Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[Toddsterpatriot]

And yet, can still point out the huge holes in your "ideas".

No, you can't. You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost; that is why, you have nothing but repeal.

No, you can't.

Sure I can. If you pay layabouts to lay about, they will.
This reduces GDP and will result in higher taxes and lower productivity.

You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost

Sure I can....get a job, lazy bum.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Economics is not a right wing, forte.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Economics is not a right wing, forte.

I agree, just because liberals are really, really bad at it doesn't mean it's exclusively for the right wing.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

So, so wrong.

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

 

[Markle]

It almost appears that far left wing Progressives such as danielpalos have been assigned certain threads with orders to overwhelm them with nonsense posts. The sole purpose being to deflect, detract and dilute any and all legitimate posts so they may go unnoticed.

Another sign of the sheer panic and desperation of my Progressive good friends.

 

[danielpalos]

No, you can't. You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost; that is why, you have nothing but repeal.

No, you can't.

Sure I can. If you pay layabouts to lay about, they will.
This reduces GDP and will result in higher taxes and lower productivity.

You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost

Sure I can....get a job, lazy bum.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Economics is not a right wing, forte.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Economics is not a right wing, forte.

I agree, just because liberals are really, really bad at it doesn't mean it's exclusively for the right wing.

Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

So, so wrong.

Yes, it does, simply Because, I say so.

I'm sorry that your mental illness makes it more difficult for you to find employment.

This is the argument: Simply circulating capital is what creates a positive multiplier effect on our economy.

Having nothing but fallacy for rebuttal instead of a better argument at lower cost, really is worthless in the non-porn sector.

 

[danielpalos]

It almost appears that far left wing Progressives such as danielpalos have been assigned certain threads with orders to overwhelm them with nonsense posts. The sole purpose being to deflect, detract and dilute any and all legitimate posts so they may go unnoticed.

Another sign of the sheer panic and desperation of my Progressive good friends.

my unsubstantiated opinion, gainsays your unsubstantiated opinion.

 

[Papageorgio]

just clueless and Causeless; i got it.

and yet ten times whatever you are. dude, keep flopping.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

 

[Papageorgio]

No, you can't. You can't even come up with a better solution at lower cost; that is why, you have nothing but repeal.

a better solution than paying unemployment???? How about creating jobs? Pretty simple, but it only fixes it for people that want to work.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment; it is a natural rate of inefficiency from a social perspective of full employment of human capital resources. Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

 

[Papageorgio]

that makes no sense. more sense is, the right hates blacks, and refuse to come up with better solutions at lower cost, as a result.

i love to "compete" for fun and practice. Ask Boss or Ding.

I already explained, the right gave respect back to welfare folks in the 90s. you all took that away in 2009. WTF? you should learn history.

All he has is canned responses, that way he doesn't need to think, just do what he is told.

I have no fking clue what he is even discussing. I don't talk stupid. It would be nice if he was writing coherently so a normal person would understand his position. right now, he is but a fish flopping out of water.

He doesn't discuss anything and nothing more than a line two of some silly childish saying that means absolutely nothing and is way off topic. That is how clueless the left is.

nothing but repeal; how, full of worth is that, in the non-porn sector?

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

 

[danielpalos]

and yet ten times whatever you are. dude, keep flopping.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

 

[danielpalos]

a better solution than paying unemployment???? How about creating jobs? Pretty simple, but it only fixes it for people that want to work.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment; it is a natural rate of inefficiency from a social perspective of full employment of human capital resources. Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

 

[danielpalos]

I already explained, the right gave respect back to welfare folks in the 90s. you all took that away in 2009. WTF? you should learn history.

All he has is canned responses, that way he doesn't need to think, just do what he is told.

I have no fking clue what he is even discussing. I don't talk stupid. It would be nice if he was writing coherently so a normal person would understand his position. right now, he is but a fish flopping out of water.

He doesn't discuss anything and nothing more than a line two of some silly childish saying that means absolutely nothing and is way off topic. That is how clueless the left is.

nothing but repeal; how, full of worth is that, in the non-porn sector?

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

 

[Papageorgio]

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

No, the argument is, why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently want them on welfare?

So far, al you have is diversion because you can't refute the claim. It's ok, we all know why the claim cannot be refuted, it is because it is true.

 

[Papageorgio]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment; it is a natural rate of inefficiency from a social perspective of full employment of human capital resources. Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

Then why would you ask? Seems like you have no cause.

 

[Papageorgio]

All he has is canned responses, that way he doesn't need to think, just do what he is told.

I have no fking clue what he is even discussing. I don't talk stupid. It would be nice if he was writing coherently so a normal person would understand his position. right now, he is but a fish flopping out of water.

He doesn't discuss anything and nothing more than a line two of some silly childish saying that means absolutely nothing and is way off topic. That is how clueless the left is.

nothing but repeal; how, full of worth is that, in the non-porn sector?

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

 

[danielpalos]

are you saying that "equal protection under the law" means that everyone gets the same pay no matter what job they do?

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

No, the argument is, why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently want them on welfare?

So far, al you have is diversion because you can't refute the claim. It's ok, we all know why the claim cannot be refuted, it is because it is true.

