Why Does It Seem Like Obama Is Getting Everything He Wants?

[Geaux4it]

I'm sure most of you feel like we're almost living in a Twilight Zone these days. How can Obama get away with what he's doing? How can he go out in public and say all of these scandals are phony with a straight face? Well, it's easy, he knows everything about everyone. Anyone who becomes involved in what he's doing Obama has the goods on them. Even before they begin to become a problem he's already got them by the balls.

Fact is, just about everyone has done something that can be exploited. if not, they know enough to make something up. Everyone is vulnerable. Some of us more so than others. Some of us have cheated on an exam or fudged on our taxes and still some have sent pictures of their penis to strange women. Think about your past. Has there ever been something you have done that if it came to light would embarrass you? Anthony Weiner has been caught several times but that didn't stop Geraldo Rivera from doing it last week.

There is a reason why this country is so great. We've always felt we had privacy. In many countries privacy is a thing of the past or it never was. Here in America your privacy is a right. Thanks to recent revelations about NSA spying and IRS abuses, our security, our peace of mind is slowly slipping away. This is one of the primary reasons so many come here. It's not just that the country is the land of opportunity, or used to be. It's the secure feeling that we used to have that nobody was looking over our shoulders.

The year started out with the Administration hammering new gun regulations down our throats. Then the IRS scandal came to light, ether by design or by necessity. Then it was discovered that the NSA records every single communication that every single American does. They have total access to every email, every text, every tweet. Imagine the IRS, in full control of Obamacare, what they will be able to do once they look at your blood tests and discover if you've been using drugs or alcohol and begin to use it against you.

Taking all of this in to account, now imagine a White House that no matter what they do it seems nobody can stop them. The media won't call them into account and nobody has the courage to stand up to them because something in their history could possibly come to light or has already been pointed out to them could come to light.

It's clear that Obama has no intention of following the law. He applies our laws unequally whichever way suits him. I believe the GOP has come to the realization that there's really nothing they can do to stop him without destroying themselves in the process. The new Tea Party caucus doesn't know how it all works. Folks like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul don't know the real deal. Boehner, McCain, Christey, and the rest of the RINOs know where their bread it buttered. I believe that the White House made it obvious to everyone including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It's no accident that Obama has put every record of his past under lock and key. He doesn't want anyone else to do to him what he's willing to do to us.

This is the reality of America. This is the change that was promised. This country has been transformed into a police state. One that a large part of the populous isn't even aware of. The more you pay attention the more frightening it becomes. Some would say that our country has always been this way. Some may have tried to make it that way in the past, but they've finally got it all thanks to technology. Everyone that owns a cell-phone can be tracked. Every communication monitored and recorded to be used at a later date. This is why al Qaeda uses couriers instead of cell-phones. Once the government targets you you're toast.

The long of the short of it? We are living in a Tyranny.

The fact that you can freely post on a message board about how much you hate our government or current President proves otherwise.

Even Hitler allowed the Jews to feel 'good' as they rode the train in.

A fly never see's his asshole until its to late on the windshield

it's a complete embarrassment what Americans have voted in as POTUS

-Geaux

 

[mudwhistle]

The two are not related, Mud: you clearly don't understand economics or finance or energy.

I guess you are part of the 47% whining for your government money. Hint: just like me on VA disability.

If I don't understand explain what I'm not understanding. Otherwise STFU.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Mud, yes, it is clear you don't understand. You are part of the 47%.

 

[mudwhistle]

Mud, yes, it is clear you don't understand. You are part of the 47%.

Only thing that is clear is you're full of excrement.

If you're gonna make a claim you also have to prove it's genuine otherwise it's just an unproven claim. Your problem is you have zero credibility here so your claims are unfounded. This wouldn't be true if you hadn't lied so many times in the past. You're simply a time waster.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are flabbling, Mud, and not making any clear points, so let's get you right before you get left.

You are unhappy because you are working 32 hours week because the parties won't compromise?

 

[mudwhistle]

You are flabbling, Mud, and not making any clear points, so let's get you right before you get left.

You are unhappy because you are working 32 hours week because the parties won't compromise?

Then let me be clear.

