What would Africa be like if it were never colonized by Europeans?

[irosie91]

I already know. The idiot is trying to claim that EVERYONE THINKS LIKE A BLOODY LIMEY------that black people are stupid---------nope------that is a claim of VICTIMIZATION that colors HIS thinking.

 

[IM2]

You redneck loafers would have to work your balls off instead of sitting on your porches drinking mint julips

Yeah, 'cause blacks are such hard workers that no one in their right mind will hire them if they can possibly avoid it. Lol...

Black People were not considered lazy until we stopped working for free.

 

[irosie91]

I already know. The idiot is trying to claim that EVERYONE THINKS LIKE A BLOODY LIMEY------that black people are stupid---------nope------that is a claim of VICTIMIZATION that colors HIS thinking.

-----the Egyptian art reveals MOSTLY----very light colored females and somewhat bronzed males-------My father who was all EUROPEAN-----was darker than those people depicted on pyramid walls who were not CLEARLY NUBIAN

 

[IM2]

I already know. The idiot is trying to claim that EVERYONE THINKS LIKE A BLOODY LIMEY------that black people are stupid---------nope------that is a claim of VICTIMIZATION that colors HIS thinking.

Nah, you just can't deal with the fact that perhaps whites did not rule everything from the beginning of time.

 

[eddiew37]

I already know. The idiot is trying to claim that EVERYONE THINKS LIKE A BLOODY LIMEY------that black people are stupid---------nope------that is a claim of VICTIMIZATION that colors HIS thinking.

Nah, you just can't deal with the fact that perhaps whites did not rule everything from the beginning of time.

They think Blacks were treated equally these past 100++ years Dunderheads

 

[IM2]

I see that most of these whites are scared to look at the videos,

 

[LOIE]

Slaves were fed as blacks are fed today, but at least they had more value since they were property. The irony is that black lives had more value as slaves than they have today

This is so wrong on so many levels. Slaves were fed the leftovers and just enough to keep them alive so they could continue to work every day. They may have been assigned a dollar value when they were bought and sold, but in order to ease their consciences, the white man had to convince himself that they were subhuman and of no real lasting value. Black lives today have every bit as much value as every other human being. It's just such a shame that so many people still think otherwise.

 

[LOIE]

I see that most of these whites are scared to look at the videos,

I have really loved watching them. Thanks for sharing, and I wish many others would watch and learn.

 

[Meathead]

Slaves were fed as blacks are fed today, but at least they had more value since they were property. The irony is that black lives had more value as slaves than they have today

This is so wrong on so many levels. Slaves were fed the leftovers and just enough to keep them alive so they could continue to work every day. They may have been assigned a dollar value when they were bought and sold, but in order to ease their consciences, the white man had to convince himself that they were subhuman and of no real lasting value. Black lives today have every bit as much value as every other human being. It's just such a shame that so many people still think otherwise.

As property, they were undeniably worth more than they are by their "owners" today. There is no way you can honestly tell me that most black people today have the value to the Democratic party than their ancestors had to their owners.

The carnage of black Americans would have never been dismissed so freely today if they had been the property of yesteryear.

 

[bgrouse]

Don't have to wonder. The success of the South never really DID depend on slavery. By the time Reconstruction was at full tilt -- there was no longer any impact from the loss of slavery. Within 30 years from the Civil War -- it was CLEAR that slavery was not a prerequisite for any part of the American economy.

In fact, fewer and fewer slaveholders existed from the 1820s to the Civil War. It was winding down on its own.

I don't think so. But then we look at the 100 years after slavery and you cannot talk about that.

...and yet you're still here now that slavery is over.

Chickenshit whites can't talk about all the years they gave themselves everything.

What's wrong with giving stuff to ourselves? Whites take care of themselves. Is that bad? Maybe you shitskins should try the same instead of leeching off of whitey like you do.

So we get stupidity like this. I was born here bitch. Why don't you leave?

I don't have a problem with the whites here. You do. You keep bitching and moaning about them every chance you get. The fact that you stay proves you're a full-of-shit, dependent-on-whitey negro.

