Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

[Superbadbrutha]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Schiff will be called as a witness as will everyone involved in the bogus FISA documents.

Schiff doesn't know anything at all.

However, the Biden Family certainly knows all about Ukraine and its leading businesses. Hunter and Sleepy Joe definitely need to be put on the stand.

Schiff is the father of all the lies. Put him under oath and let’s go thru everything he’s ever said about Trump.

I don't have a problem with that, but only if we put Trump under oath as well.

 

[Care4all]

Unemployment was on the way up/. That is why we needed the stimulus you stupid shit.

Without it, unemployment could have surpassed 11% & the recession lasted a lot longer.

The CBO said the stimulus did was was intended.

The Obama Administration said that if the stimulus wasn't granted that unemployment would rise above 8% but if it were granted that unemployment would go to 6%. They got the stimulus money but utilized it so poorly that unemployment rose above 10%! Only a progressive would claim that the stimulus worked as intended!

You are referring to the Romer report & it was based on the economic conditions at the time it was written.

Blame the Democrats for running it poorly (even though the CBO saids otherwise) instead of the Republicans for running the country poorly & taking it from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years.

The CBO s not partisan but be the typical Trumpette & blame the Democrats for not fixing the Republican's disaster.

LOL...the Romer Report was the President's economic advisor getting it wrong from the start. Why you think that makes the Obama Administration look better escapes me.

I was pointing out the time. That report was written in December. The Stimulus was passed two months later when no one really knew how the recession would develop.

The CBO report says you are wrong.

The Stimulus was SUPPOSED to provide shovel-ready jobs by the million and fix our nation's infrastructure. Obama lied, it did neither. Our infrastructure is still in need of repair, yet Chuck and Nancy actually WALKED OUT of a meeting with the President instead of working with him on this issue.

The stimulus was a lot of things, shovel ready was a part, but the stimulus mostly kept our economy afloat. It was mostly tax cuts, which only happen month by month, paycheck to paycheck, and not a lump sum dropped in to the market place all at once, and extended UE benefits, which again is month by month stimulus, that helped us from crashing further... if all those unemployed did not have these checks to put back in to the economy we had left after the fall, the economic numbers from the great recession, would have been worse and deeper... can you see that...?

the crash was already too deep, to be able to pull us completely out of it with an immediate lump sum stimulus... these other measures in the stimulus like the tax cuts and extended UE benefits, and help to refinance your home were what really pulled us out of it, not the shovel ready jobs part, imo.... the way it was done with all the different approaches combined, was more sound than just shovel ready jobs alone...

slow and steady, won the race....

and gave president Trump a good, trending upwards, economy, for him to work with.

 

[Care4all]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

 

[RealDave]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

Schiff will be called as a witness as will everyone involved in the bogus FISA documents.

Investigate your little hearts out.

The IG already said you are full of shit.

Was it Kos or CNN that told you that?

Many sources said it.

I guess you want so desperately to believe the Trump/Fox version.

 

[RealDave]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

 

[Mac-7]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

Obama and his attorney general knowingly sold semi automatic weapons to the mexican drug gangs

That was an impeachable offense

 

[Polishprince]

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

The name of the WB has already been revealed, and there is no reason to think that President Trump didn't know who it was before anyone else.

The purpose of bringing the WB forward is to show that this whole line of bullshit was just an orchestrated liberal scheme straight from the start.

Schiff and Pelosi were behind this political operative and fed him the information.

BTW, the Phone Call was perfect, the Ukraine President admits it.

 

[Mac-7]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

 

[Polishprince]

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

like what? When did Obama use his presidency and power to solicit a foreign president to make an announcement on CNN to the whole world, that the foreign gvt was opening an investigation in to the president's upcoming election political rival?

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure

"]The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

the president's goal was to out the whistleblower so he and his attack dogs could go after him in a personal way...

it's important to make WB's feel at ease with reporting all kinds of wrong doings of our gvt. Being anonymous, as with any anonymous tip line, is important. If not for any one single tip or complaint, but for the overall program that ends up saving us billions in fraud and corruption within the gvt... so if we can, we promise anonymity.

In this case, the whistle blower IS NOT NEEDED and CAN NOT exonerate the president, can not give the president any kind of a defense because there are 17 other sworn 1st and 2nd hand witnesses that showed up, who substantiated what was in the complaint,

along with the IG, who in his investigation FOUND the WB complaint credible and urgent. the IG said he spoke directly with FIRST HAND witnesses that confirmed the complaint.

if the IG found that the WB complaint had no legs, it would not have been pegged by the IG as credible and urgent... or gone forward. Not all or not even near all WB complaints are found credible... many DIE an early death after the IG investigates them.

So, this bulloney on not letting the president call witnesses is nothing but Trump obfuscating.... it was not a defense at all.

and not meant to be a defense.... just a smear and vengeance he could bring towards the WB and the whole WB program that is very beneficial to the USA...

ONLY CROOKS AND THE CORRUPT, hate it and work to destroy it.

