Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/---/ The climate has been changing since the day the earth was formed and will continue to change no matter what taxes libs impose./——/ Then what is your solution? Just keep bending over and let other countries continue to give us the shaft?He is hurting US interests....that's precisely the point.
Well, I wouldn't purposely hurt the United States' GDP to start out.......
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world.
Why would we do that?
We're already reducing our CO2 more than anyone else.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!? Gee....I dunno.....it's not like we all live on the same planet or anything?!?!
God, what a stupid question.
/---/ The climate has been changing since the day the earth was formed and will continue to change no matter what taxes libs impose./——/ Then what is your solution? Just keep bending over and let other countries continue to give us the shaft?
Well, I wouldn't purposely hurt the United States' GDP to start out.......
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
DING.....DING.......DING.....DING.......DING.....DING.......DING.....DING.......
Lunatic alert......seriously sunshine, you need to retake middle school Science class for Christ sake.
/---/ Oh, you think the climate is the same now as it was millions of years ago? You think raising taxes can affect the weather? Seriously?/---/ The climate has been changing since the day the earth was formed and will continue to change no matter what taxes libs impose./——/ Then what is your solution? Just keep bending over and let other countries continue to give us the shaft?
Well, I wouldn't purposely hurt the United States' GDP to start out.......
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
DING.....DING.......DING.....DING.......DING.....DING.......DING.....DING.......
Lunatic alert......seriously sunshine, you need to retake middle school Science class for Christ sake.
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world.
Why would we do that?
We're already reducing our CO2 more than anyone else.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!? Gee....I dunno.....it's not like we all live on the same planet or anything?!?!
God, what a stupid question.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!?
We shouldn't be asking. We shouldn't be imposing a stupid cap on ourselves.
If they want to damage their economy, it should be their choice.
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world.
Why would we do that?
We're already reducing our CO2 more than anyone else.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!? Gee....I dunno.....it's not like we all live on the same planet or anything?!?!
God, what a stupid question.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!?
We shouldn't be asking. We shouldn't be imposing a stupid cap on ourselves.
If they want to damage their economy, it should be their choice.
Wow, you are genuinely a stupid person.
And to think these idiots got their panties in a bunch over the Obama phones. Now $12 billion of taxpayers money going to corporate farmers ONLY.Now that Donald Trump acknowledges the economic damage his tariffs are doing by offering farmers a $12 BILLION bailout for damage caused by the tariff HE and REPUBLICANS have imposed....there are numerous questions that should be asked. Tops among them would be what other self imposed government spending should we expect?
So...if farmers get a bailout for economic damage caused by this President....who else will get a bailout?! Plus, of course, how many tax dollars will be sacrificed to do so?
On Trump's farm bailout, the GOP doth protest too much
We are seeing a pattern develop where Republican policy leads to gigantic bailouts (see Gramm/Leach/Bliley Republican bill that passed in 1999 that led to the economic crash in 2008). We are also seeing that Republican legislation often leads to large swaths of Republican spending to accommodate for that Republican legislation.
We should, at minimum, be able to say that Republicans are NOT the party of 'fiscal responsibility'...it is the exact opposite.
We bail out failing automotive companies so they can rebuild overseas.
We bail out countries that hate us.
We bail out corrupt politicians.
We bail out all kinds of people for some bullshit reasons.
While i dont think this issue with the farmers should happen, the outrage is a bunch of bullshit.
/——/ Rather than name calling, try refuting his point because I agree with him.I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world.
Why would we do that?
We're already reducing our CO2 more than anyone else.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!? Gee....I dunno.....it's not like we all live on the same planet or anything?!?!
God, what a stupid question.
Why are we asking other industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions?!?!?
We shouldn't be asking. We shouldn't be imposing a stupid cap on ourselves.
If they want to damage their economy, it should be their choice.
Wow, you are genuinely a stupid person.
So handouts are bribes?We bail out failing automotive companies so they can rebuild overseas.
We bail out countries that hate us.
We bail out corrupt politicians.
We bail out all kinds of people for some bullshit reasons.
