Why ignore Kavanaugh's disregard for the Constitution?

[Indeependent]

You bet! Next time you want to defeat someone do it honestly. Otherwise fuck you and all democrats!

Now you are truly showing what a dumb-ass you are. I have been a registered Republican for many years and all my best friends are too. What I am not is so ignorant as to believe that when you start removing Constitutional protections you start becoming a police state. Too bad your brain is stuck on that dog and pony show they all put on for the totally blind fools to follow along with. If you had done your research you would know Kavanaugh was as much Obama's man as he was Bush's for taking away peoples 4th and 5th. Stuff that up your craw and choke on it for awhile.

You’re registered R because you’re too fucking lazy to change parties or you’re currying favor from someone (kissing ass).

You are entitled to your opinion. Every asshole is. I have no need to change party affiliation just because a few creeps are willing to ignore the truth. Now a lot of Democrats have switched over but I can assure you that won't last long when they start learning some of the shit some Republicans are keeping pushed on them that violates not only their constitutional rights but their human rights too.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

 

[RodISHI]

Now you are truly showing what a dumb-ass you are. I have been a registered Republican for many years and all my best friends are too. What I am not is so ignorant as to believe that when you start removing Constitutional protections you start becoming a police state. Too bad your brain is stuck on that dog and pony show they all put on for the totally blind fools to follow along with. If you had done your research you would know Kavanaugh was as much Obama's man as he was Bush's for taking away peoples 4th and 5th. Stuff that up your craw and choke on it for awhile.

You’re registered R because you’re too fucking lazy to change parties or you’re currying favor from someone (kissing ass).

You are entitled to your opinion. Every asshole is. I have no need to change party affiliation just because a few creeps are willing to ignore the truth. Now a lot of Democrats have switched over but I can assure you that won't last long when they start learning some of the shit some Republicans are keeping pushed on them that violates not only their constitutional rights but their human rights too.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

 

[Indeependent]

You’re registered R because you’re too fucking lazy to change parties or you’re currying favor from someone (kissing ass).

You are entitled to your opinion. Every asshole is. I have no need to change party affiliation just because a few creeps are willing to ignore the truth. Now a lot of Democrats have switched over but I can assure you that won't last long when they start learning some of the shit some Republicans are keeping pushed on them that violates not only their constitutional rights but their human rights too.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

 

[WillowTree]

You’re registered R because you’re too fucking lazy to change parties or you’re currying favor from someone (kissing ass).

You are entitled to your opinion. Every asshole is. I have no need to change party affiliation just because a few creeps are willing to ignore the truth. Now a lot of Democrats have switched over but I can assure you that won't last long when they start learning some of the shit some Republicans are keeping pushed on them that violates not only their constitutional rights but their human rights too.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

Yep! You are a democrat! Hit every single one of their talking points! Next?

 

[RodISHI]

.

You are entitled to your opinion. Every asshole is. I have no need to change party affiliation just because a few creeps are willing to ignore the truth. Now a lot of Democrats have switched over but I can assure you that won't last long when they start learning some of the shit some Republicans are keeping pushed on them that violates not only their constitutional rights but their human rights too.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

 

[RodISHI]

You are entitled to your opinion. Every asshole is. I have no need to change party affiliation just because a few creeps are willing to ignore the truth. Now a lot of Democrats have switched over but I can assure you that won't last long when they start learning some of the shit some Republicans are keeping pushed on them that violates not only their constitutional rights but their human rights too.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

Yep! You are a democrat! Hit every single one of their talking points! Next?

Really? I haven't heard very many talking about anything other than that nasty shit show put on by spooks. Is Judge Andrew Napolitano a Democrat in your eyes too?

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Brett Kavanaugh and the Patriot Act

 

[Yarddog]

I have not seen anyone in the know among those who claim to be conservative patriots talking about this except Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Kavanaugh's disregard for our rights to privacy; and everyone that I had any respect for in their reporting on conservative issues are ignoring that and instead they are reporting on the dog and pony show in D.C.. What a disgrace for him to be called a Constitutionalist by anyone.