Obama and his attorney general knowingly sold semi automatic weapons to the mexican drug gangs

That was an impeachable offense

Worse than that, Obama fought the subpoenas in regards to the Fast and Furious scandal in court. And that is the High Crime of "Obstruction of Congress". B. Hussein O needs to be picked off of the Oahu golf course and sent to solitary confinement for such a high crime.

 

[RealDave]

Uh yea, sure. Unemployment went down under Obama. Because so many people stopped looking for jobs because they couldn't find any. OOPS.

Labor participation rate under Obama:

That's some UGLY shit right there and explains the unemployment rate. Liberals are too stupid to realize the number can down for TWO REASONS. Not just ONE.

Keerp whining about a useless stat.

The economy starts to tank & my wife needs to go to work because my work hours were shortened. The rate goes up & you run screaming through the streets how great it is.

The economy picks up & my wife no longer needs to work, the rate comes down & you run screaming through the streeets " OMG OMG OMG the economy!!!"

 

[RealDave]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

 

[Polishprince]

Uh yea, sure. Unemployment went down under Obama. Because so many people stopped looking for jobs because they couldn't find any. OOPS.

Labor participation rate under Obama:

That's some UGLY shit right there and explains the unemployment rate. Liberals are too stupid to realize the number can down for TWO REASONS. Not just ONE.

Keerp whining about a useless stat.

The economy starts to tank & my wife needs to go to work because my work hours were shortened. The rate goes up & you run screaming through the streets how great it is.

The economy picks up & my wife no longer needs to work, the rate comes down & you run screaming through the streeets " OMG OMG OMG the economy!!!"

I remember the Double Digit unemployment during the Obama regime and how many young black guys were standing on the corners drinking fine wine and smoking expensive newports. The number has gone down dramatically. People are working again.

 

[Mac-7]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

Bit players not directly involved with trump are entitled to their opinion based on hearsay and rumors

And we are entitled to ours

 

[Polishprince]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

"Impeached" merely means accused. And considering the fact that in 2020, Trump will be exonerated and declared Innocent as a New Born Babe in the matter, the D's will look like sore losers.

In 2021, the House of Reps will move to expunge Trump's record, erasing the impeachment.

 

[RealDave]

Unemployment was on the way up/. That is why we needed the stimulus you stupid shit.

Without it, unemployment could have surpassed 11% & the recession lasted a lot longer.

The CBO said the stimulus did was was intended.

The Obama Administration said that if the stimulus wasn't granted that unemployment would rise above 8% but if it were granted that unemployment would go to 6%. They got the stimulus money but utilized it so poorly that unemployment rose above 10%! Only a progressive would claim that the stimulus worked as intended!

You are referring to the Romer report & it was based on the economic conditions at the time it was written.

Blame the Democrats for running it poorly (even though the CBO saids otherwise) instead of the Republicans for running the country poorly & taking it from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years.

The CBO s not partisan but be the typical Trumpette & blame the Democrats for not fixing the Republican's disaster.

LOL...the Romer Report was the President's economic advisor getting it wrong from the start. Why you think that makes the Obama Administration look better escapes me.

I was pointing out the time. That report was written in December. The Stimulus was passed two months later when no one really knew how the recession would develop.

The CBO report says you are wrong.

The Stimulus was SUPPOSED to provide shovel-ready jobs by the million and fix our nation's infrastructure. Obama lied, it did neither. Our infrastructure is still in need of repair, yet Chuck and Nancy actually WALKED OUT of a meeting with the President instead of working with him on this issue.

The money set aside for infrastructure was spent for that purpose. It was just more difficult than expected.

The stimulus was 38% tax relief. Helping people caught up in the Bush recession also took a large chuick through extending benefits. Money wasx sent to the States to help them fund education, police & fire protection.

I have a thought. Look up how it was spent instead of lying about it 24/7.

If infrastructure is so important, explain why Trump couldn't get it done?

 

[Polishprince]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

Bit players not directly involved with trump are entitled to their opinion based on hearsay and rumors

And we are entitled to ours

Few of the so-called witnesses that the Pencil Necked Geek brought to "testify" ever even met the Trumpster.

 

[RealDave]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

"Impeached" merely means accused. And considering the fact that in 2020, Trump will be exonerated and declared Innocent as a New Born Babe in the matter, the D's will look like sore losers.

In 2021, the House of Reps will move to expunge Trump's record, erasing the impeachment.

IMPOTUS!!

Trump will always carry that stain.

The only way Trump is not convicted is if Republican Senators vote party. Trump is guilty as sin. Everyone knows it.

 

[RealDave]

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

Bit players not directly involved with trump are entitled to their opinion based on hearsay and rumors

And we are entitled to ours

Few of the so-called witnesses that the Pencil Necked Geek brought to "testify" ever even met the Trumpster.

So.

 

[Polishprince]

Democrats Are Daring Mitch McConnell to Call Impeachment Witnesses

Less than a couple of months ago -- Trump's BFF at Fox & Friends said this....

"If the president said, I'll give you the money, but you've got to investigate Joe Biden, that'd be off the rails wrong" --- and thru the UNDER OATH TESTIMONIES of Trump's own officials, they proved that is exactly what happened....and what did Steve Doocy do?? Pretend that he never said what he said, why?? Because he and most other Trumpers are full of shit.....

