🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

White House outlines gun control moves

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,149
2,645
Obama and gun control: White House outlines moves - CNNPolitics.com

Expand mandatory background checks for some private sales.

Provide more funding for mental health treatment, FBI staff and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives agents.

The most sweeping action currently being considered, an executive order defining who's "engaged in the business" of selling guns, would immediately require some private dealers to obtain a license and begin conducting background checks.

Doctors can now reports 'mentally ill patients' to the FBI
-- In Hillary's case, they already know about her: Suffered a head trauma, her own staff says she's 'frequently confused', and is crazier than a bag of wet multiple-personality-plagued cats....

'Surprisingly enough' :p Obama's Executive Order does not address his administration's own 'thorough' yet inept background check system that allowed a terrorist into the country who eventually murdered 14 Americans - after he had praised the system, mocked Americans as cowards for their legitimate concerns for our national security and their safety, and declared his administration's background checks left nothing for Americans to be afraid of except for 'widows and orphans'.

It also fails to address Obama's and his administration's inability to identify friend versus foe, as demonstrated by it's giving thousands of weapons to Mexican drug Cartels (resulting in 500+ deaths, 2 Americans), arming and going to war to help Al Qaeida take over Libya, supplied/armed/trained/protected ISIS, AND flew members of the terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood who were on the 'No Fly List' into the US and to Washington so they could attend Cabinet meetings as part of their 'training' to take over the Egyptian government.

ALSO not addressed is the fact that NOTHING Obama's Executive Order includes could prevent any of the mass shootings he has chosen to politicize OR the shootings he has chosen NOT to politicize or the successful terrorist attacks he has allowed to happen. Instead, it is just another progressive step forward towards govt gun confiscation/out-lawing in the US.


*** In other news, Gun Sales are at an all-time record high due to Obama and Progressive Liberals.
- 2015: The Year of the Gun
 
It's politics, not meant to be effective. He (his handlers) want the Republicans to come out against it so they can cry to the media how they don't care if your children are butchered.
 
The most sweeping action currently being considered, an executive order defining who's "engaged in the business" of selling guns, would immediately require some private dealers to obtain a license and begin conducting background checks.

Per the constitution, the federal government may only regulate sellers and buyers engaged in INTERstate commerce. INTRAstate sales are beyond the purview of federal power.
 
Here is what is in Obama's Executive Order

• Hiring more people to run the FBI background check system, so the government can be "processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week." More people doing background checks= faster turnaround for background checks

• Requesting from Congress an additional $500 million to increase access to mental health care. Who doesn't want to keep crazies from getting guns?

• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Other than it has Obamas name on it, why would anyone object to these measures?
 
Here is what is in Obama's Executive Order

• Hiring more people to run the FBI background check system, so the government can be "processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week." More people doing background checks= faster turnaround for background checks

• Requesting from Congress an additional $500 million to increase access to mental health care. Who doesn't want to keep crazies from getting guns?

• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Other than it has Obamas name on it, why would anyone object to these measures?

Hiring more people wasn't the problem regarding allowing a terrorist into the country and won't stop mass shootings from happening.

Kudos for FINALLY addressing mental health....but this is the govt. Any idea they come up with will be oppressive, will miss the mark, and still won't stop shite.

Who is a dealer and who is a seller is not the big problem...it's who is / are the SHOOTERS and TERRORISTS. Again, t won't stop anything. Criminals and terrorists will get guns...hell, our own government facilitated the murder of over 500 people/2 Americans by GIVING Mexican Drug Cartels thousands of weapons. Perhaps they ought to invest in some background checks on politicians and govt employees to see if they can find an ounce of common sense sometimes!?
 
• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Per the constitution, INTRAstate sales are beyond the purview of the federal government.
 
• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Per the constitution, INTRAstate sales are beyond the purview of the federal government.

You keep saying that but no court supports your limited views on the powers of the federal government
 
Here is what is in Obama's Executive Order

• Hiring more people to run the FBI background check system, so the government can be "processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week." More people doing background checks= faster turnaround for background checks

• Requesting from Congress an additional $500 million to increase access to mental health care. Who doesn't want to keep crazies from getting guns?

• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Other than it has Obamas name on it, why would anyone object to these measures?

Hiring more people wasn't the problem regarding allowing a terrorist into the country and won't stop mass shootings from happening.

