Where did the left dig this psycho up?

[Pogo]

I didn't say he was.

But he sure as hell is spending his presidency playing to his base, exclusively.
.

Let's see if I have this correct: So what you're saying is she's playing to her base? Well then that's an admission that her base is Socialist. Am I correct?

Yes, although I don't know what your personal definition of "socialist" is.
.

That's quite an admission. What we really need on the left are people with your honesty, and to scream that message as loud as thunder.

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

You uh, just proved Mac's point.

 

[Pogo]

She won’t win. All she is is a democrat chick who isn’t old. That’s it. She will lose at election time and be forgotten in about a day after.

I wouldn't put all my eggs in that basket. Attractive women have a lot of pull with young horny men, and let's face it, the Democrat party is very short on attractive women.

She ain’t that hot and she is dumb as a rock. Sure, Trump got by with armpit fart sounds, but this chick ain’t got what Donald had and has. Let her run. She will lose. She already is losing every time she does an interview.

I dont' know about that. Look at where she's running. It's what Limbaugh coined as the Uninformed Voter, and there are many in that area.

---- and there it is again. Clevelander wants to tell us all about... Queens.

See what I mean, FA_Q2 ?

It's not about Queens, it's about any liberal Mecca.

Read your own post.

"In that area".

Does it depend on what the meaning of "that" is?

Hacks can never admit their own hackery.

 

[basquebromance]

we're here to talk about saving the country, we're here to talk about saving the planet, we're here to talk about saving humanity.

Ocasio Cortez will win the presidency and implement a carbon tax and save us from universal death

 

[frigidweirdo]

WATCH: Ocasio-Cortez Caught Misleading About Her Campaign, Political Issues

My goodness
And she’ll probably win in one of those sheep districts

So, you hate it when the left does it, but when Trump does it you love it.

 

[tyroneweaver]

WATCH: Ocasio-Cortez Caught Misleading About Her Campaign, Political Issues

My goodness
And she’ll probably win in one of those sheep districts

So, you hate it when the left does it, but when Trump does it you love it.

but bu bu trump....typical.

 

[karpenter]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

...you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate.
... And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.
So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term.

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

 

[Mac1958]

I didn't say he was.

But he sure as hell is spending his presidency playing to his base, exclusively.
.

Let's see if I have this correct: So what you're saying is she's playing to her base? Well then that's an admission that her base is Socialist. Am I correct?

Yes, although I don't know what your personal definition of "socialist" is.
.

That's quite an admission. What we really need on the left are people with your honesty, and to scream that message as loud as thunder.

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

As I told you, you no longer scare people with that word. You've over-used it into meaninglessness.

Just as I tell the Regressives with "racism".

And you clearly don't understand that YOUR definition of the word is not the same as that of OTHERS.
.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

...you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate.
... And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.
So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term.

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

What is your definition of the word?
.

 

[Two Thumbs]

WATCH: Ocasio-Cortez Caught Misleading About Her Campaign, Political Issues

My goodness
And she’ll probably win in one of those sheep districts

the poor girl doesn't know a thing beyond what her socialist handlers have told her, she doesn't go off topic and any of us could give her responses

healthcare for all
freeshit
more free shit
some more free shit
tyranny
and more free shit

 

[Two Thumbs]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

...you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate.
... And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.
So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term.

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

What is your definition of the word?
.

she calls herself a 'democratic socialist'

basically instead of the government taking your rights away, they will convince people to vote them away.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

...you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate.
... And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.
So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term.

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

What is your definition of the word?
.

she calls herself a 'democratic socialist'

basically instead of the government taking your rights away, they will convince people to vote them away.

That's really your definition?
.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

...you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate.
... And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.
So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term.

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

What is your definition of the word?
.

she calls herself a 'democratic socialist'

basically instead of the government taking your rights away, they will convince people to vote them away.

That's really your definition?
.

It's a fairly simplified definition, not the actual one, but it defines the reality of socialism.

 

[Mac1958]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

...you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate.
... And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.
So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term.

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

What is your definition of the word?
.

she calls herself a 'democratic socialist'

basically instead of the government taking your rights away, they will convince people to vote them away.

That's really your definition?
.

It's a fairly simplified definition, not the actual one, but it defines the reality of socialism.

Okay, never mind.
.

 

[Two Thumbs]

They Tell Everyone To Their Face They're Socialists
They Wear Che T-Shirts
With Hammer & Sickle Emblems To Their Rallies

Geez, What Does This Guy Need ??

All 'The Right' Has Done, Is Call A Spade A Spade

What is your definition of the word?
.

she calls herself a 'democratic socialist'

basically instead of the government taking your rights away, they will convince people to vote them away.

That's really your definition?
.

It's a fairly simplified definition, not the actual one, but it defines the reality of socialism.

Okay, never mind.
.

ing

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Let's see if I have this correct: So what you're saying is she's playing to her base? Well then that's an admission that her base is Socialist. Am I correct?

Yes, although I don't know what your personal definition of "socialist" is.
.

