Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #121
Can I nominate this thread for best “Title Says It All” award?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you really trademarked TardLogic? If so, apologies for the unauthorized usage.TardLogic™ at its finest.Since the targets were prominent Democrats who are not in government or running in the current election and none of the (fake) bombs have been found to be operational and the Democrats will benefit at the polls from this incident, it is reasonable to think Democratic political operatives may have played a part in this incident in order to try to influence the election.
TardLogic™ at its finest.Since the targets were prominent Democrats who are not in government or running in the current election and none of the (fake) bombs have been found to be operational and the Democrats will benefit at the polls from this incident, it is reasonable to think Democratic political operatives may have played a part in this incident in order to try to influence the election.
Indeed they do. The very point I try to make on this forum every day. Unfortunately, the pseuedocons flood this board with their confirmation biases every minute of every day.TardLogic™ at its finest.Since the targets were prominent Democrats who are not in government or running in the current election and none of the (fake) bombs have been found to be operational and the Democrats will benefit at the polls from this incident, it is reasonable to think Democratic political operatives may have played a part in this incident in order to try to influence the election.
"Tards"....did you know they come in BOTH Republican AND Democrat flavors? lol
I think he's just a mentally ill person
And most such mentally ill people remain harmless, until someone sets them off.
The right has been engaged in an extended campaign to set such people off. The left hasn't. The two sides are polar opposites in that regard, which is why there's been so much more violence from the right.
The "both sides do it!" argument is nonsense, as both sides don't do it. The right does it, the left doesn't, hence one should condemn the right.
Mamooth is an intellectually dishonest progressive. She doesn't care about truth, and she probably has an IQ in the range of 100. Unlike Mamooth, I say things that are supported. In this example, I expose Mamooth and those like her:
COMPILATION: Democrats, Media Figures Glorify Violence Against Trump Supporters
The Left Has Become a Cult of Violence
COMPILATION: Democrats, Media Figures Glorify Violence Against Trump Supporters
Trump supporter’s hair lit on fire by protester
Anarchists, expletives, 9/11: Portland protest video ignites political firestorm
Read Hillary Clinton's 'Basket of Deplorables' Remarks on Trump Supporters
Latino Trump supporter says he was beaten by protesters
Trump supporter recounts beating by Antifa group
Never dated never any context means nothing, super duper. The only actual spike in violence is against Muslims Jews blacks and gays since Trump started....
Lay off the kool-aid, it's not good for your mental health.
If the guy was a true Trump supporter, I will say he's pretty stupid. Especially to have done this now.
Seems every time there's some down to the wire, critical political appointment, election, or other event, something happens that always benefits the left.
Now we have this and 7,000 illegal immigrants marching towards the US...right at election time.
Things that make you go hmmmm
Indeed they do. The very point I try to make on this forum every day. Unfortunately, the pseuedocons flood this board with their confirmation biases every minute of every day.TardLogic™ at its finest.Since the targets were prominent Democrats who are not in government or running in the current election and none of the (fake) bombs have been found to be operational and the Democrats will benefit at the polls from this incident, it is reasonable to think Democratic political operatives may have played a part in this incident in order to try to influence the election.
"Tards"....did you know they come in BOTH Republican AND Democrat flavors? lol
YOU go hmmmmm? It never occurred to me that you are curious or thoughtful, and I don't believe you are.
Nice try to change the topic to the migration, hate and fear mongering never seem to go away when an election is imminent or a negative news story impacts a Republican [remember when the G.W. Bush raised the terror alert whenever they needed to change the front pages?].
OK, I’ll try again... you are claiming that due to the upcoming election it is more likely that his social media posts and vehicle decorations are part of a conspiracy to throw the election than they are just expressions of what this guy actually believes. So your logic, if I’m following it correctly, is the Dems are so desperate to make Trump supporters look bad before the election that they hatched this plan just in time. Quick question, when was the last time negative news about the president or his supporters swayed anyone from an opinion they have. Best I can tell it was the child separation policy at the border. Was that a conspiracy?Don’t forget to speak to the timing issue El Rich.
It probably seems that way to you because it is apparently the only kind of logic you are familiar with.TardLogic™ at its finest.Since the targets were prominent Democrats who are not in government or running in the current election and none of the (fake) bombs have been found to be operational and the Democrats will benefit at the polls from this incident, it is reasonable to think Democratic political operatives may have played a part in this incident in order to try to influence the election.
Man, just as I predicted.
The tards came up with a horseshit theory about the bomber. In the TOTAL ABSENCE OF FACTS OR EVIDENCE, they created a fucking phantasm.
Then they began stating it as a fact.
This is a textbook example of MASS DELUSION.
And just as I predicted, if it turns out reality conflicts with their made up fucking BULLSHIT, the fucking idiot tard herd goes into full reality denial mode.
Ha ha, you did no such thing and you're still probably wrong.
You assume the bomber wanted the bombs to detonate.Let's see, bombs delivered to liberal heads right before the election. The culprit(s) is smart enough to build a bomb and locate an address, but somehow is too stupid to understand how the bombs detonate. Yeah exactly, something stinks. Who you figure is behind this?
