Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their bankrollers pay them to widen the gap between rich and poor, and you see it every one of their policies.
Too bad he is too dim to realize how completely you just demolished him.
I've been around for 80 years. I've seen what happens here. You poor little patriotic rubes will eventually figure it out.
I've been around for 80 years.
Shit for brains, cry me river. Shit happensWhy Are Republicans So Relentlessly Cruel to the Poor?
Interesting article and much of it chimes with what we see in the UK.
It has to be coated with a thin veneer of religion to make it acceptable but in essence right wing politics is based on a selfish me me me doctrine. DISCUSS
One of these days i hope you learn what Jesus taught. It may surprise you
I think they hate waste fraud abuse lazy people. So they will purge all the slackers off foodstamps and people so incapable they truly can't figure out, will seek and find help somewhere. Maybe they'll think twice before having another kid they can't afford.Why Are Republicans So Relentlessly Cruel to the Poor?
Interesting article and much of it chimes with what we see in the UK.
It has to be coated with a thin veneer of religion to make it acceptable but in essence right wing politics is based on a selfish me me me doctrine. DISCUSS
But there have to be jobs that pay a living wage for the masses. If not you will see our population shrink. I don't see a problem with that but I know the corporations want growth not reduction.
Without immigration our population would already be declining. As the rest of the First World already is.
I certainly don't have any problem with that. I don't know why some people think that's a major issue. 315 million people is not enough?
To answer the question in the OP, it's because conservatives are selfish pieces of shit, almost across the board, and they are only concerned about themselves. They don't hate the poor as much as libertarians, but they come close. Everything they say about "giving" is bullshit, their childish Christian religion breeds a bizarre sort of hypocrisy that permeates into every aspect of their self-centered, materialistic lives. They really are the worst of humanity.
You are full of it!
I feed my next door neighbors three time a week and I am white and they are Tejano.
You just want the government to do what you refuse to do!
Terrible food and good(good for you) food are the same price, or are you suggesting more money for dining out?Because they eat terrible food and cant afford good food.Why are much of the poor in The United States fat?
if you actually thought about it, it is dems keeping them dependent and holding them back. The repubs want them to be successful. Not sure how you get where you got. your facts are messed up.Why Are Republicans So Relentlessly Cruel to the Poor?
Interesting article and much of it chimes with what we see in the UK.
It has to be coated with a thin veneer of religion to make it acceptable but in essence right wing politics is based on a selfish me me me doctrine. DISCUSS
Considering conservatives give more to charity and donate volunteer time 3X more than leftists it looks like once again you are chewing your own shoe.
Who’s More Generous, Liberals or Conservatives?
Who Gives More -- The Rich or The Poor?
Who's more charitable -- conservatives or liberals?
Giving Differently: Liberals and Conservatives Have Radically Different Views of Charity
Hmmm Aparagus has been on sale for the last month at Smiths,Albertsons and Sprouts for .99 Lb.The month of Feb it was 1.29 lb Same with both yellow squash and zucchini .99 lb. carrots,cucumbers and onions always under a dollar at sprouts. You can also buy bags of fish ( swai,tilapia and cod)No they cant afford good food. Good food costs more than bad food. How could you not know this?Of course they can afford good food. Good food does not taste as good as bad food. Food is the way the poor reward themselves. They can't afford a new car but they can afford an ice cream cone. They can't afford a steak but they can afford a big mac.Because they eat terrible food and cant afford good food.Why are much of the poor in The United States fat?
A car is not good food nor is a steak. Red meat is terrible for you.
Considering conservatives give more to charity and donate volunteer time 3X more than leftists it looks like once again you are chewing your own shoe.
Who’s More Generous, Liberals or Conservatives?
Who Gives More -- The Rich or The Poor?
Who's more charitable -- conservatives or liberals?
Giving Differently: Liberals and Conservatives Have Radically Different Views of Charity
Typical FAKE NEWS:
From your own fucking article:
In 2006 Arthur C. Brooks, now president of the American Enterprise Institute, authored the book Who Really Cares, which Los Angeles Times liberal columnist Michael Hiltzik has cited as "the source of the notion that conservatives are more generous." Hiltzik disputes this "received wisdom," citing a 2013 paper by MIT political scientists Michele F. Margolis and Michael W. Sances that found that, for individuals, the "relationship between conservatism and giving vanishes after adjusting for income and religiosity." In other words, conservatives are more likely to be wealthy and more likely to give to their churches than liberals.
