Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is where a consensus candidate should be determined. The 200 are being as much "my way or the highway" as the minority who is obstructing. McCarthy is a lousy candidate. Move on and find someone acceptable to both sides. Scalise?I am against a very small minority trying to oppress the very huge majority. The 5% shouldn't be getting their way over the 95%. It was never supposed to be like that. Now, if you want to talk about more closer percentages, then I agree with you. If we had 125 voting for McCarthy and 100 voting against, I don't think the majority should run roughshod over the minority.
none of them are there to represnt any party,, they are there to represent the people of their districts,,How many Republicans do you think should have voted for Hakeem Jeffries?
That's the fact of the last vote.LOL. Sure.
That is parallel to what controls the nation today. And one of the reasons we are in this situation are the RINOS.I am against a very small minority trying to oppress the very huge majority. The 5% shouldn't be getting their way over the 95%. It was never supposed to be like that. Now, if you want to talk about more closer percentages, then I agree with you. If we had 125 voting for McCarthy and 100 voting against, I don't think the majority should run roughshod over the minority.
I don't think you have a firm concept of the definition of "election".There are 20 voting against McCarthy and 202 voting for him.
You are not the majority. You don’t represent “the people.”
wrong,, 232 voted against mccarthy not 20,,There are 20 voting against McCarthy and 202 voting for him.
You are not the majority. You don’t represent “the people.”
www.foxnews.com
Those few will only be happy if a far right candidate wins. Everyone else will be unacceptable. It is either their way or the highway. They are trying to force the 200 backing McCarthy into accepting someone further right than McCarthy.That is where a consensus candidate should be determined. The 200 are being as much "my way or the highway" as the minority who is obstructing. McCarthy is a lousy candidate. Move on and find someone acceptable to both sides. Scalise?
Whoever is in power oppresses the rest.none of them are there to represnt any party,, they are there to represent the people of their districts,,
you are in favor of that arent you?? the party represents group think that always leads to oppression,,
LOL. Sure.That's the fact of the last vote.
So, you want to get rid of the RINOs so you can oppress them and everyone else.That is parallel to what controls the nation today. And one of the reasons we are in this situation are the RINOS.
so its a no win game and youve just wasted our time,,Whoever is in power oppresses the rest.
Edit - Luckily I screenshot the tweet before the uniparty quashed it..
View attachment 744736
"Your true colors keep shining though..."
McCarthy's theme song.
Shut up and get back in line, mere prole.....It's my turn!If the far right Republicans would vote for McCarthy we wouldn't get to this point. We shouldn't allow just a handful of people to take our democracy away. According to them, it is either their way or the highway, scorched Earth. Voters gave the House to Republicans and now a small handful of radical Republicans are wiling to throw it away.
What you are referring to is a pure democracy where everyone votes on thing.a constitutional republic like ours is supposed to reduce or stop oppression of anyone,,
far better than any democracy,,
By the ten per cent of one party???We want our elected people to fight and when they do many do not like it. McCarthy must give in a little more. He must be owned.
Edit - Luckily I screenshot the tweet before the uniparty quashed it..
View attachment 744736
"Your true colors keep shining though..."
McCarthy's theme song.
Whoever is in power oppresses the rest. You just want it so that your side is the one who can do the oppressing because you don't want the majority to do the oppressing, you want the minority to do the oppressing.so its a no win game and youve just wasted our time,,
figures youre just another big mouth saying nothing,,
no... because we have a constitution we are a constitutional republic that uses democratically elected reps,,What you are referring to is a pure democracy where everyone votes on thing.
We are a democratic republic where we democratically elect representatives.
Which still leaves the reps of the majority making most policy… not the reps of a minority
