Why do RWs spend so much energy on demonizing democrats yet make no effort to defend republicans?

[Billy000]

The primary funding from the stimulus went to tax cuts

How can you spend on tax cuts?

That's like saying I exhaled to get oxygen into my system...

Because you dumbass. Tax cuts create debt you doofus.

 

[Wyatt earp]

By the chief - only a really immature asshole (i.e. a liberal) believes that any politician "cares" about them. If you think that Barack Obama gives a damn about you, you're an idiot. Conservatives realize that not only do no politicians in Washington (Republican or Democrat) care about them, but they also recognize that no politicians should care about them. That's not why government exist. The fact that you don't even grasp something that basic is why you struggle in these discussions and why you spend your life so frustrated.

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects"



.

 

[Dale Smith]

Billy sez????? " If you can't come up with a good reason to vote repub? Then you need to join me in voting for demcrats!!!! We need MORE gubermint, MORE taxes, MORE fees...MORE entitlements and subsidies!!!! Your way through this world is with leftards leading the charge!!!!!"

Good God Almighty, son...you don't have a fucking clue. Both parties are just different sides of the same coin and owned by the same oligarchs that own the rest of the world that has a central bank. Your understanding of what is really going on I could put on the left hand side of a sesame seed. While I have nothing but disdain for the neocons, I have nothing but utter hatred for the left. The banking oligarchs have not had a better pawn than your side, Billyboy and I could do a three hour lecture on just that topic. I would slit the throat of a leftist long before I would ever support one and you can take that to the fucking bank and etch it in stone.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

By the chief - only a really immature asshole (i.e. a liberal) believes that any politician "cares" about them. If you think that Barack Obama gives a damn about you, you're an idiot. Conservatives realize that not only do no politicians in Washington (Republican or Democrat) care about them, but they also recognize that no politicians should care about them. That's not why government exist. The fact that you don't even grasp something that basic is why you struggle in these discussions and why you spend your life so frustrated.

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Bwahahaha! What a crock of crap. Even you can't be that naive. This is just senseless propaganda. You're so scared of losing your government handouts that you push this nonsense (and nobody is buying it my friend).

The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans (the true conservative one's anyway) create policy to ensure liberty, while Democrats create policy to ensure power and wealth for themselves. Everything is designed to collapse the system and get people on the government plantation - beholden to government for their every basic need. That makes them more likely to vote Dumbocrat which keeps people like Obama, Pelosi, and Reid rolling in wealth and power.

So "ensure Liberty" is the best example you can give? Lmao.

The OP stated much more than that.
Do you have a problem with liberty?

 

[Billy000]

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects"



.

According the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs.

 

[Clementine]

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Dems push policies in line with the Cloward-Piven strategy. That means all-controlling government, few rights and no liberty.

Encouraging dependency on government to the point that people are incapable of survival on their own is NOT benevolent. It's cruel.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Lol that's the biggest load of bullshit I have heard all week.

And yet you can't dispute it. All you can do is proclaim it "bullshit" and then run away.

I don't need to dispute it lol. You're the one that can't give specific policy reasons why anyone should vote republican

There is no reason. Just like there's no reason to vote for Democrats. The two parties are taxing and spending us into the ground

Well there is a reason for 000. They don't pay taxes and in exchange for trading in their freedom (that other people fought and died for), they get the pitiful government table scraps that they desire. Tragic.

Oh really? Like what? I make too much money to qualify for food stamps. Nice try though. In fact, the average Bernie supporter makes 47K per year. Trump supporters on the other hand are dirt poor.

More unsubstantiated bullshit.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects"



.

According the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs.

How many of those tree planting jobs still around today?



.

 

[Harry Dresden]

you are getting to be as bad as your good friend dean billy...

I'm asking a pretty straight forward question here: why should anyone vote republican? Explain with specific policy reasons.

dont ask me....i dont vote for them or your fucked up party.....and my statement still stands....you sound like dean.....

And how do I sound like Dean?

you have been here what 5 years now and you dont know?...here is a hint billy.....90% of the shit you post is bad mouthing republicans.....if you need more clues let me know....