Tell us again how Hannibal, who was no sub-Saharan, kicked Alexander's ass. Btw, the other guy who used regale us with jungle bunny civilizations no longer does. Do you think you can pick it up. Not so much that everybody on Africa was black, but the sub-Saharan stuff.

Sub Saharan is a white racist depiction. Id yo knew anything you understand there was plenty of advancement in that region long before whitey showed up.

But you don't want to discuss that because you are allowed to troll and those in charge like facaltenn troll right along with you.

Let's discuss how you contradicted yourself.

Maybe whites just move completely out of Africa

In the 2000s Zimbabwe's economy began to deteriorate due to various factors, including, the imposition of economic sanctions by western countries led by the United Kingdom,

So which is it? Is Zimbabwe a shithole because of white involvement or because of a lack of white involvement?

Let me give you a hint: what's the common denominator of white involvement with a black-run country and a lack of white involvement in the black country? It's the black country, retard! That's the cause of failure: negroes!

You are truly a dipshit. The examples show how whites fucked up zimbabwe.

Why don't you answer the question? The only thing you're showing is the shocking stupidity (given how you're contradicting yourself) of negroes like you, so it's not surprising that negro shitholes are shitholes.

You're also refusing to address questions, which is another problem negroes have: lack of personal responsibility. You made a stupid post and when asked about it, you come back with more whining about whites.

You talked yourself into a corner, shitskin.

No, you see idiot, whites gave themselves all these things and did not allow others to get them. I've answered your questions and when you talk about the lack pf personal responsibility, whites are numero uno. All the examples I showed for zimbabwe was how whites fucked it up. But the problem with you illiterate bastards is zimbabwe is not the only African nation. So I tell you what, why don't you take your white ass right on up to an African and tell them how colonization didn't fuck up most of that continent and see what you get?

I already told you. What I got was a dumb ape (you) contradicting itself, saying white involvement is the cause and that white lack of involvement (economic sanctions) is the cause. Thanks for the laughs, you stupid shitskin retard.

Runaway population in all these shithole countries is the one HUGE problem no one dares to address, or even discuss. These people cannot feed themselves, and cannot afford or support children, so the suffering is compounded by the continued high birth rates.

Then all blame is laid on western countries for not spending (wasting) ever more billions of taxpayer dollars to feed their sorry asses, when they seem to do nothing to help themselves. They could at least wear a stinking rubber (if there were a responsible government to be found that would engourage it). That's aid that might actually improve things: boatloads of rubbers.

You are wrong. Western countries stole wealth from these nations and still do.

Take it to some dingbat black liberation site where you'll be showered with accolades of brilliance instead of laughter and derision. This is not safe space "bro", and you really, really need one.

Nah, Ill post here because I don't concern myself with what a bunch of illiterate stormfront troopers think.

Oh, we're well aware that you don't concern yourself with trifles like facts, per capita statistics (when it suits you), and current events. No need to point it out to us.

I dealt with per capita. But that's your only argument when it pertains to the fact shown numerically that whites commit the most crimes. Your punk ass can't even talk about all; crimes, you just talk about murder which on a per capita basis 14 per 100,000 blacks are doing it. The number is so small hat t males your per capita claim a mother fucking joke.

I've talked about violent crime plenty. Negroes lead the stats there, too.

 

[eddiew37]

I don't think so. But then we look at the 100 years after slavery and you cannot talk about that.

...and yet you're still here now that slavery is over.

Chickenshit whites can't talk about all the years they gave themselves everything.

What's wrong with giving stuff to ourselves? Whites take care of themselves. Is that bad? Maybe you shitskins should try the same instead of leeching off of whitey like you do.

So we get stupidity like this. I was born here bitch. Why don't you leave?

I don't have a problem with the whites here. You do. You keep bitching and moaning about them every chance you get. The fact that you stay proves you're a full-of-shit, dependent-on-whitey negro.

Sub Saharan is a white racist depiction. Id yo knew anything you understand there was plenty of advancement in that region long before whitey showed up.

But you don't want to discuss that because you are allowed to troll and those in charge like facaltenn troll right along with you.

Let's discuss how you contradicted yourself.

