Why Did Strzok Refuse to Answer Questions?

[Dschrute3]

It was treason. He should be in prison.

What was treason? Point to the act of treason, liar.

Check out his Emails. How was he allowed to conduct any investigations? Fluck him. There's a special place in Hell reserved for him.

Isn't it amazing that Trumpkins think that anyone who detests their Don the Con deserves to go to hell.....and has committed treason?

He worked for the FBI. He was supposed to be independent and non-partisan. He's a despicable traitor. Fuck em.

FBI IG says he is not.

Now that the American intel agencies are looking at Message Boards and other social media for American traitors, life will get more interesting.

Fuck him. He's a Clinton/Obama-owned piece of shit. He shouldn't have been allowed to conduct any investigations. There really is a special place in hell reserved for him.

 

[Dschrute3]

It was treason. He should be in prison.

What was treason? Point to the act of treason, liar.

Check out his Emails. How was he allowed to conduct any investigations? Fluck him. There's a special place in Hell reserved for him.

Isn't it amazing that Trumpkins think that anyone who detests their Don the Con deserves to go to hell.....and has committed treason?

He worked for the FBI. He was supposed to be independent and non-partisan. He's a despicable traitor. Fuck em.

Yes he worked for the FBI- which is why you think that the FBI should be destroyed now
FBI agents are not supposed to be independent- they are supposed to work within the FBI.
FBI agents are not required to be non-partisan- at all- only that they should not allow their partisan beliefs to interfere with their investigation- and there is no evidence that Strzok's view of Don the Con played any part in any investigation.

And you think he is a 'traitor' and should go to hell- because he despises your dear Don the Con.

Now that is partisan.

Partisan idiocy.

He worked for the FBI, he was supposed to have integrity. He was clearly an Obama/Clinton-owned piece of shit. May he rot in hell.

 

[JakeStarkey]

What was treason? Point to the act of treason, liar.

Check out his Emails. How was he allowed to conduct any investigations? Fluck him. There's a special place in Hell reserved for him.

Isn't it amazing that Trumpkins think that anyone who detests their Don the Con deserves to go to hell.....and has committed treason?

He worked for the FBI. He was supposed to be independent and non-partisan. He's a despicable traitor. Fuck em.

FBI IG says he is not.

Now that the American intel agencies are looking at Message Boards and other social media for American traitors, life will get more interesting.

Fuck him. He's a Clinton/Obama-owned piece of shit. He shouldn't have been allowed to conduct any investigations. There really is a special place in hell reserved for him.

^^^ deranged nonsense from the alt right

 

[Dschrute3]

What was treason? Point to the act of treason, liar.

Check out his Emails. How was he allowed to conduct any investigations? Fluck him. There's a special place in Hell reserved for him.

Isn't it amazing that Trumpkins think that anyone who detests their Don the Con deserves to go to hell.....and has committed treason?

He worked for the FBI. He was supposed to be independent and non-partisan. He's a despicable traitor. Fuck em.

His work is supposed to be independent and non-party, which oversight and everyone respected agrees was how he ACTED, BRAINWASHED TWITS.

Well the Trumpkins think that anyone who even thinks bad thoughts about Don the Con is a traitor and can't work for the FBI.

When can we expect the rest of the purges to happen to cleanse every government agency of any who are not purely Trump partisans?

The man has no integrity. He's a Clinton/Obama Puppet. His treatment of Trump wasn't just biased and unprofessional, it was treasonous. They should lock the asshole up.

 

[francoHFW]

Check out his Emails. How was he allowed to conduct any investigations? Fluck him. There's a special place in Hell reserved for him.

Isn't it amazing that Trumpkins think that anyone who detests their Don the Con deserves to go to hell.....and has committed treason?

He worked for the FBI. He was supposed to be independent and non-partisan. He's a despicable traitor. Fuck em.

His work is supposed to be independent and non-party, which oversight and everyone respected agrees was how he ACTED, BRAINWASHED TWITS.

Well the Trumpkins think that anyone who even thinks bad thoughts about Don the Con is a traitor and can't work for the FBI.

When can we expect the rest of the purges to happen to cleanse every government agency of any who are not purely Trump partisans?

The man has no integrity. He's a Clinton/Obama Puppet. His treatment of Trump wasn't just biased and unprofessional, it was treasonous. They should lock the asshole up.

There is no evidence for any of that, just your brainwashed tiny little mind...

 

[playtime]

really? you got ^^^ that ^^^ out of what i wrote? oh, silly you...you don't upset me. i am simply putting a fine point of what you is.

You're obviously upset.

you obviously need to believe that to justify your own shortcomings.

it's ok, i understand.