 

[thereisnospoon]

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects"



.

According the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs.

Ha ha ha. Now THAT is funny. BTW, latest figures is Obama HIMSELF created 10 million jobs.....Ahh boy

 

[P@triot]

The primary funding from the stimulus went to tax cuts

How can you spend on tax cuts?

That's like saying I exhaled to get oxygen into my system...

Because you dumbass. Tax cuts create debt you doofus.

But you didn't spend. You just took in less. That is not spending. Do you see how the liberals completely own you? Every stupid, nonsensical talking point they have you parrot without question. Here is the definition of spend. Do you see anything that could even remotely be construed as "cutting taxes" or otherwise taking in less money?!?

spend
spend/
verb
1.
pay out (money) in buying or hiring goods or services.
"the firm has spent $100,000 on hardware and software"
noun
informal

1. 1.
   an amount of money paid for a particular purpose or over a particular period of time.
   "the average spend at the cafe is about $10 a head"

 

[kaz]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

By the chief - only a really immature asshole (i.e. a liberal) believes that any politician "cares" about them. If you think that Barack Obama gives a damn about you, you're an idiot. Conservatives realize that not only do no politicians in Washington (Republican or Democrat) care about them, but they also recognize that no politicians should care about them. That's not why government exist. The fact that you don't even grasp something that basic is why you struggle in these discussions and why you spend your life so frustrated.

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It wasn't half, you're full of shit. And in addition to that "refundable" tax credits aren't tax cuts, you can't cut a tax that wasn't paid. It's welfare just like any other welfare program

 

[kaz]

That's as stupid as asking "why do people demonize Ryan Leaf but make no effort to defend Peyton Manning". You don't have to defend success. You don't have to defend prosperity. You don't have to defend liberty. Success speaks for itself.

Lol that's the biggest load of bullshit I have heard all week.

And yet you can't dispute it. All you can do is proclaim it "bullshit" and then run away.

I don't need to dispute it lol. You're the one that can't give specific policy reasons why anyone should vote republican

There is no reason. Just like there's no reason to vote for Democrats. The two parties are taxing and spending us into the ground

Well there is a reason for 000. They don't pay taxes and in exchange for trading in their freedom (that other people fought and died for), they get the pitiful government table scraps that they desire. Tragic.

I don't know what that means

 

[Wyatt earp]

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects"



.

According the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs.

Obama's Stimulus, Five Years Later

The federal government poured billions into the government and education sectors, where unemployment was low, but spent only about 10% on promised infrastructure, though the unemployment rate in construction was running in double digits. And some of the individual projects funded by the law were truly appalling. $783,000 was spent on a study of why young people consume malt liquor and marijuana. $92,000 went to the Army Corps of Engineers for costumes for mascots like Bobber the Water Safety Dog. $219,000 funded a study of college "hookups."
In aggregate, the spending helped drive federal outlays from less than $3 trillion in 2008 to $3.5 trillion in 2009, where federal spending has roughly remained ever since.



.

 

[P@triot]

Like Obama's stimulus that was just pay back to Unions and democrat supporters?

.

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects".

According the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs.

Even if that were true....where in the hell did I or anyone else authorize the federal government to take our money to create jobs for other people? It simply doesn't work that way 000. We have a U.S. Constitution which is the law. Obama, Bush, and the rest of those hacks don't get to violate the law simply because they feel like it.

 

[P@triot]

Lol that's the biggest load of bullshit I have heard all week.

And yet you can't dispute it. All you can do is proclaim it "bullshit" and then run away.

I don't need to dispute it lol. You're the one that can't give specific policy reasons why anyone should vote republican

There is no reason. Just like there's no reason to vote for Democrats. The two parties are taxing and spending us into the ground

Well there is a reason for 000. They don't pay taxes and in exchange for trading in their freedom (that other people fought and died for), they get the pitiful government table scraps that they desire. Tragic.

I don't know what that means

You said "there is no reason". I was just saying that there is a reason in the minds of people like Billy000.

