What would happen to the economy if minimum wages are raised?

[danielpalos]

i have; you are simply clueless and Causeless. the right habitually complains about the cost of social services.

Okay then, which first world countries are thriving that do not have a strong work ethic? I've noticed a pattern from you. You don't deal with inconvenient issues, you wander off and start picking daisies, then come back and claim you dealt with them.

only Capital has to work, not fools or horses. is that clear enough for you?

It's clear that you're either:

1. A moron.
2. High as a kite.
3. A socialist phrase generating bot.
4. Completely incapable of deeper thought than a slogan.

it is your ignorance. capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism. only the right, never gets it.

Obviously a bot. Good-bye.

not worth your pay, in the logic and reason sector?

 

[hadit]

Okay then, which first world countries are thriving that do not have a strong work ethic? I've noticed a pattern from you. You don't deal with inconvenient issues, you wander off and start picking daisies, then come back and claim you dealt with them.

only Capital has to work, not fools or horses. is that clear enough for you?

It's clear that you're either:

1. A moron.
2. High as a kite.
3. A socialist phrase generating bot.
4. Completely incapable of deeper thought than a slogan.

it is your ignorance. capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism. only the right, never gets it.

Obviously a bot. Good-bye.

not worth your pay, in the logic and reason sector?

If you discover a clue, let me know. Otherwise, you're a waste of time.

 

[danielpalos]

only Capital has to work, not fools or horses. is that clear enough for you?

It's clear that you're either:

1. A moron.
2. High as a kite.
3. A socialist phrase generating bot.
4. Completely incapable of deeper thought than a slogan.

it is your ignorance. capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism. only the right, never gets it.

Obviously a bot. Good-bye.

not worth your pay, in the logic and reason sector?

If you discover a clue, let me know. Otherwise, you're a waste of time.

Dear, only wo-men can be inferior in the logic and reason sector.

capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And socialism still sucks. Still fails.

God is all about socialism, not capitalism. Only the (semi-)Religious right, never gets it.

God wants higher taxes and UE benefits for people who quit?

Link?

Bearing false witness to our own laws is a moral turpitude; only the (semi-)Religious right wing, never gets it.

If God is about socialism, so why does it fail everywhere?

a lack of social morals for free? how much does it cost us to need more than Ten Commandments.

Socialism is not moral.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

i have; you are simply clueless and Causeless. the right habitually complains about the cost of social services.

Okay then, which first world countries are thriving that do not have a strong work ethic? I've noticed a pattern from you. You don't deal with inconvenient issues, you wander off and start picking daisies, then come back and claim you dealt with them.

only Capital has to work, not fools or horses. is that clear enough for you?

It's clear that you're either:

1. A moron.
2. High as a kite.
3. A socialist phrase generating bot.
4. Completely incapable of deeper thought than a slogan.

I vote...all of the above.

just another clueless wonder. how many rich people work like the poor, if they can get capital to work for them.

Yes, socialism is clueless.

 

[danielpalos]

God is all about socialism, not capitalism. Only the (semi-)Religious right, never gets it.

God wants higher taxes and UE benefits for people who quit?

Link?

Bearing false witness to our own laws is a moral turpitude; only the (semi-)Religious right wing, never gets it.

If God is about socialism, so why does it fail everywhere?

a lack of social morals for free? how much does it cost us to need more than Ten Commandments.

Socialism is not moral.

yes, because it requires social morals for free even under our form of capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Okay then, which first world countries are thriving that do not have a strong work ethic? I've noticed a pattern from you. You don't deal with inconvenient issues, you wander off and start picking daisies, then come back and claim you dealt with them.

only Capital has to work, not fools or horses. is that clear enough for you?

It's clear that you're either:

1. A moron.
2. High as a kite.
3. A socialist phrase generating bot.
4. Completely incapable of deeper thought than a slogan.

I vote...all of the above.

just another clueless wonder. how many rich people work like the poor, if they can get capital to work for them.

Yes, socialism is clueless.

nothing but diversion?

how many rich people work like the poor, if they can get capital to work for them.

 

[dblack]

how many rich people work like the poor, if they can get capital to work for them.

That's a childish understanding of how 'capital' works. Capitalists make the most important decisions in our economy. If they do it well, they make a lot of money. If they don't, they lose it. Making those decisions is difficult work, it's not just a matter of sitting on your ass and counting your money.

 

[hadit]

how many rich people work like the poor, if they can get capital to work for them.

That's a childish understanding of how 'capital' works. Capitalists make the most important decisions in our economy. If they do it well, they make a lot of money. If they don't, they lose it. Making those decisions is difficult work, it's not just a matter of sitting on your ass and counting your money.