Good, that's the first step to being an adult.

so when are you gonna become an adult?

You're an idiot.

your needle is stuck.

 

[BS Filter]

Having seen the vile nature of his texts to and from his lover. If you or a loved one was being investigated by Strozk and he had said these things about you or your loved one, how confident would you be that his judgment would be totally unbiased?

Completely. Especially given the conclusions of the IG and his own testimony under oath.

The better question is still, what evidence do you have that he acted in an official capacity with bias?

The answer, none of course.

Your bias is showing.

He was fired by Mueller from the investigation.

He was reassigned. Mueller knew the perception of these texts would cause a shitstorm. They have indeed and Mueller was smart to remove him immediately in order to protect the investigation. There is no official finding of bias in his professional conduct.

Stop lying.

Yes, he was "reassigned" because of the appearance of BIAS. Stop lying.

No. The perception of bias among those too dumb to understand the difference between perception and reality. You demonstrate that dynamic well.
Professional bias is an action, not a thought.
Strzok expressed personal opinions. He did not employ bias in his professional conduct.

Then why was he fired from the investigation?

 

[BS Filter]

You're obviously upset.

you obviously need to believe that to justify your own shortcomings.

it's ok, i understand.

Good, that's the first step to being an adult.

so when are you gonna become an adult?

You're an idiot.

your needle is stuck.

You're an idiot.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, he is not, and your needle is stuck.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Strozk's lack of good judgement to verbalize political beliefs in that role make certain to me he lacked sufficient judgement to not allow his beliefs to influence his investigative responsibilities.

 

[BS Filter]

No, he is not, and your needle is stuck.

You're stupid. I've never seen so many stupid idiots on a political forum. Deplorable.

 

[JakeStarkey]

oodles_dupe is well named. Strzok, like a good professional, did not let his bias interfere with his work.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, he is not, and your needle is stuck.

You're stupid. I've never seen so many stupid idiots on a political forum. Deplorable.

A stupid person like you would think that.

The fact is that Strzok defeated the GOP committee.

The FBI IG cleared him. Neither what your ilk or the freedom caucus think counts for beans.

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Check out his Emails. How was he allowed to conduct any investigations? Fluck him. There's a special place in Hell reserved for him.

Isn't it amazing that Trumpkins think that anyone who detests their Don the Con deserves to go to hell.....and has committed treason?

He worked for the FBI. He was supposed to be independent and non-partisan. He's a despicable traitor. Fuck em.

His work is supposed to be independent and non-party, which oversight and everyone respected agrees was how he ACTED, BRAINWASHED TWITS.

Well the Trumpkins think that anyone who even thinks bad thoughts about Don the Con is a traitor and can't work for the FBI.

When can we expect the rest of the purges to happen to cleanse every government agency of any who are not purely Trump partisans?

The man has no integrity. He's a Clinton/Obama Puppet. His treatment of Trump wasn't just biased and unprofessional, it was treasonous. They should lock the asshole up.

What treatment would that be?

 

[BS Filter]

oodles_dupe is well named. Strzok, like a good professional, did not let his bias interfere with his work.

Yeah, that's why he was fired from the investigation. Idiot.

 

[BS Filter]

No, he is not, and your needle is stuck.

You're stupid. I've never seen so many stupid idiots on a political forum. Deplorable.

A stupid person like you would think that.

The fact is that Strzok defeated the GOP committee.

The FBI IG cleared him. Neither what your ilk or the freedom caucus think counts for beans.

The corrupt take care of their own. Where are Hillary's servers?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Completely. Especially given the conclusions of the IG and his own testimony under oath.

The better question is still, what evidence do you have that he acted in an official capacity with bias?

The answer, none of course.

Your bias is showing.

He was fired by Mueller from the investigation.

He was reassigned. Mueller knew the perception of these texts would cause a shitstorm. They have indeed and Mueller was smart to remove him immediately in order to protect the investigation. There is no official finding of bias in his professional conduct.

Stop lying.

Yes, he was "reassigned" because of the appearance of BIAS. Stop lying.

No. The perception of bias among those too dumb to understand the difference between perception and reality. You demonstrate that dynamic well.
Professional bias is an action, not a thought.
Strzok expressed personal opinions. He did not employ bias in his professional conduct.

Then why was he fired from the investigation?

He was reassigned. Not fired.

I just told you why. He was removed because the perception of bias could have damaged the integrity of the investigation if he had stayed.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Strzok was not fired but reassigned.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Strozk's lack of good judgement to verbalize political beliefs in that role make certain to me he lacked sufficient judgement to not allow his beliefs to influence his investigative responsibilities.

Texts are a form of verbalization? Who knew?