pattern is the same.

I suppose mental masturbation provides you some degree of satisfaction, that's sad and would be pitiful, but you don't deserve pity.

OP is a troll???? WTF? the OP provided an opinion and material relevant to it. You, however provide nothing of substance while calling him a troll.
You barely deserve notice.

An empty post???


Why, that's the most intelligent one you've ever posted!


Keep up the good work.

"In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

"That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others)."

Reads like a bio of you PC; for more, see:

Internet troll personality study: Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism.

Clearly written by a pantywaist like you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The original query was what to do with a lawless President..this lawless President....and to this moment, it remains unanswered.


In fact, the lap dogs can't wait to ignore the illegality of this thug, and evince the same degree of character that he does.....





How about we compare Obama to the Left's earlier bête noire:


4. " George Will: Obama’s unconstitutional steps worse than Nixon’s

a. President Obama’s increasingly grandiose claims for presidential power are inversely proportional to his shriveling presidency. Desperation fuels arrogance ...his pantry of excuses for failure is bare, his domestic agenda is nonexistent and his foreign policy... is floundering. And at last week’s news conference he offered inconvenience as a justification for illegality.

b. Explaining his decision to unilaterally rewrite the Affordable Care Act(ACA), he said: “I didn’t simply choose to” ignore the statutory requirement for beginning in 2014 the employer mandate to provide employees with health care. No, “this was in consultation with businesses.”



c. ....journalists did not ask the pertinent question: “Wheredoes the Constitution confer upon presidents the ‘executive authority’ to ignore the separation of powers by revising laws?” .... there is no such authority.



Even if he understood “normal” political environments here, the Constitution is not suspended...."
George Will: Obama’s unconstitutional steps worse than Nixon’s - The Washington Post

 

[paulitician]

Are we still a Nation of Laws? That's a very serious question more Americans need to start contemplating.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are we still a Nation of Laws? That's a very serious question more Americans need to start contemplating.

Hardly.


In memorium of a once great nation:


"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.

 

[Ernie S.]

Try winning an election

As to your OP, you people already have a lawsuit filed against the President. What more do you want?

Maybe in the meantime Repubs could work on legislation that will pass the senate?

Your side's butt hurtedness knows no bounds and you exemplify it daily PoliHack.

Actually, my hurt is based on the fact there are some folks....fewer all the time....who are as abysmally stupid as you appear to be.

The point of the OP is that this is a lawless President....

...do you have any comment to that point?

The point of the OP is to troll, something you do regularly. Then, when others disagree with you, you call them stupid. In every thread you post, the pattern is the same.

I suppose mental masturbation provides you some degree of satisfaction, that's sad and would be pitiful, but you don't deserve pity.

OP is a troll???? WTF? the OP provided an opinion and material relevant to it. You, however provide nothing of substance while calling him a troll.
You barely deserve notice.

Yes, SHE is a troll and my post was an opinion based on evidence. She is also a narcissist, also an opinion, but a malady which has never been ruled out.

Opinions are like Wry Catchers. Everyone has one.

Opinions need to be qualified with facts, not more opinions.

Let's see you support your opinions

Troll
1
2
3
Narcissist
1
2
3

Go

Let's see you prove she is not a troll nor a narcissist. The evidence is there, simply read all of the threads she has posted, see how she responds to criticism, or how willing she is to engage in meaningful debate.

You're playing a game, one in which I will not engage.

I expressed no such opinion, therefore, I owe no proof or justification. YOU made the claim. The onus is on you.

You're playing a game that I will not allow you to.

Your turn.

 

[Ernie S.]

Try winning an election

As to your OP, you people already have a lawsuit filed against the President. What more do you want?

Maybe in the meantime Repubs could work on legislation that will pass the senate?

Your side's butt hurtedness knows no bounds and you exemplify it daily PoliHack.

Actually, my hurt is based on the fact there are some folks....fewer all the time....who are as abysmally stupid as you appear to be.

The point of the OP is that this is a lawless President....

...do you have any comment to that point?

The point of the OP is to troll, something you do regularly. Then, when others disagree with you, you call them stupid. In every thread you post, the pattern is the same.

I suppose mental masturbation provides you some degree of satisfaction, that's sad and would be pitiful, but you don't deserve pity.

OP is a troll???? WTF? the OP provided an opinion and material relevant to it. You, however provide nothing of substance while calling him a troll.
You barely deserve notice.

Yes, SHE is a troll and my post was an opinion based on evidence. She is also a narcissist, also an opinion, but a malady which has never been ruled out.

Opinions are like Wry Catchers. Everyone has one.

