Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US Government needs a list of all gun owners and the weapons they have.
It is the only way we can form well regulated militias
Based on the fact that not one of those lists exist from the era, your claim is ridiculous. The FF's had a healthy fear of big government so made it as difficult as possible for the government to interfere with the Peoples gun ownership. They would have thrown any person making your claims into the sewer had you had the audacity to make your claim to their faces.
Self regulated is good enough… Fuck the collectivePosse registry and militia enrollment, should be enough.Na, not under progressives terms...Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations
Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.
Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
Na, It’s on a need to know basis, the fucking federal government does not need to knowThere you go again, reading it out of context. The federal government has no right to know what individual firearm ownership is.Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.
Yes it is clear what is necessary
A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state
Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry
The context of well regulated hasn’t changed
Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around
Of course they do. They need to know who owns guns so they can have well regulated militias
Don’t you care about the security of a free state?
Anarchy or Chaos, are Not in our Constitution.Self regulated is good enough… Fuck the collectivePosse registry and militia enrollment, should be enough.Na, not under progressives terms...Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations
Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.
Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
Shall not be infringed, that’s all the federal government needs to know. It’s none of their fucking businessHave you read the militia acts?There you go again, reading it out of context. The federal government has no right to know what individual firearm ownership is.Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.
Yes it is clear what is necessary
A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state
Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry
The context of well regulated hasn’t changed
Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around
There would not be, there would be less of that…Anarchy or Chaos, are Not in our Constitution.Self regulated is good enough… Fuck the collectivePosse registry and militia enrollment, should be enough.Na, not under progressives terms...Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.
Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
Anarchy or Chaos, are Not in our Constitution.Self regulated is good enough… Fuck the collectivePosse registry and militia enrollment, should be enough.Na, not under progressives terms...Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.
Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
Na, None of those things are necessary. The federal government does not have a clueAll perfectly allowable by the second amendmentLeave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations
Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.
Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
No...the Founders didn't want any of that.
Background checks.....don't stop criminals or mass shooters. Universal Background checks will end in registration of guns...
Registration...unConstitutional...Haynes v United States ruled that criminals do not have to register their illegal guns...therefore, normal, law abiding gun owners do not have to register their legal guns
Required training....un Constitutional the same way that Literacy Tests were declared unConstitutional when democrats used them to keep black Americans from voting.
Licensing, unnecessary......criminals can't buy, own or carry guns so they can't get a license in the first place. Mass shooters will simply get a license. Also, unConstitutional if you charge any fee....that would be the same as Poll Tax for voting. We don't need a license, since law abiding people can legally own and carry guns. If you are stopped by the police and they find you with a gun, they run your name for felony convictions, if you don't pop up on that, they have no reason to hassle you. If you do...you can already be arrested. See, no reason for a license other than to make owning a gun more expensive and to put law abiding gun owners in legal peril....
Shall not be infringed, that’s all the federal government needs to know. It’s none of their fucking businessHave you read the militia acts?There you go again, reading it out of context. The federal government has no right to know what individual firearm ownership is.Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.Yes it is clear what is necessary
A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state
Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry
The context of well regulated hasn’t changed
Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around
that is Only when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; not natural rights.Shall not be infringed, that’s all the federal government needs to know. It’s none of their fucking businessHave you read the militia acts?There you go again, reading it out of context. The federal government has no right to know what individual firearm ownership is.Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.Yes it is clear what is necessary
A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state
Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry
The context of well regulated hasn’t changed
Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around
All perfectly allowable by the second amendmentLeave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations
Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.
Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
No...the Founders didn't want any of that.
Background checks.....don't stop criminals or mass shooters. Universal Background checks will end in registration of guns...
Registration...unConstitutional...Haynes v United States ruled that criminals do not have to register their illegal guns...therefore, normal, law abiding gun owners do not have to register their legal guns
Required training....un Constitutional the same way that Literacy Tests were declared unConstitutional when democrats used them to keep black Americans from voting.
Licensing, unnecessary......criminals can't buy, own or carry guns so they can't get a license in the first place. Mass shooters will simply get a license. Also, unConstitutional if you charge any fee....that would be the same as Poll Tax for voting. We don't need a license, since law abiding people can legally own and carry guns. If you are stopped by the police and they find you with a gun, they run your name for felony convictions, if you don't pop up on that, they have no reason to hassle you. If you do...you can already be arrested. See, no reason for a license other than to make owning a gun more expensive and to put law abiding gun owners in legal peril....
The US Government needs a list of all gun owners and the weapons they have.
It is the only way we can form well regulated militias
Read: England.The US Government needs a list of all gun owners and the weapons they have.
It is the only way we can form well regulated militias
Based on the fact that not one of those lists exist from the era, your claim is ridiculous. The FF's had a healthy fear of big government so made it as difficult as possible for the government to interfere with the Peoples gun ownership. They would have thrown any person making your claims into the sewer had you had the audacity to make your claim to their faces.
Monarchies in the 1700's terrorized and abused their own people, they forbid them from owning arms so they could not fight back. Hence the 2nd amendment. It does not surprise me that the 1st amendment guaranteed free speech followed by the 2nd amendment which guaranteed the 1st could not be taken away.
Anarchy or Chaos, are Not in our Constitution.Self regulated is good enough… Fuck the collectivePosse registry and militia enrollment, should be enough.Na, not under progressives terms...Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted
Training yes, background checks yes, licensing HELL NO, registration HELL NO. Both of the latter have been abused to infringe in our rights its not a theory its already happened. You give government an inch they take a mile, FACT! Just because we have a constitution does not mean government abides by it.
The States' national guards are already subject to their own governors.One would think the term 'militia' ,at least in the FF's 2nd context, would be anything but gub'mit conscripts. In fact,one could easily read 10th'ers stance into it.
How bad would it be if each state was in fact responsible for the creation , and maintenance of it's own militia ?
Something that would not bow to the Feds (funding strings)
Wouldn't that be in step with FF's constitutional foersight?
~S~
Self regulation is the only regulation needed when it comes to the second amendment. The federal government is in the dark and shall always remain in the dark on personal firearm ownership.that is Only when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union; not natural rights.Shall not be infringed, that’s all the federal government needs to know. It’s none of their fucking businessHave you read the militia acts?There you go again, reading it out of context. The federal government has no right to know what individual firearm ownership is.Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.
The context of well regulated hasn’t changed
Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around
Yep, Exactly it’s a “well regulated” militia... Controlled by the states as it should be. Fuck the federal government and their pussy whipped deep stateThe States' national guards are already subject to their own governors.One would think the term 'militia' ,at least in the FF's 2nd context, would be anything but gub'mit conscripts. In fact,one could easily read 10th'ers stance into it.
How bad would it be if each state was in fact responsible for the creation , and maintenance of it's own militia ?
Something that would not bow to the Feds (funding strings)
Wouldn't that be in step with FF's constitutional foersight?
~S~
The States' national guards are already subject to their own governors.One would think the term 'militia' ,at least in the FF's 2nd context, would be anything but gub'mit conscripts. In fact,one could easily read 10th'ers stance into it.
How bad would it be if each state was in fact responsible for the creation , and maintenance of it's own militia ?
Something that would not bow to the Feds (funding strings)
Wouldn't that be in step with FF's constitutional foersight?
~S~
The US Government needs a list of all gun owners and the weapons they have.
It is the only way we can form well regulated militias