View attachment 295699

And in the spirit of being full of shit, Mitch McConnell doesn't want to call any witnesses..even tho Trump wants to have a long drawn out trial with lots of witnesses, even tho Democrats wants to call witnesses who Trump claims will exonerate him -- it is the GOP who is refusing to call any witnesses, why??

"Chuck Schumer on Thursday tore into Mitch McConnell for “breaking precedent” in announcing he will be in lock step with Donald Trump’s legal team throughout an impeachment trial, accusing him of helping the president skirt accountability. “We ask: Is the president’s case so weak that none of the president’s men can defend him under oath?” Schumer said on the Senate floor, after McConnell dismissed the historic vote to impeach Trump as a “partisan crusade.” “If the House case is so weak, why is Leader McConnell so afraid of witnesses and documents?”

For months, all I have seen from you trumpers was "just wait until it gets to the Senate, then Trump can present his case" …"just wait until Trump presents his secret evidence that will totally own the Dems" --

Witnesses were called in the last impeachment trial, why not this one?? Why aren't you demanding that the GOP Senate Leader give Trump what he claims he wants?? Or is this tough talk about witnesses and evidence just shit he tells yall -- even tho both you and he knows all of yall are full of shit...

IMHO this entire post epitomizes the very hypocrisy posing as, blood, which runs through Dem's veins.

i.) Everything the Dems complain about Trump doing, every act, is some act which the same Dems stayed silent about when they observed Obama Admin doing the same things from 2012-'16.

ii.) Trump stayed away from the House's impeachment sham, exactly because they refused to let him call his own witnesses and to invalidate the whistleblower. But now MitchMc & the Senate Repubs are dead wrong, for repeating what the Dems just did? go figure.

The House did not have to refuse to let Trump question his whistleblowing-accuser's validity ---to legally guard any President from his critics concocting fictitious impeachable acts.

I reiterate, that the House did not have to refuse to 1)let Trump have his own witnesses and 2)let Nunes or Jordan or any GOP Congessmember question his whistleblower. But, they did refuse to. Therefore if you sat silently and was a-okay with that unfairness by the Dems ---then you have to now do the same thing, the right thing/delete this thread then sit silently while the Repubs get their chance to be unfair. True?

i) They were not the same, quit lying
ii) Trump crires about the Impeachment e very fucking day. Trump blocked so many from testifying, quit lying & claiming hios people could not tell their story.

The whistleblower became irrelevant with the release of the transcript summary that confirmed what was dasi.

They only want to question the whistleblower to find out who they are so you & your fat assed orange buddy can attack them.

The democrat house clearly voted to impeach trump without sufficient evidence

So nearly everyone involved testified that there was quid pro quo means nothing?

In your dreams. Your fat assed orange hero has been IMPEACHED

IMPOTUS

And in 2020, you will go down in history & laughed about when history talks how crooked Trump was & how stupid people still voted for him.

Of course it means nothing as these witnesses didn't see anything. guys like Kent and Taylor were "out of the loop" sitting on the outskirts. Working on visiting Americans arrested in Ukraine picked up for shoplifting or helping with visas.

The real business of diplomacy was being handled by trusted folks like Mr. Giuliani and they were butt hurt about it. Their careers were at a low point

 

[Mac-7]

The Obama Administration said that if the stimulus wasn't granted that unemployment would rise above 8% but if it were granted that unemployment would go to 6%. They got the stimulus money but utilized it so poorly that unemployment rose above 10%! Only a progressive would claim that the stimulus worked as intended!

You are referring to the Romer report & it was based on the economic conditions at the time it was written.

Blame the Democrats for running it poorly (even though the CBO saids otherwise) instead of the Republicans for running the country poorly & taking it from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years.

The CBO s not partisan but be the typical Trumpette & blame the Democrats for not fixing the Republican's disaster.

LOL...the Romer Report was the President's economic advisor getting it wrong from the start. Why you think that makes the Obama Administration look better escapes me.

I was pointing out the time. That report was written in December. The Stimulus was passed two months later when no one really knew how the recession would develop.

The CBO report says you are wrong.

The Stimulus was SUPPOSED to provide shovel-ready jobs by the million and fix our nation's infrastructure. Obama lied, it did neither. Our infrastructure is still in need of repair, yet Chuck and Nancy actually WALKED OUT of a meeting with the President instead of working with him on this issue.

The money set aside for infrastructure was spent for that purpose. It was just more difficult than expected.

The stimulus was 38% tax relief. Helping people caught up in the Bush recession also took a large chuick through extending benefits. Money wasx sent to the States to help them fund education, police & fire protection.

I have a thought. Look up how it was spent instead of lying about it 24/7.

If infrastructure is so important, explain why Trump couldn't get it done?

Far too much of the obama stimulus was squandered on programs such as teaching african men how to clean their penis

Stimulus Funds African Genital Washing Study - Judicial Watch

On the heels of a scathing report exposing incessant waste in President Obama’s scandal-plagued economic stimulus, a news agency reveals that nearly $1 million in recovery funds have gone to a genitalia-washing program for uncircumcised African men.