What’s the difference between Paul pelosi driving around in a car drunk

[WTF19]

Well he wasn't drunk or they wod of given him a DWI.

So continue with the masterbation.

the alcoholic was buzzed (illegal)...not quite DWI, but enough for impaired (illegal)
So continue with your masturbation session
IF YOU ONLY HAD A BRAIN

 

[WTF19]

Well he wasn't drunk or they wod of given him a DWI.

So continue with the masterbation.

with a blood alcohol content level of 0.08 or higher
this was the reading of the DRUNK PIG-lousy....ITS FUGLY wife was DRUNK at the white house---nothing but FUCKING DRUNKS...them PIG-lousy's
IF YOU ONLY HAD A BRAIN

 

[jwoodie]

Why are you defending Pelosi?

​

Paul Pelosi, 82, was nabbed just before midnight in Napa County, California and charged with one count of driving under the influence and another for driving with a blood alcohol content level of 0.08 or higher, the outlet reported.​

When did they administer the test?

 

[playtime]

People would be dancing in the streets if it was a Trump....lololol

God Damned...lolol

there would be no tears from me.

FACT!

 

[HandleTheTruth]

He was under the influence but not drunk.

And under the clean start rule this is in violation and shoud be locked.

 

[Flash]

first there is the clear intent.

& 2ndly, a car's original design & purpose is not to kill.

But yet about 50K Americans are killed in them every year. You are really confused about this.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

there would be no tears from me.

FACT!

Ewwwww.....Had too many Peronis yesterday and posted. Never a good idea. And I did not drive home either...lolololol

Drunk driving is a serious matter no matter what and it is no joke.

I find it comical on this thread that some are saying over .08 is no big deal

 

[jc456]

There's no such thing as DWI in California. The charge is called DUI that state, other states call it DWI instead. Also see the sentence in bold below. Paul Pelosi was charged with both offenses, so he was indeed over the legal limit, and as usual you're talking out of your ass.

www.losangelescriminallawyer.pro/amp/dui-vs-dwi.html

In California, a driver can be charged with driving under the influence of alcohol pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC, driving under the influence of drugs in violation of California Vehicle Code Section 23152(f) VC or driving under the combined influence of alcohol and drugs under California Vehicle Code Section 23152(f) VC. In addition, a driver can also be charged with driving with a BAC of 0.08 percent or higher pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) VC. In most DUI cases involving alcohol, the defendant will be charged with DUI and driving with a BAC of 0.08 or higher. This allows the prosecution to pursue two different theories of criminal liability.

And never admit you had anything to drink. Even if you are below the limit, you have confessed to consuming alcohol and driving, a judge can therefore convict you cause you admitted it.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

But yet about 50K Americans are killed in them every year. You are really confused about this.

Face it. If this were a Trump, .08 would mean you are hugging a lamp post at 3am

Let's not kid ourselves. These Pelosi's are so GD corrupt. That son of theirs has like 5 open investigations

Now...Let's say it was Don Jr.....LOLOLOL...Would it be all over the news

You see what dickless cowards we argue with

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

He was under the influence but not drunk.

And under the clean start rule this is in violation and shoud be locked.

You got your balls sliced off idiot....lololol

Now you are a Hall Marm...Clean titles...........LOLOLOLOL

You little koonta...lololol

 

[Flash]

Face it. If this were a Trump, .08 would mean you are hugging a lamp post at 3am

Let's not kid ourselves. These Pelosi's are so GD corrupt. That son of theirs has like 5 open investigations

Now...Let's say it was Don Jr.....LOLOLOL...Would it be all over the news

You see what dickless cowards we argue with

If Nancy would spend more time being a wife and a mother instead of fucking up this country maybe she wouldn't have an alcoholic husband and a criminal son.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

Clean start rule. This thread should be locked. The thread title and article title are not the same .

Sorry guys I got threads locked for less.

 

[jc456]

first there is the clear intent.

& 2ndly, a car's original design & purpose is not to kill.

why do people die? why do people use it as a weapon like Darrel Brooks?

Why do they manufacturer with air bags and seat belts? you truly are one fked in the head human. your ability to understand is limited to CNN and MSNBC.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

If Nancy would spend more time being a wife and a mother instead of fucking up this country maybe she wouldn't have an alcoholic husband and a criminal son.

Your such an ass. What crime was her son convicted of?

 

[jc456]

Clean start rule. This thread should be locked. The thread title and article title are not the same .

Sorry guys I got threads locked for less.

how so?

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Clean start rule. This thread should be locked. The thread title and article title are not the same .

Sorry guys I got threads locked for less.

You deserved to be locked out of everything you little rat fink.lolololol

I love posting this

 

[HandleTheTruth]

why do people die? why do people use it as a weapon like Darrel Brooks?

It happens. You are never going to stop all killings. Pepe want to kill all sorts of people for different reasons.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Your such an ass. What crime was her son convicted of?

 

[HandleTheTruth]

how so?

The clean start rule says you have to have the same title as the article you link. I've had many threads that have been locked for this reason.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

View attachment 652260

So you were doing an ass pull as usual. Virtue signaling that democrats don't get convicted of crimes. That's so funny.