"The Nominee and Privacy
The Fourth Amendment
Judge Kavanaugh has authored a number of Fourth Amendment opinions which have consistently favored law enforcement and government surveillance over the privacy of individuals.

In Klayman v. Obama, Judge Kavanaugh went out of his way to set out theories to defend the suspicionless surveillance of the American public that surprised even conservative legal scholars. The case challenged the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata collection program, a program that collected call records of millions of Americans. Judge Kavanaugh issued an opinion in a decision to deny plaintiffs' emergency petition for rehearing en banc and determined that the government's "bulk collection of telephony data" is "entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment." He set out two justifications: (1) the third-party doctrine, and (2) national security. The opinion was surprising because the denial of a petition for a rehearing en banc is a procedural matter, and rarely calls for an opinion by one of the panel members. In issuing an opinion as Judge Kavanaugh did, he not only broke with tradition but also set out views in defense of post 9-11 surveillance that no judge had previously stated. Judge Kavanaugh's tendency to elevate national security over individual privacy, in this case and broadly, may jeopardize important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.

Judge Kavanaugh dissented in United States v. Maynard, a case that was later appealed to the Supreme Court under the name United States v. Jones. In Maynard, the D.C. Circuit majority held that the government's warrantless use of a global positioning system ("GPS") device to track the public movements of an appellant's vehicle for approximately four weeks was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Judge Kavanaugh, dissenting from the court, noted that the police's initial installation of the GPS device on the appellant's car without a warrant raised an important question over whether that installation was an "unauthorized physical encroachment within a constitutionally protected area." He found this to be an "important question [that] deserves careful consideration" while dismissing the panel opinion's reliance on the amount of information obtained by the police as a "novel aggregation approach to Fourth Amendment analysis." Without regard to the vast stores of private data collected on users these days, however, serious privacy violations might happen with no Fourth Amendment redress.

In Wesby v. District of Columbia, Judge Kavanaugh dissented from a decision denying a petition for rehearing en banc and found that the police had probable cause to arrest a group of party-goers for trespassing when the police had no evidence about their state of mind. Writing for the majority in United States v. Burnett, Judge Kavanaugh determined that the police had probable cause to search a rental car for heroin based on defendants' travel activity. In United States v. Washington, he held that police officers had a reasonable fear for their safety during a traffic stop when defendants ran the stop sign, and that their search of defendants' car thus does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Writing for the majority in a panel opinion in United States v. Askew, and dissenting from a rehearing en banc of the same case , Judge Kavanaugh found it reasonable for the police to unzip the jacket of a suspected armed robber to facilitate a show-up even though the unzipping would neither establish nor negate his identification as the robber. In United States v. Spencer, he ruled for the police and held that their search of defendant's house was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.

In all his authored Fourth Amendment opinions, Judge Kavanaugh has sided with government surveillance and police search without any exception, even when serious privacy violations exist. This disregard for Americans' privacy is a threat to our democracy and treasured civil liberties. It could also jeopardize the important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.
...." more at link EPIC - Brett M. Kavanaugh and Privacy




FOX News lost any credibility along with their lackey speaker Representative Ronald Dion DeSantis.

He very well might not be the best candidate for the job, but the problem is the way the Dems have been going about trying to destroy the guy through false accusations. If his record was the problem, we had a whole process period where that could have been brought up. i would not care one bit if he was denied because of something in his rulings, it's just the kangaroo court tactics by the Left that are pretty distasteful to say the very least.

 

[Indeependent]

.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

Only Progressives do the “Guilty as Charged” bullshit.
Way too British Empire for me.

 

[Indeependent]

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

Yep! You are a democrat! Hit every single one of their talking points! Next?

Really? I haven't heard very many talking about anything other than that nasty shit show put on by spooks. Is Judge Andrew Napolitano a Democrat in your eyes too?

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Brett Kavanaugh and the Patriot Act

Neo-Con...a Faux News regular.

 

[WillowTree]

.

