Who exactly are the rich that aren’t paying their fair share?

So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.

We that is different than you, you hate work and want the government to support you.
By solving for simple poverty in our Republic.
 
Most big businesses are paying 0%(GE, Boeing) to 20% at a time they are suppose to pay the current rates. That is what I call not paying their fair share as their fair share is what has been the law.

You can bet that the poor and middle class pay what is on the books.

Really? Big business pays what the law calls for them to pay, just like you do. Do you pay in more than you are required?

The businesses pay their fair share according to the tax laws. So you are being dishonest to blame the business for following the law.
Dear, Mr. Trump and the poor only pay the taxes we are legally obligated to pay.

Don't complain, be Patriotic.
 
So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.

We that is different than you, you hate work and want the government to support you.
By solving for simple poverty in our Republic.

You want to solve getting paid for you being lazy. Sorry, but that is greedy and self centered of you. Solving poverty is a good thing, allowing you to be lazy and expect others to support you is morally wrong.
 
Most big businesses are paying 0%(GE, Boeing) to 20% at a time they are suppose to pay the current rates. That is what I call not paying their fair share as their fair share is what has been the law.

You can bet that the poor and middle class pay what is on the books.
You do realize that every dollar a corporation makes gets taxed because every dollar eventually ends up in the hands of stockholders and employees don't you?

So it makes no difference if the corp pays income tax.

In fact most incorporated businesses are S corps and as such file no corporate tax returns as all the profit and loss is reported on the shareholders individual tax return via the form K1
 
So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.
You don't work at all.


He is becoming like a random number generator. Or a magic 8-ball.

"Solve basic income redistribution for the republic"
 
So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.
You don't work at all.


He is becoming like a random number generator. Or a magic 8-ball.

"Solve basic income redistribution for the republic"

HE's a lazy unemployed idiot who still lives with his mama. If he worked at getting a job like he does masturbating he'd be a CEO himself
 
Most big businesses are paying 0%(GE, Boeing) to 20% at a time they are suppose to pay the current rates. That is what I call not paying their fair share as their fair share is what has been the law.

You can bet that the poor and middle class pay what is on the books.

Really? Big business pays what the law calls for them to pay, just like you do. Do you pay in more than you are required?

The businesses pay their fair share according to the tax laws. So you are being dishonest to blame the business for following the law.
Dear, Mr. Trump and the poor only pay the taxes we are legally obligated to pay.

Don't complain, be Patriotic.

Every American pays what they are legally obligated to pay, I wasn’t complaining you were, you made a complaint about businesses by implying they not paying what was legally obligated by law. I have no issue in people following the law and taking every deduction allowed by law.

So next time you make so stupid accusation that I am complaining, you need to get your shit straight and back it up. Got it?
 
So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.
You don't work at all.


He is becoming like a random number generator. Or a magic 8-ball.

"Solve basic income redistribution for the republic"

He is a dishonest, doesn’t have a job, doesn’t want to work and wants all of us to pay for his lazy ass to sit home and smoke pot. While I am not against helping others, I am not interested in supporting an ungrateful bum who does nothing to make the world a better place.
 
So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.
You don't work at all.


He is becoming like a random number generator. Or a magic 8-ball.

"Solve basic income redistribution for the republic"

HE's a lazy unemployed idiot who still lives with his mama. If he worked at getting a job like he does masturbating he'd be a CEO himself


Could be "a peice of software"? Searches for keywords in a thread......then posts a canned answer from a table?

In between porn and kleenex of course.
 
30 years ago people in the top 10% were making close to $60,000/per year, and so started the chant of rich people don’t pay their fare share. Today we’re hearing the exact same thing. So what I’m curious to know is who the rich are? What level of income is needed before you’re considered to not be paying your fair share. Is it still the $60,000 mark or is it anyone that has $1.00 more than you do.

I guess that we can't really answer most of your questions as to who are the rich, and what is their fair share, until Trump releases his returns.
 
30 years ago people in the top 10% were making close to $60,000/per year, and so started the chant of rich people don’t pay their fare share. Today we’re hearing the exact same thing. So what I’m curious to know is who the rich are? What level of income is needed before you’re considered to not be paying your fair share. Is it still the $60,000 mark or is it anyone that has $1.00 more than you do.

