What legal or ethical reasons are those? That only majorities should have rights to self-determination, sovereignty and independence?
So, for example, the Catalans, as a minority, are prohibited from having rights to self-determination, sovereignty and independence?
A Jewish minority being granted 56% of land in a proposed nation where they cumulatively own less than 5% of the land??? To the obvious extent that they were not a 'dependent minority' they are not entitled to state 'independence" You're hilarious
56%?? How many times is with its' Palestinian majority Jordan bigger than Israel? How many times?
Knock-knock - do Indians own most of the land in the US?
Jordan is irrelevant to historic Palestine
Why because it has a Palestinian majority?
Because it's 100% Palestinian Arab state, where Jews were not allowed to live?
Arabs received much more than half the land already.
Typically you bottom-feeders assume that this level of flipping psychology is fool-proof---all the more pathetic...indeed the minority of Jews are permitted to 'live' in Palestine as was the case---NOT TO RAVAGE THE MAJORITY POPULATION AND STEAL FROM AND EXPEL 800,000 NATIVE PALESTINIANS...any questions Gestapo-girl???
Did you know that punctuation was a Joooooo invention?