The only reason we are showing any growth in the economy is because Obama is digitally pumping $85 billion/mo into the stockmarket to offset other negative factors in the economy. The economy only grew 1.7% in the second quarter. This is adjusted by inflation.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...eater-during-the-bush-years-than-under-obama/

Despite the Clinton recession, the Attack on 9-11, Hurricane Katrina, two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the mortgage crisis that caused the 2008 financial collapse, GDP growth during the Bush years was higher than during the Obama years.

Under George Bush GDP growth was an average 1.67 percent.
Under Barack Obama GDP growth was an average 1.53 percent.
(Numbers from Trading Economics)

Remember this the next time Obama bashes George W. Bush.


*

 

[JakeStarkey]

Today The Gateway Pundit is a leading right-of-center news website. The Gateway Pundit has 4-5 million visits (Sitemeter) each month and is read by over 600,000 individual readers. It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Drudge, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations. Jim Hoft was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013.
About | The Gateway Pundit

No true American Republican buys the above crap at all.

 

[mudwhistle]

Today The Gateway Pundit is a leading right-of-center news website. The Gateway Pundit has 4-5 million visits (Sitemeter) each month and is read by over 600,000 individual readers. It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Drudge, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations. Jim Hoft was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013.
About | The Gateway Pundit

No true American buys the above crap at all.

So you're a Democrat. What else is new.

Bet you read Media-Matters religiously.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Today The Gateway Pundit is a leading right-of-center news website. The Gateway Pundit has 4-5 million visits (Sitemeter) each month and is read by over 600,000 individual readers. It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Drudge, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations. Jim Hoft was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013.
About | The Gateway Pundit

No true American Republican buys the above crap at all.

So you're a Democrat. What else is new.

No true American reads that crap, whether Republican or Democrat.

 

[Londoner]

Growth during the Reagan and Clinton years was largely precipitated by a massive expansion of credit to middle class families. It's amazing that nobody knows or understands or has attempted to research pre and post Reagan levels of household debt. From 1980 to the Bush Meltdown Americans went on a debt-financed spending binge like never before. Once traditional borrowing lost force, we turned the housing market into an ATM by pumping money into the hands of non credit-worthy borrowers so that the investment class could ride the bubble up, then hedge the bursting.

It was actually a typical fuck the poor scheme. Clinton and Bush deregulated the derivatives market and removed all barriers to lending. Then they pumped trillions into the economy on the backs of morons, so they could convert each high risk mortgage into a profitable security. Of course, in pure Reagan fashion, they captured the Ratings Agencies so they could slap an "A+" on dog shit, which allowed the American Private Sector to sell fraudulent securities and derivatives all over the globe. Then, when everything blew up, as they knew it would, big firms like AIG and their investors were bailed out, while the middle class was foreclosed upon. Classic Reaganomics upward transfer of wealth. They tried to blame government social programs, but nobody forced the private sector to place trillions of dollars of bets on the housing market.

If my neighbor takes out a mortgage he cannot repay, shame on him. If I place a trillion dollar bet on that mortgage which I cannot cover, shame on me.

Reaganomics, of which Clinton and Obama are partial supporters, started with a massive expansion of credit, and it ended with TARP.

Under the Reagan moment history, the middle class lost good jobs to Chinese sweatshops (so our corporations could make more money) ... and then they were fed credit cards to make up for lower wages and disappearing benefits, while the wealthy were perpetually subsidized and bailed out.

And rather than admitting it, the Republican Party quietly recycles a portion of the profits into a vast media apparatus which distracts the poor with a culture war.

Fucking brilliant!

 

[mudwhistle]

Growth during the Reagan and Clinton years was largely precipitated by a massive expansion of credit to middle class families. It's amazing that nobody knows or understands or has attempted to research pre and post Reagan levels of household debt. From 1980 to the Bush Meltdown Americans went on a debt-financed spending binge like never before. Once traditional borrowing lost force, we turned the housing market into an ATM by pumping money into the hands of non credit-worthy borrowers so that the investment class could ride the bubble up, then hedge the bursting.

