Cowman
Cows Have Liberal Minds
- Nov 6, 2011
- 5,037
- 577
TRANSLATION:Yes, there are, you stupid kid.
It's a school night. Better get ready for bed now, kid. And no X-Box, either.
No, there is no reasonable use of '"the sun gets cold". It just doesn't. Sun spots are lower in temperature, the sun may become slightly less radiant or of slightly less intensity, but it doesn't get cold.
The important thing to take away from this is that when given many choices that are far more accurate and acceptable and would convey a far less controversial idea, Ol' Fitz refuses and instead decides to stick with the option that is the worst fit, the least accurate and has to be stretched all out of shape to even get close to describing a slight variation in the suns radiance.
A slight variation in the suns radiance could be described as:
"slight variations in suns radiance"
"a slight decrease in the suns intensity"
"a slight decrease in surface temperatures"
We could even say the the sun "cooled" ever so slightly.
But the sun doesn't "get cold"
When offered all these choices, you guys want to stick with "the sun gets cold".
This fact of the sun is not very important to the point at all. The point is, once you guys are stuck on an idea, even one as lame and insignificant as this one, even when much better alternatives exist and are presented to you, you still chose the lamest and worst option.
Tell me why anything else you have to say is not liable to be equally lame and loose with the truth, but you have just refused to accept a better idea?
That's the point.
That and... the sun doesn't get cold.
![]()
![]()
Did you just discover gifs old man?