I actually read your posts...you’re a Progressive.
Or mentally ill.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

No.

 

[Oddball]

Well apparently neither do Republicans or they are merely being sheeple to busy following the circus while this dude is appointed to the Supreme Court. People in the alternative media who have bitched about the Patriot Act are even ignoring that this guy penned it. I am thoroughly disgusted with some of them (supposedly conservative Republicans) supporting and pushing for this guy to be confirmed.

It's already a given that most republicans are all in for the police/snoop state...They're the ones who shoved the Patriot Act, DHS, and TSA on us, so it's not likely that they're have any problems putting someone who would further cripple the 4th and 5th Amendments on the USSC...It has traditionally been the democrats who have been the ones to mistrust the abuse of police authority....But now that they're up to their armpits in weaponizing the police state to take out their political opponents, they've fallen dead silent...Hell, even the ACLU has ignored the civil liberties angle in favor of the character assassination route.

Strange and scary days indeed.

 

[RodISHI]

.

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

Only Progressives do the “Guilty as Charged” bullshit.
Way too British Empire for me.

Who said Kavanaugh was "guilty as charged"? That whole dog and pony show was obviously a farce from the get go but some of the more ignorant in D.C. fell for it hook, line and sinker. Along with a whole lot of peeps that can't see past the smoke and mirrors act or do a little research to look for his actual record online.

 

[Jerico]

I have not seen anyone in the know among those who claim to be conservative patriots talking about this except Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Kavanaugh's disregard for our rights to privacy; and everyone that I had any respect for in their reporting on conservative issues are ignoring that and instead they are reporting on the dog and pony show in D.C.. What a disgrace for him to be called a Constitutionalist by anyone.

"The Nominee and Privacy
The Fourth Amendment
Judge Kavanaugh has authored a number of Fourth Amendment opinions which have consistently favored law enforcement and government surveillance over the privacy of individuals.

In Klayman v. Obama, Judge Kavanaugh went out of his way to set out theories to defend the suspicionless surveillance of the American public that surprised even conservative legal scholars. The case challenged the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata collection program, a program that collected call records of millions of Americans. Judge Kavanaugh issued an opinion in a decision to deny plaintiffs' emergency petition for rehearing en banc and determined that the government's "bulk collection of telephony data" is "entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment." He set out two justifications: (1) the third-party doctrine, and (2) national security. The opinion was surprising because the denial of a petition for a rehearing en banc is a procedural matter, and rarely calls for an opinion by one of the panel members. In issuing an opinion as Judge Kavanaugh did, he not only broke with tradition but also set out views in defense of post 9-11 surveillance that no judge had previously stated. Judge Kavanaugh's tendency to elevate national security over individual privacy, in this case and broadly, may jeopardize important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.

Judge Kavanaugh dissented in United States v. Maynard, a case that was later appealed to the Supreme Court under the name United States v. Jones. In Maynard, the D.C. Circuit majority held that the government's warrantless use of a global positioning system ("GPS") device to track the public movements of an appellant's vehicle for approximately four weeks was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Judge Kavanaugh, dissenting from the court, noted that the police's initial installation of the GPS device on the appellant's car without a warrant raised an important question over whether that installation was an "unauthorized physical encroachment within a constitutionally protected area." He found this to be an "important question [that] deserves careful consideration" while dismissing the panel opinion's reliance on the amount of information obtained by the police as a "novel aggregation approach to Fourth Amendment analysis." Without regard to the vast stores of private data collected on users these days, however, serious privacy violations might happen with no Fourth Amendment redress.

In Wesby v. District of Columbia, Judge Kavanaugh dissented from a decision denying a petition for rehearing en banc and found that the police had probable cause to arrest a group of party-goers for trespassing when the police had no evidence about their state of mind. Writing for the majority in United States v. Burnett, Judge Kavanaugh determined that the police had probable cause to search a rental car for heroin based on defendants' travel activity. In United States v. Washington, he held that police officers had a reasonable fear for their safety during a traffic stop when defendants ran the stop sign, and that their search of defendants' car thus does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Writing for the majority in a panel opinion in United States v. Askew, and dissenting from a rehearing en banc of the same case , Judge Kavanaugh found it reasonable for the police to unzip the jacket of a suspected armed robber to facilitate a show-up even though the unzipping would neither establish nor negate his identification as the robber. In United States v. Spencer, he ruled for the police and held that their search of defendant's house was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.

