Why do poor communities exist in America?

[danielpalos]

They don't. I never said they do.

Yes, you are implying that by Requiring a work ethic.

 

[danielpalos]

And my plan follows the law.

Employment is at the will of either party, regardless of the weeks involved.
Is your plan going to involve automatic stimulus payments for those who run out of unemployment compensation after twenty-six weeks?

 

[WinterBorn]

It means you are hiring for Cause not at-will. Contractual obligations are expressed and agreed to by the parties involved, not the State.

No it doesn't. No one is required to work or to hire.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, you are implying that by Requiring a work ethic.

Working for 6 months and then drawing a check for nothing for 6 months is hardly much of a work ethic.

 

[danielpalos]

No it doesn't. No one is required to work or to hire.

For-cause employment is employment by mutual agreement not State requirement.

 

[WinterBorn]

Employment is at the will of either party, regardless of the weeks involved.
Is your plan going to involve automatic stimulus payments for those who run out of unemployment compensation after twenty-six weeks?

True. No one is required to work and no one is required to hire.

And there is no requirement for you to receive a check. Show me where any statute requires you to be paid for not working.

 

[danielpalos]

Working for 6 months and then drawing a check for nothing for 6 months is hardly much of a work ethic.

Requiring a work ethic in an at-will employment State is socialism not free market Capitalism.

 

[WinterBorn]

For-cause employment is employment by mutual agreement not State requirement.

Right. And the state is not requiring anyone to work. They ARE, however, requiring you to work to renew your qualification for UC.

That is not the same as requiring you to work.

 

[danielpalos]

True. No one is required to work and no one is required to hire.

And there is no requirement for you to receive a check. Show me where any statute requires you to be paid for not working.

Unemployment compensation is compensation for being unemployed; on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

 

[WinterBorn]

Requiring a work ethic in an at-will employment State is socialism not free market Capitalism.

No one is requiring a work ethic. You are free to never work again, if you so choose.

 

[danielpalos]

Right. And the state is not requiring anyone to work. They ARE, however, requiring you to work to renew your qualification for UC.

That is not the same as requiring you to work.

That requirement requires a work ethic in an at-will employment State. Any person in the public sector should know what that means unless they are simply overpaid physical laborers.

 

[WinterBorn]

Unemployment compensation is compensation for being unemployed; on an at-will basis in any at-will employment State.

Yes it is. And the maximum benefit allowed is $450 a week for 26 weeks.

 

[danielpalos]

No one is requiring a work ethic. You are free to never work again, if you so choose.

Unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in an at-will employment State solves simple poverty.

 

[WinterBorn]

That requirement requires a work ethic in an at-will employment State. Any person in the public sector should know what that means unless they are simply overpaid physical laborers.

No, it does not. You are welcome to do without the check and the world will do without your labor.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes it is. And the maximum benefit allowed is $450 a week for 26 weeks.

You don't have the Constitutional authority to impose for-cause criteria in an at-will employment State. That is the Cause of action and merit for my argument.

 

[WinterBorn]

Unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in an at-will employment State solves simple poverty.

Even if it did, which I do not believe it does, solving simple poverty is not the reason UC was created and is not the goal of UC. It is temporary assistance.

$450 a week for 26 weeks.

 

[danielpalos]

No, it does not. You are welcome to do without the check and the world will do without your labor.

That is unequal protection of employment at will of either party laws.

 

[WinterBorn]

You don't have the Constitutional authority to impose for-cause criteria in an at-will employment State. That is the Cause of action and merit for my argument.

No one is imposing for-cause criteria.

 

[danielpalos]

Even if it did, which I do not believe it does, solving simple poverty is not the reason UC was created and is not the goal of UC. It is temporary assistance.

$450 a week for 26 weeks.

Promoting and providing for the general welfare is why the power to tax exists, along with the common defense.

 

[WinterBorn]

That is unequal protection of employment at will of either party laws.

No, it is not. It is exactly equal protection under the law, for all parties.