I guess that we can't really answer most of your questions as to who are the rich, and what is their fair share, until Trump releases his returns.

So Trump’s tax return holds the key to all? Who would have known, since the beginning of time it has all come down to one person’s tax return.
 
30 years ago people in the top 10% were making close to $60,000/per year, and so started the chant of rich people don’t pay their fare share. Today we’re hearing the exact same thing. So what I’m curious to know is who the rich are? What level of income is needed before you’re considered to not be paying your fair share. Is it still the $60,000 mark or is it anyone that has $1.00 more than you do.

I guess that we can't really answer most of your questions as to who are the rich, and what is their fair share, until Trump releases his returns.

Until Trump releases his returns?? WTF, dems have been saying "the rich" aren't paying their fair share for years and years and now you can't figure it out until you see Trumps taxes. That's got to be the most stupid comment of the day.
 
So what. Ad hominems are fallacies.

Fallacy is all the right wing has.

The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.

We that is different than you, you hate work and want the government to support you.
By solving for simple poverty in our Republic.

You want to solve getting paid for you being lazy. Sorry, but that is greedy and self centered of you. Solving poverty is a good thing, allowing you to be lazy and expect others to support you is morally wrong.
Why do you believe that is immoral. A natural rate of unemployment Only exists for the bottom line of Capitalists.
 
30 years ago people in the top 10% were making close to $60,000/per year, and so started the chant of rich people don’t pay their fare share. Today we’re hearing the exact same thing. So what I’m curious to know is who the rich are? What level of income is needed before you’re considered to not be paying your fair share. Is it still the $60,000 mark or is it anyone that has $1.00 more than you do.

I guess that we can't really answer most of your questions as to who are the rich, and what is their fair share, until Trump releases his returns.

So Trump’s tax return holds the key to all? Who would have known, since the beginning of time it has all come down to one person’s tax return.

Well, yeah, if that one person is the president of the United States, and based on his leaked 2015 return, will save $15 Million dollars per year, just for himself, and perhaps billions for his millionaire cabinet, associates, and donors. But, for the time being, I'll just stick to the issue that the GOP just handed their billionaire president a windfall, without anyone having the slightest information of whether or not it is conflict of interest. Nobody on that side of the aisle thinks that you have a right to know.
 
The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.

We that is different than you, you hate work and want the government to support you.
By solving for simple poverty in our Republic.

You want to solve getting paid for you being lazy. Sorry, but that is greedy and self centered of you. Solving poverty is a good thing, allowing you to be lazy and expect others to support you is morally wrong.
Why do you believe that is immoral. A natural rate of unemployment Only exists for the bottom line of Capitalists.

Can't say I agree with it being a morality issue, more of a stupidity issue.
 
30 years ago people in the top 10% were making close to $60,000/per year, and so started the chant of rich people don’t pay their fare share. Today we’re hearing the exact same thing. So what I’m curious to know is who the rich are? What level of income is needed before you’re considered to not be paying your fair share. Is it still the $60,000 mark or is it anyone that has $1.00 more than you do.

I guess that we can't really answer most of your questions as to who are the rich, and what is their fair share, until Trump releases his returns.

Until Trump releases his returns?? WTF, dems have been saying "the rich" aren't paying their fair share for years and years and now you can't figure it out until you see Trumps taxes. That's got to be the most stupid comment of the day.

Thinker, I don't think that you thought your ironic post through, did you?
 
The right wing works, the left wing cries about having to work, the left is lazy and wants other to support them.
Work smarter not harder. Red Herrings are not worth much in politics.

We that is different than you, you hate work and want the government to support you.
By solving for simple poverty in our Republic.

You want to solve getting paid for you being lazy. Sorry, but that is greedy and self centered of you. Solving poverty is a good thing, allowing you to be lazy and expect others to support you is morally wrong.
Why do you believe that is immoral. A natural rate of unemployment Only exists for the bottom line of Capitalists.

Taking care of the poor and the afflicted is moral, taking care of a lazy man is folly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top