Why Flynn's testimony & plea for immunity are important...

Podesta just asked for immunity. So that means he must be guilty of something and by extension Hillary is also guilty, right?

MiddleFingerBaby likes to follow anonymous scum-bucket bloggers who allege crap about Podesta.

HEY MORON.......there is only ONE openly declared investigation by the FBI....want to know who the target is??? LOL
Clinton.
 
In short, this is the choice before us regarding Flynn and his plea for immunity....

Do we want to find out the truth of the Trump team's collusion with the Russians and have Flynn walk away, OR .......do we want to see Flynn in an orange suit?
Neither is going to happen, dumbass. There is no "there" there.

Sent from my SM-G930U using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Yeah Flynn asked for immunity from nothing!! Lmao
Yeah, just like in the Clinton server investigation all those folks pledging the fifth.
 
It was to be expected that the first round of Flynn's lawyers asking for immunity for his client, would have been rejected by the FBI and (I think) the Senate intelligence committee.

We should first remember a bit more of our recent history, When the Iran-Contra affair gained momentum, congressional committees were ONLY interested in finding out what had been going on, more than a wish to indict and jail (by the DOJ) those who had participated in the scam. This is why Oliver North never went to prison, although he richly deserved to do so, but was offered immunity when testifying.

Now, regarding Flynn, NO ONE seeks immunity for "crimes" that same one has committed and could be fairly easily proven......One seeks immunity ONLY if one's testimony is crucial to implicate usually other people higher up in the "food chain"......and for Flynn, that would be those higher in status than his own.

In other words, Flynn is not seeking immunity....nor would he ever be granted such......for his crimes in not declaring his job as a Turkish government lobbyist or for accepting a payoff from Russia TV.

In legal terms, there is what is called a "proffer".....which basically entails one's attorney offering a listing of what his/her client will reveal IF immunity is granted....In short, Flynn needs to snitch on others to avoid penalties for his own errant behavior and deeds.

For Flynn, his prayers must be that one of the 3 investigative entities allow him immunity; otherwise, fines, possible incarceration and loss of benefits from the Pentagon are in his near future....Of course, he'll also write a book. .
Lol...it was to be expected??? Lol

Take a nap, Jake
 
Should Internet Outreach Opertions be allowed to force their worker to run 30 sock accounts 24 hours straight until they're babbling?
 
It sounds a little bit sinister when a "request for immunity" it becomes a "plea for immunity" but anyway there is no evidence that Flynn asked for immunity in exchange for testimony. It is either based on more leaked information or fake news. The left is walking a tightrope by concentrating on Flynn when it's clear that a felony was committed by leaking his conversation. Funny how nobody even noticed that Obama's A.G. was held in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify and Obama invoked "executive privlege" rather than allow his IRS chief testify and implicate him.
 
Lol...it was to be expected??? Lol

Take a nap, Jake

Hey, moron, Jake happens to be another smart poster who doesn't swallow the Trumpster's bullshit as your ilk has.....I, however, am not Jake.....but thanks for showing us all your very low comprehension skills....... LOL
 
In short, this is the choice before us regarding Flynn and his plea for immunity....

Do we want to find out the truth of the Trump team's collusion with the Russians and have Flynn walk away, OR .......do we want to see Flynn in an orange suit?
Neither is going to happen, dumbass. There is no "there" there.

Sent from my SM-G930U using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
What information are you privy to that makes you say that with such assurance?
 
It sounds a little bit sinister when a "request for immunity" it becomes a "plea for immunity" but anyway there is no evidence that Flynn asked for immunity in exchange for testimony. It is either based on more leaked information or fake news. The left is walking a tightrope by concentrating on Flynn when it's clear that a felony was committed by leaking his conversation. Funny how nobody even noticed that Obama's A.G. was held in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify and Obama invoked "executive privlege" rather than allow his IRS chief testify and implicate him.

If it never happened then what is Flynn's lawyer asking for? And why is Trump saying Flynn should do something he's not doing?
 
How can that be true when you haven't got a single fact incriminating any of the people you hate?

There are several facts that you claim are all coincidences but that won't work anymore.
which "facts" are those?

I asked earlier. Still haven't heard what facts are coming together

Let's go slowly here and I'll post one fact. If you don't acknowledge this fact I know this is a waste of time.

Fact: Michael Flynn registered as a foreign agent for Turkey.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?