You assume much, and this topic is just bait for tards to roll their own bullshit, inspired by your propagandists' bullshit.
Who cares about waiting for facts? Let's make shit up and then if reality doesn't match up with our phantasm, we'll call the reality "FAKE NEWS!"
Tards can't stand an information vacuum. You need to fill all that empty airspace in your pointy heads with something, even if it is your own shit pulled out of your own ass.
Of course you will, tard.I'll stick with the likelihood he's just a nut case. That and the possibility the Democrat deep state exploited him.
I’ll say this simply so you can understand it. A terrorist attack on the eve of an election, successfully attached to one of the political parties, would’ve resulted in landslide voting for the other party from MIDDLE voters, where elections are won.OK, I’ll try again... you are claiming that due to the upcoming election it is more likely that his social media posts and vehicle decorations are part of a conspiracy to throw the election than they are just expressions of what this guy actually believes. So your logic, if I’m following it correctly, is the Dems are so desperate to make Trump supporters look bad before the election that they hatched this plan just in time. Quick question, when was the last time negative news about the president or his supporters swayed anyone from an opinion they have. Best I can tell it was the child separation policy at the border. Was that a conspiracy?Don’t forget to speak to the timing issue El Rich.
Ok, and again possible and probable are far from the same. You seem to be claiming the most likely explanation is a Dem conspiracy, you have offered no evidence other than to imply that Pro-Trump stickers are proof that he does not support Trump. This logic is not....well logical.I’ll say this simply so you can understand it. A terrorist attack on the eve of an election, successfully attached to one of the political parties, would’ve resulted in landslide voting for the other party from MIDDLE voters, where elections are won.OK, I’ll try again... you are claiming that due to the upcoming election it is more likely that his social media posts and vehicle decorations are part of a conspiracy to throw the election than they are just expressions of what this guy actually believes. So your logic, if I’m following it correctly, is the Dems are so desperate to make Trump supporters look bad before the election that they hatched this plan just in time. Quick question, when was the last time negative news about the president or his supporters swayed anyone from an opinion they have. Best I can tell it was the child separation policy at the border. Was that a conspiracy?Don’t forget to speak to the timing issue El Rich.
I say “would’ve” because the ruse is so obviously backfired. Also simply put.
I’ll say this simply so you can understand it. A terrorist attack on the eve of an election, successfully attached to one of the political parties, would’ve resulted in landslide voting for the other party from MIDDLE voters, where elections are won.OK, I’ll try again... you are claiming that due to the upcoming election it is more likely that his social media posts and vehicle decorations are part of a conspiracy to throw the election than they are just expressions of what this guy actually believes. So your logic, if I’m following it correctly, is the Dems are so desperate to make Trump supporters look bad before the election that they hatched this plan just in time. Quick question, when was the last time negative news about the president or his supporters swayed anyone from an opinion they have. Best I can tell it was the child separation policy at the border. Was that a conspiracy?Don’t forget to speak to the timing issue El Rich.
I say “would’ve” because the ruse is so obvious that it has already backfired. Also simply put.
I think the place where we are disagreeing is that you are seeing things that are “obvious”, but other than your mistrust of Dems I see no evidence that supports your claim. Please, educate me.I’ll say this simply so you can understand it. A terrorist attack on the eve of an election, successfully attached to one of the political parties, would’ve resulted in landslide voting for the other party from MIDDLE voters, where elections are won.OK, I’ll try again... you are claiming that due to the upcoming election it is more likely that his social media posts and vehicle decorations are part of a conspiracy to throw the election than they are just expressions of what this guy actually believes. So your logic, if I’m following it correctly, is the Dems are so desperate to make Trump supporters look bad before the election that they hatched this plan just in time. Quick question, when was the last time negative news about the president or his supporters swayed anyone from an opinion they have. Best I can tell it was the child separation policy at the border. Was that a conspiracy?Don’t forget to speak to the timing issue El Rich.
I say “would’ve” because the ruse is so obvious that it has already backfired. Also simply put.
YOU go hmmmmm? It never occurred to me that you are curious or thoughtful, and I don't believe you are.
Nice try to change the topic to the migration, hate and fear mongering never seem to go away when an election is imminent or a negative news story impacts a Republican [remember when the G.W. Bush raised the terror alert whenever they needed to change the front pages?].
when you have nothing....lean on character assassination right? (oh the irony)
so, are you denying the radical Left attempted to derail Kavanaugh's nomination with un-corroborated and false allegations?
The point was showing a correlation that the radical left does many underhanded things.....especially recently.
But you apparently couldn't see the connection.
I’ll say this simply so you can understand it. A terrorist attack on the eve of an election, successfully attached to one of the political parties, would’ve resulted in landslide voting for the other party from MIDDLE voters, where elections are won.
I say “would’ve” because the ruse is so obvious that it has already backfired. Also simply put.
You are alleging a mythical radical left attempted to derail the nomination of Kavanaugh..