Why does the liberal think the Benghazi event is over?

Liberals thinking Benghazi is over???????? Are you shitting me????? We know better.
Benghazi WILL NEVER BE OVER. Right wing whack jobs of the sort that populate these sites will trot out Benghazi 20 years from now.

When they are STILL trying to win back the WH.

Benghazi over? LMAO. Never ever.

You know RW wack jobs hate this President BAD when they cut President Carter some slack for his "rescue" mission failure. And I have read a couple posts today where that was being done. Actually giving Carter credit for trying. From rethugs. Amazing shit.
 
Why aren't the right wingers investigating W for the 10 attacks on foreign embassies leading to the deaths of over 50 americans?

Why aren't the right wingers investigating W for his lie about WMD's, causing the deaths of over 4,000 US troops and 2 trillion taxpayer dollars?

Oh that's right, It's A-OK just as long as a (R) does it :eusa_hand:

Why do you bring this up in every single Benghazi post?? How many times have we explained it?

It's always blame Bush for everything....

The majority of people that died were not Americans, I believe I read there was only 1. And Bush didn't lie about it. And Bush didn't blame someone else for it. As far as I know, not ONE embassy had asked for more protection and was turned down.

Benghazi happened on the anniversary of 9/11 - and there were many warnings out there that something was going to happen, and they all went ignored.

Tell us what Bush did wrong again? Was he warned? Did he lie for weeks?

Why can't any of you admit that your president is a liar and won't accept responsibility for anything? Just shows how up his ass you all are!
 
Why aren't the right wingers investigating W for the 10 attacks on foreign embassies leading to the deaths of over 50 americans?

Why aren't the right wingers investigating W for his lie about WMD's, causing the deaths of over 4,000 US troops and 2 trillion taxpayer dollars?

Oh that's right, It's A-OK just as long as a (R) does it :eusa_hand:

Because it was tried.
On June 10th 2008 articles of impeachment for President Bush was voted on floor, 251 to 166 to refer it to the Judiciary Committee and on July 25th 2008 the committee took no further action.
Why?
Because most of the Democrats on the committee voted for both the wars that's why.
 
Liberals thinking Benghazi is over???????? Are you shitting me????? We know better.
Benghazi WILL NEVER BE OVER. Right wing whack jobs of the sort that populate these sites will trot out Benghazi 20 years from now.

When they are STILL trying to win back the WH.

Benghazi over? LMAO. Never ever.

You know RW wack jobs hate this President BAD when they cut President Carter some slack for his "rescue" mission failure. And I have read a couple posts today where that was being done. Actually giving Carter credit for trying. From rethugs. Amazing shit.

Do you know who made the choice to lie to the american people?
Do you know who decided not to rescue the 4 Americans under attack?
Do you know who decided to not bring more help there when asked?
do you know why BHO kept on lying?

these are simple questions
 
Why aren't the right wingers investigating W for the 10 attacks on foreign embassies leading to the deaths of over 50 americans?

Why aren't the right wingers investigating W for his lie about WMD's, causing the deaths of over 4,000 US troops and 2 trillion taxpayer dollars?

Oh that's right, It's A-OK just as long as a (R) does it :eusa_hand:

Because it was tried.
On June 10th 2008 articles of impeachment for President Bush was voted on floor, 251 to 166 to refer it to the Judiciary Committee and on July 25th 2008 the committee took no further action.
Why?
Because most of the Democrats on the committee voted for both the wars that's why.

For the right reasons
they also knew that the UN provided the intel that lead to the war in IRAQ as per the agreement voted on in comgress
no-one else
read the link
Update 27 January 2003
 
they are very simple questions
why did they lie?
whi decided to lie?
why did that lie get re peated
most important is why those people where left there to die?

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

"First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired."

"What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation."

You have yet to provide a lie.

Well of course now we have ABC who outright lied and used a forged email. Stick a fork in it, it's done.
 
You really can't use the word "liberal" and "think" together in the same sentence.
 
they are very simple questions
why did they lie?
whi decided to lie?
why did that lie get re peated
most important is why those people where left there to die?

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

"First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired."

"What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation."

You have yet to provide a lie.

Well of course now we have ABC who outright lied and used a forged email. Stick a fork in it, it's done.

That is one person
in fact
Fred Fry International: Obama's UN Speech Supported the State Dept's Benghazi Lie
•11 Sept
•During the day - Protests in Egypt over the Mohammad video
•In the evening - Attack on US Consultate - Ambassador killed
•Later that evening - Attack on CIA Safe House - Two Americans killed
• Hilary Clinton blames video for violence
•16 Sept
•Susan Rice Makes TV show rounds and blames the video
•25 Sept
•Obama makes his speech at the UN

President Obama, surely knowing that this was a terrorist attack, still pushed the video lie in his speech to the United Nations.


There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy. There is no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan. - Link

President Obama's entire UN speech reinforces the lie created by Hilary Clinton and his State Department, that the deaths of 3 Americans were the result of some video that nobody saw. His UN speech only mentions terrorists once, and that is in reference to Iran. Instead, he refers to the terrorist attack on the US Consulate as some mere violent religious outrage. The President was right in that there was no video that justified an attack on a US Embassy. However, terrorists do not have to justify their actions.