Margolis and Sances also argue that, "At the state level, we find no evidence of a relationship between charitable giving and Republican presidential voteshare." Consider this new Chronicle study, then, another interesting rhetorical salvo in the ongoing debate about which side of the American political spectrum is more generous hearted, but not the final one.
Looks like conservatives don't read to good either... How about ye fucks actually read the articles ye post.
Exactly. Fresh veggies and fruit are fairly cheap at Sprouts. Right now bell peppers are 2/1.00. Aparagus .98 lb. Apples .98 lb and carrots .98 lb. Bunches of red or gold beets .98 ea. If a person wants cantaloupe Albertsons has them right now buy one get one free. Along with 10lb bags of russet potatoes for 1.77 ea.No they cant afford good food. Good food costs more than bad food. How could you not know this?Of course they can afford good food. Good food does not taste as good as bad food. Food is the way the poor reward themselves. They can't afford a new car but they can afford an ice cream cone. They can't afford a steak but they can afford a big mac.Because they eat terrible food and cant afford good food.Why are much of the poor in The United States fat?
A car is not good food nor is a steak. Red meat is terrible for you.
I can buy a bag of Swai Fish at HEB for a little over six dollars. Call me a liar on that.
I can buy a small bag of black beans around a dollar at HEB.
I can buy cheap veggies at HEB.
I also can buy frozen veggies at Kroger one dollar per bag.
So tell me how is it that you can not afford healthy food!?!
I prefer my fish to be fresh but unless I go fishing then I have to buy frozen at HEB or fresh at the local Vietnames store.
So there is no excuse to eat poorly!
Liberals give their donations to the arts..conservatives to helping the needy.Considering conservatives give more to charity and donate volunteer time 3X more than leftists it looks like once again you are chewing your own shoe.
Who’s More Generous, Liberals or Conservatives?
Who Gives More -- The Rich or The Poor?
Who's more charitable -- conservatives or liberals?
Giving Differently: Liberals and Conservatives Have Radically Different Views of Charity
Typical FAKE NEWS:
From your own fucking article:
In 2006 Arthur C. Brooks, now president of the American Enterprise Institute, authored the book Who Really Cares, which Los Angeles Times liberal columnist Michael Hiltzik has cited as "the source of the notion that conservatives are more generous." Hiltzik disputes this "received wisdom," citing a 2013 paper by MIT political scientists Michele F. Margolis and Michael W. Sances that found that, for individuals, the "relationship between conservatism and giving vanishes after adjusting for income and religiosity." In other words, conservatives are more likely to be wealthy and more likely to give to their churches than liberals.
Margolis and Sances also argue that, "At the state level, we find no evidence of a relationship between charitable giving and Republican presidential voteshare." Consider this new Chronicle study, then, another interesting rhetorical salvo in the ongoing debate about which side of the American political spectrum is more generous hearted, but not the final one.
Looks like conservatives don't read to good either... How about ye fucks actually read the articles ye post.
Probably because conservatives are more likely to be religious.
I wonder how much more likely liberals are to give to charities rather than churches.
Here's the problem, churches get given charitable status so their pastor can get rich.... it's still counted as giving to charity, when really it's rich people trying to buy their way into heaven. Oh, the irony.
But it is not as emotionally rewarding.Exactly. Fresh veggies and fruit are fairly cheap at Sprouts. Right now bell peppers are 2/1.00. Aparagus .98 lb. Apples .98 lb and carrots .98 lb. Bunches of red or gold beets .98 ea. If a person wants cantaloupe Albertsons has them right now buy one get one free. Along with 10lb bags of russet potatoes for 1.77 ea.No they cant afford good food. Good food costs more than bad food. How could you not know this?Of course they can afford good food. Good food does not taste as good as bad food. Food is the way the poor reward themselves. They can't afford a new car but they can afford an ice cream cone. They can't afford a steak but they can afford a big mac.Because they eat terrible food and cant afford good food.Why are much of the poor in The United States fat?
A car is not good food nor is a steak. Red meat is terrible for you.
I can buy a bag of Swai Fish at HEB for a little over six dollars. Call me a liar on that.
I can buy a small bag of black beans around a dollar at HEB.
I can buy cheap veggies at HEB.
I also can buy frozen veggies at Kroger one dollar per bag.
So tell me how is it that you can not afford healthy food!?!