It was actually a typical fuck the poor scheme. Clinton and Bush deregulated the derivatives market and removed all barriers to lending. Then they pumped trillions into the economy on the backs of morons, so they could convert each high risk mortgage into a profitable security. Of course, in pure Reagan fashion, they captured the Ratings Agencies so they could slap an "A+" on dog shit, which allowed the American Private Sector to sell fraudulent securities and derivatives all over the globe. Then, when everything blew up, as they knew it would, big firms like AIG and their investors were bailed out, while the middle class was foreclosed upon. Classic Reaganomics upward transfer of wealth. They tried to blame government social programs, but nobody forced the private sector to place trillions of dollars of bets on the housing market.

If my neighbor takes out a mortgage he cannot repay, shame on him. If I place a trillion dollar bet on that mortgage which I cannot cover, shame on me.

Reaganomics, of which Clinton and Obama are partial supporters, started with a massive expansion of credit, and it ended with TARP.

Under the Reagan moment history, the middle class lost good jobs to Chinese sweatshops (so our corporations could make more money) ... and then they were fed credit cards to make up for lower wages and disappearing benefits, while the wealthy were perpetually subsidized and bailed out.

And rather than admitting it, the Republican Party quietly recycles a portion of the profits into a vast media apparatus which distracts the poor with a culture war.

Fucking brilliant!

So you've taken it a step farther than everyone else. You want to blame Reagan for everything everyone else did even after his death.

I guess the concept of "Cheating the system" never crossed your mind.

Used to be folks would constantly look for loopholes in a program, but now folks in the White House are using them, not just opportunists and scam-artists.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Growth during the Reagan and Clinton years was largely precipitated by a massive expansion of credit to middle class families. It's amazing that nobody knows or understands or has attempted to research pre and post Reagan levels of household debt. From 1980 to the Bush Meltdown Americans went on a debt-financed spending binge like never before. Once traditional borrowing lost force, we turned the housing market into an ATM by pumping money into the hands of non credit-worthy borrowers so that the investment class could ride the bubble up, then hedge the bursting.

It was actually a typical fuck the poor scheme. Clinton and Bush deregulated the derivatives market and removed all barriers to lending. Then they pumped trillions into the economy on the backs of morons, so they could convert each high risk mortgage into a profitable security. Of course, in pure Reagan fashion, they captured the Ratings Agencies so they could slap an "A+" on dog shit, which allowed the American Private Sector to sell fraudulent securities and derivatives all over the globe. Then, when everything blew up, as they knew it would, big firms like AIG and their investors were bailed out, while the middle class was foreclosed upon. Classic Reaganomics upward transfer of wealth. They tried to blame government social programs, but nobody forced the private sector to place trillions of dollars of bets on the housing market.

If my neighbor takes out a mortgage he cannot repay, shame on him. If I place a trillion dollar bet on that mortgage which I cannot cover, shame on me.

Reaganomics, of which Clinton and Obama are partial supporters, started with a massive expansion of credit, and it ended with TARP.

Under the Reagan moment history, the middle class lost good jobs to Chinese sweatshops (so our corporations could make more money) ... and then they were fed credit cards to make up for lower wages and disappearing benefits, while the wealthy were perpetually subsidized and bailed out.

And rather than admitting it, the Republican Party quietly recycles a portion of the profits into a vast media apparatus which distracts the poor with a culture war.

Fucking brilliant!

So you've taken it a step farther than everyone else. You want to blame Reagan for everything everyone else did even after his death.

Mud, the mainstream GOP does not buy your reactionary crap or that you posted above.

We, the mainstream, are above that.

 

[Stashman]

Obama gets what he wants because he is a good monkey and following the script to the "T". Nothing more, Nothing less. Good puppets always get paid.

 

[mudwhistle]

Growth during the Reagan and Clinton years was largely precipitated by a massive expansion of credit to middle class families. It's amazing that nobody knows or understands or has attempted to research pre and post Reagan levels of household debt. From 1980 to the Bush Meltdown Americans went on a debt-financed spending binge like never before. Once traditional borrowing lost force, we turned the housing market into an ATM by pumping money into the hands of non credit-worthy borrowers so that the investment class could ride the bubble up, then hedge the bursting.