While i dont think this issue with the farmers should happen, the outrage is a bunch of bullshit.
None of those "bail outs" were BRIBES. What Trump has done in the past, and does with the $12 Billion Dollars of taxpayer money (he always uses the money of others) is to bribe the farmers so that they vote for the Republican Member of Congress in November.
Will the farmers do so, and prove: You can fool some of the people all of the time.
/——/ Then what is your solution? Just keep bending over and let other countries continue to give us the shaft?
Well, I wouldn't purposely hurt the United States' GDP to start out.......
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
So handouts are bribes?We bail out failing automotive companies so they can rebuild overseas.
We bail out countries that hate us.
We bail out corrupt politicians.
We bail out all kinds of people for some bullshit reasons.
While i dont think this issue with the farmers should happen, the outrage is a bunch of bullshit.
None of those "bail outs" were BRIBES. What Trump has done in the past, and does with the $12 Billion Dollars of taxpayer money (he always uses the money of others) is to bribe the farmers so that they vote for the Republican Member of Congress in November.
Will the farmers do so, and prove: You can fool some of the people all of the time.
Is that where you want this convo to go?
Do you feel the same about all welfare, or just ones you disagree with?So handouts are bribes?We bail out failing automotive companies so they can rebuild overseas.
We bail out countries that hate us.
We bail out corrupt politicians.
We bail out all kinds of people for some bullshit reasons.
While i dont think this issue with the farmers should happen, the outrage is a bunch of bullshit.
None of those "bail outs" were BRIBES. What Trump has done in the past, and does with the $12 Billion Dollars of taxpayer money (he always uses the money of others) is to bribe the farmers so that they vote for the Republican Member of Congress in November.
Will the farmers do so, and prove: You can fool some of the people all of the time.
Is that where you want this convo to go?
It's my opinion, and it's food for thought (you don't have to eat). Not only are farmers hurt by the Tariff Wars (a war of Trump's, one more example of his inexperience and the chaos that follows), the small town and shop keepers, employees, investors and the taxpayers who put out the money for these bribes. And bribes they are.
Frankthefailure, why did Obama refuse to address the trade deficit? Why did he accept new tarrifs from China on US goods? I'm guessing it is his ideology. The same thought process that said it is a good idea to send billions of dollars to the biggest sponsor of terrorism.Now that Donald Trump acknowledges the economic damage his tariffs are doing by offering farmers a $12 BILLION bailout for damage caused by the tariff HE and REPUBLICANS have imposed....there are numerous questions that should be asked. Tops among them would be what other self imposed government spending should we expect?
So...if farmers get a bailout for economic damage caused by this President....who else will get a bailout?! Plus, of course, how many tax dollars will be sacrificed to do so?
On Trump's farm bailout, the GOP doth protest too much
We are seeing a pattern develop where Republican policy leads to gigantic bailouts (see Gramm/Leach/Bliley Republican bill that passed in 1999 that led to the economic crash in 2008). We are also seeing that Republican legislation often leads to large swaths of Republican spending to accommodate for that Republican legislation.
We should, at minimum, be able to say that Republicans are NOT the party of 'fiscal responsibility'...it is the exact opposite.
Obama had his hands full with an economy shrinking at over 6% per quarter in 2009.......Obama went from an economy shrinking at 6% per quarter (Q4 2008) to one growing his last 6 1/2 years.
However, not sure why you choose to litigate the Obama years....unless you DON'T want to talk about Trump's real failures?
Frankthefailure, why did Obama refuse to address the trade deficit? Why did he accept new tarrifs from China on US goods? I'm guessing it is his ideology. The same thought process that said it is a good idea to send billions of dollars to the biggest sponsor of terrorism.Now that Donald Trump acknowledges the economic damage his tariffs are doing by offering farmers a $12 BILLION bailout for damage caused by the tariff HE and REPUBLICANS have imposed....there are numerous questions that should be asked. Tops among them would be what other self imposed government spending should we expect?