That is your argument. The right still has nothing but repeal.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

 

[danielpalos]

correct, there will always be a small % of unemployed under any system. Most of them will be those who are mentally or physically unable to work----and the system should take care of those people.

But, unfortunately, what we have today in the US is a group of unemployable people, either by their personal choice or because they have not gained the skills needed to do any kind of work. We have generations of unemployed in our central cities and in some rural areas. Our system does nothing to solve this problem, continuing the giveaways, as you libs want to do, does not solve the problem, it perpetuates it.

Now, if those chronically unemployed were required to clean the streets and public buildings in exchange for their UE checks, you would see many of them finding jobs.

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

Then why would you ask? Seems like you have no cause.

To verify that legal fact in the public domain; for full faith and credit of public Acts, dear; want to argue it in the Public Domain?

 

[danielpalos]

I have no fking clue what he is even discussing. I don't talk stupid. It would be nice if he was writing coherently so a normal person would understand his position. right now, he is but a fish flopping out of water.

He doesn't discuss anything and nothing more than a line two of some silly childish saying that means absolutely nothing and is way off topic. That is how clueless the left is.

nothing but repeal; how, full of worth is that, in the non-porn sector?

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

yes, the right wing has nothing but repeal and no better solution at lower cost; even wo-men in the non-porn sector, are worth more than that.

 

[Papageorgio]

well if he wrote in fking English, you'd know what he's asking.

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

No, the argument is, why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently want them on welfare?

So far, al you have is diversion because you can't refute the claim. It's ok, we all know why the claim cannot be refuted, it is because it is true.

That is your argument. The right still has nothing but repeal.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

You have the wrong argument, you just want to divert because you hate poor blacks and need them to be subjugated to you. The power hungry Democrats can't get enough power, look at the way they flail when they lose, they have all lost their minds and have nothing but violence.

 

[Papageorgio]

Maine Food Stamp Work Requirement Cuts Non-Parent Caseload by 80 Percent

Is Maine an at-will employment State or not?

Select a Section 1/0

In 2015, the U.S. government spent over $1 trillion on means-tested welfare aid, providing cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. The food stamp program is the nation’s second largest means-tested welfare program.[1] The number of food stamp recipients has risen dramatically from about 17.2 million in 2000 to 45.8 million in 2015.[2] Costs have risen from $20.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2000 to $83.1 billion in FY 2014.[3]

Growth in the food stamp caseload occurred particularly rapidly among able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs). These are work-capable adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have children or other dependents to support. The ABAWD food stamp caseload grew by nearly 150 percent between 2008 and 2014 and has risen from nearly 2 million recipients in 2008 to around 5 million today.[4]

While relying on taxpayers to pay for their food, government data sources show that many ABAWDs use their own funds counterproductively. Over half of ABAWDs regularly smoke tobacco; those who smoke consume on average 19 packs of cigarettes per month at an estimated monthly cost of $111.

In response to the growth in food stamp dependence, Maine’s Governor, Paul LePage, recently established work requirements on ABAWD recipients. In Maine, all ABAWDs in the food stamp program are now required to take a job, participate in training, or perform community service.

Is Maine an at will? Why don't you go look it up since you can't seem to carry a rational thought.

Yes, the State of Maine alleges to be an, at-will employment State.

Then why would you ask? Seems like you have no cause.

To verify that legal fact in the public domain; for full faith and credit of public Acts, dear; want to argue it in the Public Domain?

I don't care what you argue, you have yet to put up any arguments. You give diversion as to why you hate poor blacks.

 

[Papageorgio]

He doesn't discuss anything and nothing more than a line two of some silly childish saying that means absolutely nothing and is way off topic. That is how clueless the left is.

nothing but repeal; how, full of worth is that, in the non-porn sector?

Repeal of a bad law is a better choice, that how it works in the non-porn sector.

only in right wing fantasy. even women make more in the porn sector.

I wouldn't know what you make in the porn industry.

I'd repeal a bad law, never keep what cannot be fixed, the Obamacare is bad and hurts the poor and middle class.

yes, the right wing has nothing but repeal and no better solution at lower cost; even wo-men in the non-porn sector, are worth more than that.

Right end Obama care, with that I agree, the current plan hurts poor blacks more so than not.

 

[danielpalos]

you are merely, too incompetent to discuss politics.

Wow! you calling someone else incompetent. If that isn't irony, I find it amazing that you have the IQ to breathe.

This is the argument: Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

No, the argument is, why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently want them on welfare?

So far, al you have is diversion because you can't refute the claim. It's ok, we all know why the claim cannot be refuted, it is because it is true.

That is your argument. The right still has nothing but repeal.

Unemployment compensation can correct for that capitalism based inefficiency, via the socialism of equal protection of the law, for Labor, as the least wealthy in our Republic.

You have the wrong argument, you just want to divert because you hate poor blacks and need them to be subjugated to you. The power hungry Democrats can't get enough power, look at the way they flail when they lose, they have all lost their minds and have nothing but violence.

dear, You have nothing but Diversion and Red Herrings. That is all we got from "teaching the right wing, how to fish."