The bigger issue here is
1) why no help
2) who made those choices
3) who told Susan rice to lie and why

this is simple
 
Why does the liberal think the Benghazi event is over?

Because the GOP has cried WOLF so many times that only the GOP loyalists are still listening?
 
they are very simple questions
why did they lie?
whi decided to lie?
why did that lie get re peated
most important is why those people where left there to die?

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

"First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired."

"What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation."

You have yet to provide a lie.

Well of course now we have ABC who outright lied and used a forged email. Stick a fork in it, it's done.

That is one person
in fact
Fred Fry International: Obama's UN Speech Supported the State Dept's Benghazi Lie
•11 Sept
•During the day - Protests in Egypt over the Mohammad video
•In the evening - Attack on US Consultate - Ambassador killed
•Later that evening - Attack on CIA Safe House - Two Americans killed
• Hilary Clinton blames video for violence
•16 Sept
•Susan Rice Makes TV show rounds and blames the video
•25 Sept
•Obama makes his speech at the UN

President Obama, surely knowing that this was a terrorist attack, still pushed the video lie in his speech to the United Nations.


There are no words that excuse the killing of innocents. There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy. There is no slander that provides an excuse for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan. - Link

President Obama's entire UN speech reinforces the lie created by Hilary Clinton and his State Department, that the deaths of 3 Americans were the result of some video that nobody saw. His UN speech only mentions terrorists once, and that is in reference to Iran. Instead, he refers to the terrorist attack on the US Consulate as some mere violent religious outrage. The President was right in that there was no video that justified an attack on a US Embassy. However, terrorists do not have to justify their actions.

The bigger issue here is
1) why no help
2) who made those choices
3) who told Susan rice to lie and why

this is simple

You did not provide a quote where the Preisdent blames the attack on our consualte in benghazi on the video. What's the problem? Here's a link to the transcript of the entire UN speech he gave. Can you find where he blames the Benghazi attack on the video? Or are you saying that no US embassy was attacked because of the radical Islamic outrage over the stupid video?

Transcript: Obama address to U.N. General Assembly | Fox News
 
Who told susan rice to lie?

She didn't.



Why what? Didn't happen. She didn't lie.


Why was there no attempt to save those people?

Happened too fast.



Why did BHO keep lying after he knew the truth?

He didn't. You're making shit up.



Why does he still not acknowledge it as a terrorist attack?

He acknowledged that the next day. Come out of your cave.



This event has just began and why 100% of the people in this country are not demanding we know the truth baffles me


Truth eludes you.

fox-news-brainwashed-sheep.jpg
 
Who told susan rice to lie?
Why?
Why was there no attempt to save those people?
Why did BHO keep lying after he knew the truth?
Why does he still not acknowledge it as a terrorist attack?

This event has just began and why 100% of the people in this country are not demanding we know the truth baffles me

The "Benghazi event"? You make it sound like a rock band tour.
 
Politicians try to make any incident into a scandal that hurts the other party. This has been going on since George Washington made eyes at Sally Fairfax. Some scandals are real and can bite the party in power others simply die out. The best response to a potential scandal, I think, is the "Mikey did it too" one and many people recognize its just another rerun scandal. For example have other diplomatic corps people died in overseas posts?
Another buster of a good potential scandal is for the opposing party to enhance the incident, create stuff about it that is worse than the reality, that too can backfire. I think people are on hold right now waiting for some new life, and in the meantime new potential scandals are being overlooked. How about Obama is not a citizen?
 
Who told susan rice to lie?
Why?
Why was there no attempt to save those people?
Why did BHO keep lying after he knew the truth?
Why does he still not acknowledge it as a terrorist attack?

This event has just began and why 100% of the people in this country are not demanding we know the truth baffles me
Deflection. They know obamaturd and hillary are liars and lying on Benghazi, they hope it will go away.
 
Who told susan rice to lie?

She didn't.



Why what? Didn't happen. She didn't lie.




Happened too fast.





He didn't. You're making shit up.



Why does he still not acknowledge it as a terrorist attack?

He acknowledged that the next day. Come out of your cave.



This event has just began and why 100% of the people in this country are not demanding we know the truth baffles me


Truth eludes you.

fox-news-brainwashed-sheep.jpg

at no time did any-one come out and state the truth
we had an attack on American people serving this country in Lybia
They asked for help before this attack, we did not give it to them
They asked for help during this attack, we refused it
This attack was a planned attack by a group linked to or perhaps Al Qaeda them selves
simply a terrorist attack, 9-11-2013

Now your telling me this event as it occcured has ever been described this way by our president or H Clinton?
NO WAY

And BTW
how do you kow there was not enough time?
is there some magic clock for a rescue?
 
Last edited:
Who told susan rice to lie?
Why?
Why was there no attempt to save those people?
Why did BHO keep lying after he knew the truth?
Why does he still not acknowledge it as a terrorist attack?

This event has just began and why 100% of the people in this country are not demanding we know the truth baffles me

The "Benghazi event"? You make it sound like a rock band tour.

you Libs blow me away with your lack of compassion to people serving this country
anything for the base I guess and to hell with any-one who gets harmed along the way huh?
along as the base is covered

Our President should have came out 9-12-2012 and told us the truth. That truth should have included the rescue of those 4 men
 

Forum List

Back
Top