Whatever ever happened to the little sign ‘We have a right to refuse service’?

[candycorn]

Segregation was government enforced, and no one wants to go back to that. There was a state law that said blacks had to ride in the back of the bus. It wasn't the decision of the bus company. Public restrooms were built by the state and local governments, so that isn't an example of freedom either. It's an example of government imposing its will on blacks. Separate lunch counters were also government enforced. The entire apparatus of segregation was enforced by law. Those laws were created in the first place because private business were not inclined to discriminate against paying customers and bigots didn't like it.

Your attempt to paint freedom as being responsible for segregation didn't hit the target. Government is what enforced segregation, not private businesses.

Private businesses were the ones who insisted on the laws, because they didn't want to serve "Those People' or they wanted to keep "Those people' in their place.

It was government- namely Federal Civil Rights Acts - that put an end to segregation.

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Again, straw-man. You're making stuff up because you can't articulate your position and defend it with a rational argument.

Incidentally, you're also proving the bigotry of liberals with the "toothless rednecks" stuff. Funny how you people declare yourselves "tolerant" and throw around endless racist and sexist terms.

The only people I know that don't recognize the authority of the federal government are the unhinged asshat libertarians, sovereign citizens, and anarchists. Every conservative I know completely recognizes and respects the authority of the federal government. The problem is, they recognize only the 18 enumerated powers that the federal government is constitutionally restricted by, where as you demand that conservatives recognize the federal government as having unlimited powers "for the good" of society because liberals have brainwashed you into believing such nonsense and your pissed off that conservatives won't follow you on it.

From her perspective, if you don't support the laws liberals have forced on us, then you don't recognize the rule of law. However, you're free to oppose any law that liberals don't like.

Liberals forced you to stop lynching blacks? How terrible.

 

[candycorn]

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

 

[P@triot]

Segregation was government enforced, and no one wants to go back to that. There was a state law that said blacks had to ride in the back of the bus. It wasn't the decision of the bus company. Public restrooms were built by the state and local governments, so that isn't an example of freedom either. It's an example of government imposing its will on blacks. Separate lunch counters were also government enforced. The entire apparatus of segregation was enforced by law. Those laws were created in the first place because private business were not inclined to discriminate against paying customers and bigots didn't like it.

Your attempt to paint freedom as being responsible for segregation didn't hit the target. Government is what enforced segregation, not private businesses.

Private businesses were the ones who insisted on the laws, because they didn't want to serve "Those People' or they wanted to keep "Those people' in their place.

It was government- namely Federal Civil Rights Acts - that put an end to segregation.

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Again, straw-man. You're making stuff up because you can't articulate your position and defend it with a rational argument.

Incidentally, you're also proving the bigotry of liberals with the "toothless rednecks" stuff. Funny how you people declare yourselves "tolerant" and throw around endless racist and sexist terms.

The only people I know that don't recognize the authority of the federal government are the unhinged asshat libertarians, sovereign citizens, and anarchists. Every conservative I know completely recognizes and respects the authority of the federal government. The problem is, they recognize only the 18 enumerated powers that the federal government is constitutionally restricted by, where as you demand that conservatives recognize the federal government as having unlimited powers "for the good" of society because liberals have brainwashed you into believing such nonsense and your pissed off that conservatives won't follow you on it.

From her perspective, if you don't support the laws liberals have forced on us, then you don't recognize the rule of law. However, you're free to oppose any law that liberals don't like.

Well I already pointed out how she's so pissed off that someone would question an illegal "law" (courts don't and cannot make law - they are the judicial branch and laws are made by the legislative branch) and yet her and her ilk have tried to ban guns despite the fact that the Constitution guaranteed my right to them over 230 years ago.

It's so ironic watching them lose their mind over people pushing back against a law that doesn't even really exist when they have shredded the Constitution which is the highest law in the land.

 

[bripat9643]

Segregation was government enforced, and no one wants to go back to that. There was a state law that said blacks had to ride in the back of the bus. It wasn't the decision of the bus company. Public restrooms were built by the state and local governments, so that isn't an example of freedom either. It's an example of government imposing its will on blacks. Separate lunch counters were also government enforced. The entire apparatus of segregation was enforced by law. Those laws were created in the first place because private business were not inclined to discriminate against paying customers and bigots didn't like it.

Your attempt to paint freedom as being responsible for segregation didn't hit the target. Government is what enforced segregation, not private businesses.

Private businesses were the ones who insisted on the laws, because they didn't want to serve "Those People' or they wanted to keep "Those people' in their place.

It was government- namely Federal Civil Rights Acts - that put an end to segregation.