Don't bother trying to explain anything. You'll only get socialist slogans back. The puddle over there is not very deep.

 

[danielpalos]

how many rich people work like the poor, if they can get capital to work for them.

That's a childish understanding of how 'capital' works. Capitalists make the most important decisions in our economy. If they do it well, they make a lot of money. If they don't, they lose it. Making those decisions is difficult work, it's not just a matter of sitting on your ass and counting your money.

no, it isn't. it called and styled, "class warfare". Only fools and horses should Have to work under our fine and capital form of socialism.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

only Capital has to work, not fools or horses. is that clear enough for you?

It's clear that you're either:

1. A moron.
2. High as a kite.
3. A socialist phrase generating bot.
4. Completely incapable of deeper thought than a slogan.

it is your ignorance. capital must circulate under any form of Capitalism. only the right, never gets it.

Obviously a bot. Good-bye.

not worth your pay, in the logic and reason sector?

If you discover a clue, let me know. Otherwise, you're a waste of time.

as I said Danny speaks english as a 4th language

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

it would for example wipe out all of Walmarts profits, unemploy 2.3 million, and cause a world wide Depression

and lets not forget a libcommie wants 10001 interventions in the free market not just this one and all because he lacks the IQ to understand capitalism

 

[danielpalos]

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

it would for example wipe out all of Walmarts profits, unemploy 2.3 million, and cause a world wide Depression

and lets not forget a libcommie wants 10001 interventions in the free market not just this one and all because he lacks the IQ to understand capitalism

Why do you believe Capitalists would not want to achieve gains from productivity, if labor prices increase?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

it would for example wipe out all of Walmarts profits, unemploy 2.3 million, and cause a world wide Depression

and lets not forget a libcommie wants 10001 interventions in the free market not just this one and all because he lacks the IQ to understand capitalism

Why do you believe Capitalists would not want to achieve gains from productivity, if labor prices increase?

dear, you wanted to know harm if $15. I told you and then you changed the subject hoping no one would notice. How will you learn if you are afraid of the truth?.
Do you want to be a liberal all your life?

 

[danielpalos]

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

it would for example wipe out all of Walmarts profits, unemploy 2.3 million, and cause a world wide Depression

and lets not forget a libcommie wants 10001 interventions in the free market not just this one and all because he lacks the IQ to understand capitalism

Why do you believe Capitalists would not want to achieve gains from productivity, if labor prices increase?

dear, you wanted to know harm if $15. I told you and then you changed the subject hoping no one would notice. How will you learn if you are afraid of the truth?.
Do you want to be a liberal all your life?

Dear, that was the subject. Now you know why no one takes the right wing seriously about economics.

It is about full employment of resources in our markets. Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual, is what nanny-State-ism, should Always be Good for; not, merely socializing our tax codes through micromanagement.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

it would for example wipe out all of Walmarts profits, unemploy 2.3 million, and cause a world wide Depression

and lets not forget a libcommie wants 10001 interventions in the free market not just this one and all because he lacks the IQ to understand capitalism

Why do you believe Capitalists would not want to achieve gains from productivity, if labor prices increase?

dear, you wanted to know harm if $15. I told you and then you changed the subject hoping no one would notice. How will you learn if you are afraid of the truth?.
Do you want to be a liberal all your life?

Dear, that was the subject. Now you know why no one takes the right wing seriously about economics.

It is about full employment of resources in our markets. Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual, is what nanny-State-ism, should Always be Good for; not, merely socializing our tax codes through micromanagement.

DANIELPALOS SAID: ↑
Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

 

[danielpalos]

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

it would for example wipe out all of Walmarts profits, unemploy 2.3 million, and cause a world wide Depression

and lets not forget a libcommie wants 10001 interventions in the free market not just this one and all because he lacks the IQ to understand capitalism

Why do you believe Capitalists would not want to achieve gains from productivity, if labor prices increase?

dear, you wanted to know harm if $15. I told you and then you changed the subject hoping no one would notice. How will you learn if you are afraid of the truth?.
Do you want to be a liberal all your life?

Dear, that was the subject. Now you know why no one takes the right wing seriously about economics.

It is about full employment of resources in our markets. Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment by using socialism to bailout capitalism, like usual, is what nanny-State-ism, should Always be Good for; not, merely socializing our tax codes through micromanagement.

DANIELPALOS SAID: ↑
Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage

So, how can we be worse off, with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour?

Only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

Simple trickle up poor, no middle class

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

Simple trickle up poor, no middle class

trickle up, means the poor do most of the spending.