In all his authored Fourth Amendment opinions, Judge Kavanaugh has sided with government surveillance and police search without any exception, even when serious privacy violations exist. This disregard for Americans' privacy is a threat to our democracy and treasured civil liberties. It could also jeopardize the important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.
...." more at link EPIC - Brett M. Kavanaugh and Privacy




FOX News lost any credibility along with their lackey speaker Representative Ronald Dion DeSantis.

Now Democrats care about privacy? What a timeline. Just in time for the most privacy violating president in history to have finished his two terms under their label.

If Kavanaugh were so unconstitutional, the left wouldn't be trying to destroy him- they'd love him.

 

[Indeependent]

.

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

Only Progressives do the “Guilty as Charged” bullshit.
Way too British Empire for me.

Who said Kavanaugh was "guilty as charged"? That whole dog and pony show was obviously a farce from the get go but some of the more ignorant in D.C. fell for it hook, line and sinker. Along with a whole lot of peeps that can't see past the smoke and mirrors act or do a little research to look for his actual record online.

I think you need to blow off some steam about what happened to your husband because you’re not making sense.

 

[RodISHI]

I have not seen anyone in the know among those who claim to be conservative patriots talking about this except Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Kavanaugh's disregard for our rights to privacy; and everyone that I had any respect for in their reporting on conservative issues are ignoring that and instead they are reporting on the dog and pony show in D.C.. What a disgrace for him to be called a Constitutionalist by anyone.

"The Nominee and Privacy
The Fourth Amendment
Judge Kavanaugh has authored a number of Fourth Amendment opinions which have consistently favored law enforcement and government surveillance over the privacy of individuals.

In Klayman v. Obama, Judge Kavanaugh went out of his way to set out theories to defend the suspicionless surveillance of the American public that surprised even conservative legal scholars. The case challenged the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata collection program, a program that collected call records of millions of Americans. Judge Kavanaugh issued an opinion in a decision to deny plaintiffs' emergency petition for rehearing en banc and determined that the government's "bulk collection of telephony data" is "entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment." He set out two justifications: (1) the third-party doctrine, and (2) national security. The opinion was surprising because the denial of a petition for a rehearing en banc is a procedural matter, and rarely calls for an opinion by one of the panel members. In issuing an opinion as Judge Kavanaugh did, he not only broke with tradition but also set out views in defense of post 9-11 surveillance that no judge had previously stated. Judge Kavanaugh's tendency to elevate national security over individual privacy, in this case and broadly, may jeopardize important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.

Judge Kavanaugh dissented in United States v. Maynard, a case that was later appealed to the Supreme Court under the name United States v. Jones. In Maynard, the D.C. Circuit majority held that the government's warrantless use of a global positioning system ("GPS") device to track the public movements of an appellant's vehicle for approximately four weeks was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Judge Kavanaugh, dissenting from the court, noted that the police's initial installation of the GPS device on the appellant's car without a warrant raised an important question over whether that installation was an "unauthorized physical encroachment within a constitutionally protected area." He found this to be an "important question [that] deserves careful consideration" while dismissing the panel opinion's reliance on the amount of information obtained by the police as a "novel aggregation approach to Fourth Amendment analysis." Without regard to the vast stores of private data collected on users these days, however, serious privacy violations might happen with no Fourth Amendment redress.