So...if farmers get a bailout for economic damage caused by this President....who else will get a bailout?! Plus, of course, how many tax dollars will be sacrificed to do so?
On Trump's farm bailout, the GOP doth protest too much
We are seeing a pattern develop where Republican policy leads to gigantic bailouts (see Gramm/Leach/Bliley Republican bill that passed in 1999 that led to the economic crash in 2008). We are also seeing that Republican legislation often leads to large swaths of Republican spending to accommodate for that Republican legislation.
We should, at minimum, be able to say that Republicans are NOT the party of 'fiscal responsibility'...it is the exact opposite.
Obama had his hands full with an economy shrinking at over 6% per quarter in 2009.......Obama went from an economy shrinking at 6% per quarter (Q4 2008) to one growing his last 6 1/2 years.
However, not sure why you choose to litigate the Obama years....unless you DON'T want to talk about Trump's real failures?
Are you even vaguely familiar with Chinese tariffs and restrictions on US goods? Why did Obama and his minions allow them? Why do liberals continue to put China and the EU ahead of their fellow citizens? So Sad.So handouts are bribes?We bail out failing automotive companies so they can rebuild overseas.
We bail out countries that hate us.
We bail out corrupt politicians.
We bail out all kinds of people for some bullshit reasons.
While i dont think this issue with the farmers should happen, the outrage is a bunch of bullshit.
None of those "bail outs" were BRIBES. What Trump has done in the past, and does with the $12 Billion Dollars of taxpayer money (he always uses the money of others) is to bribe the farmers so that they vote for the Republican Member of Congress in November.
Will the farmers do so, and prove: You can fool some of the people all of the time.
Is that where you want this convo to go?
It's my opinion, and it's food for thought (you don't have to eat). Not only are farmers hurt by the Tariff Wars (a war of Trump's, one more example of his inexperience and the chaos that follows), the small town and shop keepers, employees, investors and the taxpayers who put out the money for these bribes. And bribes they are.
Well, I wouldn't purposely hurt the United States' GDP to start out.......
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
So you are OK with hampering the economy when it comes to the possibility of maybe some type of sort of change to our climate kind of, but when trying to fix trade
THINK OF THE GEEEDEEEPPEEEE!!!!
Wanker.
/——/No one is hampering the economy. President Trump is fixing an inequitable rigged system and we know how you libtards hate the US being in a position of power.Well, I wouldn't purposely hurt the United States' GDP to start out.......
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
So you are OK with hampering the economy when it comes to the possibility of maybe some type of sort of change to our climate kind of, but when trying to fix trade
THINK OF THE GEEEDEEEPPEEEE!!!!
Wanker.
Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
So you are OK with hampering the economy when it comes to the possibility of maybe some type of sort of change to our climate kind of, but when trying to fix trade
THINK OF THE GEEEDEEEPPEEEE!!!!
Wanker.
I understand that your emotions (hysterical as they are) are simply an opinion, but one so foolish I feel the need to respond.
The economy was bolstered by funding green and renewable sources of energy, not hampered. Oil and coal burning sources of power are expensive, as well as environmentally harmful.
/——/No one is hampering the economy. President Trump is fixing an inequitable rigged system and we know how you libtards hate the US being in a position of power.Kind of like limiting your energy production because of bad weather?
What?!??!?!? Let me guess....you're one of 'those people' who deny climate change is occurring?!
I deny we need to ruin our economy even if there is some impact from our activities. We will figure out how to survive, that's why we have Engineers.
But things like carbon caps and control negatively impact GDP AND increase the cost of living?
So still concerned about GDP effects?
Carbon caps are tied to reduced emissions which is needed if we're going to negotiate reduced carbon emissions from other industrialized nations in the world. Unless, of course, you're denying the chemistry of the effects of carbon in the atmosphere?!
Carbon caps result in lower carbon emissions (cause and effect).....tariffs do NOT result in better trade deals.
So you are OK with hampering the economy when it comes to the possibility of maybe some type of sort of change to our climate kind of, but when trying to fix trade
THINK OF THE GEEEDEEEPPEEEE!!!!
Wanker.
