Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mueller only can relieve the pressure on Trump, and apparently the former believes the latter is dirty.Strzok was following the FBI counsel's advice.
As he said, when the investigation is over, Congress can have all the info it wants.
But Congress is never, ever in charge of DOJ or FBI investigations: separation of powers.
But now there is an investigation into Mr. Strzok, as to whether or not he committed perjury, obstruction of justice or contempt of Congress. Very serious felonies, BTW. So the key here is to have AG Sessions or President Trump order him to spill his guts. They are his superiors.
An investigation by who? Congress? Congress has no authority to prosecute anyone- they would have to go through the Justice Department......which controls the FBI....
Just because Congress is stomping its feet and making demands doesn't mean that the FBI should let Congress interfere with an ongoing investigation.
But certainly Don the Con can continue to try to interfere with an ongoing FBI investigation.
So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.Not to mention he just lied to Congress about letting his bias affect his investigation.
LOL since his testimony is completely in line with what the Inspector General's report said- it would appear that you are the one lying.
Trumkpkins....lol
Well we have evidence of him doing and saying stuff. What do you have on any of those 3?says buckeye who says he is a Republican but far right of Goldwater.it's starkey, he says he's a republican but is left of Marx.
I am mainstream American and buckey is an Alt Right anti-American.
Strzok had the right to refuse to answer the questions.
Go live in Russia if you can't live with freedoms.
No he doesn't as long as he works for the FBI. Paige can, because she quit! By the way, why won't she testify? Where is the old, "if you have nothing to hide routine?"
Strzok is refusing to answer the questions that the FBI legal counsel advised him not to answer- because it would be interfering with an ongoing FBI investigation.
Why won't she testify? Hmmmm how many Trump administration officials have refused to testify completely?
Democrat cites 'pattern' of U.S. administration refusals to testify...
Steve Bannon
Lewandowski
Hope Hicks
Top Dem: Hope Hicks refuses to answer questions about time in White House
What does the Adminstration have to hide?
And how many in the administration have testified ?
what evidence????Well we have evidence of him doing and saying stuff. What do you have on any of those 3?says buckeye who says he is a Republican but far right of Goldwater.it's starkey, he says he's a republican but is left of Marx.
I am mainstream American and buckey is an Alt Right anti-American.
Strzok had the right to refuse to answer the questions.
Go live in Russia if you can't live with freedoms.
No he doesn't as long as he works for the FBI. Paige can, because she quit! By the way, why won't she testify? Where is the old, "if you have nothing to hide routine?"
Strzok is refusing to answer the questions that the FBI legal counsel advised him not to answer- because it would be interfering with an ongoing FBI investigation.
Why won't she testify? Hmmmm how many Trump administration officials have refused to testify completely?
Democrat cites 'pattern' of U.S. administration refusals to testify...
Steve Bannon
Lewandowski
Hope Hicks
Top Dem: Hope Hicks refuses to answer questions about time in White House
What does the Adminstration have to hide?
And how many in the administration have testified ?
I love the double standard you loyal Trumpkins use to dance for Don the Con!
Plenty of evidence that Steve Bannon and Hope Hicks 'doing and saying stuff'- and that is why Congress subpoened them and they refused to answer all of Congress's questions.
Don't worry- I will never expect you to hold any of Don the Con's people to the same standard as the FBI.
After all- your mission is now to destroy the FBI- just to protect Don the Con.
Ok, so again if a DA calls the person he's investigating the n word. you would be ok with that? You guys use different rules depending on who is being investigated.....it's called partisanship.So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.LOL since his testimony is completely in line with what the Inspector General's report said- it would appear that you are the one lying.
Trumkpkins....lol
Ah- you want to go by hyperbole- and feelings- not facts- I get it- you are loyal Trumpkin who feels a need to protect Don the Con.
Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.
Trumkpkins....lol
Well this investigation is about Russian collusion.......you guys are using it for a fishing expedition....which we can do as well.......and we will remember this.....lefties are very very dirty.Mueller only can relieve the pressure on Trump, and apparently the former believes the latter is dirty.Strzok was following the FBI counsel's advice.
As he said, when the investigation is over, Congress can have all the info it wants.