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Again, straw-man. You're making stuff up because you can't articulate your position and defend it with a rational argument.

Incidentally, you're also proving the bigotry of liberals with the "toothless rednecks" stuff. Funny how you people declare yourselves "tolerant" and throw around endless racist and sexist terms.

The only people I know that don't recognize the authority of the federal government are the unhinged asshat libertarians, sovereign citizens, and anarchists. Every conservative I know completely recognizes and respects the authority of the federal government. The problem is, they recognize only the 18 enumerated powers that the federal government is constitutionally restricted by, where as you demand that conservatives recognize the federal government as having unlimited powers "for the good" of society because liberals have brainwashed you into believing such nonsense and your pissed off that conservatives won't follow you on it.

From her perspective, if you don't support the laws liberals have forced on us, then you don't recognize the rule of law. However, you're free to oppose any law that liberals don't like.

Liberals forced you to stop lynching blacks? How terrible.

It's apparent you've realized that you're an idiot who is unable to use facts and logic to support your points.

 

[bripat9643]

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

One thing we learned from liberals is that no issue is ever settled until we say it is.

 

[P@triot]

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

Stay classy CC! Interesting how you fantasize about me "destroying" many bedsprings giving it to so many women so good. Liberal women tend to be very attracted to power - so should we read this that you are attracted to my power over you and other libs with my facts that none of you can dispute?

I'm going to disappoint you a bit here CC but in the interest of full disclosure - I'm a married man and very faithful to my wife. I do not engage in the disgusting promiscuity that liberals engage in. Therefore, there has been no parade of women in my bed. Only 1 (she's absolutely beautiful though!) ;-)

 

[candycorn]

Private businesses were the ones who insisted on the laws, because they didn't want to serve "Those People' or they wanted to keep "Those people' in their place.

It was government- namely Federal Civil Rights Acts - that put an end to segregation.

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Again, straw-man. You're making stuff up because you can't articulate your position and defend it with a rational argument.

Incidentally, you're also proving the bigotry of liberals with the "toothless rednecks" stuff. Funny how you people declare yourselves "tolerant" and throw around endless racist and sexist terms.

The only people I know that don't recognize the authority of the federal government are the unhinged asshat libertarians, sovereign citizens, and anarchists. Every conservative I know completely recognizes and respects the authority of the federal government. The problem is, they recognize only the 18 enumerated powers that the federal government is constitutionally restricted by, where as you demand that conservatives recognize the federal government as having unlimited powers "for the good" of society because liberals have brainwashed you into believing such nonsense and your pissed off that conservatives won't follow you on it.

From her perspective, if you don't support the laws liberals have forced on us, then you don't recognize the rule of law. However, you're free to oppose any law that liberals don't like.

Liberals forced you to stop lynching blacks? How terrible.

It's apparent you've realized that you're an idiot who is unable to use facts and logic to support your points.

It's apparent (has been for a while), you're frustrated that "liberal laws" protecting minorities have robbed you of your way of life.

 

[BlackSand]

Whatever floats your boat there...but when you argue on the side of discrimination as poodle and brifart are doing...you're probably not going to get much mileage out of it with the black community.

Your type are the silly Liberals that think people like me need help understanding the community we live in ... And uppity white folks that don't even know most of the toothless hicks here are Democrats ... Lol!

.

 

[candycorn]

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

One thing we learned from liberals is that no issue is ever settled until we say it is.

It was settled a long time ago. If you and I were at the counter at Woolworth's you'd be the one clubbing the guys in the back of the head trying to get them to end their sit-in and I'd be standing between you and them.

You want to go back to those days.

The rest of the world doesn't.

It's that simple and you're upset by the world leaving you behind.

 

[candycorn]

Whatever floats your boat there...but when you argue on the side of discrimination as poodle and brifart are doing...you're probably not going to get much mileage out of it with the black community.

Your type are the silly Liberals that think people like me need help understanding the community we live in ... And uppity white folks that don't even know most of the toothless hicks here are Democrats ... Lol!

.

Never paid much attention to you. You're display here this morning has indicated that you don't seem to know much about society or the topic at hand.

 

[candycorn]

Today's toothless rednecks don't recognize the authority of the Federal Government (when the black guy is in charge anyway).

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

Stay classy CC! Interesting how you fantasize about me "destroying" many bedsprings giving it to so many women so good. Liberal women tend to be very attracted to power - so should we read this that you are attracted to my power over you and other libs with my facts that none of you can dispute?

