Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, you can't.

Sure I can. If you pay layabouts to lay about, they will.
This reduces GDP and will result in higher taxes and lower productivity.

You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost

Sure I can....get a job, lazy bum.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Economics is not a right wing, forte.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Economics is not a right wing, forte.

I agree, just because liberals are really, really bad at it doesn't mean it's exclusively for the right wing.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

So, so wrong.

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Yes, the handouts to layabouts argument lost decades ago.

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but repeal; how, full of worth is that, in the non-porn sector?

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

yes, the right wing has nothing but repeal and no better solution at lower cost; even wo-men in the non-porn sector, are worth more than that.

Right end Obama care, with that I agree, the current plan hurts poor blacks more so than not.

in right wing fantasy? is that why the right could not muster even a repeal.

 

[danielpalos]

You have no idea what you are talking about. Economics is not a right wing, forte.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Economics is not a right wing, forte.

I agree, just because liberals are really, really bad at it doesn't mean it's exclusively for the right wing.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

So, so wrong.

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Yes, the handouts to layabouts argument lost decades ago.

Just Red Herrings for learning how to fish, right winger? Why not get a real argument; too much of a hard work ethic.

 

[Papageorgio]

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

No, the argument is, why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently want them on welfare?

So far, al you have is diversion because you can't refute the claim. It's ok, we all know why the claim cannot be refuted, it is because it is true.

That is your argument. The right still has nothing but repeal.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

You have the wrong argument, you just want to divert because you hate poor blacks and need them to be subjugated to you. The power hungry Democrats can't get enough power, look at the way they flail when they lose, they have all lost their minds and have nothing but violence.

dear, You have nothing but Diversion and Red Herrings. That is all we got from "teaching the right wing, how to fish."

Then explain why the democrats hate poor blacks and want to keep them on welfare until they die.

You are trying to frame your arguments off topic because of your inability to grasp the real hate of the Democratic Party.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency

Creating a new class of unemployed, unemployables does not reduce inefficiency.

 

[Papageorgio]

Economics is not a right wing, forte.

I agree, just because liberals are really, really bad at it doesn't mean it's exclusively for the right wing.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

So, so wrong.

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Yes, the handouts to layabouts argument lost decades ago.

Just Red Herrings for learning how to fish, right winger? Why not get a real argument; too much of a hard work ethic.

You have no cause, just diversion, sad for you Democrats.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Economics is not a right wing, forte.

I agree, just because liberals are really, really bad at it doesn't mean it's exclusively for the right wing.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

So, so wrong.

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Yes, the handouts to layabouts argument lost decades ago.

Just Red Herrings for learning how to fish, right winger? Why not get a real argument; too much of a hard work ethic.

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
It'll be fun to read your continued ignorance.

 

[Papageorgio]

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

yes, the right wing has nothing but repeal and no better solution at lower cost; even wo-men in the non-porn sector, are worth more than that.

Right end Obama care, with that I agree, the current plan hurts poor blacks more so than not.

in right wing fantasy? is that why the right could not muster even a repeal.

Do you want it repealed for the sake of being repealed? Are you that shallow?

 

[danielpalos]

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

No, the argument is, why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently want them on welfare?

So far, al you have is diversion because you can't refute the claim. It's ok, we all know why the claim cannot be refuted, it is because it is true.

That is your argument. The right still has nothing but repeal.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

You have the wrong argument, you just want to divert because you hate poor blacks and need them to be subjugated to you. The power hungry Democrats can't get enough power, look at the way they flail when they lose, they have all lost their minds and have nothing but violence.

dear, You have nothing but Diversion and Red Herrings. That is all we got from "teaching the right wing, how to fish."

Then explain why the democrats hate poor blacks and want to keep them on welfare until they die.

You are trying to frame your arguments off topic because of your inability to grasp the real hate of the Democratic Party.

They don't. It is the right wing that has nothing but repeal instead of better solutions at lower cost. It really is, worth less.

 

[danielpalos]

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency

Creating a new class of unemployed, unemployables does not reduce inefficiency.

That is Your Red Herring, fishmonger.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Yes, the handouts to layabouts argument lost decades ago.

Just Red Herrings for learning how to fish, right winger? Why not get a real argument; too much of a hard work ethic.

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
It'll be fun to read your continued ignorance.

dear, capital must circulate to create a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

 

[danielpalos]

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

yes, the right wing has nothing but repeal and no better solution at lower cost; even wo-men in the non-porn sector, are worth more than that.

Right end Obama care, with that I agree, the current plan hurts poor blacks more so than not.

in right wing fantasy? is that why the right could not muster even a repeal.

Do you want it repealed for the sake of being repealed? Are you that shallow?

why do you bother arguing politics.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

Really?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he came out with Commie Care forcing businesses and individuals to by insurance they really couldn't afford?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a fine on people who couldn't afford health insurance netting the US government over a billion dollars a year?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he closed down electric plants which increases the cost of electricity for consumers?

Do you think the left figured that in when they pushed for ethanol; ethanol which burns up our food supply while at the same time, increasing the cost of food?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a sin tax on tobacco users, closed down roll-your-own cigarette shops across the country, and stopped the American Indians from selling cigarettes via mail?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment; it is a natural rate of inefficiency from a social perspective of full employment of human capital resources. Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No, you can't. You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost; that is why, you have nothing but repeal.

a better solution than paying unemployment???? How about creating jobs? Pretty simple, but it only fixes it for people that want to work.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment; it is a natural rate of inefficiency from a social perspective of full employment of human capital resources. Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

I never heard of an at will employment state.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency

Creating a new class of unemployed, unemployables does not reduce inefficiency.

That is Your Red Herring, fishmonger.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect.

Taking capital away from the productive to hand it to the unproductive will never improve productivity.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Yes, the handouts to layabouts argument lost decades ago.

Just Red Herrings for learning how to fish, right winger? Why not get a real argument; too much of a hard work ethic.

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
It'll be fun to read your continued ignorance.

dear, capital must circulate to create a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.

So for once, be productive and explain. DERP!

 

[danielpalos]

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

Really?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he came out with Commie Care forcing businesses and individuals to by insurance they really couldn't afford?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a fine on people who couldn't afford health insurance netting the US government over a billion dollars a year?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he closed down electric plants which increases the cost of electricity for consumers?

Do you think the left figured that in when they pushed for ethanol; ethanol which burns up our food supply while at the same time, increasing the cost of food?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a sin tax on tobacco users, closed down roll-your-own cigarette shops across the country, and stopped the American Indians from selling cigarettes via mail?

Nobody needs to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Fiscal multiplier - Wikipedia

 

[danielpalos]

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?

Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?

 

[danielpalos]

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency

Creating a new class of unemployed, unemployables does not reduce inefficiency.

That is Your Red Herring, fishmonger.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect.

Taking capital away from the productive to hand it to the unproductive will never improve productivity.

did you know that even wo-men in the non-porn sector have more, worth, than right wing fallacy.