It was actually a typical fuck the poor scheme. Clinton and Bush deregulated the derivatives market and removed all barriers to lending. Then they pumped trillions into the economy on the backs of morons, so they could convert each high risk mortgage into a profitable security. Of course, in pure Reagan fashion, they captured the Ratings Agencies so they could slap an "A+" on dog shit, which allowed the American Private Sector to sell fraudulent securities and derivatives all over the globe. Then, when everything blew up, as they knew it would, big firms like AIG and their investors were bailed out, while the middle class was foreclosed upon. Classic Reaganomics upward transfer of wealth. They tried to blame government social programs, but nobody forced the private sector to place trillions of dollars of bets on the housing market.

If my neighbor takes out a mortgage he cannot repay, shame on him. If I place a trillion dollar bet on that mortgage which I cannot cover, shame on me.

Reaganomics, of which Clinton and Obama are partial supporters, started with a massive expansion of credit, and it ended with TARP.

Under the Reagan moment history, the middle class lost good jobs to Chinese sweatshops (so our corporations could make more money) ... and then they were fed credit cards to make up for lower wages and disappearing benefits, while the wealthy were perpetually subsidized and bailed out.

And rather than admitting it, the Republican Party quietly recycles a portion of the profits into a vast media apparatus which distracts the poor with a culture war.

Fucking brilliant!

So you've taken it a step farther than everyone else. You want to blame Reagan for everything everyone else did even after his death.

Mud, the mainstream GOP does not buy your reactionary crap or that you posted above.

We, the mainstream, are above that.

The only difference between a mainstream Repug and a Democrat is everyone still thinks you're a racist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

So you've taken it a step farther than everyone else. You want to blame Reagan for everything everyone else did even after his death.

Mud, the mainstream GOP does not buy your reactionary crap or that you posted above.

We, the mainstream, are above that.

The only difference between a mainstream Repug and a Democrat is everyone still thinks you're a racist.

Only a disillusioned and a delusional mind of a reactionary would anyone think that.

 

[mudwhistle]

Mud, the mainstream GOP does not buy your reactionary crap or that you posted above.

We, the mainstream, are above that.

The only difference between a mainstream Repug and a Democrat is everyone still thinks you're a racist.

Only a disillusioned and a delusional mind of a reactionary would anyone think that.

Great come back. *rolling eyes*

But it's very true.

You sell the rest of us out and they still hate you.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The "rest of you" is a very small minority of America, Mud.

Roll eyes. That's sissy stuff, troop.

 

[candycorn]

 

[American_Jihad]

Beating Obama​

October 22, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

...

Unlike Clinton, he reacts less to polls believing correctly that his media allies can help him weather temporary unpopularity. As long as he is moving forward, then he is in control. What he fears is losing that momentum. He fears a Newt Gingrich who will sideline his agenda with a counter-agenda.

The rise of the Tea Party panicked Obama because suddenly there were agendas in the public eye that were not his. He was forced to pivot, briefly, to the deficit. He was forced, uncomfortably, to talk about responsible spending.

The ObamaCare steamroller rolled on, but it was now doomed to be unpopular. The dedicated opposition had crippled it by making it suspect. But it was less the damage to ObamaCare that worried him than the fear of losing the ability to set the public agenda. Without that power, he would have become completely impotent.

But the natural caution of the Republican Party reasserted itself and the lessons of the Tea Party uprising were forgotten. And those lessons were simple.

Obama can only be beaten in the popular arena. In his mind, he derives his power from the bully pulpit. He is a creature of the media age and popularity is his only law and the only verdict that he will accept.

...

The Tea Party instinctively understood Obama’s uncompromising political grammar. As do men like Ted Cruz. While the Republican Party looks for a compromise, they understand that it’s impossible.

...

Obama can only be beaten with sustained opposition. Innate to his plans is the assumption that his enemies will give up and let him have his victory. When they don’t, he begins making mistakes.

The ObamaCare website went live in a disastrous state because he was too afraid of postponing it and letting Republicans smell weakness. The ObamaCare exchanges are more of a disaster than they had to be because dedicated conservatives never stopped challenging and questioning the law. And both of those mistakes may yet prove fatal.

...

Beating Obama | FrontPage Magazine

 

[BDBoop]