Biff_Poindexter
Diamond Member
Please show me where I said that -- or just admit you are pulling shit out of your ass because you got called out on your bullshitWeren't you one of the dupes advocating "Dr." Jill Biden for Surgeon General? LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please show me where I said that -- or just admit you are pulling shit out of your ass because you got called out on your bullshitWeren't you one of the dupes advocating "Dr." Jill Biden for Surgeon General? LOL
With all due respect (I am NOT being sarcastic), President Johnson presumably chose Judge Marshall because he wanted an African American (at that time, the idea of a Hispanic or Asian was probably out of the question).I don't believe any of those were chosen on the premise they were going to go get a black person.
With Biden's pick, that will be different.
He probably wants to pick a black woman since black women basically saved his presidential campaign and put him in the White House...With all due respect (I am NOT being sarcastic), President Johnson presumably chose Judge Marshall because he wanted an African American (at that time, the idea of a Hispanic or Asian was probably out of the question).
And surely President Obama chose Judge Sotomayor because he wanted a Hispanic on the Court.
(Actually, President Biden should choose an Asian or Native American. But the zeitgeist is currently in favor of African Americans, so African American it will be.)
Too late, it's already been done.Who will be the first Affirmative Action Supreme Court Justice?
He committed picking a woman......period....you can try to rationalize it all you want to...
Fact is, I have no problem with him committing to picking a woman and I have no problem with Biden committing to picking the first black woman to the SC
White male supreme court justices have been over represented on the court, not under represented..so spare me the bullshit...
Yall are the same ones who claimed a president shouldn't be able to appoint a SC pick during an election year -- then immediately broke that made up rule before Justice Ginsberg was buried...so I don't wanna hear shit
Not saying that, why not look at the qualifications instead of one color and sex?It's telling how the Right AUTOMATICALLY assumes a black woman would not be qualified.![]()
Your delusion is thinking a black woman and being the best person for the job are mutually exclusive....Eventually, and with one of his picks, not a specific one.
I don't care about over-representation, I care about the best person for the job.
I guess color-blindness is not a goal anymore. You have to be part of the right tribe all over again.
Have you noticed me bitching about Biden trying to rush the process this time?
Rules are rules, and before our side followed the rules, now Biden is following the rules.
Unlike progressive jackasses like you I understand the concept of hypocrisy.
Then how did he advance the black cause?The first Affirmative Action Supreme Court Justice is already dead, Thurgood Marshall
Why are we assuming it will be someone black. For all we know Biden's token pick could be a Mexican, Chinese, or a Jew.Then how did he advance the black cause?
How will this nomination advance the black cause?
Where in the Constitution does it prevent a president from selecting a black woman??Then how did he advance the black cause?
How will this nomination advance the black cause?
In fact, what is the black cause?
And should the selection of a Supreme Court justice be about the Black cause, or upholding the Constitution?
Apparently the Black cause supersedes the Constitution, whatever the Black cause is here.
Black women only make up 6.4% of the US population. So Diaper Joe has severely limited his selection of viable candidates considering this
Also, out of that 6.4% of the population, you have a far fewer pool to select from.
The Democrats continue to Balkanize the US population.
Your delusion is thinking a black woman and being the best person for the job are mutually exclusive....
We know for a fact --- according to Conservatives themselves -- that Amy Barrett wasn't the best person for the job...but I don't see yall losing too much sleep over it...
And it wasn't that long ago that Bush tried to nominate Harriet Meyers to the court..if anyone has made a mockery and exposed themselves to be full of shit when it comes to this "best person for the job" trope -- it has been Conservatives....
Of the short list of candidates Biden can pick from -- all of them are extremely qualified in comparison to their white male counter parts already on the bench
To be fair, the first affirmative action Justice was, I believe, His Honor Thurgood Marshall.
Then came Justice Thomas.
Then came Justice Sotomayor.
And now Her Honor _______ . (I understand one possible nominee is the sister of Stacey Abrams, the next governor of Georgia.)