Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
Annnnnnd water is wet. Glad we have another thread on this because the other 7-8 didn't really say enough
the other threads said plenty...
But as you can see by the "anti Zimmerman" posts, it want enough.
The Sanford Police said plenty. The FBI said plenty. The jury said plenty.
But as you can see by the "anti Zimmerman" rhetoric from the AG and the left in general, it wasn't enough.
Now explain to me how anti-Zimmerman posts and posts about black on black violence have anything to do with each other.
Its like you're defending Zimmerman for some reason and to defend you just respond about race. I know, let me guess...The left made you do it right?![]()
First I will explain your first question....
The reason they correlate is.....it has been automatically assumed by many that Zimmerman racially profiled......nothing else is possible in the eyes of many. He must have racially profiled......a white man kills a black man it MUST be racially motivated.....but in the meantime, black men are killed by other black men at a much higher rate....and certainly that is not racially motivated....so black men are killed by whites and blacks.....but when killed by whites it is racially motivated......really?
The left does not make me respond about race. The left cries racism and I simply show how it is an empty accusation.
FYI.....
Your post is a childish diversion.