That's quite an admission. What we really need on the left are people with your honesty, and to scream that message as loud as thunder.

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

As I told you, you no longer scare people with that word. You've over-used it into meaninglessness.

Just as I tell the Regressives with "racism".

And you clearly don't understand that YOUR definition of the word is not the same as that of OTHERS.
.

Any definition of the word is taboo to most real Americans.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Let's see if I have this correct: So what you're saying is she's playing to her base? Well then that's an admission that her base is Socialist. Am I correct?

Yes, although I don't know what your personal definition of "socialist" is.
.

That's quite an admission. What we really need on the left are people with your honesty, and to scream that message as loud as thunder.

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

You uh, just proved Mac's point.

Not about to get into a "no you didn't" "yes I did" debate with you. It's a waste of time.

 

[Mac1958]

Yes, although I don't know what your personal definition of "socialist" is.
.

That's quite an admission. What we really need on the left are people with your honesty, and to scream that message as loud as thunder.

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

As I told you, you no longer scare people with that word. You've over-used it into meaninglessness.

Just as I tell the Regressives with "racism".

And you clearly don't understand that YOUR definition of the word is not the same as that of OTHERS.
.

Any definition of the word is taboo to most real Americans.

What? The word is spreading like wildfire, thanks to its over-use by the Right.

Now it scares no one.
.

 

[Pogo]

That's quite an admission. What we really need on the left are people with your honesty, and to scream that message as loud as thunder.

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

As I told you, you no longer scare people with that word. You've over-used it into meaninglessness.

Just as I tell the Regressives with "racism".

And you clearly don't understand that YOUR definition of the word is not the same as that of OTHERS.
.

Any definition of the word is taboo to most real Americans.

What? The word is spreading like wildfire, thanks to its over-use by the Right.

Now it scares no one.
.

Indeed, it's right there in the OP's link in post One, along with calling a candidate who's never held office "the new face of the Democratic Party". (And since it was posted the same article now begins with a "correction" about where the money came from.)

This is simply the old word-bending scam, in this case selective hearing -- the candidate described her outlook as "Democratic Socialist" like Sanders, and they choose to drop the proper adjective Democratic, figuring they can morph her own words into what they think is an Emmanuel Goldstein term, via that lexicographical mendacity. They've been playing the same game on Sanders.

It's akin to the McCarthyites trying to pervert the term "Liberal" in the 1940s, it reeks of dishonesty, and as always mendacity has a way of blowing up in the mendacitors' faces. And probably more importantly it speaks volumes about the ethics of those who employ it. To paraphrase a Jack Nicholson character, they can't handle the truth.

 

[Dschrute3]

She's been chosen. She's been anointed the 'Next Hussein.' Hopefully Americans won't go down that Communist asshole road again. But hey, anything can happen i guess.

 

[Some Guy]

Well, just as the Left has over-used the word "racism" into the ground, the Right has done it with "socialist".

I don't think you folks realize it, but the word no longer scares people, and the Right has made more people curious about it by constantly using the word.

Times have changed.
.

Oh please. If the Dems didn't rig the primaries, you would have had an admitted Socialist as your presidential candidate. The guy took his honeymoon in the USSR. So what term we Republicans used came to fruition. And now this dingy is another admitted Socialist.

In five years there will be ten admitted Socialists in the Dem part, In ten years maybe 25. So don't tell me it's because Republicans are using the term. The evidence just doesn't pan out.

As I told you, you no longer scare people with that word. You've over-used it into meaninglessness.

Just as I tell the Regressives with "racism".

And you clearly don't understand that YOUR definition of the word is not the same as that of OTHERS.
.

Any definition of the word is taboo to most real Americans.

What? The word is spreading like wildfire, thanks to its over-use by the Right.

Now it scares no one.
.

Indeed, it's right there in the OP's link in post One, along with calling a candidate who's never held office "the new face of the Democratic Party". (And since it was posted the same article now begins with a "correction" about where the money came from.)

This is simply the old word-bending scam, in this case selective hearing -- the candidate described her outlook as "Democratic Socialist" like Sanders, and they choose to drop the proper adjective Democratic, figuring they can morph her own words into what they think is an Emmanuel Goldstein term, via that lexicographical mendacity. They've been playing the same game on Sanders.

It's akin to the McCarthyites trying to pervert the term "Liberal" in the 1940s, it reeks of dishonesty, and as always mendacity has a way of blowing up in the mendacitors' faces. And probably more importantly it speaks volumes about the ethics of those who employ it. To paraphrase a Jack Nicholson character, they can't handle the truth.

You're off on the "new face of the democratic party." If she's not most representative of what the party is, where it's going and what it stands for, then who is? Elected office doesn't really matter in this context, her election is a forgone conclusion so it's just a matter of time. It's a hyperbolic statement of course but it's not too far off.

The "democratic" socialists of America say they want the Nordic model, basically. But part of what defines that model is free markets that are used to pay for a welfare state. They contradict themselves on that when they say they want to tax and regulate businesses to pay for their programs. They can say what they want all day long but it's just not believable. It's like when conservatives say they're for fiscally responsible.