What you must believe to think Biden is innocent.

[Nostra]

Well, lets see the evidence in that, even if it does not lead to anything or charges. Dragging through the tabloids doesn't impress anyone with the slanted partisan attacks, except the fellow partisans. The rest of us will just wait until you guy find some kind of actual link and if not, will know it was just partisan BS, like that from the trump lawyers after 2020 loss at the polls, many of you morons still have not gotten over, as your feelings appear hurt, at continually losing in the court of facts, even in your own courts with your own judges and your side represented by your own lawyers. Could be, you guys are just the same sore losers, you have consistently projected to be. Get it through your head. The rest of us are waiting for the real deal, not in your right wing tabloids or other places outside of official proceedings.

You seem to be responding to the wrong person. I have not lost anything in any court.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I don't doubt the Bidens have their hands in shit they shouldn't. The problem is the Republican Party's incompetence to prove any of it. Maybe the Democrats are better at weeding out malfeasance in their political opposition or maybe the Bidens are just smarter than the Trumps when it comes to covering their tracks.

 

[Marener]

They don't seem to get that. For some reason, they believe that you have to have a smoking gun to convict someone in this country. Imagine how many criminals would have been released if this were the case. Preponderance of evidence is the standard.

Thanks to Republicans, a smoking gun is necessary to convict someone in impeachment.

(Preponderance of evidence is the standard for civil law, beyond a reasonable doubt is for criminal law and considerably higher bar to reach)

 

[rightwinger]

Yeah and the fact that Tony Bobolinsky identified Joe as the "big guy" and the fact that Joe flat out lied about having any contact with Hunter's business associates. And oh yeah and Devin Archer's, Hunter's business partner talking about how many times Joe was on the phone 20+ times with Hunter's business partners... just to talk about the weather of course.

Bobolinsky “testified” in front of Tucker Carlson. Lets see him do it under oath.
Lets see any 10 percent of profit from Burisma being sent to anyone
Lets see millions of dollars that Joe Biden can’t explain

You neglected to mention that Devon Archer testified under oath that at no time did he or his associates talk business in any of those 20+ calls

 

[rightwinger]

or maybe the Bidens are just smarter than the Trumps when it comes to covering their tracks.

Yes the same Joe Biden Republicans claim is a dementia addled fool

 

[Billiejeens]

You mean he successfully carried out US foreign policy without trying to corrupt the process by withholding much needed military aid until that president attacked his political rivals.

It was not US policy -

Was not the policy of the Obama administration.

I know that you will deny that - Your Cult went hard on this one., because it is Joe who will say anything and need people to clean up behind him.

Recap - Official US policy under Obama was that Ukraine had cleaned up its' corruption to the point that they were to receive the loan guarantees.

Biden withheld money to Ukraine until they agreed to fire the person looking into Burisma at Burisma's request.
Not in dispute.
Documented.

 

[Billiejeens]

Nope, you actually do NOT have enough!

You not wanting them to have enough and them actually not having enough are not the same thing.

 

[Care4all]

Even Comer said he does not have any actually evidence of any of it, "But was HOPING to find some."

what kind of shithead congressman would tell the public, the citizens of America, that he was HOPING to find evidence that our president did something illegal? Wtfudge?

 

[Marener]

Bobolinsky “testified” in front of Tucker Carlson. Lets see him do it under oath.
Lets see any 10 percent of profit from Burisma being sent to anyone
Lets see millions of dollars that Joe Biden can’t explain

You neglected to mention that Devon Archer testified under oath that at no time did he or his associates talk business in any of those 20+ calls

Bobolinsky may well be telling the truth, but it’s irrelevant since he was only involved with the Bidens after he left office.

Pretty hard to abuse an office you don’t hold.

 

[White 6]

In order to believe that Biden is innocent of taking bribes for favorable foreign policy decisions, we must ignore his own words, his son’s text messages and emails, all the “spontaneous” meetings, all the whistleblowers and witnesses, and the need for more than 20 shell companies to launder and distribute loot among family members who have no demonstrable skills. Finally, we must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people except the only one possessed of the power to make it rain.

