Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Y'all are always so busy quibbling a point y'all never had, and forget the point. The point is employment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk you're talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?
Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?
yes, when money is spent there is an economic multiplier. When credit is granted it has the effect of increasing the money supply. All that is why supply side economics works and a government controlled economy does not.
No one here knows what point you are trying to make. Either try to post a logical explanation in English or just shut up and go away.
just right wing fantasy, like usual.I haven't avoided anything. All y'all have, is just plain fallacy and the resulting fantasy.Every question he avoids, lol! Daniel is an idiot who has no answers just hate, diversion and avoidance. He is a load of laughs. I mean read his tripe, no substance to his posts, just a lot of Neanderthal statements that a six year old could make, except a six year old is a lot smarter and will grow up into responsible adult, Daniel has no chance.
You avoid every question, you somehow think if you reply to a post you are answering a question? One day you will grow up, just not today.
Y'all are always so busy quibbling a point y'all never had, and forget the point. The point is employment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk you're talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.
Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?
yes, when money is spent there is an economic multiplier. When credit is granted it has the effect of increasing the money supply. All that is why supply side economics works and a government controlled economy does not.
No one here knows what point you are trying to make. Either try to post a logical explanation in English or just shut up and go away.
Capital must circulate.
Nothing but diversion? It is about correcting for capitalism's laissez-fair laziness regarding full employment of capital resources in the market for labor.Not as wide and deep as yours. People spending more money creates more demand. Capitalists usually need more labor to meed more demand.the laws of demand and supply don't stop working, just for right wing fantasy.dear, capital must circulate to create a positive multiplier effect on our economy.
I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
So for once, be productive and explain. DERP!
Yes, your ignorance of economics is both wide and deep.
Taxing the productive reduces their productivity as well as their demand.
That's why it's a negative multiplier.
Nothing but diversion? It is about correcting for capitalism's laissez-fair laziness regarding full employment of capital resources in the market for labor.Not as wide and deep as yours. People spending more money creates more demand. Capitalists usually need more labor to meed more demand.the laws of demand and supply don't stop working, just for right wing fantasy.I guess I could ask you why paying people to not produce would increase production.
So for once, be productive and explain. DERP!
Yes, your ignorance of economics is both wide and deep.
Taxing the productive reduces their productivity as well as their demand.
That's why it's a negative multiplier.
dear, being legal to our own laws means being legal to State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes.Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?
Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.
So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?
WTF does "being legal to the law" mean and what does that have to do with what I asked?
You said (I think) that Maine is an at will unemployment state and I asked you for proof.
Bad enough you can't write English, you can't understand it either.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Like i always claim; just right wing fantasy.Nobody needs to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.
Really?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he came out with Commie Care forcing businesses and individuals to by insurance they really couldn't afford?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a fine on people who couldn't afford health insurance netting the US government over a billion dollars a year?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he closed down electric plants which increases the cost of electricity for consumers?
Do you think the left figured that in when they pushed for ethanol; ethanol which burns up our food supply while at the same time, increasing the cost of food?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a sin tax on tobacco users, closed down roll-your-own cigarette shops across the country, and stopped the American Indians from selling cigarettes via mail?
Fiscal multiplier - Wikipedia
Economics is when government takes more money from its citizens, there is less money for them to spend.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
In the Age of Corporate Welfare?Y'all are always so busy quibbling a point y'all never had, and forget the point. The point is employment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk you're talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?
Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?
yes, when money is spent there is an economic multiplier. When credit is granted it has the effect of increasing the money supply. All that is why supply side economics works and a government controlled economy does not.
No one here knows what point you are trying to make. Either try to post a logical explanation in English or just shut up and go away.
Capital must circulate.
Get your own capital.
arguing economics with the right wing; has to be for fun and practice on a not-for-profit basis, for some on the left.Nothing but diversion? It is about correcting for capitalism's laissez-fair laziness regarding full employment of capital resources in the market for labor.Not as wide and deep as yours. People spending more money creates more demand. Capitalists usually need more labor to meed more demand.the laws of demand and supply don't stop working, just for right wing fantasy.
Yes, your ignorance of economics is both wide and deep.
Taxing the productive reduces their productivity as well as their demand.
That's why it's a negative multiplier.
Handing you money is a waste of capital.
Like i always claim; just right wing fantasy.Nobody needs to take the right wing seriously about economics, or the law.Capital circulating is what causes a multiplier effect. the more people circulating money, the better it is for our economy.
Really?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he came out with Commie Care forcing businesses and individuals to by insurance they really couldn't afford?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a fine on people who couldn't afford health insurance netting the US government over a billion dollars a year?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he closed down electric plants which increases the cost of electricity for consumers?
Do you think the left figured that in when they pushed for ethanol; ethanol which burns up our food supply while at the same time, increasing the cost of food?
Do you think Obama figured that in when he laid a sin tax on tobacco users, closed down roll-your-own cigarette shops across the country, and stopped the American Indians from selling cigarettes via mail?
Fiscal multiplier - Wikipedia
Economics is when government takes more money from its citizens, there is less money for them to spend.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
dear, being legal to our own laws means being legal to State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes.Don't like being legal to the law, but whine about less fortunate illegals?Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.
So what do you mean by an at will unemployment state, that they give unemployment to people who decide they just don't feel like working anymore?
WTF does "being legal to the law" mean and what does that have to do with what I asked?
You said (I think) that Maine is an at will unemployment state and I asked you for proof.
Bad enough you can't write English, you can't understand it either.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Y'all are always so busy quibbling a point y'all never had, and forget the point. The point is employment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.How do Any transactions occur, without Any money circulating?what concepts? See you need to post in English, what the fk you're talking about? So far the repeated jibberish is just that, jibberish. It's a fking message board with rules. Why not try following them?Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?dude, the target audience speaks English. It would be helpful if you utilized the English language in order to maintain a discussion. thanks.
Dudes; if You are not "bright enough" to understand the concepts, why should anyone take the right wing seriously about economics or the law?
yes, when money is spent there is an economic multiplier. When credit is granted it has the effect of increasing the money supply. All that is why supply side economics works and a government controlled economy does not.
No one here knows what point you are trying to make. Either try to post a logical explanation in English or just shut up and go away.
Capital must circulate.
In other words, the right wing hates the poor and has no solutions and nothing but repeal, to prove it.
OP- Silly stuff, for dupes only. Every investment in memory in education, training and job program for blacks has been from Dems....every cut and racist sentiment from the GOP.
Proud and correct, hater dupe. 50%+ chance racist and ignorant as well you are....OP- Silly stuff, for dupes only. Every investment in memory in education, training and job program for blacks has been from Dems....every cut and racist sentiment from the GOP.
"Every investment in memory in education, training and job program for blacks has been from Dems"....and look at them now.
OP- Silly stuff, for dupes only. Every investment in memory in education, training and job program for blacks has been from Dems....every cut and racist sentiment from the GOP.
"Every investment in memory in education, training and job program for blacks has been from Dems"....and look at them now.