In Wesby v. District of Columbia, Judge Kavanaugh dissented from a decision denying a petition for rehearing en banc and found that the police had probable cause to arrest a group of party-goers for trespassing when the police had no evidence about their state of mind. Writing for the majority in United States v. Burnett, Judge Kavanaugh determined that the police had probable cause to search a rental car for heroin based on defendants' travel activity. In United States v. Washington, he held that police officers had a reasonable fear for their safety during a traffic stop when defendants ran the stop sign, and that their search of defendants' car thus does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Writing for the majority in a panel opinion in United States v. Askew, and dissenting from a rehearing en banc of the same case , Judge Kavanaugh found it reasonable for the police to unzip the jacket of a suspected armed robber to facilitate a show-up even though the unzipping would neither establish nor negate his identification as the robber. In United States v. Spencer, he ruled for the police and held that their search of defendant's house was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.

In all his authored Fourth Amendment opinions, Judge Kavanaugh has sided with government surveillance and police search without any exception, even when serious privacy violations exist. This disregard for Americans' privacy is a threat to our democracy and treasured civil liberties. It could also jeopardize the important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.
...." more at link EPIC - Brett M. Kavanaugh and Privacy




FOX News lost any credibility along with their lackey speaker Representative Ronald Dion DeSantis.

Now Democrats care about privacy? What a timeline. Just in time for the most privacy violating president in history to have finished his two terms under their label.

If Kavanaugh were so unconstitutional, the left wouldn't be trying to destroy him- they'd love him.

His record speaks for itself on that matter and I love Judge Andrew Napolitano's explanation on the issue. Everyone should watch his video on it that is why I put it in this thread. All one has to do is look at that and the record at EPIC.com to see what he has stood for. He obviously didn't like it when people were able to make up shit and go after him. What is embraced by one party will be manifested by another when things get heated no matter which side of the fence one is on so why allow anyone in such a position that was willing to trash the fourth and the fifth in their rulings and by their past actions?

(Truthfully though I do see a bit of justice transpiring in all that as he seems to have ruled in favor of warrantless searches and surveillance. So he basically tied himself to that guilty without any proven cause when he trashed the fourth and fifth. Even so though that was a nasty dog and pony show that some Democrats helped initiate and create. I am sure that will come back to haunt them heavily in the next election cycle but that doesn't mean I believe we need Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court either. Justice isn't actually blind as it all comes around in its own time and the Lord does choose the foolish things)

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I have not seen anyone in the know among those who claim to be conservative patriots talking about this except Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Kavanaugh's disregard for our rights to privacy; and everyone that I had any respect for in their reporting on conservative issues are ignoring that and instead they are reporting on the dog and pony show in D.C.. What a disgrace for him to be called a Constitutionalist by anyone.

"The Nominee and Privacy
The Fourth Amendment
Judge Kavanaugh has authored a number of Fourth Amendment opinions which have consistently favored law enforcement and government surveillance over the privacy of individuals.

In Klayman v. Obama, Judge Kavanaugh went out of his way to set out theories to defend the suspicionless surveillance of the American public that surprised even conservative legal scholars. The case challenged the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata collection program, a program that collected call records of millions of Americans. Judge Kavanaugh issued an opinion in a decision to deny plaintiffs' emergency petition for rehearing en banc and determined that the government's "bulk collection of telephony data" is "entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment." He set out two justifications: (1) the third-party doctrine, and (2) national security. The opinion was surprising because the denial of a petition for a rehearing en banc is a procedural matter, and rarely calls for an opinion by one of the panel members. In issuing an opinion as Judge Kavanaugh did, he not only broke with tradition but also set out views in defense of post 9-11 surveillance that no judge had previously stated. Judge Kavanaugh's tendency to elevate national security over individual privacy, in this case and broadly, may jeopardize important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.

Judge Kavanaugh dissented in United States v. Maynard, a case that was later appealed to the Supreme Court under the name United States v. Jones. In Maynard, the D.C. Circuit majority held that the government's warrantless use of a global positioning system ("GPS") device to track the public movements of an appellant's vehicle for approximately four weeks was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Judge Kavanaugh, dissenting from the court, noted that the police's initial installation of the GPS device on the appellant's car without a warrant raised an important question over whether that installation was an "unauthorized physical encroachment within a constitutionally protected area." He found this to be an "important question [that] deserves careful consideration" while dismissing the panel opinion's reliance on the amount of information obtained by the police as a "novel aggregation approach to Fourth Amendment analysis." Without regard to the vast stores of private data collected on users these days, however, serious privacy violations might happen with no Fourth Amendment redress.

