Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
- Nov 15, 2008
- 55,062
- 16,609
They only counted the undervotes, not all the ballots that were in dispute. It is interesting to note, of the 4 standards for reviewing the votes, Gore would've won one of them.LIE on your part...again!
USA Today
5/15/2001
George W. Bush would have won a hand count of Florida's disputed ballots if the standard advocated by Al Gore had been used, the first full study of the ballots reveals. Bush would have won by 1,665 votes — more than triple his official 537-vote margin — if every dimple, hanging chad and mark on the ballots had been counted as votes, a USA TODAY/Miami Herald/Knight Ridder study shows. The study is the first comprehensive review of the 61,195 "undervote" ballots that were at the center of Florida's disputed presidential election.
USATODAY.com - Newspapers' recount shows Bush prevailed
From your link...
The fourth standard gives Gore a razor-thin win.
So where's the lie, asshole?
In Florida, the law is that you can't recount ballots in favored areas. If you have recounts in three Democrat areas, you must have three recounts in Republican areas as well.
It was yet another violation of the Florida laws when the court said Gore could have recounts in his districts only.
Well, apparently, declaring that the laws on the books actually must be applied constitutes "stealing an election". Who knew?