Maybe whites just move completely out of Africa

In the 2000s Zimbabwe's economy began to deteriorate due to various factors, including, the imposition of economic sanctions by western countries led by the United Kingdom,

So which is it? Is Zimbabwe a shithole because of white involvement or because of a lack of white involvement?

Let me give you a hint: what's the common denominator of white involvement with a black-run country and a lack of white involvement in the black country? It's the black country, retard! That's the cause of failure: negroes!

You are truly a dipshit. The examples show how whites fucked up zimbabwe.

Why don't you answer the question? The only thing you're showing is the shocking stupidity (given how you're contradicting yourself) of negroes like you, so it's not surprising that negro shitholes are shitholes.

You're also refusing to address questions, which is another problem negroes have: lack of personal responsibility. You made a stupid post and when asked about it, you come back with more whining about whites.

You talked yourself into a corner, shitskin.

No, you see idiot, whites gave themselves all these things and did not allow others to get them. I've answered your questions and when you talk about the lack pf personal responsibility, whites are numero uno. All the examples I showed for zimbabwe was how whites fucked it up. But the problem with you illiterate bastards is zimbabwe is not the only African nation. So I tell you what, why don't you take your white ass right on up to an African and tell them how colonization didn't fuck up most of that continent and see what you get?

I already told you. What I got was a dumb ape (you) contradicting itself, saying white involvement is the cause and that white lack of involvement (economic sanctions) is the cause. Thanks for the laughs, you stupid shitskin retard.

You are wrong. Western countries stole wealth from these nations and still do.

Take it to some dingbat black liberation site where you'll be showered with accolades of brilliance instead of laughter and derision. This is not safe space "bro", and you really, really need one.

Nah, Ill post here because I don't concern myself with what a bunch of illiterate stormfront troopers think.

Oh, we're well aware that you don't concern yourself with trifles like facts, per capita statistics (when it suits you), and current events. No need to point it out to us.

I dealt with per capita. But that's your only argument when it pertains to the fact shown numerically that whites commit the most crimes. Your punk ass can't even talk about all; crimes, you just talk about murder which on a per capita basis 14 per 100,000 blacks are doing it. The number is so small hat t males your per capita claim a mother fucking joke.

I've talked about violent crime plenty. Negroes lead the stats there, too.

And republicans get angry when you call them racists??

 

[irosie91]

You redneck loafers would have to work your balls off instead of sitting on your porches drinking mint julips

Yeah, 'cause blacks are such hard workers that no one in their right mind will hire them if they can possibly avoid it. Lol...

Black People were not considered lazy until we stopped working for free.

you are playing victim too

Aw shut the hell up. You can't take the truth.

to what "truth" are you referring? the fact that you IMAGINE that black skin is a mark of SAINTHOOD?

 

[IM2]

I don't think so. But then we look at the 100 years after slavery and you cannot talk about that.

...and yet you're still here now that slavery is over.

Chickenshit whites can't talk about all the years they gave themselves everything.

What's wrong with giving stuff to ourselves? Whites take care of themselves. Is that bad? Maybe you shitskins should try the same instead of leeching off of whitey like you do.

So we get stupidity like this. I was born here bitch. Why don't you leave?

I don't have a problem with the whites here. You do. You keep bitching and moaning about them every chance you get. The fact that you stay proves you're a full-of-shit, dependent-on-whitey negro.

Sub Saharan is a white racist depiction. Id yo knew anything you understand there was plenty of advancement in that region long before whitey showed up.

But you don't want to discuss that because you are allowed to troll and those in charge like facaltenn troll right along with you.

Let's discuss how you contradicted yourself.

Maybe whites just move completely out of Africa

In the 2000s Zimbabwe's economy began to deteriorate due to various factors, including, the imposition of economic sanctions by western countries led by the United Kingdom,

So which is it? Is Zimbabwe a shithole because of white involvement or because of a lack of white involvement?

Let me give you a hint: what's the common denominator of white involvement with a black-run country and a lack of white involvement in the black country? It's the black country, retard! That's the cause of failure: negroes!

You are truly a dipshit. The examples show how whites fucked up zimbabwe.

Why don't you answer the question? The only thing you're showing is the shocking stupidity (given how you're contradicting yourself) of negroes like you, so it's not surprising that negro shitholes are shitholes.