In Wesby v. District of Columbia, Judge Kavanaugh dissented from a decision denying a petition for rehearing en banc and found that the police had probable cause to arrest a group of party-goers for trespassing when the police had no evidence about their state of mind. Writing for the majority in United States v. Burnett, Judge Kavanaugh determined that the police had probable cause to search a rental car for heroin based on defendants' travel activity. In United States v. Washington, he held that police officers had a reasonable fear for their safety during a traffic stop when defendants ran the stop sign, and that their search of defendants' car thus does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Writing for the majority in a panel opinion in United States v. Askew, and dissenting from a rehearing en banc of the same case , Judge Kavanaugh found it reasonable for the police to unzip the jacket of a suspected armed robber to facilitate a show-up even though the unzipping would neither establish nor negate his identification as the robber. In United States v. Spencer, he ruled for the police and held that their search of defendant's house was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.

In all his authored Fourth Amendment opinions, Judge Kavanaugh has sided with government surveillance and police search without any exception, even when serious privacy violations exist. This disregard for Americans' privacy is a threat to our democracy and treasured civil liberties. It could also jeopardize the important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.
...." more at link EPIC - Brett M. Kavanaugh and Privacy




FOX News lost any credibility along with their lackey speaker Representative Ronald Dion DeSantis.

Yup. I'd never have picked Kavanaugh for that very reason

 

[RodISHI]

.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

Only Progressives do the “Guilty as Charged” bullshit.
Way too British Empire for me.

Who said Kavanaugh was "guilty as charged"? That whole dog and pony show was obviously a farce from the get go but some of the more ignorant in D.C. fell for it hook, line and sinker. Along with a whole lot of peeps that can't see past the smoke and mirrors act or do a little research to look for his actual record online.

I think you need to blow off some steam about what happened to your husband because you’re not making sense.

The bank stole all of his heavy equipment when they went after me on a corporate loan that the bank had committed major fraud on. They had the sheriff raid our home and shop basically taking whatever they thought looked like it had any value. My cupboards were even gone through. The bank called me a terrorist. I was threatened with arrest for protesting what they were doing. It all transpire shortly after the Patriot Act was passed. Democrats used that Act as their justification but the bankers and their attorneys along with the company that designed my equipment to fail from the factory were all Republicans pushing through the banks agenda of "scorched earth" when it all started coming apart on them. Does that explain it enough for you to make a little sense out of why I think warrantless search and seizures suck?

 

[Lumpy 1]

I have not seen anyone in the know among those who claim to be conservative patriots talking about this except Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Kavanaugh's disregard for our rights to privacy; and everyone that I had any respect for in their reporting on conservative issues are ignoring that and instead they are reporting on the dog and pony show in D.C.. What a disgrace for him to be called a Constitutionalist by anyone.

"The Nominee and Privacy
The Fourth Amendment
Judge Kavanaugh has authored a number of Fourth Amendment opinions which have consistently favored law enforcement and government surveillance over the privacy of individuals.

In Klayman v. Obama, Judge Kavanaugh went out of his way to set out theories to defend the suspicionless surveillance of the American public that surprised even conservative legal scholars. The case challenged the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata collection program, a program that collected call records of millions of Americans. Judge Kavanaugh issued an opinion in a decision to deny plaintiffs' emergency petition for rehearing en banc and determined that the government's "bulk collection of telephony data" is "entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment." He set out two justifications: (1) the third-party doctrine, and (2) national security. The opinion was surprising because the denial of a petition for a rehearing en banc is a procedural matter, and rarely calls for an opinion by one of the panel members. In issuing an opinion as Judge Kavanaugh did, he not only broke with tradition but also set out views in defense of post 9-11 surveillance that no judge had previously stated. Judge Kavanaugh's tendency to elevate national security over individual privacy, in this case and broadly, may jeopardize important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.