Opinions need to be qualified with facts, not more opinions.

Let's see you support your opinions

Troll
1
2
3
Narcissist
1
2
3

Go

Let's see you prove she is not a troll nor a narcissist. The evidence is there, simply read all of the threads she has posted, see how she responds to criticism, or how willing she is to engage in meaningful debate.

You're playing a game, one in which I will not engage.

"You're playing a game, one in which I will not engage"

But you just did.....dunce.

Except, he plays it so poorly.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This thread fails as a straw man fallacy.

 

[Mad Scientist]

A Lawless and Corrupt President won't be stopped by a Lawless and Corrupt Congress.

A Citizenry who worships Lawlessness and Corruption and Filth won't either.

 

[FJO]

One of the big problems Americans have is that they think things will get better when "their party wins elections".

They have no idea how corrupt and controlled BOTH parties are so they cheer "their side" like it's the NBA Finals or World Series and they're gonna' gain something from it.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

 

[FJO]

One of the big problems Americans have is that they think things will get better when "their party wins elections".

They have no idea how corrupt and controlled BOTH parties are so they cheer "their side" like it's the NBA Finals or World Series and they're gonna' gain something from it.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

How about Obama offering himself for the captured journalist?

 

[PoliticalChic]

This thread fails as a straw man fallacy.

If your brain exploded, it wouldn't even mess up your hair.

One cannot help but notice that you've 'failed' to provide any inaccuracies in the OP, or any other posts in the thread.
And, as there are no such inaccuracies.....the overwhelming conclusion is that it is you who are the failure.....and much less of a man.




And that leads to these questions:

Do you recommend an anti-constitutional bias in political leaders?

Are you too cowardly to call corruption corruption?

Will you go through any contortions to support this lawless President?

Are you simply too stupid to recognize what a risible post you've provided?


So, Chamber_Pot.....which is it?
Inquiring minds what to know.

 

[g5000]

The GAO report says not a word about the President. It does not say the President broke the law. It says the DoD violated the reporting requirements of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

But that doesn't stop the tards from substituting "Obama" for "DoD".

 

[Wry Catcher]

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

I sometimes talk with Sports Zombies about their favorite team and they can quote me all sorts of stuff like: Win/Loss record, place in division, how many games left, starting pitcher record and ERA, injury list, it goes on and on.

I'll act all interested for a while but then I'll ask them: "What's the 4th Amendment to the Constitution?". 99.9% of the time I'll just get a blank stare. I've done this numerous times. I've even done this while waiting in line at the store on some sports guy wearing a jersey. (They're all fat so they're not intimidating at all)

They may get mad at me but I've already planted the seed and they'll think about it more later.

My solution? Turn off the TV. Read News stories on the Internet. Reading requires Active Participation while TV just puts you in a Mind-Numbed Trance.

Find out where your local gov't offices are. And go there.
Buy a Dash Cam and record Officers when they pull you over.
Fight a Traffic Ticket.
Submit a FOIR request. If you don't know how, learn how.
Know the Laws of your State. Learn how Laws are made in the State. Compare that with "rules" and "ordinances".

There are MANY things you can do to better our Government and Society but NONE of them will come as a result of watching a TV News Show or voting in an online poll.

They will come as a result of YOU getting involved. Not just for 30 minutes, but for the rest of your life.

Bread and circus....

....anybody recall Gibbon?

One of the big problems Americans have is that they think things will get better when "their party wins elections".

They have no idea how corrupt and controlled BOTH parties are so they cheer "their side" like it's the NBA Finals or World Series and they're gonna' gain something from it.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

"Ain't it Awful" posts ^^^ are opinions, How about offering a solution? How can our (in your head) dystopian system of government be fixed?

Are you endorsing the illegality of the thug in office, or haven't you thought that far ahead?

Let's take a trip to 'Wonderland'....what would your post look like if it had been Bush?

As a self appointed word smith, I'm sure you have evidence that President Obama is a "thug". Let's use the dictionary.com definition of thug: "a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber ,or murderer."

Post the evidence.

As for President Bush (43) I found him incompetent, and until his final year, too easily influenced (lead) by Cheney who I believe to be a very evil man.

Evil, as defined by dictionary.com: "morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked"

Thug: "“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said ..."
Obama brings a gun to a knife fight - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Wow, are you channelling CrusaderFrank?

You're dodging the subject...that means I win, right?

In fact, it's probably a wise idea for you to dodge....as this thug in office has provided the milieu that results in Ferguson Riots.

The "Ferguson Riots" have roots which go back well beyond the birth of President Obama. You know that, but being the dishonest person you are, you choose to dodge the real issues.