Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His “personal” troops?Yeah, he did. They were HIS personal troops. Trump allowed them to be killed. Over 200 of them. One quarter of the entire force at that time. Obummer would have NEVER attacked his masters troops that way.
DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
His “personal” troops?
That means nothing. Totally made up.
Putin doesn’t have a problem getting tens of thousands of his troops killed in Ukraine.
Trump was not part of anything in this episode.
Did they ask Trump’s permission before doing so?Trump ALLOWED US troops to kill them.
Keep dreaming, fatboy.
Over 300 classified documents recovered during raid of Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago
Officials are investigating whether Trump illegally took documents from the White House after losing the 2021 presidential electionmetro.co.uk
Will you respect the work of keeping America secure from traitors ?
or
Will you polish up your guns and kill some cops ?
or
Will you squat on your couch , watch Fox and burble about Hillary,Hunter and stuff ?
You havent got long to think about this.
Did they ask Trump’s permission before doing so?
Rules of engagement always allow our troops to defend themselves.Of course. They are called "rules of engagement". Obummer NEVER allowed US troops to engage them.
Rules of engagement always allow our troops to defend themselves.
You realize that’s why the engaged the Russian troops, right? The Russians mistakenly attacked our position.
taskandpurpose.com
Setting aside the very different circumstances that they were in, do you think Russian soldiers carry weapons?Anyone who wasn’t carrying a weapon or planting a bomb was considered a non-combatant."
Setting aside the very different circumstances that they were in, do you think Russian soldiers carry weapons?
They already are. They're over here instead, doing the work your sorry ass won't do. What goes around comes around.Come take them, man lover.
Anybody who would do and say this, will do the other; Billy Bush says infamous 'grab them by the p***y' comments came from TrumpYou liars spew that crap like you were actually there. Liars all.
And you think the Russians shelling their positions and advancing in tanks were non-combatants? Not sure what you’re getting at here.Not allowed to employ even their rifle if they might injure a non combatant.
DURRRRR
In what way exactly?You mean like you are now, liar?
Um, your counter argument is?
Why?Probably the one federal crime a former president CAN'T be charged with.
But you stupid clods will believe anything they shovel down your throats.
Elaborate? What are you talking about? Do you know?Probably the one federal crime a former president CAN'T be charged with.
But you stupid clods will believe anything they shovel down your throats.
Rules of engagement always allow our troops to defend themselves.
Keep dreaming about what? The FbI has the stolen classified documents.Keep dreaming, fatboy.
They talked to their lawyers first? Explain with links please?Hey idiot: many of our troops in places like Afghanistan have DIED because they were attacked and could not respond back defending themselves (or attack an obvious target) in time without first contacting central command to talk to their lawyers and get permission first.
That's part of how our men were killed in Benghazi.
Iraq and Afghanistan wars were a shit show propped up by lies, Obama inherited. Obama would have never invaded those countries to begin with, except we were still partially there, so his goal was to try and stabilize the insurgency from ISIS. And where did ISIS come from? Take a look; The Secret History of ISIS | FRONTLINENo, they don't. You should read more about what shit our troops had to put up with.
"President Barack Obama appeared on board with this idea when, in December 2009, he announced a surge of 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, bringing the total to record high of 100,000 for an 18-month window to beat back the Taliban before a withdrawal commenced. But the deployment of overwhelming force came with a catch, courtesy of Gen. Stanley McChrystal. McChrystal subscribed to the once immensely popular idea that counterinsurgencies aren’t won by stacking bodies, but rather by winning over the “hearts and minds” of the civilian population — which means doing everything possible to avoid killing innocent people, among whom insurgents tend to eat, sleep, hide, and launch attacks. Troops were no longer allowed to employ firepower — airstrikes, guided-rocket attacks, artillery barrages, mortar fire, and even their personal rifles — if doing so would endanger the life of a non-combatant. Anyone who wasn’t carrying a weapon or planting a bomb was considered a non-combatant."
What Mattis’ New Rules Of Engagement Mean For The War In Afghanistan
When people struggle to make sense of why the United States still isn’t winning the war in Afghanistan after 16 years, they often blame the rules of