Judge Kavanaugh dissented in United States v. Maynard, a case that was later appealed to the Supreme Court under the name United States v. Jones. In Maynard, the D.C. Circuit majority held that the government's warrantless use of a global positioning system ("GPS") device to track the public movements of an appellant's vehicle for approximately four weeks was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Judge Kavanaugh, dissenting from the court, noted that the police's initial installation of the GPS device on the appellant's car without a warrant raised an important question over whether that installation was an "unauthorized physical encroachment within a constitutionally protected area." He found this to be an "important question [that] deserves careful consideration" while dismissing the panel opinion's reliance on the amount of information obtained by the police as a "novel aggregation approach to Fourth Amendment analysis." Without regard to the vast stores of private data collected on users these days, however, serious privacy violations might happen with no Fourth Amendment redress.

In Wesby v. District of Columbia, Judge Kavanaugh dissented from a decision denying a petition for rehearing en banc and found that the police had probable cause to arrest a group of party-goers for trespassing when the police had no evidence about their state of mind. Writing for the majority in United States v. Burnett, Judge Kavanaugh determined that the police had probable cause to search a rental car for heroin based on defendants' travel activity. In United States v. Washington, he held that police officers had a reasonable fear for their safety during a traffic stop when defendants ran the stop sign, and that their search of defendants' car thus does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Writing for the majority in a panel opinion in United States v. Askew, and dissenting from a rehearing en banc of the same case , Judge Kavanaugh found it reasonable for the police to unzip the jacket of a suspected armed robber to facilitate a show-up even though the unzipping would neither establish nor negate his identification as the robber. In United States v. Spencer, he ruled for the police and held that their search of defendant's house was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.

In all his authored Fourth Amendment opinions, Judge Kavanaugh has sided with government surveillance and police search without any exception, even when serious privacy violations exist. This disregard for Americans' privacy is a threat to our democracy and treasured civil liberties. It could also jeopardize the important privacy protections established by the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment precedents.
...." more at link EPIC - Brett M. Kavanaugh and Privacy




FOX News lost any credibility along with their lackey speaker Representative Ronald Dion DeSantis.

I noticed that your taking a lot of crap over this Rodishi. Me, I think you're great, well informed (well, more than me) and privacy rights do need to be reviewed.

9-11 resulted in some desperate measures ie the Patriot Act, yup.. let's review it..

Kavanaugh would be 1 of 9 and his views would be valuable, informed and put to the test, I have no problem with that..

 

[RodISHI]

A Progressive. Really. In what sense? Are all the Tea Party people Progressives too? I ask because see if it were not for them the Republicans wouldn't have a chance even though the Democrat leadership mostly sucks at this point.


pro·gres·sive
prəˈɡresiv/
adjective
adjective: progressive

1. 1.
   happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
   "a progressive decline in popularity"
   synonyms: continuing, continuous, increasing, growing, developing, ongoing, accelerating, escalating; More
   gradual, step-by-step, cumulative
   "progressive deterioration"
   • (of a disease or ailment) increasing in severity or extent.
     "progressive liver failure"
   • (of taxation or a tax) increasing as a proportion of the sum taxed as that sum increases.
     "steeply progressive income taxes"
   • (of a card game or dance) involving a series of sections for which participants successively change place or relative position.
   • archaic
     engaging in or constituting forward motion.
2. 2.
   (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
   "a relatively progressive governor"
   • favoring or promoting change or innovation.
     "a progressive art school"
     synonyms: modern, liberal, advanced, forward-thinking, enlightened, enterprising, innovative, pioneering, dynamic, bold, avant-garde, reforming, reformist, radical;
     informalgo-ahead
     "progressive views"
     antonyms: conservative, reactionary
   • relating to or denoting a style of rock music popular especially in the 1980s and characterized by classical influences, the use of keyboard instruments, and lengthy compositions.
3. 3.
   Grammar
   denoting an aspect or tense of a verb that expresses an action in progress, e.g., am writing, was writing.

noun
noun: progressive; plural noun: progressives; noun: progressive proof; plural noun: progressive proofs
1.
a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
synonyms: innovator, reformer, reformist, liberal, libertarian
"he is very much a progressive"

I suggest you read your posts from the last 2 years...I have.
You’re a Republican Hating/Progressive Loving loon.