 

[P@triot]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

By the chief - only a really immature asshole (i.e. a liberal) believes that any politician "cares" about them. If you think that Barack Obama gives a damn about you, you're an idiot. Conservatives realize that not only do no politicians in Washington (Republican or Democrat) care about them, but they also recognize that no politicians should care about them. That's not why government exist. The fact that you don't even grasp something that basic is why you struggle in these discussions and why you spend your life so frustrated.

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Bwahahaha! What a crock of crap. Even you can't be that naive. This is just senseless propaganda. You're so scared of losing your government handouts that you push this nonsense (and nobody is buying it my friend).

The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans (the true conservative one's anyway) create policy to ensure liberty, while Democrats create policy to ensure power and wealth for themselves. Everything is designed to collapse the system and get people on the government plantation - beholden to government for their every basic need. That makes them more likely to vote Dumbocrat which keeps people like Obama, Pelosi, and Reid rolling in wealth and power.

So "ensure Liberty" is the best example you can give? Lmao.

Leave it to a liberal to laugh at liberty. They never had to fight for it and they sure as hell didn't give their life for it, so they are so unappreciative of it. It's just some abstract concept and a bargain chip to be exchanged for government table scraps. My heart breaks for the millions of men and women who died really young and never got to live a full life in this great country, all so that people like 000 could mock liberty.

 

[Billy000]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

By the chief - only a really immature asshole (i.e. a liberal) believes that any politician "cares" about them. If you think that Barack Obama gives a damn about you, you're an idiot. Conservatives realize that not only do no politicians in Washington (Republican or Democrat) care about them, but they also recognize that no politicians should care about them. That's not why government exist. The fact that you don't even grasp something that basic is why you struggle in these discussions and why you spend your life so frustrated.

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Bwahahaha! What a crock of crap. Even you can't be that naive. This is just senseless propaganda. You're so scared of losing your government handouts that you push this nonsense (and nobody is buying it my friend).

The difference between Republicans and Democrats is that Republicans (the true conservative one's anyway) create policy to ensure liberty, while Democrats create policy to ensure power and wealth for themselves. Everything is designed to collapse the system and get people on the government plantation - beholden to government for their every basic need. That makes them more likely to vote Dumbocrat which keeps people like Obama, Pelosi, and Reid rolling in wealth and power.

So "ensure Liberty" is the best example you can give? Lmao.

Leave it to a liberal to laugh at liberty. They never had to fight for it and they sure as hell didn't give their life for it, so they are so unappreciative of it. It's just some abstract concept and a bargain chip to be exchanged for government table scraps. My heart breaks for the millions of men and women who died really young and never got to live a full life in this great country, all so that people like 000 could mock liberty.

The value of Liberty isn't in question. You giving a weak ass answer as "ensure Liberty" as the sole reason to vote republican without at all elaborating is what's funny.

 

[Billy000]

Just admit that you don't actually know what the stimulus was spent on. Hint: half of the funding was in the form of tax cuts.

It was? Prove it.
Because you are WRONG
Did 80% of Federal Stimulus Funds Go To Public Unions? - Media Trackers
The Recovery Act Saved Public-Sector Jobs, But Can Governments Retain Them?
http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/should-public-sector-jobs-come-first/?_r=0
all three articles state most of the stimulus money went to preserve public sector jobs. With the lion's share going those represented by public worker unions.
Billy, every thread you create you get your ass handed to you on the facts.
If you were a race horse this would be you. The horse that lost 100 races, but won a family’s heart | New York Post

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

Billy there was no shovel ready jobs, again just temporary cosmetic jobs.

Obama: "No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Projects" - CBS News


With unemployment hovering near 10 percent nearly two years after President Obama signed his economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama is acknowledging that, despite his campaign promises, "there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects"



.

According the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs.

