Why do poor communities exist in America?

[WinterBorn]

Not being able to quit on an at-will basis and collect unemployment compensation in an at-will employment State is an abridgment. Employment is at-will not for (good) Cause.

The at will employment laws are for both employer and employee to be able to end the relationship at any time and for any (or no) reason.

It does not apply to the unemployment compensation laws.

Oh, and if you win your court case (and I think that is impossible), and suddenly unemployment compensation will have to be paid to every person who has no job, the state will have to force every person to be paid from the unemployment insurance of their last employer. So either the amount of unemployment compensation will be ridiculously low, or tens of thousands of businesses will go bankrupt.

 

[danielpalos]

The at will employment laws are for both employer and employee to be able to end the relationship at any time and for any (or no) reason.

That is the employment relationship at Law. At-will and for-(good)Cause are Employment terms not public policy terms.

 

[WinterBorn]

That is the employment relationship at Law. At-will and for-(good)Cause are Employment terms not public policy terms.

Funny you did not respond to the funding part of my comment.

But no, the at will employment laws do not cover unemployment compensation any more than they cover contractual employees, union employees with contracts, and other situations.

 

[danielpalos]

Funny you did not respond to the funding part of my comment.

But no, the at will employment laws do not cover unemployment compensation any more than they cover contractual employees, union employees with contracts, and other situations.

Simple economics. Unemployment compensation has a multiplier of Two (2) therefore cost doesn't matter. And, we have a central bank and use fiat money.

 

[WinterBorn]

Funny you did not respond to the funding part of my comment.

But no, the at will employment laws do not cover unemployment compensation any more than they cover contractual employees, union employees with contracts, and other situations.

You can disagree all you want. But the unemployment compensation is only funded through the employers unemployment insurance. Only the state and federal legislature can authorize taxes to be used.

 

[WinterBorn]

Simple economics. Unemployment compensation has a multiplier of Two (2) therefore cost doesn't matter. And, we have a central bank and use fiat money.

So the states and federal gov't will borrow to pay unemployment compensation? lol

So increase the national and state debts? Brilliant plan.

 

[danielpalos]

So the states and federal gov't will borrow to pay unemployment compensation? lol

So increase the national and state debts? Brilliant plan.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics.

These persons need to make their multimillion dollar bonuses:

From 1978 to 2018, CEO compensation grew by 1,007.5% (940.3% under the options-realized measure), far outstripping S&P stock market growth (706.7%) and the wage growth of very high earners (339.2%). In contrast, wages for the typical worker grew by just 11.9%.

Right-wingers it seems, simply prefer to get fleeced.

 

[WinterBorn]

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics.

These persons need to make their multimillion dollar bonuses:

From 1978 to 2018, CEO compensation grew by 1,007.5% (940.3% under the options-realized measure), far outstripping S&P stock market growth (706.7%) and the wage growth of very high earners (339.2%). In contrast, wages for the typical worker grew by just 11.9%.

Right-wingers it seems, simply prefer to get fleeced.

Not even close to being relevant.

What will probably happen if your farfetched court case goes you way is that by the time all the people who have no job because they quit or were fired, register for unemployment compensation, the program will be bankrupt. It will be closed down.

 

[danielpalos]

You simply have no understanding of economics.

 

[danielpalos]

Why do right-wingers prefer to be false Christians and "hate on the Poor" instead of helping them with equality under our form of Constitutional Government?

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Only immoral and unethical false Christians should "hate on the Poor".

 

[Soupnazi630]

Thanks for confirming my point of view regarding means tested welfare. It should be used to deliberately try to cure or mitigate complex poverty by "concentrating wealth" to do it.

I proved you wrong.

Government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law

 

[danielpalos]

I proved you wrong.

Government cannot solve poverty and we have equal protection under the law

Simply because You say so? Nobody has any confidence in the sincerity of the right-wing with a modus operandi like that.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Simply because You say so? Nobody has any confidence in the sincerity of the right-wing with a modus operandi like that.

Wrong moron.

Because facts and objective reality prove it which you willfully bear false witness against.

All valid arguments onm this subject have come from othgers proving you wrong while you merely repeat the same fallacy

 

[danielpalos]

Wrong moron.

Because facts and objective reality prove it which you willfulyl bear false witness against.

All valid arguments onm this subject have come from othgers proving you wrong while you merely repeat the same fallacy

Only You say that. I have yet to see anything more than fallacy from You in this thread.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Only You say that. I have yet to see anything more than fallacy from You in this thread.

You are stating a bald faced lie.

You are a god hating liar who knows he has been proven wrong.

That is objective fact

 

[danielpalos]

Why should anyone confide in the sincerity of the right-wing when they have nothing but fallacy instead of Any valid arguments.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why should anyone confide in the sincerity of the right-wing when they have nothing but fallacy instead of Any valid arguments.

Everyone agrees.

You are exactly THAT right winger.
You post nothing but fallacy and everyone else beats the shit out of your stupid posts with valid arguments.

 

[WinterBorn]

You simply have no understanding of economics.

I have an excellent understanding of economics. That is why I think that the state would close down a bankrupt unemployment compensation rather than borrow to pay the ridiculous claims of those who have quit a job, been fired from a job, or simply decided not to work at all.

 

[WinterBorn]

Why do right-wingers prefer to be false Christians and "hate on the Poor" instead of helping them with equality under our form of Constitutional Government?

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Only immoral and unethical false Christians should "hate on the Poor".

Again, you are spouting nonsense as far as the topic is concerned.

But as far as what you have posted there, you are endowed with the rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. So pursue your happiness. That pursuit is your responsibility, and no one elses.

 

[WinterBorn]

Simply because You say so? Nobody has any confidence in the sincerity of the right-wing with a modus operandi like that.

CA has been under left-wing rules for decades. And they have not done what you want.