Yes, that's a fact. I acknowledged it.

Now, so fucking what?

Here's another fact: Flynn's lawyers told Pence and Trump he would register as a foreign agent and Yates told Trump directly Flynn was potentially compromised. Trump did nothing about it before the story broke.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
 
There are several facts that you claim are all coincidences but that won't work anymore.
which "facts" are those?

I asked earlier. Still haven't heard what facts are coming together

Let's go slowly here and I'll post one fact. If you don't acknowledge this fact I know this is a waste of time.

Fact: Michael Flynn registered as a foreign agent for Turkey.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?

Yes, that's a fact. I acknowledged it.

Now, so fucking what?

Here's another fact: Flynn's lawyers told Pence and Trump he would register as a foreign agent and Yates told Trump directly Flynn was potentially compromised. Trump did nothing about it before the story broke.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
I haven't seen any evidence on those claims one way or another.
 
There are several facts that you claim are all coincidences but that won't work anymore.
which "facts" are those?

I asked earlier. Still haven't heard what facts are coming together

Let's go slowly here and I'll post one fact. If you don't acknowledge this fact I know this is a waste of time.

Fact: Michael Flynn registered as a foreign agent for Turkey.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?

Yes, that's a fact. I acknowledged it.

Now, so fucking what?

Here's another fact: Flynn's lawyers told Pence and Trump he would register as a foreign agent and Yates told Trump directly Flynn was potentially compromised. Trump did nothing about it before the story broke.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
One more option, don't care. I guess kinda like the left didn't care about Hillary's dealing with the Russians or her server issues or Benghazi.
 
There are several facts that you claim are all coincidences but that won't work anymore.
which "facts" are those?

I asked earlier. Still haven't heard what facts are coming together

Let's go slowly here and I'll post one fact. If you don't acknowledge this fact I know this is a waste of time.

Fact: Michael Flynn registered as a foreign agent for Turkey.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?

Yes, that's a fact. I acknowledged it.

Now, so fucking what?

Here's another fact: Flynn's lawyers told Pence and Trump he would register as a foreign agent and Yates told Trump directly Flynn was potentially compromised. Trump did nothing about it before the story broke.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
Some guy told another guy that some high ranking other guy told the other guy that told him that Flynn was looking for immunity.
 
which "facts" are those?

I asked earlier. Still haven't heard what facts are coming together

Let's go slowly here and I'll post one fact. If you don't acknowledge this fact I know this is a waste of time.

Fact: Michael Flynn registered as a foreign agent for Turkey.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?

Yes, that's a fact. I acknowledged it.

Now, so fucking what?

Here's another fact: Flynn's lawyers told Pence and Trump he would register as a foreign agent and Yates told Trump directly Flynn was potentially compromised. Trump did nothing about it before the story broke.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
I haven't seen any evidence on those claims one way or another.

He's a loon...
 
The Democrats should be used to losing by now. That and their accusations prove to turn against them. Dollars to donuts Flynn's situation is no different. He's got dirt on the Obama admin. You watch.
 
Lol...it was to be expected??? Lol

Take a nap, Jake

Hey, moron, Jake happens to be another smart poster who doesn't swallow the Trumpster's bullshit as your ilk has.....I, however, am not Jake.....but thanks for showing us all your very low comprehension skills....... LOL

Now, that's funny....one moron sticking up for another one.

Jake yaked about how the Tea Party was crushed and no longer relevant. He stated Trump would never be elected.

And so did you.
 
which "facts" are those?

I asked earlier. Still haven't heard what facts are coming together

Let's go slowly here and I'll post one fact. If you don't acknowledge this fact I know this is a waste of time.

Fact: Michael Flynn registered as a foreign agent for Turkey.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?

Yes, that's a fact. I acknowledged it.

Now, so fucking what?

Here's another fact: Flynn's lawyers told Pence and Trump he would register as a foreign agent and Yates told Trump directly Flynn was potentially compromised. Trump did nothing about it before the story broke.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
I haven't seen any evidence on those claims one way or another.

To believe that you'd have to believe that the vetting was so poor they didn't know. So either they knew about it and didn't do anything OR they did a piss poor job of vetting.

Fact: After Flynn resigned Trump attacked the media for destroying a good man. The Foreign agent stuff wasn't mentioned as a problem.

Acknowledge, deflect or deny?
 

Forum List

Back
Top