But Congress is never, ever in charge of DOJ or FBI investigations: separation of powers.
But now there is an investigation into Mr. Strzok, as to whether or not he committed perjury, obstruction of justice or contempt of Congress. Very serious felonies, BTW. So the key here is to have AG Sessions or President Trump order him to spill his guts. They are his superiors.
An investigation by who? Congress? Congress has no authority to prosecute anyone- they would have to go through the Justice Department......which controls the FBI....
Just because Congress is stomping its feet and making demands doesn't mean that the FBI should let Congress interfere with an ongoing investigation.
But certainly Don the Con can continue to try to interfere with an ongoing FBI investigation.
I don't know what Mueller thinks. I think that Mueller is an aggressive prosecutor that is following all the leads.
Do I think that Don the Con is dirty? Very possibly. Do I believe that Don the Con conspired with Russia? No firm evidence of that yet- I am going to wait and see what Mueller comes up with.
But Don the Con sure acts like he is guilty of something that he fears Mueller will find.
So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?
DA's are suits who really should know better than that.
But the NAACP had no problem with LBJ addressing them at their convention and explaining his Great Society Giveaway programs and saying "With this program, I will have you n's voting Democrat for a hundred years"
Ok, so again if a DA calls the person he's investigating the n word. you would be ok with that? You guys use different rules depending on who is being investigated.....it's called partisanship.So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.
Trumkpkins....lol
Ah- you want to go by hyperbole- and feelings- not facts- I get it- you are loyal Trumpkin who feels a need to protect Don the Con.
Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.
Trumkpkins....lol
Well this investigation is about Russian collusion.......you guys are using it for a fishing expedition....which we can do as well.......and we will remember this.....lefties are very very dirty.Mueller only can relieve the pressure on Trump, and apparently the former believes the latter is dirty.Strzok was following the FBI counsel's advice.
As he said, when the investigation is over, Congress can have all the info it wants.
But Congress is never, ever in charge of DOJ or FBI investigations: separation of powers.
But now there is an investigation into Mr. Strzok, as to whether or not he committed perjury, obstruction of justice or contempt of Congress. Very serious felonies, BTW. So the key here is to have AG Sessions or President Trump order him to spill his guts. They are his superiors.
An investigation by who? Congress? Congress has no authority to prosecute anyone- they would have to go through the Justice Department......which controls the FBI....
Just because Congress is stomping its feet and making demands doesn't mean that the FBI should let Congress interfere with an ongoing investigation.
But certainly Don the Con can continue to try to interfere with an ongoing FBI investigation.
I don't know what Mueller thinks. I think that Mueller is an aggressive prosecutor that is following all the leads.
Do I think that Don the Con is dirty? Very possibly. Do I believe that Don the Con conspired with Russia? No firm evidence of that yet- I am going to wait and see what Mueller comes up with.
But Don the Con sure acts like he is guilty of something that he fears Mueller will find.
No, I don't know. Why don't you tell us. Go ahead. Are you upset that I'm mocking your lying hero?Sure, it's a great avatar. It accurately describes obamacare.I agree, it would be destructive. It would mean the leftist-socialist-communist corruption in our government would be taken down.or gay hatred & sure as shit knew how destructive having fundie christians taking over congress would be.
you think you can be taken seriously with that avatar? haaaaaaaa............
uh-sure. why not just have one of 'obamacare' with a red slash thru it?
yaaaaaa.................. we both know why ......
So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.Not to mention he just lied to Congress about letting his bias affect his investigation.
LOL since his testimony is completely in line with what the Inspector General's report said- it would appear that you are the one lying.
Trumkpkins....lol
then how do you know he had enough intel?So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.LOL since his testimony is completely in line with what the Inspector General's report said- it would appear that you are the one lying.
Trumkpkins....lol
you do realize that if he let his personal bias interfere with & actually conspire to take president tribbles down.... he could easily had enough intel leaked to get 'er done.
yet he didn't. hmmmmm.... because he is able to keep the two sides of his brain separate. unlike the poorly educated that trump loves long time.
like you.
So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.LOL since his testimony is completely in line with what the Inspector General's report said- it would appear that you are the one lying.