You're also refusing to address questions, which is another problem negroes have: lack of personal responsibility. You made a stupid post and when asked about it, you come back with more whining about whites.

You talked yourself into a corner, shitskin.

No, you see idiot, whites gave themselves all these things and did not allow others to get them. I've answered your questions and when you talk about the lack pf personal responsibility, whites are numero uno. All the examples I showed for zimbabwe was how whites fucked it up. But the problem with you illiterate bastards is zimbabwe is not the only African nation. So I tell you what, why don't you take your white ass right on up to an African and tell them how colonization didn't fuck up most of that continent and see what you get?

I already told you. What I got was a dumb ape (you) contradicting itself, saying white involvement is the cause and that white lack of involvement (economic sanctions) is the cause. Thanks for the laughs, you stupid shitskin retard.

You are wrong. Western countries stole wealth from these nations and still do.

Take it to some dingbat black liberation site where you'll be showered with accolades of brilliance instead of laughter and derision. This is not safe space "bro", and you really, really need one.

Nah, Ill post here because I don't concern myself with what a bunch of illiterate stormfront troopers think.

Oh, we're well aware that you don't concern yourself with trifles like facts, per capita statistics (when it suits you), and current events. No need to point it out to us.

I dealt with per capita. But that's your only argument when it pertains to the fact shown numerically that whites commit the most crimes. Your punk ass can't even talk about all; crimes, you just talk about murder which on a per capita basis 14 per 100,000 blacks are doing it. The number is so small hat t males your per capita claim a mother fucking joke.

I've talked about violent crime plenty. Negroes lead the stats there, too.

Unwarranted white economic sanctions is not about the lack of white involvement. said crime, tat means all crime. You talk about violent crime, but whites lead in the numbers of violent crimes committed. Then when you get told that, instead of facing the truth you want to use per capita and when we look at per capita the number per 100,000 is low. So low that it is of no consequence.

 

[IM2]

You redneck loafers would have to work your balls off instead of sitting on your porches drinking mint julips

Yeah, 'cause blacks are such hard workers that no one in their right mind will hire them if they can possibly avoid it. Lol...

Black People were not considered lazy until we stopped working for free.

you are playing victim too

Aw shut the hell up. You can't take the truth.

to what "truth" are you referring? the fact that you IMAGINE that black skin is a mark of SAINTHOOD?

Never have said that. There is a pretty large difference between saying that blacks had great civilizations that whites like you deny existed, that believing that we are perfect and that we have been the only race that has accomplished anything like you whites here do. You can't deal with the truth.

 

[IM2]

Slaves were fed as blacks are fed today, but at least they had more value since they were property. The irony is that black lives had more value as slaves than they have today

This is so wrong on so many levels. Slaves were fed the leftovers and just enough to keep them alive so they could continue to work every day. They may have been assigned a dollar value when they were bought and sold, but in order to ease their consciences, the white man had to convince himself that they were subhuman and of no real lasting value. Black lives today have every bit as much value as every other human being. It's just such a shame that so many people still think otherwise.

As property, they were undeniably worth more than they are by their "owners" today. There is no way you can honestly tell me that most black people today have the value to the Democratic party than their ancestors had to their owners.

The carnage of black Americans would have never been dismissed so freely today if they had been the property of yesteryear.

Whites kill each other too.

 

[IM2]

The Africa They Never Show You.

 

[flacaltenn]

But a vehement critic of corrupt, violent, and incompetent govt with totally unqualified leadership.

Seems to me the United States of America has had this type of leadership for many of it's years of existence, including current ones.

Well of course. Especially the inept and incompetent part. The DIFFERENCE IS -- our system reserves enough power to the people to largely ignore, work around, or outpace the inept sloths. So in OUR case, the govt is usually YEARS BEHIND any issue before they even react to it.

In a dictatorship for life, practicing rampant nepotism, and STEALING from it's people, there are no many good "work arounds"... Besides Zimbabwe, we have Nigeria and at least 6 or 8 other blatant examples of this in Sub Saharan Africa today.

 

[bgrouse]

...and yet you're still here now that slavery is over.

