Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the clandestent government op cant take care of a elevator inspection policy...lol
people dont have to be in on it to be minpulated...especialy...elevator inspectors...lol
So these people are in on it and still have not came forward? If you believe this why dont you all track these people down and attempt to get the answers from them?
there a restrictions of resources and access for individuals of the truth movement to do the a investigation..it is the government responsibility and duty to facilitate the investigate of 911 under the terms of the petition...
Can you also prove such an elevator even exists? I have a hard time believing that the only individuals allowed to one certain elevator were government employees in all three WTC buildings. Where are you all getting this information from? If this elevator even exists then there would be reports that this wouldn't have been checked and someone would have came forward informing us of this by now. Also, as I have shown you the WTC was heavily surveillanced. I really have a hard time believing all this could have been done without anyone having evidence by now.
yet all these individuals with vast experincein covert operations and intel cleartly dont see these issues as you do...do they...these are your laymens assumptions
Finally, the demolition experts I have seen said that you have place demolition throughout the building. You cannot just simply place it in the elevator shaft.
you mean the government front company controled demolitions inc the same company in charge of destroying the evidence at grund zero clean up
the first responders said they found...nothing...nothing...bigger than a match book..everything..pulverised....if wires survived or where even used..what about all the miles of other wires that would run through the trade centers and the equipment within
this is a stupid argument....
Then how come with all the photos and videos taken of the debris that was around 24/7 after the fall of the buildings did nobody point this out to us?
As I have also shown you, I have numerous experts that agree with me. Loose Change implies that Mark Dayton is on their side which is of course not true.
there a restrictions of resources and access for individuals of the truth movement to do the a investigation..it is the government responsibility and duty to facilitate the investigate of 911 under the terms of the petition...
yet all these individuals with vast experincein covert operations and intel cleartly dont see these issues as you do...do they...these are your laymens assumptions
you mean the government front company controled demolitions inc the same company in charge of destroying the evidence at grund zero clean up
the first responders said they found...nothing...nothing...bigger than a match book..everything..pulverised....if wires survived or where even used..what about all the miles of other wires that would run through the trade centers and the equipment within
this is a stupid argument....
or ha been made not true....mark keep talking this way and we don't know if we can keep your family safe from weirdos....we need a real investigation testimony under oath disclosure of all classified evidence. under the terms of the petition..only a idiot would argue otherwise
your a joke...Mr popular mechanics.. that is where all your links and info boil down to,,you are foolish and disingenuous..clearly,,your interest ls only in trying to perpetrate the 911 myth not deal with reality or proper protocol that should be expected and demanded ...spin...thats all it is thinly veiled spin
your a joke...Mr popular mechanics.. that is where all your links and info boil down to,,you are foolish and disingenuous..clearly,,your interest ls only in trying to perpetrate the 911 myth not deal with reality or proper protocol that should be expected and demanded ...spin...thats all it is thinly veiled spin
I cannot remember the last time I quoted popular mechanics. It hasnt been for months. It is foolish to think that you can place demolition in an elevator and cause a 110 story building to crumble. So you think I am being disingenuous? Wouldnt you think from all the information you gave me that if I thought it was an inside job, then I would debate along side you?
Take me up on my challenge. Get ten people to admit they were involved and you will receive your second investigation by the govt.
your a joke...Mr popular mechanics.. that is where all your links and info boil down to,,you are foolish and disingenuous..clearly,,your interest ls only in trying to perpetrate the 911 myth not deal with reality or proper protocol that should be expected and demanded ...spin...thats all it is thinly veiled spin
I cannot remember the last time I quoted popular mechanics. It hasnt been for months. It is foolish to think that you can place demolition in an elevator and cause a 110 story building to crumble. So you think I am being disingenuous? Wouldnt you think from all the information you gave me that if I thought it was an inside job, then I would debate along side you?
Take me up on my challenge. Get ten people to admit they were involved and you will receive your second investigation by the govt.
officialy an IDIOT...
I cannot remember the last time I quoted popular mechanics. It hasnt been for months. It is foolish to think that you can place demolition in an elevator and cause a 110 story building to crumble. So you think I am being disingenuous? Wouldnt you think from all the information you gave me that if I thought it was an inside job, then I would debate along side you?
Take me up on my challenge. Get ten people to admit they were involved and you will receive your second investigation by the govt.
officially an IDIOT...
What a profound statement. Stupid me thought you should actually do something about your cause besides making the debating on a conspiracy forum.
your concept of "fact" and his are a universe apartHere ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
Here ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
your concept of "fact" and his are a universe apartHere ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
your concept of "fact" and his are a universe apartHere ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
True ...Here ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
??????????????????? you cant even ask a proper question...that says otherwise ....what ? you loon ...that stoves wont melt ?...that Carlin did not make fun of conspiracy theorys...as opposed to you showing something to give credit to your stupid statements...just give it up and stick to what you know....wtf ever that is
again, look who's talkingyour concept of "fact" and his are a universe apartHere ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
but yours and kitty fluff brains are 2 peas in a pod....lol
your concept of "fact" and his are a universe apartHere ... show me one factually based link that says otherwise ....
yes if i say wood burning stove cant melt from a wood fire it is reality if I post a video on Carlin it says what I say it does...but your facts are another story
yes if i say wood burning stove cant melt from a wood fire it is reality if I post a video on Carlin it says what I say it does...but your facts are another story
No, if I say you are lucky your house is still standing because you are an irresponsible wood stove owner, that is reality.
... as for Carlin ... I really don't have to do anything to prove your wrongness in that one, just you trying to take anything he says seriously is proof enough.
