WheelieAddict
Gold Member
- Feb 10, 2012
- 7,853
- 1,140
- 265
The politifact article is true, it is about using social security to fund the war which is false. The times article is also true, it is about how the Bush administration hid the costs of the war on terror.Bush hid expenses, Obama was honest about it.Can't argue against that. I just wanted to highlight that the right caring about the debt is a myth. I guess nowadays it is more a disagreement about where that debt money goes.
I don't know where you get your data....but I whine about debt all the time.
Nobody seems to really care.
S.S. and Medicare are sucking up more and more.
Our kids are totally screwed.
But we worry about to much other crap.
Excuse me, but SS and Medicare are paid into and are sucking nothing out of the government. I get SS and guess what? Even it is taxed. I worked from age 19 until I retired and paid into SS and Medicare every one of those years. SS has a surplus and would have even more if the GOP didn't rob from it to fund the Iraq war. And they never paid it back.
I think you have no idea what you're talking about. Go back a couple years into DumBama, and you will see he reduced the employee and employer deductions for SS on every working person and company in the US for a period of time. I don't know what that could have cost us, but I'm sure it was quite a bit.
Now it's Education Time. From one of your very own, Politifact:
Did George W. Bush 'borrow' from Social Security to fund the war in Iraq and tax cuts?
Obama Bans Gimmicks, and Deficit Will Rise
Really? You are going to use this pathetic piece from the NYT to support your case? I used Politifact, a very leftist fact checking source and even they admitted Bush didn't do anything any other President did. He didn't hide anything.
Bush ran up massive debt, but DumBama doubled what Bush ran up.