Is this schizophrenic spam repetition, as you have no defense against normal people that still require evidence in a formal setting? Without evidence in a formal proceeding that prove your projected point, you are just not considered a master of the facts, actually more like a master-baiter.

 

[bodecea]

The guy lays everything out in the article, but here is his synopsis at the end. Unfortunately, the liberal board members believe all this.

Que the "where is the evidence' crowd...........

In order to believe that Biden is innocent of taking bribes for favorable foreign policy decisions, we must ignore his own words, his son’s text messages and emails, all the “spontaneous” meetings, all the whistleblowers and witnesses, and the need for more than 20 shell companies to launder and distribute loot among family members who have no demonstrable skills. Finally, we must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people except the only one possessed of the power to make it rain.

What We Must Believe to Believe Biden Is Innocent - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

We must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people in Biden's circle but not him.

spectator.org

What charges are President Biden indicted for?

 

[Lisa558]

To be a bribe, you have to say what Biden was bribed to do.

The only specific thing anyone has ever come up with is that he got Shokin fired.

This narrative requires you ignore the mountain of evidence that Shokin was fired because the everyone involved in Ukrainian reforms saw he was corrupt and preventing progress in cleaning up the prosecutor office.

I don’t think any of you even know about it because it’s censored by your media.

Actually, we just have to prove that Joe knew his drug addict son was using him to turn the entire Biden Family into multimillionnaires, with $20 million laundered through fake shell companies - and that he was aware of it and let it happen, at best. At worst, he profited directly.

He could clear all this up before dinner just by telling us what the Biden family members did for $20 million from foreign companies, and why Hunter did not register as a foreign agent, and why Hunter did not claim the bribe money on his tax return, and why he himself sent 1000 emails to Hunter using an alias.

But…..silence.

 

[Billiejeens]

Your political bias might make it difficult for you to make “reasonable” assumptions.

Your mind will ignore reality if you’re already emotionally invested in your narrative.

What's that sound?

Oh, it's that dang Irony meter again.

 

[rightwinger]

Lets just face it

Republicans have nothing against Joe Biden and they know it.
The last thing they want is for their investigation to be completed and admitting they found nothing.

So, they will just keep “investigating” for the next 14 months to create the illusion of corruption

 

[Lisa558]

Is this schizophrenic spam repetition, as you have no defense against normal people that still require evidence in a formal setting? Without evidence in a formal proceeding that prove your projected point, you are just not considered a master of the facts, actually more like a master-baiter.

We have evidence. It’s not my fault that you don’t understand what the word means.

 

[bodecea]

No one believes it -

The Democrat Cult simply does not care.

What charges is President Biden indicted for?

 

[bodecea]

We have evidence. It’s not my fault that you don’t understand what the word means.

What charges is President Biden indicted for?

 

[Marener]

Actually, we just have to prove that Joe knew his drug addict son was using him to turn the entire Biden Family into multimillionnaires, with $20 million laundered through fake shell companies - and that he was aware of it and let it happen, at best. At worst, he profited directly.

He could clear all this up before dinner just by telling us what the Biden family members did for $20 million from foreign companies, and why Hunter did not register as a foreign agent, and why Hunter did not claim the bribe money on his tax return, and why he himself sent 1000 emails to Hunter using an alias.

But…..silence.

Why would that be enough? Joe Biden isn’t culpable for his son’s behavior. None of us are affected whatsoever by it.

 

[Billiejeens]

Dont Taz Me Bro said:
or maybe the Bidens are just smarter than the Trumps when it comes to covering their tracks.

I'm sure that is true.
Biden has a 50-year record of practicing corruption, whereas Trump was a private upstanding citizen.

 

[Donald H]

What you must believe?

You have to believe that America didn't start the war against Russia.

That's the only way that Biden is going to be snagged into crimes that can justify an impeachment.

And there's probably no way that the Republican party will compromise their country's foreign policy crimes against humanity, for a little bit of joy in seeing Biden squirm through an impeachment.