Obama's Stimulus, Five Years Later

The federal government poured billions into the government and education sectors, where unemployment was low, but spent only about 10% on promised infrastructure, though the unemployment rate in construction was running in double digits. And some of the individual projects funded by the law were truly appalling. $783,000 was spent on a study of why young people consume malt liquor and marijuana. $92,000 went to the Army Corps of Engineers for costumes for mascots like Bobber the Water Safety Dog. $219,000 funded a study of college "hookups."
In aggregate, the spending helped drive federal outlays from less than $3 trillion in 2008 to $3.5 trillion in 2009, where federal spending has roughly remained ever since.



.

Obama’s Stimulus Generated Up to 3.3 Million Jobs, CBO Says

End of story.

 

[P@triot]

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

This was directly from Senator Tom Coburn's (OK) website. Every year he tracked and published reports on government spending. He made a special one just for the Obama "stimulus package":

1. Forest Service to Replace Windows in Visitor Center Closed in 2007 (Amboy, WA) - $554,763
Despite having no plans to reopen a shuttered visitor center at Mount St. Helens in Washington State, the U.S. Forest Service is spending more than $554,000 to replace its windows.

2. “Dance Draw” - Interactive Dance Software Development (Charlotte, NC) - $762,372
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte received more than $760,000 in stimulus funds to help develop a computerized choreography program that its creators believe could lead to a YouTube-like “Dance Tube” online application.

3. North Shore Connector to Professional Sports Stadiums, Casino (Pittsburgh, PA) - $62 million
ederal money has covered the vast majority of costs, with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) agreeing to provide $348 million—nearly the full original cost—leaving state and local governments responsible for a small fraction.30 Even with that level of assistance, the Port Authority still threatened to shut down the project due to the enormous cost overruns. With an infusion of more than $62 million in stimulus money, the project was taken off life support.

4. FEMA Stalls Two Fire Stations More Than a Year, Increases Costs (San Antonio, TX) - $7.3 million
The City of San Antonio is hoping that there aren’t any fires for at least a year in the vicinity of two planned fire stations, thanks to “help” from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

5. Abandoned Train Station Converted Into Museum (Glassboro, NJ) - $1.2 million
Taxpayers may not be happy to learn that they are paying for one broken down train station twice. The Glassboro train station was built in 1860 and closed in 1971. Unused for nearly 40 years, it now sits boarded up and riddled with graffiti.

6. Ants Talk. Taxpayers Listen (San Francisco, CA) - $1.9 million
The California Academy of Sciences is receiving nearly $2 million to send researchers to the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands and east Africa, to capture, photograph, and analyze thousands of exotic ants.

7. Stimulus Project Threatens Pastor’s House (Newark, OH) - $1.8 million
An Ohio road project received $1.8 million in stimulus funds,56 despite the threat it poses to the residents of over two dozen homes next to it. Pastor Greg Sheets of Newark, Ohio’s Truth Tabernacle 57 has already lost his front yard to the project, and could lose his entire home.

8. Old Abandoned Iron Furnace Gets Facelift after Money Squandered on Same Project Years Before (Fitchburg, KY) – $357,710
Once considered ahead of its time, the Fitchburg Furnace in Kentucky was abandoned after just five years in service—it then sat unused for nearly 140 more. Now it is getting a $357,710 makeover to repair stonework on the old structure and allow historians to conduct research.

9. Power Plant Construction Won’t Start for at Least Two Years (Kern County, CA) - $308 million
BP may have found itself staring down huge financial losses over the past several months, but executives can take solace knowing that a stimulus windfall will help offset them. On September 28, 2009, Hydrogen Energy California, LLC (HECA), owned largely by BP, was awarded $308 million86 in stimulus funds to “generate more environmentally friendly electricity by capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.”

10. Town Replaces New Sidewalks With Newer Sidewalks That Lead to Ditch (Boynton, OK) - $89,298
People around Boynton, Oklahoma were left scratching their heads after the town was awarded nearly $90,00096 to replace a quarter-mile stretch of sidewalk that was replaced only five years ago. Another resident, Mike Lance, noted that “the best indication of the absurdity of the project is what the contractor did with a section of sidewalk at the north end of town – one that fronts no homes or businesses, and leads directly into a ditch.”

It goes up to 100 Billy000. Let me know if you want me to post the rest.