I see I don't agree with tactics like forcing people into your way of thinking so you must make a label up in your mind for me.

Kavanaugh's type of thinking is a prelude to a fascist police state. I will not agree with any one who denies people their rights. The Democrats via a few crooked Republicans used the Patriot Act as an excuse against me when Wells Fargo committed major fraud against me as they stole my husband's livelihood and then made the American public pay for it on top of all that so I will never go along with that kind of treatment for anyone in this country. If you do not like that go suck an egg.

Kavanaugh was as much Obama's boy as Bush's. You fail to address that don't you. It is easier for you to try and label me as something that might disgust someone else.

I will never support denying people the right to refuse vaccines, toxic food, toxic water, insurance or someone else's version of what religion they should follow. Apparently a few Republicans are willing to try and force their benefactors (corporate creeps) crap on the whole; and I do not support that anymore than I support the give away of the money in the peoples coffer and stealing away their paychecks for the insurance/banking industry and pharmaceutical industry via Obamacare. If you support those things then you are a fascist just as much as the Austrian stazi.

Tell me what do you call a person who claims to be a Republican but desires to force the commerce of their benefactors on someone else? Do you have a label for that?

Yep! You are a democrat! Hit every single one of their talking points! Next?

Really? I haven't heard very many talking about anything other than that nasty shit show put on by spooks. Is Judge Andrew Napolitano a Democrat in your eyes too?

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Brett Kavanaugh and the Patriot Act

Neo-Con...a Faux News regular.

That video I post on youtube is the first time I have seen FOX News in ages. We don't have television and haven't had for years. Beside they have been caught in too many lil lies for me to desire watching them anymore than I desire to watch the others which is generally zip. What I did do was look for anyone talking about Kavanaugh's actual record and I didn't other than Napolitano and FOX's gal cut him off before he could spill the beans.

 

[Indeependent]

.

I hate both Parties.
I voted against Globalism, Business Visas and any politician that was too polite to be honest.
That’s why I voted for Trump.

That two parties is the basic of the system. Same as in the spirit. There is a right hand side and a left hand side but if one is corrupted the other is subject to that corruption. Very few have the ability to use both their right and left hands equally but in time it all balances out.

Now back to Kavanaugh. I think it would not be a good thing to have him on the Supreme Court unless he has a change of heart and realizes what he has done is wrong for the country. I doubt that is going to happen so he needs to be dismissed and someone else considered who believes in the Constitutional rights provided in the fourth and fifth amendments. .

Only Progressives do the “Guilty as Charged” bullshit.
Way too British Empire for me.

Who said Kavanaugh was "guilty as charged"? That whole dog and pony show was obviously a farce from the get go but some of the more ignorant in D.C. fell for it hook, line and sinker. Along with a whole lot of peeps that can't see past the smoke and mirrors act or do a little research to look for his actual record online.

I think you need to blow off some steam about what happened to your husband because you’re not making sense.

The bank stole all of his heavy equipment when they went after me on a corporate loan that the bank had committed major fraud on. They had the sheriff raid our home and shop basically taking whatever they thought looked like it had any value. My cupboards were even gone through. The bank called me a terrorist. I was threatened with arrest for protesting what they were doing. It all transpire shortly after the Patriot Act was passed. Democrats used that Act as their justification but the bankers and their attorneys along with the company that designed my equipment to fail from the factory were all Republicans pushing through the banks agenda of "scorched earth" when it all started coming apart on them. Does that explain it enough for you to make a little sense out of why I think warrantless search and seizures suck?

Wells-Fargo is run by scum.
I worked on Wall Street...scum is Party neutral.