I'm going to disappoint you a bit here CC but in the interest of full disclosure - I'm a married man and very faithful to my wife. I do not engage in the disgusting promiscuity that liberals engage in. Therefore, there has been no parade of women in my bed. Only 1 (she's absolutely beautiful though!) ;-)

 

[P@triot]

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

One thing we learned from liberals is that no issue is ever settled until we say it is.

It was settled a long time ago. If you and I were at the counter at Woolworth's you'd be the one clubbing the guys in the back of the head trying to get them to end their sit-in and I'd be standing between you and them.

You want to go back to those days.

The rest of the world doesn't.

It's that simple and you're upset by the world leaving you behind.

The 2nd Amendment was settled centuries ago dear. And yet that doesn't stop you and your unhinged ilk from trying to ban guns.

However, there was nothing "settled" on this issue. If all you can point to is a "court ruling" then you have nothing. Courts do not and cannot make law. Period. End of story.

The fact is, you very logically and very rationally state that a singer should not be forced to perform for someone against their will. But then you turn around and irrationally state that a restaurant should be forced to serve food to someone. WTF is the difference?!? The fact that you're not even consistent in your views says it all. A restaurant order should no more be forced to serve food (slavery) than a singer should be forced to sing (slaver).

If you have to use force sweetie - then you know you are wrong.

 

[bodecea]

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

One thing we learned from liberals is that no issue is ever settled until we say it is.

It was settled a long time ago. If you and I were at the counter at Woolworth's you'd be the one clubbing the guys in the back of the head trying to get them to end their sit-in and I'd be standing between you and them.

You want to go back to those days.

The rest of the world doesn't.

It's that simple and you're upset by the world leaving you behind.

The 2nd Amendment was settled centuries ago dear. And yet that doesn't stop you and your unhinged ilk from trying to ban guns.

However, there was nothing "settled" on this issue. If all you can point to is a "court ruling" then you have nothing. Courts do not and cannot make law. Period. End of story.

The fact is, you very logically and very rationally state that a singer should not be forced to perform for someone against their will. But then you turn around and irrationally state that a restaurant should be forced to serve food to someone. WTF is the difference?!? The fact that you're not even consistent in your views says it all. A restaurant order should no more be forced to serve food (slavery) than a singer should be forced to sing (slaver).

If you have to use force sweetie - then you know you are wrong.

How many gun control laws have been enacted during President Obama's terms?

 

[BlackSand]

Never paid much attention to you. You're display here this morning has indicated that you don't seem to know much about society or the topic at hand.

Well ... It is obvious you don't pay attention to much more than yourself.
The topic at hand is proprietary rights of business owners ... Not racial discrimination up to the mid 1900's.

Like many business owners around here ... We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Luckily the person doesn't have to be black, gay, male, female, Mexican, old, young, fat or skinny. We even reserve the right to tell jackasses like you to hit the door.

.

 

[candycorn]

Never paid much attention to you. You're display here this morning has indicated that you don't seem to know much about society or the topic at hand.

Well ... It is obvious you don't pay attention to much more than yourself.
The topic at hand is proprietary rights of business owners ... Not racial discrimination up to the mid 1900's.

Like many business owners around here ... We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. Luckily the person doesn't have to be black, gay, male, female, Mexican, old, young, fat or skinny. We even reserve the right to tell jackasses like you to hit the door.

.

Yeah and society is passing you by as well. Adios.

 

[candycorn]

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

One thing we learned from liberals is that no issue is ever settled until we say it is.

It was settled a long time ago. If you and I were at the counter at Woolworth's you'd be the one clubbing the guys in the back of the head trying to get them to end their sit-in and I'd be standing between you and them.

You want to go back to those days.

The rest of the world doesn't.

It's that simple and you're upset by the world leaving you behind.

The 2nd Amendment was settled centuries ago dear. And yet that doesn't stop you and your unhinged ilk from trying to ban guns.

However, there was nothing "settled" on this issue. If all you can point to is a "court ruling" then you have nothing. Courts do not and cannot make law. Period. End of story.

The fact is, you very logically and very rationally state that a singer should not be forced to perform for someone against their will. But then you turn around and irrationally state that a restaurant should be forced to serve food to someone. WTF is the difference?!? The fact that you're not even consistent in your views says it all. A restaurant order should no more be forced to serve food (slavery) than a singer should be forced to sing (slaver).

If you have to use force sweetie - then you know you are wrong.

How many gun control laws have been enacted during President Obama's terms?

Good one.

 

[candycorn]

Uppity white socialists always resort to racial comments so the black man can carry their water when all other arguments fail.

.

They toothless hicks are arguing against the rule of law so the only failure is theirs. But thanks for playing our game.