Kudos for FINALLY addressing mental health....but this is the govt. Any idea they come up with will be oppressive, will miss the mark, and still won't stop shite.

Who is a dealer and who is a seller is not the big problem...it's who is / are the SHOOTERS and TERRORISTS. Again, t won't stop anything. Criminals and terrorists will get guns...hell, our own government facilitated the murder of over 500 people/2 Americans by GIVING Mexican Drug Cartels thousands of weapons. Perhaps they ought to invest in some background checks on politicians and govt employees to see if they can find an ounce of common sense sometimes!?

Why do you want guns openly sold to crazies and criminals?

Why make it easy for them to just buy over the internet?
 
You keep saying that but no court supports your limited views on the powers of the federal government

I agree. The federal government doesn't accept the limits imposed upon it by the constitution.

That doesn't, however, change what the constitution says.
 
You keep saying that but no court supports your limited views on the powers of the federal government

I agree. The federal government doesn't accept the limits imposed upon it by the constitution.

That doesn't, however, change what the constitution says.

You have our Constitutional court system to defend your position on the limits of federal authority

Why don't you use it?
 
Here is what is in Obama's Executive Order

• Hiring more people to run the FBI background check system, so the government can be "processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week." More people doing background checks= faster turnaround for background checks

• Requesting from Congress an additional $500 million to increase access to mental health care. Who doesn't want to keep crazies from getting guns?

• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Other than it has Obamas name on it, why would anyone object to these measures?
The imperil president.

You must be so proud.
 
RW: "Why do you want guns openly sold to crazies and criminals?"

Why do you ask dumbass questions in such a was as to falsely accuse someone of something they have not said?

WHY do you support a President whose administration ILLEGALLY GAVE Mexican Drug Cartels THOUSANDS of guns, resulting in the deaths of over 500 / 2 Americans, who continues his perpetuation of this scandal, and who has held no one responsible? I am all for keeping weapons out of the hands of psychos and criminals - Obama and his administration should have no access to them or be able to hand them out like candy to his terrorist buddies or criminals.
 
All I heard was GROW more government to come and step their jackboots on all our necks. that's OBama's visions for us. except it said NOTHING about the gang bangers, thugs, criminals or terrorist
 
You have our Constitutional court system to defend your position on the limits of federal authority

Why don't you use it?

You mean why don't I ask the federal government to arbitrate a dispute between me and it? And if I ask nicely it will voluntarily limit its power to only that permitted by the constitution?

That's a good one.
 
You have our Constitutional court system to defend your position on the limits of federal authority

Why don't you use it?

You mean why don't I ask the federal government to arbitrate a dispute between me and it? And if I ask nicely it will voluntarily limit its power to only that permitted by the constitution?

That's a good one.

You do realize the purpose of the Constitution that you claim to love was for We the People to establish a Federal Government?
 
You do realize the purpose of the Constitution that you claim to love was for We the People to establish a Federal Government?

Not any government though.

Only one established on certain unchangeable principles, principles that make it clear what a legitimate government is . . .

If the Federal Government violates the principles of its establishment it would no longer be --the government established by the Constitution-- it would be something else, and that would be cause for the people to rescind their consent to be governed, reclaim the powers they conferred through the Constitution and throw off the usurpers; using the means secured by the People in the 2nd Amendment if necessary.
 
You do realize the purpose of the Constitution that you claim to love was for We the People to establish a Federal Government?

The states, when they created their union, gave it a limited set of enumerated powers. The federal government has long ago assumed more powers than the states ever granted in the constitution, rendering it essentially null and void.
 
Here is what is in Obama's Executive Order

• Hiring more people to run the FBI background check system, so the government can be "processing background checks 24 hours a day, 7 days a week." More people doing background checks= faster turnaround for background checks

• Requesting from Congress an additional $500 million to increase access to mental health care. Who doesn't want to keep crazies from getting guns?

• Clarifying that people selling guns over the Internet can still be required to conduct background checks on buyers if they are "engaged in the business" of selling guns, not just a hobbyist.
Clarifies who is a dealer vs who is a private seller

Other than it has Obamas name on it, why would anyone object to these measures?

That's it, it has Obama's name on it...

Paul Ryan Wants Someone To Close The Gun Show Loophole, As Long As That Someone Isn't Obama
 

Forum List

Back
Top