Chickenshit whites can't talk about all the years they gave themselves everything.

What's wrong with giving stuff to ourselves? Whites take care of themselves. Is that bad? Maybe you shitskins should try the same instead of leeching off of whitey like you do.

So we get stupidity like this. I was born here bitch. Why don't you leave?

I don't have a problem with the whites here. You do. You keep bitching and moaning about them every chance you get. The fact that you stay proves you're a full-of-shit, dependent-on-whitey negro.

Let's discuss how you contradicted yourself.

So which is it? Is Zimbabwe a shithole because of white involvement or because of a lack of white involvement?

Let me give you a hint: what's the common denominator of white involvement with a black-run country and a lack of white involvement in the black country? It's the black country, retard! That's the cause of failure: negroes!

You are truly a dipshit. The examples show how whites fucked up zimbabwe.

Why don't you answer the question? The only thing you're showing is the shocking stupidity (given how you're contradicting yourself) of negroes like you, so it's not surprising that negro shitholes are shitholes.

You're also refusing to address questions, which is another problem negroes have: lack of personal responsibility. You made a stupid post and when asked about it, you come back with more whining about whites.

You talked yourself into a corner, shitskin.

No, you see idiot, whites gave themselves all these things and did not allow others to get them. I've answered your questions and when you talk about the lack pf personal responsibility, whites are numero uno. All the examples I showed for zimbabwe was how whites fucked it up. But the problem with you illiterate bastards is zimbabwe is not the only African nation. So I tell you what, why don't you take your white ass right on up to an African and tell them how colonization didn't fuck up most of that continent and see what you get?

I already told you. What I got was a dumb ape (you) contradicting itself, saying white involvement is the cause and that white lack of involvement (economic sanctions) is the cause. Thanks for the laughs, you stupid shitskin retard.

Take it to some dingbat black liberation site where you'll be showered with accolades of brilliance instead of laughter and derision. This is not safe space "bro", and you really, really need one.

Nah, Ill post here because I don't concern myself with what a bunch of illiterate stormfront troopers think.

Oh, we're well aware that you don't concern yourself with trifles like facts, per capita statistics (when it suits you), and current events. No need to point it out to us.

I dealt with per capita. But that's your only argument when it pertains to the fact shown numerically that whites commit the most crimes. Your punk ass can't even talk about all; crimes, you just talk about murder which on a per capita basis 14 per 100,000 blacks are doing it. The number is so small hat t males your per capita claim a mother fucking joke.

I've talked about violent crime plenty. Negroes lead the stats there, too.

Unwarranted white economic sanctions is not about the lack of white involvement.

Sure it is. Sanctions prevent whites in those countries from trading/doing business with Zimbabwe. WTF do you think sanctions are? It's what you wanted, but now you're whining about it. Face it: you need whitey and will whine when whitey helps you. That's why you are in a white country.

said crime, tat means all crime. You talk about violent crime, but whites lead in the numbers of violent crimes committed.

Yeah, they might speed more, since negroes are too busy doing time in prison for murder/rape/robbery. Bwahahaha!

Then when you get told that, instead of facing the truth you want to use per capita and when we look at per capita the number per 100,000 is low. So low that it is of no consequence.

Sorry, shitskin, I don't care as much about speeding as I do about murder/rape/robbery. Maybe that's the kind of attitude that makes white countries so much better than negro shitskin countries.

 

[IM2]

Africa you never see on TV -Poverty in Europe

 

[IM2]

But a vehement critic of corrupt, violent, and incompetent govt with totally unqualified leadership.

Seems to me the United States of America has had this type of leadership for many of it's years of existence, including current ones.

Well of course. Especially the inept and incompetent part. The DIFFERENCE IS -- our system reserves enough power to the people to largely ignore, work around, or outpace the inept sloths. So in OUR case, the govt is usually YEARS BEHIND any issue before they even react to it.

In a dictatorship for life, practicing rampant nepotism, and STEALING from it's people, there are no many good "work arounds"... Besides Zimbabwe, we have Nigeria and at least 6 or 8 other blatant examples of this in Sub Saharan Africa today.

Excuse after excuse after excuse. And lies even