Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[danielpalos]

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

is English your second or third language? that last post is jibberish.

it doesn't matter to me. this is politics. only wo-men make excuses regarding language.

 

[danielpalos]

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

is English your second or third language? that last post is jibberish.

that's all that dude has. I have been asking for about ten posts for him to speak in a tongue the rest of use, like English.

dudes; i could win my arguments with "google translate"; y'all ONLY have excuses, like wo-men.

 

[danielpalos]

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency

Creating a new class of unemployed, unemployables does not reduce inefficiency.

That is Your Red Herring, fishmonger.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

perhaps you could explain your philosophy here.

A fiscal multiplier effect is what I am referring to.

explain it. let's see some links that back your argument son! can you participate in a thread the way it was intended, rather than just write the same post fifty times?

Is it not a self-evident truth, that money circulating, "multiplies" transactions?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

 

[jc456]

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

is English your second or third language? that last post is jibberish.

that's all that dude has. I have been asking for about ten posts for him to speak in a tongue the rest of use, like English.

dudes; i could win my arguments with "google translate"; y'all ONLY have excuses, like wo-men.

huh?

 

[jc456]

That is Your Red Herring, fishmonger.

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

perhaps you could explain your philosophy here.

A fiscal multiplier effect is what I am referring to.

explain it. let's see some links that back your argument son! can you participate in a thread the way it was intended, rather than just write the same post fifty times?

Is it not a self-evident truth, that money circulating, "multiplies" transactions?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.

 

[danielpalos]

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

is English your second or third language? that last post is jibberish.

that's all that dude has. I have been asking for about ten posts for him to speak in a tongue the rest of use, like English.

dudes; i could win my arguments with "google translate"; y'all ONLY have excuses, like wo-men.

huh?

like I have claimed in the past; y'all are just clueless and Causeless.

 

[danielpalos]

perhaps you could explain your philosophy here.

A fiscal multiplier effect is what I am referring to.

explain it. let's see some links that back your argument son! can you participate in a thread the way it was intended, rather than just write the same post fifty times?

Is it not a self-evident truth, that money circulating, "multiplies" transactions?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.

Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?

 

[jc456]

A fiscal multiplier effect is what I am referring to.

explain it. let's see some links that back your argument son! can you participate in a thread the way it was intended, rather than just write the same post fifty times?

Is it not a self-evident truth, that money circulating, "multiplies" transactions?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.

Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?

what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk are you talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?

 

[danielpalos]

explain it. let's see some links that back your argument son! can you participate in a thread the way it was intended, rather than just write the same post fifty times?

Is it not a self-evident truth, that money circulating, "multiplies" transactions?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.

Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?

what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk you're talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?

 

[Redfish]

Is it not a self-evident truth, that money circulating, "multiplies" transactions?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.

Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?

what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk you're talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?

How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?

Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?

yes, when money is spent there is an economic multiplier. When credit is granted it has the effect of increasing the money supply. All that is why supply side economics works and a government controlled economy does not.

No one here knows what point you are trying to make. Either try to post a logical explanation in English or just shut up and go away.

 

[Papageorgio]

Every question he avoids, lol! Daniel is an idiot who has no answers just hate, diversion and avoidance. He is a load of laughs. I mean read his tripe, no substance to his posts, just a lot of Neanderthal statements that a six year old could make, except a six year old is a lot smarter and will grow up into responsible adult, Daniel has no chance.

I haven't avoided anything. All y'all have, is just plain fallacy and the resulting fantasy.

You avoid every question, you somehow think if you reply to a post you are answering a question? One day you will grow up, just not today.

 

[Papageorgio]

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
It'll be fun to read your continued ignorance.

dear, capital must circulate to create a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

that's a different statement then what you've been making. but glad you finally got something right. wow, blind squirrel

i have been saying the same thing, the whole and entire time; y'all are just clueless and Causeless.

no, no you haven't.

Yes, I have. I even got banned from USPoliticsOnline, as proof.

Getting banned is proof? LOL! Really? That is about the dumbest thing I have heard. Maybe you are the one clueless and causeless and that is why you were really banned. Keep digging clueless and causeless.

 

[Papageorgio]

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

so if you knew the answer, why did you post the question?

Because he is clueless and causeless.

 

[Papageorgio]

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

yes, the right wing has nothing but repeal and no better solution at lower cost; even wo-men in the non-porn sector, are worth more than that.

Right end Obama care, with that I agree, the current plan hurts poor blacks more so than not.

in right wing fantasy? is that why the right could not muster even a repeal.

Do you want it repealed for the sake of being repealed? Are you that shallow?

why do you bother arguing politics.

I'm not, I am arguing with you, which has nothing to do with politics. You are only here for my entertainment.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
It'll be fun to read your continued ignorance.

dear, capital must circulate to create a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.

So for once, be productive and explain. DERP!

the laws of demand and supply don't stop working, just for right wing fantasy.

Yes, your ignorance of economics is both wide and deep.

Not as wide and deep as yours. People spending more money creates more demand. Capitalists usually need more labor to meed more demand.

Taxing the productive reduces their productivity as well as their demand.
That's why it's a negative multiplier.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?

Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?

WTF does "being legal to the law" mean and what does that have to do with what I asked?

You said (I think) that Maine is an at will unemployment state and I asked you for proof.

Bad enough you can't write English, you can't understand it either.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.

Really?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he came out with Commie Care forcing businesses and individuals to by insurance they really couldn't afford?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a fine on people who couldn't afford health insurance netting the US government over a billion dollars a year?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he closed down electric plants which increases the cost of electricity for consumers?

Do you think the left figured that in when they pushed for ethanol; ethanol which burns up our food supply while at the same time, increasing the cost of food?

Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a sin tax on tobacco users, closed down roll-your-own cigarette shops across the country, and stopped the American Indians from selling cigarettes via mail?

Nobody needs to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.

Fiscal multiplier - Wikipedia

Economics is when government takes more money from its citizens, there is less money for them to spend.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[jc456]

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?

Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?

WTF does "being legal to the law" mean and what does that have to do with what I asked?

You said (I think) that Maine is an at will unemployment state and I asked you for proof.

Bad enough you can't write English, you can't understand it either.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

maybe it's pig latin. I'm not sure. I've been trying to fit into different models, and I keep getting back a note it does not compute.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?

Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?

WTF does "being legal to the law" mean and what does that have to do with what I asked?

You said (I think) that Maine is an at will unemployment state and I asked you for proof.

Bad enough you can't write English, you can't understand it either.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

maybe it's pig latin. I'm not sure. I've been trying to fit into different models, and I keep getting back a note it does not compute.

Must be a really bad translation program or something.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[jc456]

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?

Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?

WTF does "being legal to the law" mean and what does that have to do with what I asked?

You said (I think) that Maine is an at will unemployment state and I asked you for proof.

Bad enough you can't write English, you can't understand it either.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

maybe it's pig latin. I'm not sure. I've been trying to fit into different models, and I keep getting back a note it does not compute.

Must be a really bad translation program or something.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I know right? I mean, jibberish is spoken so much.