Trumkpkins....lol
you do realize that if he let his personal bias interfere with & actually conspire to take president tribbles down.... he could easily had enough intel leaked to get 'er done.
yet he didn't. hmmmmm.... because he is able to keep the two sides of his brain separate. unlike the poorly educated that trump loves long time.
like you.
ah I hate to interrupt the circle jerk of pseudo intellecuals, but what evidence is he talking about? Or is this one of those we'll see in the report kinda deals?So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....oooopppsExcept it wasn't.
Trumkpkins....lol
you do realize that if he let his personal bias interfere with & actually conspire to take president tribbles down.... he could easily had enough intel leaked to get 'er done.
yet he didn't. hmmmmm.... because he is able to keep the two sides of his brain separate. unlike the poorly educated that trump loves long time.
like you.
Well that doesn't fit with the narrative that Don the Con has told his Trumpkins to bleat.
Strzok said as much during his open statement- he absolutely could have sabotaged the Trump campaign if he wanted to- if there really had been the 'conspiracy' that Don the Con lies about- by the FBI- Don the Con would never have gotten elected.
Strzok's attack on the distinguished gentleman from Texas, Mr. Gohmert, was despicable.
Why didn't the agent just tell the truth.
Gohmert is a despicable retard.
Rep. Gohmert is a distinguished gentleman and a decorated officer in the US Army. Just like Eisenhower.
Louis Gohmert
Trumpanzees have issues with intellecTuals.ah I hate to interrupt the circle jerk of pseudo intellecuals, but what evidence is he talking about? Or is this one of those we'll see in the report kinda deals?So if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....ooooppps
Trumkpkins....lol
you do realize that if he let his personal bias interfere with & actually conspire to take president tribbles down.... he could easily had enough intel leaked to get 'er done.
yet he didn't. hmmmmm.... because he is able to keep the two sides of his brain separate. unlike the poorly educated that trump loves long time.
like you.
Well that doesn't fit with the narrative that Don the Con has told his Trumpkins to bleat.
Strzok said as much during his open statement- he absolutely could have sabotaged the Trump campaign if he wanted to- if there really had been the 'conspiracy' that Don the Con lies about- by the FBI- Don the Con would never have gotten elected.
Strzok's attack on the distinguished gentleman from Texas, Mr. Gohmert, was despicable.
Why didn't the agent just tell the truth.
Gohmert is a despicable retard.
Rep. Gohmert is a distinguished gentleman and a decorated officer in the US Army. Just like Eisenhower.
ah I hate to interrupt the circle jerk of pseudo intellecualsSo if a DA used the n word while investigating a black, you would be ok with that?Except of course his texts showed his bias- no that that it affected his investigation.Not even in line with his texts to Lisa Paige.....ooooppps
Trumkpkins....lol
you do realize that if he let his personal bias interfere with & actually conspire to take president tribbles down.... he could easily had enough intel leaked to get 'er done.
yet he didn't. hmmmmm.... because he is able to keep the two sides of his brain separate. unlike the poorly educated that trump loves long time.
like you.
Well that doesn't fit with the narrative that Don the Con has told his Trumpkins to bleat.
Strzok said as much during his open statement- he absolutely could have sabotaged the Trump campaign if he wanted to- if there really had been the 'conspiracy' that Don the Con lies about- by the FBI- Don the Con would never have gotten elected.
The FBI has no issue (nor do I) with judging texts/comments made regarding terrorism or Russian trolls as being criminal, yet Strzok seems to think he should be held to a different standard regarding texts/comments he has made regarding political bias involving FBI investigations he is in charge of investigating.
Exhibit F: Strzok had the magic bullet and he didn't use it. He testified that he was aware of the investigation of possible collaboration on the part of the Trump campaign team in July of 2016. He never disclosed that information to a soul outside of the FBI.
What are the House committees investigating? If Strzok wanted to sabotage the Trump campaign, he had the weapon to do exactly that and he didn't.
He didn't disclose the information about investigating the TRUMP campaign most likely because the FBI under direction of Obama was illegally spying on TRUMP..
You Trumpkins do you like to parrot Don the Con's fantasies.
