What would happen to the economy if minimum wages are raised?

[hadit]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

 

[hadit]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

 

[hadit]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

 

[danielpalos]

Nothing but fallacy from the fantastical right wing.

Can the right wing explain how we would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States?

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

 

[hadit]

That's been explained to you multiple times. You apparently can't grasp the concept.

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

yes, worker participation and wages keep dropping as liberalism cripples more and more people. There never has been a liberal in human history who didn't want always more welfare without end. As welfare cripples it creates the need for more liberals and more welfare. Its the perfect formula for starving 120 million to death as Stalin and Mao did in the name of helping.

 

[danielpalos]

all y'all have is right wing fantasy.

no one would be worse off with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and fourteen dollars an hour for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis.

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

You give yourself away; that is why No One, takes the right wing seriously about economics. A positive multiplier effect grows the size of the pie to cover costs.

 

[danielpalos]

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

yes, worker participation and wages keep dropping as liberalism cripples more and more people. There never has been a liberal in human history who didn't want always more welfare without end. As welfare cripples it creates the need for more liberals and more welfare. Its the perfect formula for starving 120 million to death as Stalin and Mao did in the name of helping.

only capital has to work under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

A positive multiplier effect grows the size of the pie to cover costs.

and yet more and more human beings are crippled by the lib commie welfare you constantly advocate.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

No One, takes the right wing seriously about economics.

I wonder how MIlton Friedman got the Nobel prize then???

 

[danielpalos]

A positive multiplier effect grows the size of the pie to cover costs.

and yet more and more human beings are crippled by the lib commie welfare you constantly advocate.

only the right thinks that way. all i am advocating, is a simple bailout by Uncle Sam if we cannot get daddy to do it.

 

[danielpalos]

No One, takes the right wing seriously about economics.

I wonder how MIlton Friedman got the Nobel prize then???

doing research with Mr. Krugman?

 

[hadit]

Like I said, you're not able to grasp the concept.

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

You give yourself away; that is why No One, takes the right wing seriously about economics. A positive multiplier effect grows the size of the pie to cover costs.

You are deliberately ignoring reality. More slackers combined with fewer producers means a lower multiplier effect. This is why socialism always kills the goose that lays the golden eggs, and that has been proven multiple times over the last 100 or so years.

 

[hadit]

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

yes, worker participation and wages keep dropping as liberalism cripples more and more people. There never has been a liberal in human history who didn't want always more welfare without end. As welfare cripples it creates the need for more liberals and more welfare. Its the perfect formula for starving 120 million to death as Stalin and Mao did in the name of helping.

only capital has to work under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

Where do you think the capital comes from in the first place?

 

[danielpalos]

you have no valid concept, only fallacy. how typical of the right wing.

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

You give yourself away; that is why No One, takes the right wing seriously about economics. A positive multiplier effect grows the size of the pie to cover costs.

You are deliberately ignoring reality. More slackers combined with fewer producers means a lower multiplier effect. This is why socialism always kills the goose that lays the golden eggs, and that has been proven multiple times over the last 100 or so years.

no dear; capitalism doesn't simply cease to exist because of your right wing fantasy. only capital has work under Any form of Capitalism. It is why we merely need to ensure capital circulates in our economy like an oil pump.

 

[danielpalos]

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

yes, worker participation and wages keep dropping as liberalism cripples more and more people. There never has been a liberal in human history who didn't want always more welfare without end. As welfare cripples it creates the need for more liberals and more welfare. Its the perfect formula for starving 120 million to death as Stalin and Mao did in the name of helping.

only capital has to work under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

Where do you think the capital comes from in the first place?

a printing press at an official Mint.

 

[hadit]

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

yes, worker participation and wages keep dropping as liberalism cripples more and more people. There never has been a liberal in human history who didn't want always more welfare without end. As welfare cripples it creates the need for more liberals and more welfare. Its the perfect formula for starving 120 million to death as Stalin and Mao did in the name of helping.

only capital has to work under any form of capitalism; only the right wing, never gets it.

Where do you think the capital comes from in the first place?

a printing press at an official Mint.

IOW, fake money that has no intrinsic value and can thus be completely devalued in an instant. If socialism actually could function with that, there would be no poverty. There is, however, and millions have starved under socialism precisely because there was no value in what they were paid.

 

[hadit]

Yet more meaningless slogans. The bottom line is this. You want a guaranteed income given to those who do not work, provided by those who do. It's been tried before and does not work. In fact, It only spreads misery and death around, not wealth and prosperity. You can't accept that reality, so you substitute your own. The more slogans you spout, the less credibility you have.

It is unemployment compensation, to compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, as a capital gain in civil liberty.

The fact is, you are welcome to quit for fourteen dollars an hour under a full employment scenario, where unemployment compensation pays out, simply for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; in order to ensure, full employment of resources in our capital economy.

How will you be worse off?

Because there won't be enough money to endlessly give to a large number of slackers who just want to get paid for doing nothing. Means testing for welfare and unemployment helps to prevent that scenario from developing.

You give yourself away; that is why No One, takes the right wing seriously about economics. A positive multiplier effect grows the size of the pie to cover costs.

You are deliberately ignoring reality. More slackers combined with fewer producers means a lower multiplier effect. This is why socialism always kills the goose that lays the golden eggs, and that has been proven multiple times over the last 100 or so years.

no dear; capitalism doesn't simply cease to exist because of your right wing fantasy. only capital has work under Any form of Capitalism. It is why we merely need to ensure capital circulates in our economy like an oil pump.

Millions starved under socialism during the last century, and many continue to do so today. You are ignoring reality.