I prefer my fish to be fresh but unless I go fishing then I have to buy frozen at HEB or fresh at the local Vietnames store.
So there is no excuse to eat poorly!
Shopping healthy on a budget isn't hard.
Liberals give their donations to the arts..conservatives to helping the needy.Considering conservatives give more to charity and donate volunteer time 3X more than leftists it looks like once again you are chewing your own shoe.
Who’s More Generous, Liberals or Conservatives?
Who Gives More -- The Rich or The Poor?
Who's more charitable -- conservatives or liberals?
Giving Differently: Liberals and Conservatives Have Radically Different Views of Charity
Typical FAKE NEWS:
From your own fucking article:
In 2006 Arthur C. Brooks, now president of the American Enterprise Institute, authored the book Who Really Cares, which Los Angeles Times liberal columnist Michael Hiltzik has cited as "the source of the notion that conservatives are more generous." Hiltzik disputes this "received wisdom," citing a 2013 paper by MIT political scientists Michele F. Margolis and Michael W. Sances that found that, for individuals, the "relationship between conservatism and giving vanishes after adjusting for income and religiosity." In other words, conservatives are more likely to be wealthy and more likely to give to their churches than liberals.
Margolis and Sances also argue that, "At the state level, we find no evidence of a relationship between charitable giving and Republican presidential voteshare." Consider this new Chronicle study, then, another interesting rhetorical salvo in the ongoing debate about which side of the American political spectrum is more generous hearted, but not the final one.
Looks like conservatives don't read to good either... How about ye fucks actually read the articles ye post.
Probably because conservatives are more likely to be religious.
I wonder how much more likely liberals are to give to charities rather than churches.
Here's the problem, churches get given charitable status so their pastor can get rich.... it's still counted as giving to charity, when really it's rich people trying to buy their way into heaven. Oh, the irony.
Sances that found that, for individuals, the "relationship between conservatism and giving vanishes after adjusting for income and religiosity." In other words, conservatives are more likely to be wealthy and more likely to give to their churches than liberals.
Looks like conservatives don't read to good either... How about ye fucks actually read the articles ye post.
a Florida governor owned an interest in drug testing companies. he was also for drug testing welfare recipients.the republicans want them drug tested in Firms they own; and to deny and disparage the poor, steak and lobster if they fail any drug tests.Of course they can afford good food. Good food does not taste as good as bad food. Food is the way the poor reward themselves. They can't afford a new car but they can afford an ice cream cone. They can't afford a steak but they can afford a big mac.Because they eat terrible food and cant afford good food.Why are much of the poor in The United States fat?
Clueless. The companies only drug test to get cheaper workman's compensation rates and nothing more.
Bleeding Heart TightwadsLiberals give their donations to the arts..conservatives to helping the needy.Considering conservatives give more to charity and donate volunteer time 3X more than leftists it looks like once again you are chewing your own shoe.
Who’s More Generous, Liberals or Conservatives?
Who Gives More -- The Rich or The Poor?
Who's more charitable -- conservatives or liberals?
Giving Differently: Liberals and Conservatives Have Radically Different Views of Charity
Typical FAKE NEWS:
From your own fucking article:
In 2006 Arthur C. Brooks, now president of the American Enterprise Institute, authored the book Who Really Cares, which Los Angeles Times liberal columnist Michael Hiltzik has cited as "the source of the notion that conservatives are more generous." Hiltzik disputes this "received wisdom," citing a 2013 paper by MIT political scientists Michele F. Margolis and Michael W. Sances that found that, for individuals, the "relationship between conservatism and giving vanishes after adjusting for income and religiosity." In other words, conservatives are more likely to be wealthy and more likely to give to their churches than liberals.
Margolis and Sances also argue that, "At the state level, we find no evidence of a relationship between charitable giving and Republican presidential voteshare." Consider this new Chronicle study, then, another interesting rhetorical salvo in the ongoing debate about which side of the American political spectrum is more generous hearted, but not the final one.
Looks like conservatives don't read to good either... How about ye fucks actually read the articles ye post.
Probably because conservatives are more likely to be religious.
I wonder how much more likely liberals are to give to charities rather than churches.
Here's the problem, churches get given charitable status so their pastor can get rich.... it's still counted as giving to charity, when really it's rich people trying to buy their way into heaven. Oh, the irony.
Prove it...
Because I don't believe you.