Stay classy CC!

(Incidentally, I have all of my teeth and they are perfectly straight - and I am destroying you with facts in this discussion)

The issue was settled over 50 years ago...the only thing you've ever destroyed was your bedsprings.

One thing we learned from liberals is that no issue is ever settled until we say it is.

It was settled a long time ago. If you and I were at the counter at Woolworth's you'd be the one clubbing the guys in the back of the head trying to get them to end their sit-in and I'd be standing between you and them.

You want to go back to those days.

The rest of the world doesn't.

It's that simple and you're upset by the world leaving you behind.

It was settled a long time ago. If you and I were at the counter at Woolworth's you'd be the one clubbing the guys in the back of the head trying to get them to end their sit-in and I'd be standing between you and them.

You want to go back to those days.

The rest of the world doesn't.

It's that simple and you're upset by the world leaving you behind.

Bears Repeating.

 

[Nosmo King]

I consider these folks who want to use aparthied type behavior in order to not have to deal with or accept people because they don't like their color, race, ethnicity, lifestyle, religion, etc. to be completely un-American. It's repulsive the joy you take in disaproving of and hating others, and it is truly un-American.

The true American spirit resides in FREEDOM ... Which includes the freedom of association.

Tolerance and the acceptance of others does not mean you have to neglect your own values and invite them to participate or diminish your desired course of action. Each of us has the freedom to engage life and opportunity as it suits our own needs, absent physical harm or the theft of another's property.

To hide behind false barriers established by the group think mentality is just another way our basic freedoms are eroded over . Nanny-State socialists don't know crap about what Freedom or American mean.

.

Discrimination =Freedom? Hate, fear and suspicion are American values? Creating a second class citizen because you think it's a matter of Liberty and Freedom makes sense?

What a pitiful attitude you have.

Freedom includes the freedom to discriminate. Freedom doesn't guarantee that everyone will always behave in exemplar fashion. It includes the right to behave badly, so long as you don't violate anyone's rights. No one has a right to be served by any particular person or establishment.

You have twisted and perverted the definition of 'freedom' so that your warped and uncivilized attitudes might gain some moral cover. It is not working.

 

[BlackSand]

Yeah and society is passing you by as well. Adios.

Yeah ... You can tell me that from the parking lot and think you made it anywhere other than outside.

.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

I count SIX pharmacies in or VERY near Mariposa, CA

Pharmacies in Mariposa California with Reviews Ratings - YP.com

There are TWO Rite Aids, as shown in this map

YP.com - Yellow Pages the new yellowpages.com

Also, you forgot about the Dynamite and Drugstore.

Why are being so dishonest about such an easily provable thing Candy. Just say "I made a mistake" and go on.

There is no town in America where someone will only have access to one Pharmacy



Nice try:

Pick ANY town in America and I'll find you a minimum of 3 pharmacies within 20 miles of the center of town

Twenty miles--3 Pharmacies. Your conditions...not mine.

You're link listed pharmacies in

Merced, nearly twice the distance
Camp Hill, PA, something like 1800 miles away
Chowchilla, CA, further than Merced
etc...

Come back when you can meet your own standards...

Are you insane?

Pharmacy 1.

Rite Aid
4994 Joe Howard St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

Other Locations »

(209) 742-7600

Pharmacy 2

Dynamite & Drugstore
5102 Jessie St,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-4141

Pharmacy 3

Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

Pharmacy 4
Pioneer Market Pharmacy
(1)
OPEN NOW

Today:7:00 am - 10:00 pm

5034 Coakley Cir,

Mariposa, CA 95338

(209) 742-6100

So, that is FOUR that are RIGHT IN TOWN.

None of the pharmacies on that page were in PA, I don't even know where you came up with that at.

Not quite the case...

Well, you listed Pioneer twice.

And Dynamite & Drugstore is actually a marijuana dispensary...Screenshot below.

View attachment 33677

View attachment 33677

Yes, I mis posted

There are two Rite AIds, a Pioneer, a Dynamite IN TOWN

Dynamite might sell medical marijuana, but that is not all they sell, notice they call themselves a DRUG store.

In either case, I produced at minimum 3, I say 4 Pharmacies, RIGHT IN TOWN.

Why you idiotic troll liberals can't just say "okay you proved me wrong on that one" is fucking beyond me.

No..there is one Rite Aid and the Pioneer. The facts prove you wrong...I merely pointed them out.

No, there are TWO Rite AIds, A Pioneer, AND a Dynamite. Jesus Candy, just admit you were wrong, and there is no town with only one Pharmacy